9617edf0c2
This PR improves internationalized domain name handling according to rules of IDNA and based on the description in RFC 5280, section 7: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5280#section-7. Support for internationalized URI(s), so-called IRIs, still needs to be done.
843 lines
28 KiB
Go
Executable file
843 lines
28 KiB
Go
Executable file
package policy
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"bytes"
|
|
"crypto/x509"
|
|
"crypto/x509/pkix"
|
|
"fmt"
|
|
"net"
|
|
"net/url"
|
|
"reflect"
|
|
"strings"
|
|
|
|
"go.step.sm/crypto/x509util"
|
|
"golang.org/x/crypto/ssh"
|
|
"golang.org/x/net/idna"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
type NamePolicyReason int
|
|
|
|
const (
|
|
// NotAuthorizedForThisName results when an instance of
|
|
// NamePolicyEngine determines that there's a constraint which
|
|
// doesn't permit a DNS or another type of SAN to be signed
|
|
// (or otherwise used).
|
|
NotAuthorizedForThisName NamePolicyReason = iota
|
|
// CannotParseDomain is returned when an error occurs
|
|
// when parsing the domain part of SAN or subject.
|
|
CannotParseDomain
|
|
// CannotParseRFC822Name is returned when an error
|
|
// occurs when parsing an email address.
|
|
CannotParseRFC822Name
|
|
// CannotMatch is the type of error returned when
|
|
// an error happens when matching SAN types.
|
|
CannotMatchNameToConstraint
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
type NamePolicyError struct {
|
|
Reason NamePolicyReason
|
|
Detail string
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (e NamePolicyError) Error() string {
|
|
switch e.Reason {
|
|
case NotAuthorizedForThisName:
|
|
return "not authorized to sign for this name: " + e.Detail
|
|
case CannotParseDomain:
|
|
return "cannot parse domain: " + e.Detail
|
|
case CannotParseRFC822Name:
|
|
return "cannot parse rfc822Name: " + e.Detail
|
|
case CannotMatchNameToConstraint:
|
|
return "error matching name to constraint: " + e.Detail
|
|
default:
|
|
return "unknown error: " + e.Detail
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// NamePolicyEngine can be used to check that a CSR or Certificate meets all allowed and
|
|
// denied names before a CA creates and/or signs the Certificate.
|
|
// TODO(hs): the X509 RFC also defines name checks on directory name; support that?
|
|
// TODO(hs): implement Stringer interface: describe the contents of the NamePolicyEngine?
|
|
// TODO(hs): implement matching URI schemes, paths, etc; not just the domain part of URI domains
|
|
|
|
type NamePolicyEngine struct {
|
|
|
|
// verifySubjectCommonName is set when Subject Common Name must be verified
|
|
verifySubjectCommonName bool
|
|
// allowLiteralWildcardNames allows literal wildcard DNS domains
|
|
allowLiteralWildcardNames bool
|
|
|
|
// permitted and exluded constraints similar to x509 Name Constraints
|
|
permittedDNSDomains []string
|
|
excludedDNSDomains []string
|
|
permittedIPRanges []*net.IPNet
|
|
excludedIPRanges []*net.IPNet
|
|
permittedEmailAddresses []string
|
|
excludedEmailAddresses []string
|
|
permittedURIDomains []string
|
|
excludedURIDomains []string
|
|
permittedPrincipals []string
|
|
excludedPrincipals []string
|
|
|
|
// some internal counts for housekeeping
|
|
numberOfDNSDomainConstraints int
|
|
numberOfIPRangeConstraints int
|
|
numberOfEmailAddressConstraints int
|
|
numberOfURIDomainConstraints int
|
|
numberOfPrincipalConstraints int
|
|
totalNumberOfPermittedConstraints int
|
|
totalNumberOfExcludedConstraints int
|
|
totalNumberOfConstraints int
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// NewNamePolicyEngine creates a new NamePolicyEngine with NamePolicyOptions
|
|
func New(opts ...NamePolicyOption) (*NamePolicyEngine, error) {
|
|
|
|
e := &NamePolicyEngine{}
|
|
for _, option := range opts {
|
|
if err := option(e); err != nil {
|
|
return nil, err
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
e.permittedDNSDomains = removeDuplicates(e.permittedDNSDomains)
|
|
e.permittedIPRanges = removeDuplicateIPRanges(e.permittedIPRanges)
|
|
e.permittedEmailAddresses = removeDuplicates(e.permittedEmailAddresses)
|
|
e.permittedURIDomains = removeDuplicates(e.permittedURIDomains)
|
|
e.permittedPrincipals = removeDuplicates(e.permittedPrincipals)
|
|
|
|
e.excludedDNSDomains = removeDuplicates(e.excludedDNSDomains)
|
|
e.excludedIPRanges = removeDuplicateIPRanges(e.excludedIPRanges)
|
|
e.excludedEmailAddresses = removeDuplicates(e.excludedEmailAddresses)
|
|
e.excludedURIDomains = removeDuplicates(e.excludedURIDomains)
|
|
e.excludedPrincipals = removeDuplicates(e.excludedPrincipals)
|
|
|
|
e.numberOfDNSDomainConstraints = len(e.permittedDNSDomains) + len(e.excludedDNSDomains)
|
|
e.numberOfIPRangeConstraints = len(e.permittedIPRanges) + len(e.excludedIPRanges)
|
|
e.numberOfEmailAddressConstraints = len(e.permittedEmailAddresses) + len(e.excludedEmailAddresses)
|
|
e.numberOfURIDomainConstraints = len(e.permittedURIDomains) + len(e.excludedURIDomains)
|
|
e.numberOfPrincipalConstraints = len(e.permittedPrincipals) + len(e.excludedPrincipals)
|
|
|
|
e.totalNumberOfPermittedConstraints = len(e.permittedDNSDomains) + len(e.permittedIPRanges) +
|
|
len(e.permittedEmailAddresses) + len(e.permittedURIDomains) + len(e.permittedPrincipals)
|
|
|
|
e.totalNumberOfExcludedConstraints = len(e.excludedDNSDomains) + len(e.excludedIPRanges) +
|
|
len(e.excludedEmailAddresses) + len(e.excludedURIDomains) + len(e.excludedPrincipals)
|
|
|
|
e.totalNumberOfConstraints = e.totalNumberOfPermittedConstraints + e.totalNumberOfExcludedConstraints
|
|
|
|
return e, nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func removeDuplicates(strSlice []string) []string {
|
|
if len(strSlice) == 0 {
|
|
return nil
|
|
}
|
|
keys := make(map[string]bool)
|
|
result := []string{}
|
|
for _, item := range strSlice {
|
|
if _, value := keys[item]; !value && item != "" { // skip empty constraints
|
|
keys[item] = true
|
|
result = append(result, item)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
return result
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func removeDuplicateIPRanges(ipRanges []*net.IPNet) []*net.IPNet {
|
|
if len(ipRanges) == 0 {
|
|
return nil
|
|
}
|
|
keys := make(map[string]bool)
|
|
result := []*net.IPNet{}
|
|
for _, item := range ipRanges {
|
|
key := item.String()
|
|
if _, value := keys[key]; !value {
|
|
keys[key] = true
|
|
result = append(result, item)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
return result
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// AreCertificateNamesAllowed verifies that all SANs in a Certificate are allowed.
|
|
func (e *NamePolicyEngine) AreCertificateNamesAllowed(cert *x509.Certificate) (bool, error) {
|
|
dnsNames, ips, emails, uris := cert.DNSNames, cert.IPAddresses, cert.EmailAddresses, cert.URIs
|
|
// when Subject Common Name must be verified in addition to the SANs, it is
|
|
// added to the appropriate slice of names.
|
|
if e.verifySubjectCommonName {
|
|
appendSubjectCommonName(cert.Subject, &dnsNames, &ips, &emails, &uris)
|
|
}
|
|
if err := e.validateNames(dnsNames, ips, emails, uris, []string{}); err != nil {
|
|
return false, err
|
|
}
|
|
return true, nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// AreCSRNamesAllowed verifies that all names in the CSR are allowed.
|
|
func (e *NamePolicyEngine) AreCSRNamesAllowed(csr *x509.CertificateRequest) (bool, error) {
|
|
dnsNames, ips, emails, uris := csr.DNSNames, csr.IPAddresses, csr.EmailAddresses, csr.URIs
|
|
// when Subject Common Name must be verified in addition to the SANs, it is
|
|
// added to the appropriate slice of names.
|
|
if e.verifySubjectCommonName {
|
|
appendSubjectCommonName(csr.Subject, &dnsNames, &ips, &emails, &uris)
|
|
}
|
|
if err := e.validateNames(dnsNames, ips, emails, uris, []string{}); err != nil {
|
|
return false, err
|
|
}
|
|
return true, nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// AreSANSAllowed verifies that all names in the slice of SANs are allowed.
|
|
// The SANs are first split into DNS names, IPs, email addresses and URIs.
|
|
func (e *NamePolicyEngine) AreSANsAllowed(sans []string) (bool, error) {
|
|
dnsNames, ips, emails, uris := x509util.SplitSANs(sans)
|
|
if err := e.validateNames(dnsNames, ips, emails, uris, []string{}); err != nil {
|
|
return false, err
|
|
}
|
|
return true, nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// IsDNSAllowed verifies a single DNS domain is allowed.
|
|
func (e *NamePolicyEngine) IsDNSAllowed(dns string) (bool, error) {
|
|
if err := e.validateNames([]string{dns}, []net.IP{}, []string{}, []*url.URL{}, []string{}); err != nil {
|
|
return false, err
|
|
}
|
|
return true, nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// IsIPAllowed verifies a single IP domain is allowed.
|
|
func (e *NamePolicyEngine) IsIPAllowed(ip net.IP) (bool, error) {
|
|
if err := e.validateNames([]string{}, []net.IP{ip}, []string{}, []*url.URL{}, []string{}); err != nil {
|
|
return false, err
|
|
}
|
|
return true, nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// ArePrincipalsAllowed verifies that all principals in an SSH certificate are allowed.
|
|
func (e *NamePolicyEngine) ArePrincipalsAllowed(cert *ssh.Certificate) (bool, error) {
|
|
dnsNames, ips, emails, usernames, err := splitSSHPrincipals(cert)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
return false, err
|
|
}
|
|
if err := e.validateNames(dnsNames, ips, emails, []*url.URL{}, usernames); err != nil {
|
|
return false, err
|
|
}
|
|
return true, nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// appendSubjectCommonName appends the Subject Common Name to the appropriate slice of names. The logic is
|
|
// similar as x509util.SplitSANs: if the subject can be parsed as an IP, it's added to the ips. If it can
|
|
// be parsed as an URL, it is added to the URIs. If it contains an @, it is added to emails. When it's none
|
|
// of these, it's added to the DNS names.
|
|
func appendSubjectCommonName(subject pkix.Name, dnsNames *[]string, ips *[]net.IP, emails *[]string, uris *[]*url.URL) {
|
|
commonName := subject.CommonName
|
|
if commonName == "" {
|
|
return
|
|
}
|
|
subjectDNSNames, subjectIPs, subjectEmails, subjectURIs := x509util.SplitSANs([]string{commonName})
|
|
*dnsNames = append(*dnsNames, subjectDNSNames...)
|
|
*ips = append(*ips, subjectIPs...)
|
|
*emails = append(*emails, subjectEmails...)
|
|
*uris = append(*uris, subjectURIs...)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// splitPrincipals splits SSH certificate principals into DNS names, emails and usernames.
|
|
func splitSSHPrincipals(cert *ssh.Certificate) (dnsNames []string, ips []net.IP, emails, usernames []string, err error) {
|
|
dnsNames = []string{}
|
|
ips = []net.IP{}
|
|
emails = []string{}
|
|
usernames = []string{}
|
|
var uris []*url.URL
|
|
switch cert.CertType {
|
|
case ssh.HostCert:
|
|
dnsNames, ips, emails, uris = x509util.SplitSANs(cert.ValidPrincipals)
|
|
switch {
|
|
case len(emails) > 0:
|
|
err = fmt.Errorf("Email(-like) principals %v not expected in SSH Host certificate ", emails)
|
|
case len(uris) > 0:
|
|
err = fmt.Errorf("URL principals %v not expected in SSH Host certificate ", uris)
|
|
}
|
|
case ssh.UserCert:
|
|
// re-using SplitSANs results in anything that can't be parsed as an IP, URI or email
|
|
// to be considered a username. This allows usernames like h.slatman to be present
|
|
// in the SSH certificate. We're exluding IPs and URIs, because they can be confusing
|
|
// when used in a SSH user certificate.
|
|
usernames, ips, emails, uris = x509util.SplitSANs(cert.ValidPrincipals)
|
|
switch {
|
|
case len(ips) > 0:
|
|
err = fmt.Errorf("IP principals %v not expected in SSH User certificate ", ips)
|
|
case len(uris) > 0:
|
|
err = fmt.Errorf("URL principals %v not expected in SSH User certificate ", uris)
|
|
}
|
|
default:
|
|
err = fmt.Errorf("unexpected SSH certificate type %d", cert.CertType)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// validateNames verifies that all names are allowed.
|
|
// Its logic follows that of (a large part of) the (c *Certificate) isValid() function
|
|
// in https://cs.opensource.google/go/go/+/refs/tags/go1.17.5:src/crypto/x509/verify.go
|
|
func (e *NamePolicyEngine) validateNames(dnsNames []string, ips []net.IP, emailAddresses []string, uris []*url.URL, usernames []string) error {
|
|
|
|
// nothing to compare against; return early
|
|
if e.totalNumberOfConstraints == 0 {
|
|
return nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TODO: implement check that requires at least a single name in all of the SANs + subject?
|
|
|
|
// TODO: set limit on total of all names validated? In x509 there's a limit on the number of comparisons
|
|
// that protects the CA from a DoS (i.e. many heavy comparisons). The x509 implementation takes
|
|
// this number as a total of all checks and keeps a (pointer to a) counter of the number of checks
|
|
// executed so far.
|
|
|
|
// TODO: gather all errors, or return early? Currently we return early on the first wrong name; check might fail for multiple names.
|
|
// Perhaps make that an option?
|
|
for _, dns := range dnsNames {
|
|
// if there are DNS names to check, no DNS constraints set, but there are other permitted constraints,
|
|
// then return error, because DNS should be explicitly configured to be allowed in that case. In case there are
|
|
// (other) excluded constraints, we'll allow a DNS (implicit allow; currently).
|
|
if e.numberOfDNSDomainConstraints == 0 && e.totalNumberOfPermittedConstraints > 0 {
|
|
return NamePolicyError{
|
|
Reason: NotAuthorizedForThisName,
|
|
Detail: fmt.Sprintf("dns %q is not explicitly permitted by any constraint", dns),
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
didCutWildcard := false
|
|
if strings.HasPrefix(dns, "*.") {
|
|
dns = dns[1:]
|
|
didCutWildcard = true
|
|
}
|
|
parsedDNS, err := idna.Lookup.ToASCII(dns)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
return NamePolicyError{
|
|
Reason: CannotParseDomain,
|
|
Detail: fmt.Sprintf("dns %q cannot be converted to ASCII", dns),
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
if didCutWildcard {
|
|
parsedDNS = "*" + parsedDNS
|
|
}
|
|
if _, ok := domainToReverseLabels(parsedDNS); !ok {
|
|
return NamePolicyError{
|
|
Reason: CannotParseDomain,
|
|
Detail: fmt.Sprintf("cannot parse dns %q", dns),
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
if err := checkNameConstraints("dns", dns, parsedDNS,
|
|
func(parsedName, constraint interface{}) (bool, error) {
|
|
return e.matchDomainConstraint(parsedName.(string), constraint.(string))
|
|
}, e.permittedDNSDomains, e.excludedDNSDomains); err != nil {
|
|
return err
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for _, ip := range ips {
|
|
if e.numberOfIPRangeConstraints == 0 && e.totalNumberOfPermittedConstraints > 0 {
|
|
return NamePolicyError{
|
|
Reason: NotAuthorizedForThisName,
|
|
Detail: fmt.Sprintf("ip %q is not explicitly permitted by any constraint", ip.String()),
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
if err := checkNameConstraints("ip", ip.String(), ip,
|
|
func(parsedName, constraint interface{}) (bool, error) {
|
|
return matchIPConstraint(parsedName.(net.IP), constraint.(*net.IPNet))
|
|
}, e.permittedIPRanges, e.excludedIPRanges); err != nil {
|
|
return err
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for _, email := range emailAddresses {
|
|
if e.numberOfEmailAddressConstraints == 0 && e.totalNumberOfPermittedConstraints > 0 {
|
|
return NamePolicyError{
|
|
Reason: NotAuthorizedForThisName,
|
|
Detail: fmt.Sprintf("email %q is not explicitly permitted by any constraint", email),
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
mailbox, ok := parseRFC2821Mailbox(email)
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
return NamePolicyError{
|
|
Reason: CannotParseRFC822Name,
|
|
Detail: fmt.Sprintf("invalid rfc822Name %q", mailbox),
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
// According to RFC 5280, section 7.5, emails are considered to match if the local part is
|
|
// an exact match and the host (domain) part matches the ASCII representation (case-insensitive):
|
|
// https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5280#section-7.5
|
|
domainASCII, err := idna.ToASCII(mailbox.domain)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
return NamePolicyError{
|
|
Reason: CannotParseDomain,
|
|
Detail: fmt.Sprintf("cannot parse email domain %q", email),
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
mailbox.domain = domainASCII
|
|
if err := checkNameConstraints("email", email, mailbox,
|
|
func(parsedName, constraint interface{}) (bool, error) {
|
|
return e.matchEmailConstraint(parsedName.(rfc2821Mailbox), constraint.(string))
|
|
}, e.permittedEmailAddresses, e.excludedEmailAddresses); err != nil {
|
|
return err
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TODO(hs): fix internationalization for URIs (IRIs)
|
|
|
|
for _, uri := range uris {
|
|
if e.numberOfURIDomainConstraints == 0 && e.totalNumberOfPermittedConstraints > 0 {
|
|
return NamePolicyError{
|
|
Reason: NotAuthorizedForThisName,
|
|
Detail: fmt.Sprintf("uri %q is not explicitly permitted by any constraint", uri.String()),
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
if err := checkNameConstraints("uri", uri.String(), uri,
|
|
func(parsedName, constraint interface{}) (bool, error) {
|
|
return e.matchURIConstraint(parsedName.(*url.URL), constraint.(string))
|
|
}, e.permittedURIDomains, e.excludedURIDomains); err != nil {
|
|
return err
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for _, username := range usernames {
|
|
if e.numberOfPrincipalConstraints == 0 && e.totalNumberOfPermittedConstraints > 0 {
|
|
return NamePolicyError{
|
|
Reason: NotAuthorizedForThisName,
|
|
Detail: fmt.Sprintf("username principal %q is not explicitly permitted by any constraint", username),
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
// TODO: some validation? I.e. allowed characters?
|
|
if err := checkNameConstraints("username", username, username,
|
|
func(parsedName, constraint interface{}) (bool, error) {
|
|
return matchUsernameConstraint(parsedName.(string), constraint.(string))
|
|
}, e.permittedPrincipals, e.excludedPrincipals); err != nil {
|
|
return err
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// if all checks out, all SANs are allowed
|
|
return nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// checkNameConstraints checks that a name, of type nameType is permitted.
|
|
// The argument parsedName contains the parsed form of name, suitable for passing
|
|
// to the match function.
|
|
// SOURCE: https://cs.opensource.google/go/go/+/refs/tags/go1.17.5:src/crypto/x509/verify.go
|
|
func checkNameConstraints(
|
|
nameType string,
|
|
name string,
|
|
parsedName interface{},
|
|
match func(parsedName, constraint interface{}) (match bool, err error),
|
|
permitted, excluded interface{}) error {
|
|
|
|
excludedValue := reflect.ValueOf(excluded)
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < excludedValue.Len(); i++ {
|
|
constraint := excludedValue.Index(i).Interface()
|
|
match, err := match(parsedName, constraint)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
return NamePolicyError{
|
|
Reason: CannotMatchNameToConstraint,
|
|
Detail: err.Error(),
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if match {
|
|
return NamePolicyError{
|
|
Reason: NotAuthorizedForThisName,
|
|
Detail: fmt.Sprintf("%s %q is excluded by constraint %q", nameType, name, constraint),
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
permittedValue := reflect.ValueOf(permitted)
|
|
|
|
ok := true
|
|
for i := 0; i < permittedValue.Len(); i++ {
|
|
constraint := permittedValue.Index(i).Interface()
|
|
var err error
|
|
if ok, err = match(parsedName, constraint); err != nil {
|
|
return NamePolicyError{
|
|
Reason: CannotMatchNameToConstraint,
|
|
Detail: err.Error(),
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if ok {
|
|
break
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
return NamePolicyError{
|
|
Reason: NotAuthorizedForThisName,
|
|
Detail: fmt.Sprintf("%s %q is not permitted by any constraint", nameType, name),
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// domainToReverseLabels converts a textual domain name like foo.example.com to
|
|
// the list of labels in reverse order, e.g. ["com", "example", "foo"].
|
|
// SOURCE: https://cs.opensource.google/go/go/+/refs/tags/go1.17.5:src/crypto/x509/verify.go
|
|
func domainToReverseLabels(domain string) (reverseLabels []string, ok bool) {
|
|
for len(domain) > 0 {
|
|
if i := strings.LastIndexByte(domain, '.'); i == -1 {
|
|
reverseLabels = append(reverseLabels, domain)
|
|
domain = ""
|
|
} else {
|
|
reverseLabels = append(reverseLabels, domain[i+1:])
|
|
domain = domain[:i]
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if len(reverseLabels) > 0 && reverseLabels[0] == "" {
|
|
// An empty label at the end indicates an absolute value.
|
|
return nil, false
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for _, label := range reverseLabels {
|
|
if label == "" {
|
|
// Empty labels are otherwise invalid.
|
|
return nil, false
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for _, c := range label {
|
|
if c < 33 || c > 126 {
|
|
// Invalid character.
|
|
return nil, false
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return reverseLabels, true
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// rfc2821Mailbox represents a “mailbox” (which is an email address to most
|
|
// people) by breaking it into the “local” (i.e. before the '@') and “domain”
|
|
// parts.
|
|
// SOURCE: https://cs.opensource.google/go/go/+/refs/tags/go1.17.5:src/crypto/x509/verify.go
|
|
type rfc2821Mailbox struct {
|
|
local, domain string
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// parseRFC2821Mailbox parses an email address into local and domain parts,
|
|
// based on the ABNF for a “Mailbox” from RFC 2821. According to RFC 5280,
|
|
// Section 4.2.1.6 that's correct for an rfc822Name from a certificate: “The
|
|
// format of an rfc822Name is a "Mailbox" as defined in RFC 2821, Section 4.1.2”.
|
|
// SOURCE: https://cs.opensource.google/go/go/+/refs/tags/go1.17.5:src/crypto/x509/verify.go
|
|
func parseRFC2821Mailbox(in string) (mailbox rfc2821Mailbox, ok bool) {
|
|
if in == "" {
|
|
return mailbox, false
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
localPartBytes := make([]byte, 0, len(in)/2)
|
|
|
|
if in[0] == '"' {
|
|
// Quoted-string = DQUOTE *qcontent DQUOTE
|
|
// non-whitespace-control = %d1-8 / %d11 / %d12 / %d14-31 / %d127
|
|
// qcontent = qtext / quoted-pair
|
|
// qtext = non-whitespace-control /
|
|
// %d33 / %d35-91 / %d93-126
|
|
// quoted-pair = ("\" text) / obs-qp
|
|
// text = %d1-9 / %d11 / %d12 / %d14-127 / obs-text
|
|
//
|
|
// (Names beginning with “obs-” are the obsolete syntax from RFC 2822,
|
|
// Section 4. Since it has been 16 years, we no longer accept that.)
|
|
in = in[1:]
|
|
QuotedString:
|
|
for {
|
|
if in == "" {
|
|
return mailbox, false
|
|
}
|
|
c := in[0]
|
|
in = in[1:]
|
|
|
|
switch {
|
|
case c == '"':
|
|
break QuotedString
|
|
|
|
case c == '\\':
|
|
// quoted-pair
|
|
if in == "" {
|
|
return mailbox, false
|
|
}
|
|
if in[0] == 11 ||
|
|
in[0] == 12 ||
|
|
(1 <= in[0] && in[0] <= 9) ||
|
|
(14 <= in[0] && in[0] <= 127) {
|
|
localPartBytes = append(localPartBytes, in[0])
|
|
in = in[1:]
|
|
} else {
|
|
return mailbox, false
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
case c == 11 ||
|
|
c == 12 ||
|
|
// Space (char 32) is not allowed based on the
|
|
// BNF, but RFC 3696 gives an example that
|
|
// assumes that it is. Several “verified”
|
|
// errata continue to argue about this point.
|
|
// We choose to accept it.
|
|
c == 32 ||
|
|
c == 33 ||
|
|
c == 127 ||
|
|
(1 <= c && c <= 8) ||
|
|
(14 <= c && c <= 31) ||
|
|
(35 <= c && c <= 91) ||
|
|
(93 <= c && c <= 126):
|
|
// qtext
|
|
localPartBytes = append(localPartBytes, c)
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
return mailbox, false
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
} else {
|
|
// Atom ("." Atom)*
|
|
NextChar:
|
|
for len(in) > 0 {
|
|
// atext from RFC 2822, Section 3.2.4
|
|
c := in[0]
|
|
|
|
switch {
|
|
case c == '\\':
|
|
// Examples given in RFC 3696 suggest that
|
|
// escaped characters can appear outside of a
|
|
// quoted string. Several “verified” errata
|
|
// continue to argue the point. We choose to
|
|
// accept it.
|
|
in = in[1:]
|
|
if in == "" {
|
|
return mailbox, false
|
|
}
|
|
fallthrough
|
|
|
|
case ('0' <= c && c <= '9') ||
|
|
('a' <= c && c <= 'z') ||
|
|
('A' <= c && c <= 'Z') ||
|
|
c == '!' || c == '#' || c == '$' || c == '%' ||
|
|
c == '&' || c == '\'' || c == '*' || c == '+' ||
|
|
c == '-' || c == '/' || c == '=' || c == '?' ||
|
|
c == '^' || c == '_' || c == '`' || c == '{' ||
|
|
c == '|' || c == '}' || c == '~' || c == '.':
|
|
localPartBytes = append(localPartBytes, in[0])
|
|
in = in[1:]
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
break NextChar
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if len(localPartBytes) == 0 {
|
|
return mailbox, false
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// From RFC 3696, Section 3:
|
|
// “period (".") may also appear, but may not be used to start
|
|
// or end the local part, nor may two or more consecutive
|
|
// periods appear.”
|
|
twoDots := []byte{'.', '.'}
|
|
if localPartBytes[0] == '.' ||
|
|
localPartBytes[len(localPartBytes)-1] == '.' ||
|
|
bytes.Contains(localPartBytes, twoDots) {
|
|
return mailbox, false
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if in == "" || in[0] != '@' {
|
|
return mailbox, false
|
|
}
|
|
in = in[1:]
|
|
|
|
// The RFC species a format for domains, but that's known to be
|
|
// violated in practice so we accept that anything after an '@' is the
|
|
// domain part.
|
|
if _, ok := domainToReverseLabels(in); !ok {
|
|
return mailbox, false
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
mailbox.local = string(localPartBytes)
|
|
mailbox.domain = in
|
|
return mailbox, true
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// SOURCE: https://cs.opensource.google/go/go/+/refs/tags/go1.17.5:src/crypto/x509/verify.go
|
|
func (e *NamePolicyEngine) matchDomainConstraint(domain, constraint string) (bool, error) {
|
|
// The meaning of zero length constraints is not specified, but this
|
|
// code follows NSS and accepts them as matching everything.
|
|
if constraint == "" {
|
|
return true, nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// A single whitespace seems to be considered a valid domain, but we don't allow it.
|
|
if domain == " " {
|
|
return false, nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Block domains that start with just a period
|
|
if domain[0] == '.' {
|
|
return false, nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Block wildcard domains that don't start with exactly "*." (i.e. double wildcards and such)
|
|
if domain[0] == '*' && domain[1] != '.' {
|
|
return false, nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Check if the domain starts with a wildcard and return early if not allowed
|
|
if strings.HasPrefix(domain, "*.") && !e.allowLiteralWildcardNames {
|
|
return false, nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Only allow asterisk at the start of the domain; we don't allow them as part of a domain label or as a (sub)domain label (currently)
|
|
if strings.LastIndex(domain, "*") > 0 {
|
|
return false, nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Don't allow constraints with empty labels in any position
|
|
if strings.Contains(constraint, "..") {
|
|
return false, nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
domainLabels, ok := domainToReverseLabels(domain)
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
return false, fmt.Errorf("cannot parse domain %q", domain)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// RFC 5280 says that a leading period in a domain name means that at
|
|
// least one label must be prepended, but only for URI and email
|
|
// constraints, not DNS constraints. The code also supports that
|
|
// behavior for DNS constraints. In our adaptation of the original
|
|
// Go stdlib x509 Name Constraint implementation we look for exactly
|
|
// one subdomain, currently.
|
|
|
|
mustHaveSubdomains := false
|
|
if constraint[0] == '.' {
|
|
mustHaveSubdomains = true
|
|
constraint = constraint[1:]
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
constraintLabels, ok := domainToReverseLabels(constraint)
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
return false, fmt.Errorf("cannot parse domain constraint %q", constraint)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// fmt.Println(mustHaveSubdomains)
|
|
// fmt.Println(constraintLabels)
|
|
// fmt.Println(domainLabels)
|
|
|
|
expectedNumberOfLabels := len(constraintLabels)
|
|
if mustHaveSubdomains {
|
|
// we expect exactly one more label if it starts with the "canonical" x509 "wildcard": "."
|
|
// in the future we could extend this to support multiple additional labels and/or more
|
|
// complex matching.
|
|
expectedNumberOfLabels++
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if len(domainLabels) != expectedNumberOfLabels {
|
|
return false, nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for i, constraintLabel := range constraintLabels {
|
|
if !strings.EqualFold(constraintLabel, domainLabels[i]) {
|
|
return false, nil
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return true, nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// SOURCE: https://cs.opensource.google/go/go/+/refs/tags/go1.17.5:src/crypto/x509/verify.go
|
|
func matchIPConstraint(ip net.IP, constraint *net.IPNet) (bool, error) {
|
|
|
|
// TODO(hs): this is code from Go library, but I got some unexpected result:
|
|
// with permitted net 127.0.0.0/24, 127.0.0.1 is NOT allowed. When parsing 127.0.0.1 as net.IP
|
|
// which is in the IPAddresses slice, the underlying length is 16. The contraint.IP has a length
|
|
// of 4 instead. I currently don't believe that this is a bug in Go now, but why is it like that?
|
|
// Is there a difference because we're not operating on a sans []string slice? Or is the Go
|
|
// implementation stricter regarding IPv4 vs. IPv6? I've been bitten by some unfortunate differences
|
|
// between the two before (i.e. IPv4 in IPv6; IP SANS in ACME)
|
|
// if len(ip) != len(constraint.IP) {
|
|
// return false, nil
|
|
// }
|
|
|
|
// for i := range ip {
|
|
// if mask := constraint.Mask[i]; ip[i]&mask != constraint.IP[i]&mask {
|
|
// return false, nil
|
|
// }
|
|
// }
|
|
|
|
contained := constraint.Contains(ip) // TODO(hs): validate that this is the correct behavior; also check IPv4-in-IPv6 (again)
|
|
|
|
return contained, nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// SOURCE: https://cs.opensource.google/go/go/+/refs/tags/go1.17.5:src/crypto/x509/verify.go
|
|
func (e *NamePolicyEngine) matchEmailConstraint(mailbox rfc2821Mailbox, constraint string) (bool, error) {
|
|
// TODO(hs): handle literal wildcard case for emails? Does that even make sense?
|
|
// If the constraint contains an @, then it specifies an exact mailbox name (currently)
|
|
if strings.Contains(constraint, "*") {
|
|
return false, fmt.Errorf("email constraint %q cannot contain asterisk", constraint)
|
|
}
|
|
if strings.Contains(constraint, "@") {
|
|
constraintMailbox, ok := parseRFC2821Mailbox(constraint)
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
return false, fmt.Errorf("cannot parse constraint %q", constraint)
|
|
}
|
|
return mailbox.local == constraintMailbox.local && strings.EqualFold(mailbox.domain, constraintMailbox.domain), nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Otherwise the constraint is like a DNS constraint of the domain part
|
|
// of the mailbox.
|
|
return e.matchDomainConstraint(mailbox.domain, constraint)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// SOURCE: https://cs.opensource.google/go/go/+/refs/tags/go1.17.5:src/crypto/x509/verify.go
|
|
func (e *NamePolicyEngine) matchURIConstraint(uri *url.URL, constraint string) (bool, error) {
|
|
// From RFC 5280, Section 4.2.1.10:
|
|
// “a uniformResourceIdentifier that does not include an authority
|
|
// component with a host name specified as a fully qualified domain
|
|
// name (e.g., if the URI either does not include an authority
|
|
// component or includes an authority component in which the host name
|
|
// is specified as an IP address), then the application MUST reject the
|
|
// certificate.”
|
|
|
|
host := uri.Host
|
|
if host == "" {
|
|
return false, fmt.Errorf("URI with empty host (%q) cannot be matched against constraints", uri.String())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Block hosts with the wildcard character; no exceptions, also not when wildcards allowed.
|
|
if strings.Contains(host, "*") {
|
|
return false, fmt.Errorf("URI host %q cannot contain asterisk", uri.String())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if strings.Contains(host, ":") && !strings.HasSuffix(host, "]") {
|
|
var err error
|
|
host, _, err = net.SplitHostPort(uri.Host)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
return false, err
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if strings.HasPrefix(host, "[") && strings.HasSuffix(host, "]") ||
|
|
net.ParseIP(host) != nil {
|
|
return false, fmt.Errorf("URI with IP %q cannot be matched against constraints", uri.String())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TODO(hs): add checks for scheme, path, etc.; either here, or in a different constraint matcher (to keep this one simple)
|
|
|
|
return e.matchDomainConstraint(host, constraint)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// matchUsernameConstraint performs a string literal match against a constraint.
|
|
func matchUsernameConstraint(username, constraint string) (bool, error) {
|
|
// allow any plain principal username
|
|
if constraint == "*" {
|
|
return true, nil
|
|
}
|
|
return strings.EqualFold(username, constraint), nil
|
|
}
|