TrueCloudLab/distribution
13
0
Fork 3
Code Issues 3 Pull requests Projects Releases 2 Packages Wiki Activity Actions
distribution/api_test.go

420 lines
11 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

Initial implementation of Layer API The http API has its first set of endpoints to implement the core aspects of fetching and uploading layers. Uploads can be started and completed in a single chunk and the content can be fetched via tarsum. Most proposed error conditions should be represented but edge cases likely remain. In this version, note that the layers are still called layers, even though the routes are pointing to blobs. This will change with backend refactoring over the next few weeks. The unit tests are a bit of a shamble but these need to be carefully written along with the core specification process. As the the client-server interaction solidifies, we can port this into a verification suite for registry providers.
2014-11-21 03:57:01 +00:00
package registry
import (
Initial implementation of Manifest HTTP API Push, pull and delete of manifest files in the registry have been implemented on top of the storage services. Basic workflows, including reporting of missing manifests are tested, including various proposed response codes. Common testing functionality has been collected into shared methods. A test suite may be emerging but it might better to capture more edge cases (such as resumable upload, range requests, etc.) before we commit to a full approach. To support clearer test cases and simpler handler methods, an application aware urlBuilder has been added. We may want to export the functionality for use in the client, which could allow us to abstract away from gorilla/mux. A few error codes have been added to fill in error conditions missing from the proposal. Some use cases have identified some problems with the approach to error reporting that requires more work to reconcile. To resolve this, the mapping of Go errors into error types needs to pulled out of the handlers and into the application. We also need to move to type-based errors, with rich information, rather than value-based errors. ErrorHandlers will probably replace the http.Handlers to make this work correctly. Unrelated to the above, the "length" parameter has been migrated to "size" for completing layer uploads. This change should have gone out before but these diffs ending up being coupled with the parameter name change due to updates to the layer unit tests.
2014-11-26 20:16:58 +00:00
"bytes"
"encoding/json"
Initial implementation of Layer API The http API has its first set of endpoints to implement the core aspects of fetching and uploading layers. Uploads can be started and completed in a single chunk and the content can be fetched via tarsum. Most proposed error conditions should be represented but edge cases likely remain. In this version, note that the layers are still called layers, even though the routes are pointing to blobs. This will change with backend refactoring over the next few weeks. The unit tests are a bit of a shamble but these need to be carefully written along with the core specification process. As the the client-server interaction solidifies, we can port this into a verification suite for registry providers.
2014-11-21 03:57:01 +00:00
"fmt"
"io"
"net/http"
"net/http/httptest"
"net/http/httputil"
"net/url"
"os"
"testing"
Initial implementation of Manifest HTTP API Push, pull and delete of manifest files in the registry have been implemented on top of the storage services. Basic workflows, including reporting of missing manifests are tested, including various proposed response codes. Common testing functionality has been collected into shared methods. A test suite may be emerging but it might better to capture more edge cases (such as resumable upload, range requests, etc.) before we commit to a full approach. To support clearer test cases and simpler handler methods, an application aware urlBuilder has been added. We may want to export the functionality for use in the client, which could allow us to abstract away from gorilla/mux. A few error codes have been added to fill in error conditions missing from the proposal. Some use cases have identified some problems with the approach to error reporting that requires more work to reconcile. To resolve this, the mapping of Go errors into error types needs to pulled out of the handlers and into the application. We also need to move to type-based errors, with rich information, rather than value-based errors. ErrorHandlers will probably replace the http.Handlers to make this work correctly. Unrelated to the above, the "length" parameter has been migrated to "size" for completing layer uploads. This change should have gone out before but these diffs ending up being coupled with the parameter name change due to updates to the layer unit tests.
2014-11-26 20:16:58 +00:00
"github.com/docker/libtrust"
"github.com/docker/docker-registry/storage"
Initial implementation of Layer API The http API has its first set of endpoints to implement the core aspects of fetching and uploading layers. Uploads can be started and completed in a single chunk and the content can be fetched via tarsum. Most proposed error conditions should be represented but edge cases likely remain. In this version, note that the layers are still called layers, even though the routes are pointing to blobs. This will change with backend refactoring over the next few weeks. The unit tests are a bit of a shamble but these need to be carefully written along with the core specification process. As the the client-server interaction solidifies, we can port this into a verification suite for registry providers.
2014-11-21 03:57:01 +00:00
_ "github.com/docker/docker-registry/storagedriver/inmemory"
"github.com/gorilla/handlers"
"github.com/docker/docker-registry/common/testutil"
"github.com/docker/docker-registry/configuration"
"github.com/docker/docker-registry/digest"
)
// TestLayerAPI conducts a full of the of the layer api.
func TestLayerAPI(t *testing.T) {
// TODO(stevvooe): This test code is complete junk but it should cover the
// complete flow. This must be broken down and checked against the
// specification *before* we submit the final to docker core.
config := configuration.Configuration{
Storage: configuration.Storage{
"inmemory": configuration.Parameters{},
},
}
app := NewApp(config)
server := httptest.NewServer(handlers.CombinedLoggingHandler(os.Stderr, app))
Initial implementation of Manifest HTTP API Push, pull and delete of manifest files in the registry have been implemented on top of the storage services. Basic workflows, including reporting of missing manifests are tested, including various proposed response codes. Common testing functionality has been collected into shared methods. A test suite may be emerging but it might better to capture more edge cases (such as resumable upload, range requests, etc.) before we commit to a full approach. To support clearer test cases and simpler handler methods, an application aware urlBuilder has been added. We may want to export the functionality for use in the client, which could allow us to abstract away from gorilla/mux. A few error codes have been added to fill in error conditions missing from the proposal. Some use cases have identified some problems with the approach to error reporting that requires more work to reconcile. To resolve this, the mapping of Go errors into error types needs to pulled out of the handlers and into the application. We also need to move to type-based errors, with rich information, rather than value-based errors. ErrorHandlers will probably replace the http.Handlers to make this work correctly. Unrelated to the above, the "length" parameter has been migrated to "size" for completing layer uploads. This change should have gone out before but these diffs ending up being coupled with the parameter name change due to updates to the layer unit tests.
2014-11-26 20:16:58 +00:00
builder, err := newURLBuilderFromString(server.URL)
Initial implementation of Layer API The http API has its first set of endpoints to implement the core aspects of fetching and uploading layers. Uploads can be started and completed in a single chunk and the content can be fetched via tarsum. Most proposed error conditions should be represented but edge cases likely remain. In this version, note that the layers are still called layers, even though the routes are pointing to blobs. This will change with backend refactoring over the next few weeks. The unit tests are a bit of a shamble but these need to be carefully written along with the core specification process. As the the client-server interaction solidifies, we can port this into a verification suite for registry providers.
2014-11-21 03:57:01 +00:00
if err != nil {
Initial implementation of Manifest HTTP API Push, pull and delete of manifest files in the registry have been implemented on top of the storage services. Basic workflows, including reporting of missing manifests are tested, including various proposed response codes. Common testing functionality has been collected into shared methods. A test suite may be emerging but it might better to capture more edge cases (such as resumable upload, range requests, etc.) before we commit to a full approach. To support clearer test cases and simpler handler methods, an application aware urlBuilder has been added. We may want to export the functionality for use in the client, which could allow us to abstract away from gorilla/mux. A few error codes have been added to fill in error conditions missing from the proposal. Some use cases have identified some problems with the approach to error reporting that requires more work to reconcile. To resolve this, the mapping of Go errors into error types needs to pulled out of the handlers and into the application. We also need to move to type-based errors, with rich information, rather than value-based errors. ErrorHandlers will probably replace the http.Handlers to make this work correctly. Unrelated to the above, the "length" parameter has been migrated to "size" for completing layer uploads. This change should have gone out before but these diffs ending up being coupled with the parameter name change due to updates to the layer unit tests.
2014-11-26 20:16:58 +00:00
t.Fatalf("error creating url builder: %v", err)
Initial implementation of Layer API The http API has its first set of endpoints to implement the core aspects of fetching and uploading layers. Uploads can be started and completed in a single chunk and the content can be fetched via tarsum. Most proposed error conditions should be represented but edge cases likely remain. In this version, note that the layers are still called layers, even though the routes are pointing to blobs. This will change with backend refactoring over the next few weeks. The unit tests are a bit of a shamble but these need to be carefully written along with the core specification process. As the the client-server interaction solidifies, we can port this into a verification suite for registry providers.
2014-11-21 03:57:01 +00:00
}
imageName := "foo/bar"
// "build" our layer file
layerFile, tarSumStr, err := testutil.CreateRandomTarFile()
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("error creating random layer file: %v", err)
}
layerDigest := digest.Digest(tarSumStr)
// -----------------------------------
// Test fetch for non-existent content
Initial implementation of Manifest HTTP API Push, pull and delete of manifest files in the registry have been implemented on top of the storage services. Basic workflows, including reporting of missing manifests are tested, including various proposed response codes. Common testing functionality has been collected into shared methods. A test suite may be emerging but it might better to capture more edge cases (such as resumable upload, range requests, etc.) before we commit to a full approach. To support clearer test cases and simpler handler methods, an application aware urlBuilder has been added. We may want to export the functionality for use in the client, which could allow us to abstract away from gorilla/mux. A few error codes have been added to fill in error conditions missing from the proposal. Some use cases have identified some problems with the approach to error reporting that requires more work to reconcile. To resolve this, the mapping of Go errors into error types needs to pulled out of the handlers and into the application. We also need to move to type-based errors, with rich information, rather than value-based errors. ErrorHandlers will probably replace the http.Handlers to make this work correctly. Unrelated to the above, the "length" parameter has been migrated to "size" for completing layer uploads. This change should have gone out before but these diffs ending up being coupled with the parameter name change due to updates to the layer unit tests.
2014-11-26 20:16:58 +00:00
layerURL, err := builder.buildLayerURL(imageName, layerDigest)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("error building url: %v", err)
}
Initial implementation of Layer API The http API has its first set of endpoints to implement the core aspects of fetching and uploading layers. Uploads can be started and completed in a single chunk and the content can be fetched via tarsum. Most proposed error conditions should be represented but edge cases likely remain. In this version, note that the layers are still called layers, even though the routes are pointing to blobs. This will change with backend refactoring over the next few weeks. The unit tests are a bit of a shamble but these need to be carefully written along with the core specification process. As the the client-server interaction solidifies, we can port this into a verification suite for registry providers.
2014-11-21 03:57:01 +00:00
Initial implementation of Manifest HTTP API Push, pull and delete of manifest files in the registry have been implemented on top of the storage services. Basic workflows, including reporting of missing manifests are tested, including various proposed response codes. Common testing functionality has been collected into shared methods. A test suite may be emerging but it might better to capture more edge cases (such as resumable upload, range requests, etc.) before we commit to a full approach. To support clearer test cases and simpler handler methods, an application aware urlBuilder has been added. We may want to export the functionality for use in the client, which could allow us to abstract away from gorilla/mux. A few error codes have been added to fill in error conditions missing from the proposal. Some use cases have identified some problems with the approach to error reporting that requires more work to reconcile. To resolve this, the mapping of Go errors into error types needs to pulled out of the handlers and into the application. We also need to move to type-based errors, with rich information, rather than value-based errors. ErrorHandlers will probably replace the http.Handlers to make this work correctly. Unrelated to the above, the "length" parameter has been migrated to "size" for completing layer uploads. This change should have gone out before but these diffs ending up being coupled with the parameter name change due to updates to the layer unit tests.
2014-11-26 20:16:58 +00:00
resp, err := http.Get(layerURL)
Initial implementation of Layer API The http API has its first set of endpoints to implement the core aspects of fetching and uploading layers. Uploads can be started and completed in a single chunk and the content can be fetched via tarsum. Most proposed error conditions should be represented but edge cases likely remain. In this version, note that the layers are still called layers, even though the routes are pointing to blobs. This will change with backend refactoring over the next few weeks. The unit tests are a bit of a shamble but these need to be carefully written along with the core specification process. As the the client-server interaction solidifies, we can port this into a verification suite for registry providers.
2014-11-21 03:57:01 +00:00
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unexpected error fetching non-existent layer: %v", err)
}
Initial implementation of Manifest HTTP API Push, pull and delete of manifest files in the registry have been implemented on top of the storage services. Basic workflows, including reporting of missing manifests are tested, including various proposed response codes. Common testing functionality has been collected into shared methods. A test suite may be emerging but it might better to capture more edge cases (such as resumable upload, range requests, etc.) before we commit to a full approach. To support clearer test cases and simpler handler methods, an application aware urlBuilder has been added. We may want to export the functionality for use in the client, which could allow us to abstract away from gorilla/mux. A few error codes have been added to fill in error conditions missing from the proposal. Some use cases have identified some problems with the approach to error reporting that requires more work to reconcile. To resolve this, the mapping of Go errors into error types needs to pulled out of the handlers and into the application. We also need to move to type-based errors, with rich information, rather than value-based errors. ErrorHandlers will probably replace the http.Handlers to make this work correctly. Unrelated to the above, the "length" parameter has been migrated to "size" for completing layer uploads. This change should have gone out before but these diffs ending up being coupled with the parameter name change due to updates to the layer unit tests.
2014-11-26 20:16:58 +00:00
checkResponse(t, "fetching non-existent content", resp, http.StatusNotFound)
Initial implementation of Layer API The http API has its first set of endpoints to implement the core aspects of fetching and uploading layers. Uploads can be started and completed in a single chunk and the content can be fetched via tarsum. Most proposed error conditions should be represented but edge cases likely remain. In this version, note that the layers are still called layers, even though the routes are pointing to blobs. This will change with backend refactoring over the next few weeks. The unit tests are a bit of a shamble but these need to be carefully written along with the core specification process. As the the client-server interaction solidifies, we can port this into a verification suite for registry providers.
2014-11-21 03:57:01 +00:00
// ------------------------------------------
// Test head request for non-existent content
Initial implementation of Manifest HTTP API Push, pull and delete of manifest files in the registry have been implemented on top of the storage services. Basic workflows, including reporting of missing manifests are tested, including various proposed response codes. Common testing functionality has been collected into shared methods. A test suite may be emerging but it might better to capture more edge cases (such as resumable upload, range requests, etc.) before we commit to a full approach. To support clearer test cases and simpler handler methods, an application aware urlBuilder has been added. We may want to export the functionality for use in the client, which could allow us to abstract away from gorilla/mux. A few error codes have been added to fill in error conditions missing from the proposal. Some use cases have identified some problems with the approach to error reporting that requires more work to reconcile. To resolve this, the mapping of Go errors into error types needs to pulled out of the handlers and into the application. We also need to move to type-based errors, with rich information, rather than value-based errors. ErrorHandlers will probably replace the http.Handlers to make this work correctly. Unrelated to the above, the "length" parameter has been migrated to "size" for completing layer uploads. This change should have gone out before but these diffs ending up being coupled with the parameter name change due to updates to the layer unit tests.
2014-11-26 20:16:58 +00:00
resp, err = http.Head(layerURL)
Initial implementation of Layer API The http API has its first set of endpoints to implement the core aspects of fetching and uploading layers. Uploads can be started and completed in a single chunk and the content can be fetched via tarsum. Most proposed error conditions should be represented but edge cases likely remain. In this version, note that the layers are still called layers, even though the routes are pointing to blobs. This will change with backend refactoring over the next few weeks. The unit tests are a bit of a shamble but these need to be carefully written along with the core specification process. As the the client-server interaction solidifies, we can port this into a verification suite for registry providers.
2014-11-21 03:57:01 +00:00
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unexpected error checking head on non-existent layer: %v", err)
}
Initial implementation of Manifest HTTP API Push, pull and delete of manifest files in the registry have been implemented on top of the storage services. Basic workflows, including reporting of missing manifests are tested, including various proposed response codes. Common testing functionality has been collected into shared methods. A test suite may be emerging but it might better to capture more edge cases (such as resumable upload, range requests, etc.) before we commit to a full approach. To support clearer test cases and simpler handler methods, an application aware urlBuilder has been added. We may want to export the functionality for use in the client, which could allow us to abstract away from gorilla/mux. A few error codes have been added to fill in error conditions missing from the proposal. Some use cases have identified some problems with the approach to error reporting that requires more work to reconcile. To resolve this, the mapping of Go errors into error types needs to pulled out of the handlers and into the application. We also need to move to type-based errors, with rich information, rather than value-based errors. ErrorHandlers will probably replace the http.Handlers to make this work correctly. Unrelated to the above, the "length" parameter has been migrated to "size" for completing layer uploads. This change should have gone out before but these diffs ending up being coupled with the parameter name change due to updates to the layer unit tests.
2014-11-26 20:16:58 +00:00
checkResponse(t, "checking head on non-existent layer", resp, http.StatusNotFound)
Initial implementation of Layer API The http API has its first set of endpoints to implement the core aspects of fetching and uploading layers. Uploads can be started and completed in a single chunk and the content can be fetched via tarsum. Most proposed error conditions should be represented but edge cases likely remain. In this version, note that the layers are still called layers, even though the routes are pointing to blobs. This will change with backend refactoring over the next few weeks. The unit tests are a bit of a shamble but these need to be carefully written along with the core specification process. As the the client-server interaction solidifies, we can port this into a verification suite for registry providers.
2014-11-21 03:57:01 +00:00
// ------------------------------------------
// Upload a layer
Initial implementation of Manifest HTTP API Push, pull and delete of manifest files in the registry have been implemented on top of the storage services. Basic workflows, including reporting of missing manifests are tested, including various proposed response codes. Common testing functionality has been collected into shared methods. A test suite may be emerging but it might better to capture more edge cases (such as resumable upload, range requests, etc.) before we commit to a full approach. To support clearer test cases and simpler handler methods, an application aware urlBuilder has been added. We may want to export the functionality for use in the client, which could allow us to abstract away from gorilla/mux. A few error codes have been added to fill in error conditions missing from the proposal. Some use cases have identified some problems with the approach to error reporting that requires more work to reconcile. To resolve this, the mapping of Go errors into error types needs to pulled out of the handlers and into the application. We also need to move to type-based errors, with rich information, rather than value-based errors. ErrorHandlers will probably replace the http.Handlers to make this work correctly. Unrelated to the above, the "length" parameter has been migrated to "size" for completing layer uploads. This change should have gone out before but these diffs ending up being coupled with the parameter name change due to updates to the layer unit tests.
2014-11-26 20:16:58 +00:00
layerUploadURL, err := builder.buildLayerUploadURL(imageName)
Initial implementation of Layer API The http API has its first set of endpoints to implement the core aspects of fetching and uploading layers. Uploads can be started and completed in a single chunk and the content can be fetched via tarsum. Most proposed error conditions should be represented but edge cases likely remain. In this version, note that the layers are still called layers, even though the routes are pointing to blobs. This will change with backend refactoring over the next few weeks. The unit tests are a bit of a shamble but these need to be carefully written along with the core specification process. As the the client-server interaction solidifies, we can port this into a verification suite for registry providers.
2014-11-21 03:57:01 +00:00
if err != nil {
Initial implementation of Manifest HTTP API Push, pull and delete of manifest files in the registry have been implemented on top of the storage services. Basic workflows, including reporting of missing manifests are tested, including various proposed response codes. Common testing functionality has been collected into shared methods. A test suite may be emerging but it might better to capture more edge cases (such as resumable upload, range requests, etc.) before we commit to a full approach. To support clearer test cases and simpler handler methods, an application aware urlBuilder has been added. We may want to export the functionality for use in the client, which could allow us to abstract away from gorilla/mux. A few error codes have been added to fill in error conditions missing from the proposal. Some use cases have identified some problems with the approach to error reporting that requires more work to reconcile. To resolve this, the mapping of Go errors into error types needs to pulled out of the handlers and into the application. We also need to move to type-based errors, with rich information, rather than value-based errors. ErrorHandlers will probably replace the http.Handlers to make this work correctly. Unrelated to the above, the "length" parameter has been migrated to "size" for completing layer uploads. This change should have gone out before but these diffs ending up being coupled with the parameter name change due to updates to the layer unit tests.
2014-11-26 20:16:58 +00:00
t.Fatalf("error building upload url: %v", err)
Initial implementation of Layer API The http API has its first set of endpoints to implement the core aspects of fetching and uploading layers. Uploads can be started and completed in a single chunk and the content can be fetched via tarsum. Most proposed error conditions should be represented but edge cases likely remain. In this version, note that the layers are still called layers, even though the routes are pointing to blobs. This will change with backend refactoring over the next few weeks. The unit tests are a bit of a shamble but these need to be carefully written along with the core specification process. As the the client-server interaction solidifies, we can port this into a verification suite for registry providers.
2014-11-21 03:57:01 +00:00
}
Initial implementation of Manifest HTTP API Push, pull and delete of manifest files in the registry have been implemented on top of the storage services. Basic workflows, including reporting of missing manifests are tested, including various proposed response codes. Common testing functionality has been collected into shared methods. A test suite may be emerging but it might better to capture more edge cases (such as resumable upload, range requests, etc.) before we commit to a full approach. To support clearer test cases and simpler handler methods, an application aware urlBuilder has been added. We may want to export the functionality for use in the client, which could allow us to abstract away from gorilla/mux. A few error codes have been added to fill in error conditions missing from the proposal. Some use cases have identified some problems with the approach to error reporting that requires more work to reconcile. To resolve this, the mapping of Go errors into error types needs to pulled out of the handlers and into the application. We also need to move to type-based errors, with rich information, rather than value-based errors. ErrorHandlers will probably replace the http.Handlers to make this work correctly. Unrelated to the above, the "length" parameter has been migrated to "size" for completing layer uploads. This change should have gone out before but these diffs ending up being coupled with the parameter name change due to updates to the layer unit tests.
2014-11-26 20:16:58 +00:00
resp, err = http.Post(layerUploadURL, "", nil)
Initial implementation of Layer API The http API has its first set of endpoints to implement the core aspects of fetching and uploading layers. Uploads can be started and completed in a single chunk and the content can be fetched via tarsum. Most proposed error conditions should be represented but edge cases likely remain. In this version, note that the layers are still called layers, even though the routes are pointing to blobs. This will change with backend refactoring over the next few weeks. The unit tests are a bit of a shamble but these need to be carefully written along with the core specification process. As the the client-server interaction solidifies, we can port this into a verification suite for registry providers.
2014-11-21 03:57:01 +00:00
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("error starting layer upload: %v", err)
}
Initial implementation of Manifest HTTP API Push, pull and delete of manifest files in the registry have been implemented on top of the storage services. Basic workflows, including reporting of missing manifests are tested, including various proposed response codes. Common testing functionality has been collected into shared methods. A test suite may be emerging but it might better to capture more edge cases (such as resumable upload, range requests, etc.) before we commit to a full approach. To support clearer test cases and simpler handler methods, an application aware urlBuilder has been added. We may want to export the functionality for use in the client, which could allow us to abstract away from gorilla/mux. A few error codes have been added to fill in error conditions missing from the proposal. Some use cases have identified some problems with the approach to error reporting that requires more work to reconcile. To resolve this, the mapping of Go errors into error types needs to pulled out of the handlers and into the application. We also need to move to type-based errors, with rich information, rather than value-based errors. ErrorHandlers will probably replace the http.Handlers to make this work correctly. Unrelated to the above, the "length" parameter has been migrated to "size" for completing layer uploads. This change should have gone out before but these diffs ending up being coupled with the parameter name change due to updates to the layer unit tests.
2014-11-26 20:16:58 +00:00
checkResponse(t, "starting layer upload", resp, http.StatusAccepted)
checkHeaders(t, resp, http.Header{
"Location": []string{"*"},
"Content-Length": []string{"0"},
})
Initial implementation of Layer API The http API has its first set of endpoints to implement the core aspects of fetching and uploading layers. Uploads can be started and completed in a single chunk and the content can be fetched via tarsum. Most proposed error conditions should be represented but edge cases likely remain. In this version, note that the layers are still called layers, even though the routes are pointing to blobs. This will change with backend refactoring over the next few weeks. The unit tests are a bit of a shamble but these need to be carefully written along with the core specification process. As the the client-server interaction solidifies, we can port this into a verification suite for registry providers.
2014-11-21 03:57:01 +00:00
Initial implementation of Manifest HTTP API Push, pull and delete of manifest files in the registry have been implemented on top of the storage services. Basic workflows, including reporting of missing manifests are tested, including various proposed response codes. Common testing functionality has been collected into shared methods. A test suite may be emerging but it might better to capture more edge cases (such as resumable upload, range requests, etc.) before we commit to a full approach. To support clearer test cases and simpler handler methods, an application aware urlBuilder has been added. We may want to export the functionality for use in the client, which could allow us to abstract away from gorilla/mux. A few error codes have been added to fill in error conditions missing from the proposal. Some use cases have identified some problems with the approach to error reporting that requires more work to reconcile. To resolve this, the mapping of Go errors into error types needs to pulled out of the handlers and into the application. We also need to move to type-based errors, with rich information, rather than value-based errors. ErrorHandlers will probably replace the http.Handlers to make this work correctly. Unrelated to the above, the "length" parameter has been migrated to "size" for completing layer uploads. This change should have gone out before but these diffs ending up being coupled with the parameter name change due to updates to the layer unit tests.
2014-11-26 20:16:58 +00:00
layerLength, _ := layerFile.Seek(0, os.SEEK_END)
layerFile.Seek(0, os.SEEK_SET)
// TODO(sday): Cancel the layer upload here and restart.
Initial implementation of Layer API The http API has its first set of endpoints to implement the core aspects of fetching and uploading layers. Uploads can be started and completed in a single chunk and the content can be fetched via tarsum. Most proposed error conditions should be represented but edge cases likely remain. In this version, note that the layers are still called layers, even though the routes are pointing to blobs. This will change with backend refactoring over the next few weeks. The unit tests are a bit of a shamble but these need to be carefully written along with the core specification process. As the the client-server interaction solidifies, we can port this into a verification suite for registry providers.
2014-11-21 03:57:01 +00:00
Initial implementation of Manifest HTTP API Push, pull and delete of manifest files in the registry have been implemented on top of the storage services. Basic workflows, including reporting of missing manifests are tested, including various proposed response codes. Common testing functionality has been collected into shared methods. A test suite may be emerging but it might better to capture more edge cases (such as resumable upload, range requests, etc.) before we commit to a full approach. To support clearer test cases and simpler handler methods, an application aware urlBuilder has been added. We may want to export the functionality for use in the client, which could allow us to abstract away from gorilla/mux. A few error codes have been added to fill in error conditions missing from the proposal. Some use cases have identified some problems with the approach to error reporting that requires more work to reconcile. To resolve this, the mapping of Go errors into error types needs to pulled out of the handlers and into the application. We also need to move to type-based errors, with rich information, rather than value-based errors. ErrorHandlers will probably replace the http.Handlers to make this work correctly. Unrelated to the above, the "length" parameter has been migrated to "size" for completing layer uploads. This change should have gone out before but these diffs ending up being coupled with the parameter name change due to updates to the layer unit tests.
2014-11-26 20:16:58 +00:00
uploadURLBase := startPushLayer(t, builder, imageName)
pushLayer(t, builder, imageName, layerDigest, uploadURLBase, layerFile)
// ------------------------
// Use a head request to see if the layer exists.
resp, err = http.Head(layerURL)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unexpected error checking head on existing layer: %v", err)
Initial implementation of Layer API The http API has its first set of endpoints to implement the core aspects of fetching and uploading layers. Uploads can be started and completed in a single chunk and the content can be fetched via tarsum. Most proposed error conditions should be represented but edge cases likely remain. In this version, note that the layers are still called layers, even though the routes are pointing to blobs. This will change with backend refactoring over the next few weeks. The unit tests are a bit of a shamble but these need to be carefully written along with the core specification process. As the the client-server interaction solidifies, we can port this into a verification suite for registry providers.
2014-11-21 03:57:01 +00:00
}
Initial implementation of Manifest HTTP API Push, pull and delete of manifest files in the registry have been implemented on top of the storage services. Basic workflows, including reporting of missing manifests are tested, including various proposed response codes. Common testing functionality has been collected into shared methods. A test suite may be emerging but it might better to capture more edge cases (such as resumable upload, range requests, etc.) before we commit to a full approach. To support clearer test cases and simpler handler methods, an application aware urlBuilder has been added. We may want to export the functionality for use in the client, which could allow us to abstract away from gorilla/mux. A few error codes have been added to fill in error conditions missing from the proposal. Some use cases have identified some problems with the approach to error reporting that requires more work to reconcile. To resolve this, the mapping of Go errors into error types needs to pulled out of the handlers and into the application. We also need to move to type-based errors, with rich information, rather than value-based errors. ErrorHandlers will probably replace the http.Handlers to make this work correctly. Unrelated to the above, the "length" parameter has been migrated to "size" for completing layer uploads. This change should have gone out before but these diffs ending up being coupled with the parameter name change due to updates to the layer unit tests.
2014-11-26 20:16:58 +00:00
checkResponse(t, "checking head on existing layer", resp, http.StatusOK)
checkHeaders(t, resp, http.Header{
"Content-Length": []string{fmt.Sprint(layerLength)},
})
// ----------------
// Fetch the layer!
resp, err = http.Get(layerURL)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unexpected error fetching layer: %v", err)
Initial implementation of Layer API The http API has its first set of endpoints to implement the core aspects of fetching and uploading layers. Uploads can be started and completed in a single chunk and the content can be fetched via tarsum. Most proposed error conditions should be represented but edge cases likely remain. In this version, note that the layers are still called layers, even though the routes are pointing to blobs. This will change with backend refactoring over the next few weeks. The unit tests are a bit of a shamble but these need to be carefully written along with the core specification process. As the the client-server interaction solidifies, we can port this into a verification suite for registry providers.
2014-11-21 03:57:01 +00:00
}
Initial implementation of Manifest HTTP API Push, pull and delete of manifest files in the registry have been implemented on top of the storage services. Basic workflows, including reporting of missing manifests are tested, including various proposed response codes. Common testing functionality has been collected into shared methods. A test suite may be emerging but it might better to capture more edge cases (such as resumable upload, range requests, etc.) before we commit to a full approach. To support clearer test cases and simpler handler methods, an application aware urlBuilder has been added. We may want to export the functionality for use in the client, which could allow us to abstract away from gorilla/mux. A few error codes have been added to fill in error conditions missing from the proposal. Some use cases have identified some problems with the approach to error reporting that requires more work to reconcile. To resolve this, the mapping of Go errors into error types needs to pulled out of the handlers and into the application. We also need to move to type-based errors, with rich information, rather than value-based errors. ErrorHandlers will probably replace the http.Handlers to make this work correctly. Unrelated to the above, the "length" parameter has been migrated to "size" for completing layer uploads. This change should have gone out before but these diffs ending up being coupled with the parameter name change due to updates to the layer unit tests.
2014-11-26 20:16:58 +00:00
checkResponse(t, "fetching layer", resp, http.StatusOK)
checkHeaders(t, resp, http.Header{
"Content-Length": []string{fmt.Sprint(layerLength)},
})
Initial implementation of Layer API The http API has its first set of endpoints to implement the core aspects of fetching and uploading layers. Uploads can be started and completed in a single chunk and the content can be fetched via tarsum. Most proposed error conditions should be represented but edge cases likely remain. In this version, note that the layers are still called layers, even though the routes are pointing to blobs. This will change with backend refactoring over the next few weeks. The unit tests are a bit of a shamble but these need to be carefully written along with the core specification process. As the the client-server interaction solidifies, we can port this into a verification suite for registry providers.
2014-11-21 03:57:01 +00:00
Initial implementation of Manifest HTTP API Push, pull and delete of manifest files in the registry have been implemented on top of the storage services. Basic workflows, including reporting of missing manifests are tested, including various proposed response codes. Common testing functionality has been collected into shared methods. A test suite may be emerging but it might better to capture more edge cases (such as resumable upload, range requests, etc.) before we commit to a full approach. To support clearer test cases and simpler handler methods, an application aware urlBuilder has been added. We may want to export the functionality for use in the client, which could allow us to abstract away from gorilla/mux. A few error codes have been added to fill in error conditions missing from the proposal. Some use cases have identified some problems with the approach to error reporting that requires more work to reconcile. To resolve this, the mapping of Go errors into error types needs to pulled out of the handlers and into the application. We also need to move to type-based errors, with rich information, rather than value-based errors. ErrorHandlers will probably replace the http.Handlers to make this work correctly. Unrelated to the above, the "length" parameter has been migrated to "size" for completing layer uploads. This change should have gone out before but these diffs ending up being coupled with the parameter name change due to updates to the layer unit tests.
2014-11-26 20:16:58 +00:00
// Verify the body
verifier := digest.NewDigestVerifier(layerDigest)
io.Copy(verifier, resp.Body)
Initial implementation of Layer API The http API has its first set of endpoints to implement the core aspects of fetching and uploading layers. Uploads can be started and completed in a single chunk and the content can be fetched via tarsum. Most proposed error conditions should be represented but edge cases likely remain. In this version, note that the layers are still called layers, even though the routes are pointing to blobs. This will change with backend refactoring over the next few weeks. The unit tests are a bit of a shamble but these need to be carefully written along with the core specification process. As the the client-server interaction solidifies, we can port this into a verification suite for registry providers.
2014-11-21 03:57:01 +00:00
Initial implementation of Manifest HTTP API Push, pull and delete of manifest files in the registry have been implemented on top of the storage services. Basic workflows, including reporting of missing manifests are tested, including various proposed response codes. Common testing functionality has been collected into shared methods. A test suite may be emerging but it might better to capture more edge cases (such as resumable upload, range requests, etc.) before we commit to a full approach. To support clearer test cases and simpler handler methods, an application aware urlBuilder has been added. We may want to export the functionality for use in the client, which could allow us to abstract away from gorilla/mux. A few error codes have been added to fill in error conditions missing from the proposal. Some use cases have identified some problems with the approach to error reporting that requires more work to reconcile. To resolve this, the mapping of Go errors into error types needs to pulled out of the handlers and into the application. We also need to move to type-based errors, with rich information, rather than value-based errors. ErrorHandlers will probably replace the http.Handlers to make this work correctly. Unrelated to the above, the "length" parameter has been migrated to "size" for completing layer uploads. This change should have gone out before but these diffs ending up being coupled with the parameter name change due to updates to the layer unit tests.
2014-11-26 20:16:58 +00:00
if !verifier.Verified() {
t.Fatalf("response body did not pass verification")
}
}
Initial implementation of Layer API The http API has its first set of endpoints to implement the core aspects of fetching and uploading layers. Uploads can be started and completed in a single chunk and the content can be fetched via tarsum. Most proposed error conditions should be represented but edge cases likely remain. In this version, note that the layers are still called layers, even though the routes are pointing to blobs. This will change with backend refactoring over the next few weeks. The unit tests are a bit of a shamble but these need to be carefully written along with the core specification process. As the the client-server interaction solidifies, we can port this into a verification suite for registry providers.
2014-11-21 03:57:01 +00:00
Initial implementation of Manifest HTTP API Push, pull and delete of manifest files in the registry have been implemented on top of the storage services. Basic workflows, including reporting of missing manifests are tested, including various proposed response codes. Common testing functionality has been collected into shared methods. A test suite may be emerging but it might better to capture more edge cases (such as resumable upload, range requests, etc.) before we commit to a full approach. To support clearer test cases and simpler handler methods, an application aware urlBuilder has been added. We may want to export the functionality for use in the client, which could allow us to abstract away from gorilla/mux. A few error codes have been added to fill in error conditions missing from the proposal. Some use cases have identified some problems with the approach to error reporting that requires more work to reconcile. To resolve this, the mapping of Go errors into error types needs to pulled out of the handlers and into the application. We also need to move to type-based errors, with rich information, rather than value-based errors. ErrorHandlers will probably replace the http.Handlers to make this work correctly. Unrelated to the above, the "length" parameter has been migrated to "size" for completing layer uploads. This change should have gone out before but these diffs ending up being coupled with the parameter name change due to updates to the layer unit tests.
2014-11-26 20:16:58 +00:00
func TestManifestAPI(t *testing.T) {
pk, err := libtrust.GenerateECP256PrivateKey()
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unexpected error generating private key: %v", err)
Initial implementation of Layer API The http API has its first set of endpoints to implement the core aspects of fetching and uploading layers. Uploads can be started and completed in a single chunk and the content can be fetched via tarsum. Most proposed error conditions should be represented but edge cases likely remain. In this version, note that the layers are still called layers, even though the routes are pointing to blobs. This will change with backend refactoring over the next few weeks. The unit tests are a bit of a shamble but these need to be carefully written along with the core specification process. As the the client-server interaction solidifies, we can port this into a verification suite for registry providers.
2014-11-21 03:57:01 +00:00
}
Initial implementation of Manifest HTTP API Push, pull and delete of manifest files in the registry have been implemented on top of the storage services. Basic workflows, including reporting of missing manifests are tested, including various proposed response codes. Common testing functionality has been collected into shared methods. A test suite may be emerging but it might better to capture more edge cases (such as resumable upload, range requests, etc.) before we commit to a full approach. To support clearer test cases and simpler handler methods, an application aware urlBuilder has been added. We may want to export the functionality for use in the client, which could allow us to abstract away from gorilla/mux. A few error codes have been added to fill in error conditions missing from the proposal. Some use cases have identified some problems with the approach to error reporting that requires more work to reconcile. To resolve this, the mapping of Go errors into error types needs to pulled out of the handlers and into the application. We also need to move to type-based errors, with rich information, rather than value-based errors. ErrorHandlers will probably replace the http.Handlers to make this work correctly. Unrelated to the above, the "length" parameter has been migrated to "size" for completing layer uploads. This change should have gone out before but these diffs ending up being coupled with the parameter name change due to updates to the layer unit tests.
2014-11-26 20:16:58 +00:00
config := configuration.Configuration{
Storage: configuration.Storage{
"inmemory": configuration.Parameters{},
},
}
app := NewApp(config)
server := httptest.NewServer(handlers.CombinedLoggingHandler(os.Stderr, app))
builder, err := newURLBuilderFromString(server.URL)
Initial implementation of Layer API The http API has its first set of endpoints to implement the core aspects of fetching and uploading layers. Uploads can be started and completed in a single chunk and the content can be fetched via tarsum. Most proposed error conditions should be represented but edge cases likely remain. In this version, note that the layers are still called layers, even though the routes are pointing to blobs. This will change with backend refactoring over the next few weeks. The unit tests are a bit of a shamble but these need to be carefully written along with the core specification process. As the the client-server interaction solidifies, we can port this into a verification suite for registry providers.
2014-11-21 03:57:01 +00:00
if err != nil {
Initial implementation of Manifest HTTP API Push, pull and delete of manifest files in the registry have been implemented on top of the storage services. Basic workflows, including reporting of missing manifests are tested, including various proposed response codes. Common testing functionality has been collected into shared methods. A test suite may be emerging but it might better to capture more edge cases (such as resumable upload, range requests, etc.) before we commit to a full approach. To support clearer test cases and simpler handler methods, an application aware urlBuilder has been added. We may want to export the functionality for use in the client, which could allow us to abstract away from gorilla/mux. A few error codes have been added to fill in error conditions missing from the proposal. Some use cases have identified some problems with the approach to error reporting that requires more work to reconcile. To resolve this, the mapping of Go errors into error types needs to pulled out of the handlers and into the application. We also need to move to type-based errors, with rich information, rather than value-based errors. ErrorHandlers will probably replace the http.Handlers to make this work correctly. Unrelated to the above, the "length" parameter has been migrated to "size" for completing layer uploads. This change should have gone out before but these diffs ending up being coupled with the parameter name change due to updates to the layer unit tests.
2014-11-26 20:16:58 +00:00
t.Fatalf("unexpected error creating url builder: %v", err)
Initial implementation of Layer API The http API has its first set of endpoints to implement the core aspects of fetching and uploading layers. Uploads can be started and completed in a single chunk and the content can be fetched via tarsum. Most proposed error conditions should be represented but edge cases likely remain. In this version, note that the layers are still called layers, even though the routes are pointing to blobs. This will change with backend refactoring over the next few weeks. The unit tests are a bit of a shamble but these need to be carefully written along with the core specification process. As the the client-server interaction solidifies, we can port this into a verification suite for registry providers.
2014-11-21 03:57:01 +00:00
}
Initial implementation of Manifest HTTP API Push, pull and delete of manifest files in the registry have been implemented on top of the storage services. Basic workflows, including reporting of missing manifests are tested, including various proposed response codes. Common testing functionality has been collected into shared methods. A test suite may be emerging but it might better to capture more edge cases (such as resumable upload, range requests, etc.) before we commit to a full approach. To support clearer test cases and simpler handler methods, an application aware urlBuilder has been added. We may want to export the functionality for use in the client, which could allow us to abstract away from gorilla/mux. A few error codes have been added to fill in error conditions missing from the proposal. Some use cases have identified some problems with the approach to error reporting that requires more work to reconcile. To resolve this, the mapping of Go errors into error types needs to pulled out of the handlers and into the application. We also need to move to type-based errors, with rich information, rather than value-based errors. ErrorHandlers will probably replace the http.Handlers to make this work correctly. Unrelated to the above, the "length" parameter has been migrated to "size" for completing layer uploads. This change should have gone out before but these diffs ending up being coupled with the parameter name change due to updates to the layer unit tests.
2014-11-26 20:16:58 +00:00
imageName := "foo/bar"
tag := "thetag"
Initial implementation of Layer API The http API has its first set of endpoints to implement the core aspects of fetching and uploading layers. Uploads can be started and completed in a single chunk and the content can be fetched via tarsum. Most proposed error conditions should be represented but edge cases likely remain. In this version, note that the layers are still called layers, even though the routes are pointing to blobs. This will change with backend refactoring over the next few weeks. The unit tests are a bit of a shamble but these need to be carefully written along with the core specification process. As the the client-server interaction solidifies, we can port this into a verification suite for registry providers.
2014-11-21 03:57:01 +00:00
Initial implementation of Manifest HTTP API Push, pull and delete of manifest files in the registry have been implemented on top of the storage services. Basic workflows, including reporting of missing manifests are tested, including various proposed response codes. Common testing functionality has been collected into shared methods. A test suite may be emerging but it might better to capture more edge cases (such as resumable upload, range requests, etc.) before we commit to a full approach. To support clearer test cases and simpler handler methods, an application aware urlBuilder has been added. We may want to export the functionality for use in the client, which could allow us to abstract away from gorilla/mux. A few error codes have been added to fill in error conditions missing from the proposal. Some use cases have identified some problems with the approach to error reporting that requires more work to reconcile. To resolve this, the mapping of Go errors into error types needs to pulled out of the handlers and into the application. We also need to move to type-based errors, with rich information, rather than value-based errors. ErrorHandlers will probably replace the http.Handlers to make this work correctly. Unrelated to the above, the "length" parameter has been migrated to "size" for completing layer uploads. This change should have gone out before but these diffs ending up being coupled with the parameter name change due to updates to the layer unit tests.
2014-11-26 20:16:58 +00:00
manifestURL, err := builder.buildManifestURL(imageName, tag)
Initial implementation of Layer API The http API has its first set of endpoints to implement the core aspects of fetching and uploading layers. Uploads can be started and completed in a single chunk and the content can be fetched via tarsum. Most proposed error conditions should be represented but edge cases likely remain. In this version, note that the layers are still called layers, even though the routes are pointing to blobs. This will change with backend refactoring over the next few weeks. The unit tests are a bit of a shamble but these need to be carefully written along with the core specification process. As the the client-server interaction solidifies, we can port this into a verification suite for registry providers.
2014-11-21 03:57:01 +00:00
if err != nil {
Initial implementation of Manifest HTTP API Push, pull and delete of manifest files in the registry have been implemented on top of the storage services. Basic workflows, including reporting of missing manifests are tested, including various proposed response codes. Common testing functionality has been collected into shared methods. A test suite may be emerging but it might better to capture more edge cases (such as resumable upload, range requests, etc.) before we commit to a full approach. To support clearer test cases and simpler handler methods, an application aware urlBuilder has been added. We may want to export the functionality for use in the client, which could allow us to abstract away from gorilla/mux. A few error codes have been added to fill in error conditions missing from the proposal. Some use cases have identified some problems with the approach to error reporting that requires more work to reconcile. To resolve this, the mapping of Go errors into error types needs to pulled out of the handlers and into the application. We also need to move to type-based errors, with rich information, rather than value-based errors. ErrorHandlers will probably replace the http.Handlers to make this work correctly. Unrelated to the above, the "length" parameter has been migrated to "size" for completing layer uploads. This change should have gone out before but these diffs ending up being coupled with the parameter name change due to updates to the layer unit tests.
2014-11-26 20:16:58 +00:00
t.Fatalf("unexpected error getting manifest url: %v", err)
Initial implementation of Layer API The http API has its first set of endpoints to implement the core aspects of fetching and uploading layers. Uploads can be started and completed in a single chunk and the content can be fetched via tarsum. Most proposed error conditions should be represented but edge cases likely remain. In this version, note that the layers are still called layers, even though the routes are pointing to blobs. This will change with backend refactoring over the next few weeks. The unit tests are a bit of a shamble but these need to be carefully written along with the core specification process. As the the client-server interaction solidifies, we can port this into a verification suite for registry providers.
2014-11-21 03:57:01 +00:00
}
Initial implementation of Manifest HTTP API Push, pull and delete of manifest files in the registry have been implemented on top of the storage services. Basic workflows, including reporting of missing manifests are tested, including various proposed response codes. Common testing functionality has been collected into shared methods. A test suite may be emerging but it might better to capture more edge cases (such as resumable upload, range requests, etc.) before we commit to a full approach. To support clearer test cases and simpler handler methods, an application aware urlBuilder has been added. We may want to export the functionality for use in the client, which could allow us to abstract away from gorilla/mux. A few error codes have been added to fill in error conditions missing from the proposal. Some use cases have identified some problems with the approach to error reporting that requires more work to reconcile. To resolve this, the mapping of Go errors into error types needs to pulled out of the handlers and into the application. We also need to move to type-based errors, with rich information, rather than value-based errors. ErrorHandlers will probably replace the http.Handlers to make this work correctly. Unrelated to the above, the "length" parameter has been migrated to "size" for completing layer uploads. This change should have gone out before but these diffs ending up being coupled with the parameter name change due to updates to the layer unit tests.
2014-11-26 20:16:58 +00:00
// -----------------------------
// Attempt to fetch the manifest
resp, err := http.Get(manifestURL)
Initial implementation of Layer API The http API has its first set of endpoints to implement the core aspects of fetching and uploading layers. Uploads can be started and completed in a single chunk and the content can be fetched via tarsum. Most proposed error conditions should be represented but edge cases likely remain. In this version, note that the layers are still called layers, even though the routes are pointing to blobs. This will change with backend refactoring over the next few weeks. The unit tests are a bit of a shamble but these need to be carefully written along with the core specification process. As the the client-server interaction solidifies, we can port this into a verification suite for registry providers.
2014-11-21 03:57:01 +00:00
if err != nil {
Initial implementation of Manifest HTTP API Push, pull and delete of manifest files in the registry have been implemented on top of the storage services. Basic workflows, including reporting of missing manifests are tested, including various proposed response codes. Common testing functionality has been collected into shared methods. A test suite may be emerging but it might better to capture more edge cases (such as resumable upload, range requests, etc.) before we commit to a full approach. To support clearer test cases and simpler handler methods, an application aware urlBuilder has been added. We may want to export the functionality for use in the client, which could allow us to abstract away from gorilla/mux. A few error codes have been added to fill in error conditions missing from the proposal. Some use cases have identified some problems with the approach to error reporting that requires more work to reconcile. To resolve this, the mapping of Go errors into error types needs to pulled out of the handlers and into the application. We also need to move to type-based errors, with rich information, rather than value-based errors. ErrorHandlers will probably replace the http.Handlers to make this work correctly. Unrelated to the above, the "length" parameter has been migrated to "size" for completing layer uploads. This change should have gone out before but these diffs ending up being coupled with the parameter name change due to updates to the layer unit tests.
2014-11-26 20:16:58 +00:00
t.Fatalf("unexpected error getting manifest: %v", err)
}
defer resp.Body.Close()
checkResponse(t, "getting non-existent manifest", resp, http.StatusNotFound)
// TODO(stevvooe): Shoot. The error setup is not working out. The content-
// type headers are being set after writing the status code.
// if resp.Header.Get("Content-Type") != "application/json" {
// t.Fatalf("unexpected content type: %v != 'application/json'",
// resp.Header.Get("Content-Type"))
// }
dec := json.NewDecoder(resp.Body)
var respErrs struct {
Errors []Error
}
if err := dec.Decode(&respErrs); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unexpected error decoding error response: %v", err)
Initial implementation of Layer API The http API has its first set of endpoints to implement the core aspects of fetching and uploading layers. Uploads can be started and completed in a single chunk and the content can be fetched via tarsum. Most proposed error conditions should be represented but edge cases likely remain. In this version, note that the layers are still called layers, even though the routes are pointing to blobs. This will change with backend refactoring over the next few weeks. The unit tests are a bit of a shamble but these need to be carefully written along with the core specification process. As the the client-server interaction solidifies, we can port this into a verification suite for registry providers.
2014-11-21 03:57:01 +00:00
}
Initial implementation of Manifest HTTP API Push, pull and delete of manifest files in the registry have been implemented on top of the storage services. Basic workflows, including reporting of missing manifests are tested, including various proposed response codes. Common testing functionality has been collected into shared methods. A test suite may be emerging but it might better to capture more edge cases (such as resumable upload, range requests, etc.) before we commit to a full approach. To support clearer test cases and simpler handler methods, an application aware urlBuilder has been added. We may want to export the functionality for use in the client, which could allow us to abstract away from gorilla/mux. A few error codes have been added to fill in error conditions missing from the proposal. Some use cases have identified some problems with the approach to error reporting that requires more work to reconcile. To resolve this, the mapping of Go errors into error types needs to pulled out of the handlers and into the application. We also need to move to type-based errors, with rich information, rather than value-based errors. ErrorHandlers will probably replace the http.Handlers to make this work correctly. Unrelated to the above, the "length" parameter has been migrated to "size" for completing layer uploads. This change should have gone out before but these diffs ending up being coupled with the parameter name change due to updates to the layer unit tests.
2014-11-26 20:16:58 +00:00
if len(respErrs.Errors) == 0 {
t.Fatalf("expected errors in response")
}
if respErrs.Errors[0].Code != ErrorCodeUnknownManifest {
t.Fatalf("expected manifest unknown error: got %v", respErrs)
}
// --------------------------------
// Attempt to push unsigned manifest with missing layers
unsignedManifest := &storage.Manifest{
Name: imageName,
Tag: tag,
FSLayers: []storage.FSLayer{
{
BlobSum: "asdf",
},
{
BlobSum: "qwer",
},
},
}
resp = putManifest(t, "putting unsigned manifest", manifestURL, unsignedManifest)
Initial implementation of Layer API The http API has its first set of endpoints to implement the core aspects of fetching and uploading layers. Uploads can be started and completed in a single chunk and the content can be fetched via tarsum. Most proposed error conditions should be represented but edge cases likely remain. In this version, note that the layers are still called layers, even though the routes are pointing to blobs. This will change with backend refactoring over the next few weeks. The unit tests are a bit of a shamble but these need to be carefully written along with the core specification process. As the the client-server interaction solidifies, we can port this into a verification suite for registry providers.
2014-11-21 03:57:01 +00:00
defer resp.Body.Close()
Initial implementation of Manifest HTTP API Push, pull and delete of manifest files in the registry have been implemented on top of the storage services. Basic workflows, including reporting of missing manifests are tested, including various proposed response codes. Common testing functionality has been collected into shared methods. A test suite may be emerging but it might better to capture more edge cases (such as resumable upload, range requests, etc.) before we commit to a full approach. To support clearer test cases and simpler handler methods, an application aware urlBuilder has been added. We may want to export the functionality for use in the client, which could allow us to abstract away from gorilla/mux. A few error codes have been added to fill in error conditions missing from the proposal. Some use cases have identified some problems with the approach to error reporting that requires more work to reconcile. To resolve this, the mapping of Go errors into error types needs to pulled out of the handlers and into the application. We also need to move to type-based errors, with rich information, rather than value-based errors. ErrorHandlers will probably replace the http.Handlers to make this work correctly. Unrelated to the above, the "length" parameter has been migrated to "size" for completing layer uploads. This change should have gone out before but these diffs ending up being coupled with the parameter name change due to updates to the layer unit tests.
2014-11-26 20:16:58 +00:00
checkResponse(t, "posting unsigned manifest", resp, http.StatusBadRequest)
dec = json.NewDecoder(resp.Body)
if err := dec.Decode(&respErrs); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unexpected error decoding error response: %v", err)
}
var unverified int
var missingLayers int
var invalidDigests int
for _, err := range respErrs.Errors {
switch err.Code {
case ErrorCodeUnverifiedManifest:
unverified++
case ErrorCodeUnknownLayer:
missingLayers++
case ErrorCodeInvalidDigest:
// TODO(stevvooe): This error isn't quite descriptive enough --
// the layer with an invalid digest isn't identified.
invalidDigests++
default:
t.Fatalf("unexpected error: %v", err)
}
}
if unverified != 1 {
t.Fatalf("should have received one unverified manifest error: %v", respErrs)
}
if missingLayers != 2 {
t.Fatalf("should have received two missing layer errors: %v", respErrs)
}
if invalidDigests != 2 {
t.Fatalf("should have received two invalid digest errors: %v", respErrs)
}
// Push 2 random layers
expectedLayers := make(map[digest.Digest]io.ReadSeeker)
for i := range unsignedManifest.FSLayers {
rs, dgstStr, err := testutil.CreateRandomTarFile()
Initial implementation of Layer API The http API has its first set of endpoints to implement the core aspects of fetching and uploading layers. Uploads can be started and completed in a single chunk and the content can be fetched via tarsum. Most proposed error conditions should be represented but edge cases likely remain. In this version, note that the layers are still called layers, even though the routes are pointing to blobs. This will change with backend refactoring over the next few weeks. The unit tests are a bit of a shamble but these need to be carefully written along with the core specification process. As the the client-server interaction solidifies, we can port this into a verification suite for registry providers.
2014-11-21 03:57:01 +00:00
if err != nil {
Initial implementation of Manifest HTTP API Push, pull and delete of manifest files in the registry have been implemented on top of the storage services. Basic workflows, including reporting of missing manifests are tested, including various proposed response codes. Common testing functionality has been collected into shared methods. A test suite may be emerging but it might better to capture more edge cases (such as resumable upload, range requests, etc.) before we commit to a full approach. To support clearer test cases and simpler handler methods, an application aware urlBuilder has been added. We may want to export the functionality for use in the client, which could allow us to abstract away from gorilla/mux. A few error codes have been added to fill in error conditions missing from the proposal. Some use cases have identified some problems with the approach to error reporting that requires more work to reconcile. To resolve this, the mapping of Go errors into error types needs to pulled out of the handlers and into the application. We also need to move to type-based errors, with rich information, rather than value-based errors. ErrorHandlers will probably replace the http.Handlers to make this work correctly. Unrelated to the above, the "length" parameter has been migrated to "size" for completing layer uploads. This change should have gone out before but these diffs ending up being coupled with the parameter name change due to updates to the layer unit tests.
2014-11-26 20:16:58 +00:00
t.Fatalf("error creating random layer %d: %v", i, err)
Initial implementation of Layer API The http API has its first set of endpoints to implement the core aspects of fetching and uploading layers. Uploads can be started and completed in a single chunk and the content can be fetched via tarsum. Most proposed error conditions should be represented but edge cases likely remain. In this version, note that the layers are still called layers, even though the routes are pointing to blobs. This will change with backend refactoring over the next few weeks. The unit tests are a bit of a shamble but these need to be carefully written along with the core specification process. As the the client-server interaction solidifies, we can port this into a verification suite for registry providers.
2014-11-21 03:57:01 +00:00
}
Initial implementation of Manifest HTTP API Push, pull and delete of manifest files in the registry have been implemented on top of the storage services. Basic workflows, including reporting of missing manifests are tested, including various proposed response codes. Common testing functionality has been collected into shared methods. A test suite may be emerging but it might better to capture more edge cases (such as resumable upload, range requests, etc.) before we commit to a full approach. To support clearer test cases and simpler handler methods, an application aware urlBuilder has been added. We may want to export the functionality for use in the client, which could allow us to abstract away from gorilla/mux. A few error codes have been added to fill in error conditions missing from the proposal. Some use cases have identified some problems with the approach to error reporting that requires more work to reconcile. To resolve this, the mapping of Go errors into error types needs to pulled out of the handlers and into the application. We also need to move to type-based errors, with rich information, rather than value-based errors. ErrorHandlers will probably replace the http.Handlers to make this work correctly. Unrelated to the above, the "length" parameter has been migrated to "size" for completing layer uploads. This change should have gone out before but these diffs ending up being coupled with the parameter name change due to updates to the layer unit tests.
2014-11-26 20:16:58 +00:00
dgst := digest.Digest(dgstStr)
Initial implementation of Layer API The http API has its first set of endpoints to implement the core aspects of fetching and uploading layers. Uploads can be started and completed in a single chunk and the content can be fetched via tarsum. Most proposed error conditions should be represented but edge cases likely remain. In this version, note that the layers are still called layers, even though the routes are pointing to blobs. This will change with backend refactoring over the next few weeks. The unit tests are a bit of a shamble but these need to be carefully written along with the core specification process. As the the client-server interaction solidifies, we can port this into a verification suite for registry providers.
2014-11-21 03:57:01 +00:00
Initial implementation of Manifest HTTP API Push, pull and delete of manifest files in the registry have been implemented on top of the storage services. Basic workflows, including reporting of missing manifests are tested, including various proposed response codes. Common testing functionality has been collected into shared methods. A test suite may be emerging but it might better to capture more edge cases (such as resumable upload, range requests, etc.) before we commit to a full approach. To support clearer test cases and simpler handler methods, an application aware urlBuilder has been added. We may want to export the functionality for use in the client, which could allow us to abstract away from gorilla/mux. A few error codes have been added to fill in error conditions missing from the proposal. Some use cases have identified some problems with the approach to error reporting that requires more work to reconcile. To resolve this, the mapping of Go errors into error types needs to pulled out of the handlers and into the application. We also need to move to type-based errors, with rich information, rather than value-based errors. ErrorHandlers will probably replace the http.Handlers to make this work correctly. Unrelated to the above, the "length" parameter has been migrated to "size" for completing layer uploads. This change should have gone out before but these diffs ending up being coupled with the parameter name change due to updates to the layer unit tests.
2014-11-26 20:16:58 +00:00
expectedLayers[dgst] = rs
unsignedManifest.FSLayers[i].BlobSum = dgst
uploadURLBase := startPushLayer(t, builder, imageName)
pushLayer(t, builder, imageName, dgst, uploadURLBase, rs)
Initial implementation of Layer API The http API has its first set of endpoints to implement the core aspects of fetching and uploading layers. Uploads can be started and completed in a single chunk and the content can be fetched via tarsum. Most proposed error conditions should be represented but edge cases likely remain. In this version, note that the layers are still called layers, even though the routes are pointing to blobs. This will change with backend refactoring over the next few weeks. The unit tests are a bit of a shamble but these need to be carefully written along with the core specification process. As the the client-server interaction solidifies, we can port this into a verification suite for registry providers.
2014-11-21 03:57:01 +00:00
}
Initial implementation of Manifest HTTP API Push, pull and delete of manifest files in the registry have been implemented on top of the storage services. Basic workflows, including reporting of missing manifests are tested, including various proposed response codes. Common testing functionality has been collected into shared methods. A test suite may be emerging but it might better to capture more edge cases (such as resumable upload, range requests, etc.) before we commit to a full approach. To support clearer test cases and simpler handler methods, an application aware urlBuilder has been added. We may want to export the functionality for use in the client, which could allow us to abstract away from gorilla/mux. A few error codes have been added to fill in error conditions missing from the proposal. Some use cases have identified some problems with the approach to error reporting that requires more work to reconcile. To resolve this, the mapping of Go errors into error types needs to pulled out of the handlers and into the application. We also need to move to type-based errors, with rich information, rather than value-based errors. ErrorHandlers will probably replace the http.Handlers to make this work correctly. Unrelated to the above, the "length" parameter has been migrated to "size" for completing layer uploads. This change should have gone out before but these diffs ending up being coupled with the parameter name change due to updates to the layer unit tests.
2014-11-26 20:16:58 +00:00
// -------------------
// Push the signed manifest with all layers pushed.
signedManifest, err := unsignedManifest.Sign(pk)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unexpected error signing manifest: %v", err)
Initial implementation of Layer API The http API has its first set of endpoints to implement the core aspects of fetching and uploading layers. Uploads can be started and completed in a single chunk and the content can be fetched via tarsum. Most proposed error conditions should be represented but edge cases likely remain. In this version, note that the layers are still called layers, even though the routes are pointing to blobs. This will change with backend refactoring over the next few weeks. The unit tests are a bit of a shamble but these need to be carefully written along with the core specification process. As the the client-server interaction solidifies, we can port this into a verification suite for registry providers.
2014-11-21 03:57:01 +00:00
}
Initial implementation of Manifest HTTP API Push, pull and delete of manifest files in the registry have been implemented on top of the storage services. Basic workflows, including reporting of missing manifests are tested, including various proposed response codes. Common testing functionality has been collected into shared methods. A test suite may be emerging but it might better to capture more edge cases (such as resumable upload, range requests, etc.) before we commit to a full approach. To support clearer test cases and simpler handler methods, an application aware urlBuilder has been added. We may want to export the functionality for use in the client, which could allow us to abstract away from gorilla/mux. A few error codes have been added to fill in error conditions missing from the proposal. Some use cases have identified some problems with the approach to error reporting that requires more work to reconcile. To resolve this, the mapping of Go errors into error types needs to pulled out of the handlers and into the application. We also need to move to type-based errors, with rich information, rather than value-based errors. ErrorHandlers will probably replace the http.Handlers to make this work correctly. Unrelated to the above, the "length" parameter has been migrated to "size" for completing layer uploads. This change should have gone out before but these diffs ending up being coupled with the parameter name change due to updates to the layer unit tests.
2014-11-26 20:16:58 +00:00
resp = putManifest(t, "putting signed manifest", manifestURL, signedManifest)
checkResponse(t, "putting manifest", resp, http.StatusOK)
resp, err = http.Get(manifestURL)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unexpected error fetching manifest: %v", err)
Initial implementation of Layer API The http API has its first set of endpoints to implement the core aspects of fetching and uploading layers. Uploads can be started and completed in a single chunk and the content can be fetched via tarsum. Most proposed error conditions should be represented but edge cases likely remain. In this version, note that the layers are still called layers, even though the routes are pointing to blobs. This will change with backend refactoring over the next few weeks. The unit tests are a bit of a shamble but these need to be carefully written along with the core specification process. As the the client-server interaction solidifies, we can port this into a verification suite for registry providers.
2014-11-21 03:57:01 +00:00
}
Initial implementation of Manifest HTTP API Push, pull and delete of manifest files in the registry have been implemented on top of the storage services. Basic workflows, including reporting of missing manifests are tested, including various proposed response codes. Common testing functionality has been collected into shared methods. A test suite may be emerging but it might better to capture more edge cases (such as resumable upload, range requests, etc.) before we commit to a full approach. To support clearer test cases and simpler handler methods, an application aware urlBuilder has been added. We may want to export the functionality for use in the client, which could allow us to abstract away from gorilla/mux. A few error codes have been added to fill in error conditions missing from the proposal. Some use cases have identified some problems with the approach to error reporting that requires more work to reconcile. To resolve this, the mapping of Go errors into error types needs to pulled out of the handlers and into the application. We also need to move to type-based errors, with rich information, rather than value-based errors. ErrorHandlers will probably replace the http.Handlers to make this work correctly. Unrelated to the above, the "length" parameter has been migrated to "size" for completing layer uploads. This change should have gone out before but these diffs ending up being coupled with the parameter name change due to updates to the layer unit tests.
2014-11-26 20:16:58 +00:00
defer resp.Body.Close()
Initial implementation of Layer API The http API has its first set of endpoints to implement the core aspects of fetching and uploading layers. Uploads can be started and completed in a single chunk and the content can be fetched via tarsum. Most proposed error conditions should be represented but edge cases likely remain. In this version, note that the layers are still called layers, even though the routes are pointing to blobs. This will change with backend refactoring over the next few weeks. The unit tests are a bit of a shamble but these need to be carefully written along with the core specification process. As the the client-server interaction solidifies, we can port this into a verification suite for registry providers.
2014-11-21 03:57:01 +00:00
Initial implementation of Manifest HTTP API Push, pull and delete of manifest files in the registry have been implemented on top of the storage services. Basic workflows, including reporting of missing manifests are tested, including various proposed response codes. Common testing functionality has been collected into shared methods. A test suite may be emerging but it might better to capture more edge cases (such as resumable upload, range requests, etc.) before we commit to a full approach. To support clearer test cases and simpler handler methods, an application aware urlBuilder has been added. We may want to export the functionality for use in the client, which could allow us to abstract away from gorilla/mux. A few error codes have been added to fill in error conditions missing from the proposal. Some use cases have identified some problems with the approach to error reporting that requires more work to reconcile. To resolve this, the mapping of Go errors into error types needs to pulled out of the handlers and into the application. We also need to move to type-based errors, with rich information, rather than value-based errors. ErrorHandlers will probably replace the http.Handlers to make this work correctly. Unrelated to the above, the "length" parameter has been migrated to "size" for completing layer uploads. This change should have gone out before but these diffs ending up being coupled with the parameter name change due to updates to the layer unit tests.
2014-11-26 20:16:58 +00:00
checkResponse(t, "fetching uploaded manifest", resp, http.StatusOK)
Initial implementation of Layer API The http API has its first set of endpoints to implement the core aspects of fetching and uploading layers. Uploads can be started and completed in a single chunk and the content can be fetched via tarsum. Most proposed error conditions should be represented but edge cases likely remain. In this version, note that the layers are still called layers, even though the routes are pointing to blobs. This will change with backend refactoring over the next few weeks. The unit tests are a bit of a shamble but these need to be carefully written along with the core specification process. As the the client-server interaction solidifies, we can port this into a verification suite for registry providers.
2014-11-21 03:57:01 +00:00
Initial implementation of Manifest HTTP API Push, pull and delete of manifest files in the registry have been implemented on top of the storage services. Basic workflows, including reporting of missing manifests are tested, including various proposed response codes. Common testing functionality has been collected into shared methods. A test suite may be emerging but it might better to capture more edge cases (such as resumable upload, range requests, etc.) before we commit to a full approach. To support clearer test cases and simpler handler methods, an application aware urlBuilder has been added. We may want to export the functionality for use in the client, which could allow us to abstract away from gorilla/mux. A few error codes have been added to fill in error conditions missing from the proposal. Some use cases have identified some problems with the approach to error reporting that requires more work to reconcile. To resolve this, the mapping of Go errors into error types needs to pulled out of the handlers and into the application. We also need to move to type-based errors, with rich information, rather than value-based errors. ErrorHandlers will probably replace the http.Handlers to make this work correctly. Unrelated to the above, the "length" parameter has been migrated to "size" for completing layer uploads. This change should have gone out before but these diffs ending up being coupled with the parameter name change due to updates to the layer unit tests.
2014-11-26 20:16:58 +00:00
var fetchedManifest storage.SignedManifest
dec = json.NewDecoder(resp.Body)
if err := dec.Decode(&fetchedManifest); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("error decoding fetched manifest: %v", err)
}
if !bytes.Equal(fetchedManifest.Raw, signedManifest.Raw) {
t.Fatalf("manifests do not match")
}
}
func putManifest(t *testing.T, msg, url string, v interface{}) *http.Response {
body, err := json.Marshal(v)
Initial implementation of Layer API The http API has its first set of endpoints to implement the core aspects of fetching and uploading layers. Uploads can be started and completed in a single chunk and the content can be fetched via tarsum. Most proposed error conditions should be represented but edge cases likely remain. In this version, note that the layers are still called layers, even though the routes are pointing to blobs. This will change with backend refactoring over the next few weeks. The unit tests are a bit of a shamble but these need to be carefully written along with the core specification process. As the the client-server interaction solidifies, we can port this into a verification suite for registry providers.
2014-11-21 03:57:01 +00:00
if err != nil {
Initial implementation of Manifest HTTP API Push, pull and delete of manifest files in the registry have been implemented on top of the storage services. Basic workflows, including reporting of missing manifests are tested, including various proposed response codes. Common testing functionality has been collected into shared methods. A test suite may be emerging but it might better to capture more edge cases (such as resumable upload, range requests, etc.) before we commit to a full approach. To support clearer test cases and simpler handler methods, an application aware urlBuilder has been added. We may want to export the functionality for use in the client, which could allow us to abstract away from gorilla/mux. A few error codes have been added to fill in error conditions missing from the proposal. Some use cases have identified some problems with the approach to error reporting that requires more work to reconcile. To resolve this, the mapping of Go errors into error types needs to pulled out of the handlers and into the application. We also need to move to type-based errors, with rich information, rather than value-based errors. ErrorHandlers will probably replace the http.Handlers to make this work correctly. Unrelated to the above, the "length" parameter has been migrated to "size" for completing layer uploads. This change should have gone out before but these diffs ending up being coupled with the parameter name change due to updates to the layer unit tests.
2014-11-26 20:16:58 +00:00
t.Fatalf("unexpected error marshaling %v: %v", v, err)
Initial implementation of Layer API The http API has its first set of endpoints to implement the core aspects of fetching and uploading layers. Uploads can be started and completed in a single chunk and the content can be fetched via tarsum. Most proposed error conditions should be represented but edge cases likely remain. In this version, note that the layers are still called layers, even though the routes are pointing to blobs. This will change with backend refactoring over the next few weeks. The unit tests are a bit of a shamble but these need to be carefully written along with the core specification process. As the the client-server interaction solidifies, we can port this into a verification suite for registry providers.
2014-11-21 03:57:01 +00:00
}
Initial implementation of Manifest HTTP API Push, pull and delete of manifest files in the registry have been implemented on top of the storage services. Basic workflows, including reporting of missing manifests are tested, including various proposed response codes. Common testing functionality has been collected into shared methods. A test suite may be emerging but it might better to capture more edge cases (such as resumable upload, range requests, etc.) before we commit to a full approach. To support clearer test cases and simpler handler methods, an application aware urlBuilder has been added. We may want to export the functionality for use in the client, which could allow us to abstract away from gorilla/mux. A few error codes have been added to fill in error conditions missing from the proposal. Some use cases have identified some problems with the approach to error reporting that requires more work to reconcile. To resolve this, the mapping of Go errors into error types needs to pulled out of the handlers and into the application. We also need to move to type-based errors, with rich information, rather than value-based errors. ErrorHandlers will probably replace the http.Handlers to make this work correctly. Unrelated to the above, the "length" parameter has been migrated to "size" for completing layer uploads. This change should have gone out before but these diffs ending up being coupled with the parameter name change due to updates to the layer unit tests.
2014-11-26 20:16:58 +00:00
req, err := http.NewRequest("PUT", url, bytes.NewReader(body))
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("error creating request for %s: %v", msg, err)
}
Initial implementation of Layer API The http API has its first set of endpoints to implement the core aspects of fetching and uploading layers. Uploads can be started and completed in a single chunk and the content can be fetched via tarsum. Most proposed error conditions should be represented but edge cases likely remain. In this version, note that the layers are still called layers, even though the routes are pointing to blobs. This will change with backend refactoring over the next few weeks. The unit tests are a bit of a shamble but these need to be carefully written along with the core specification process. As the the client-server interaction solidifies, we can port this into a verification suite for registry providers.
2014-11-21 03:57:01 +00:00
Initial implementation of Manifest HTTP API Push, pull and delete of manifest files in the registry have been implemented on top of the storage services. Basic workflows, including reporting of missing manifests are tested, including various proposed response codes. Common testing functionality has been collected into shared methods. A test suite may be emerging but it might better to capture more edge cases (such as resumable upload, range requests, etc.) before we commit to a full approach. To support clearer test cases and simpler handler methods, an application aware urlBuilder has been added. We may want to export the functionality for use in the client, which could allow us to abstract away from gorilla/mux. A few error codes have been added to fill in error conditions missing from the proposal. Some use cases have identified some problems with the approach to error reporting that requires more work to reconcile. To resolve this, the mapping of Go errors into error types needs to pulled out of the handlers and into the application. We also need to move to type-based errors, with rich information, rather than value-based errors. ErrorHandlers will probably replace the http.Handlers to make this work correctly. Unrelated to the above, the "length" parameter has been migrated to "size" for completing layer uploads. This change should have gone out before but these diffs ending up being coupled with the parameter name change due to updates to the layer unit tests.
2014-11-26 20:16:58 +00:00
resp, err := http.DefaultClient.Do(req)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("error doing put request while %s: %v", msg, err)
Initial implementation of Layer API The http API has its first set of endpoints to implement the core aspects of fetching and uploading layers. Uploads can be started and completed in a single chunk and the content can be fetched via tarsum. Most proposed error conditions should be represented but edge cases likely remain. In this version, note that the layers are still called layers, even though the routes are pointing to blobs. This will change with backend refactoring over the next few weeks. The unit tests are a bit of a shamble but these need to be carefully written along with the core specification process. As the the client-server interaction solidifies, we can port this into a verification suite for registry providers.
2014-11-21 03:57:01 +00:00
}
Initial implementation of Manifest HTTP API Push, pull and delete of manifest files in the registry have been implemented on top of the storage services. Basic workflows, including reporting of missing manifests are tested, including various proposed response codes. Common testing functionality has been collected into shared methods. A test suite may be emerging but it might better to capture more edge cases (such as resumable upload, range requests, etc.) before we commit to a full approach. To support clearer test cases and simpler handler methods, an application aware urlBuilder has been added. We may want to export the functionality for use in the client, which could allow us to abstract away from gorilla/mux. A few error codes have been added to fill in error conditions missing from the proposal. Some use cases have identified some problems with the approach to error reporting that requires more work to reconcile. To resolve this, the mapping of Go errors into error types needs to pulled out of the handlers and into the application. We also need to move to type-based errors, with rich information, rather than value-based errors. ErrorHandlers will probably replace the http.Handlers to make this work correctly. Unrelated to the above, the "length" parameter has been migrated to "size" for completing layer uploads. This change should have gone out before but these diffs ending up being coupled with the parameter name change due to updates to the layer unit tests.
2014-11-26 20:16:58 +00:00
return resp
}
func startPushLayer(t *testing.T, ub *urlBuilder, name string) string {
layerUploadURL, err := ub.buildLayerUploadURL(name)
Initial implementation of Layer API The http API has its first set of endpoints to implement the core aspects of fetching and uploading layers. Uploads can be started and completed in a single chunk and the content can be fetched via tarsum. Most proposed error conditions should be represented but edge cases likely remain. In this version, note that the layers are still called layers, even though the routes are pointing to blobs. This will change with backend refactoring over the next few weeks. The unit tests are a bit of a shamble but these need to be carefully written along with the core specification process. As the the client-server interaction solidifies, we can port this into a verification suite for registry providers.
2014-11-21 03:57:01 +00:00
if err != nil {
Initial implementation of Manifest HTTP API Push, pull and delete of manifest files in the registry have been implemented on top of the storage services. Basic workflows, including reporting of missing manifests are tested, including various proposed response codes. Common testing functionality has been collected into shared methods. A test suite may be emerging but it might better to capture more edge cases (such as resumable upload, range requests, etc.) before we commit to a full approach. To support clearer test cases and simpler handler methods, an application aware urlBuilder has been added. We may want to export the functionality for use in the client, which could allow us to abstract away from gorilla/mux. A few error codes have been added to fill in error conditions missing from the proposal. Some use cases have identified some problems with the approach to error reporting that requires more work to reconcile. To resolve this, the mapping of Go errors into error types needs to pulled out of the handlers and into the application. We also need to move to type-based errors, with rich information, rather than value-based errors. ErrorHandlers will probably replace the http.Handlers to make this work correctly. Unrelated to the above, the "length" parameter has been migrated to "size" for completing layer uploads. This change should have gone out before but these diffs ending up being coupled with the parameter name change due to updates to the layer unit tests.
2014-11-26 20:16:58 +00:00
t.Fatalf("unexpected error building layer upload url: %v", err)
Initial implementation of Layer API The http API has its first set of endpoints to implement the core aspects of fetching and uploading layers. Uploads can be started and completed in a single chunk and the content can be fetched via tarsum. Most proposed error conditions should be represented but edge cases likely remain. In this version, note that the layers are still called layers, even though the routes are pointing to blobs. This will change with backend refactoring over the next few weeks. The unit tests are a bit of a shamble but these need to be carefully written along with the core specification process. As the the client-server interaction solidifies, we can port this into a verification suite for registry providers.
2014-11-21 03:57:01 +00:00
}
Initial implementation of Manifest HTTP API Push, pull and delete of manifest files in the registry have been implemented on top of the storage services. Basic workflows, including reporting of missing manifests are tested, including various proposed response codes. Common testing functionality has been collected into shared methods. A test suite may be emerging but it might better to capture more edge cases (such as resumable upload, range requests, etc.) before we commit to a full approach. To support clearer test cases and simpler handler methods, an application aware urlBuilder has been added. We may want to export the functionality for use in the client, which could allow us to abstract away from gorilla/mux. A few error codes have been added to fill in error conditions missing from the proposal. Some use cases have identified some problems with the approach to error reporting that requires more work to reconcile. To resolve this, the mapping of Go errors into error types needs to pulled out of the handlers and into the application. We also need to move to type-based errors, with rich information, rather than value-based errors. ErrorHandlers will probably replace the http.Handlers to make this work correctly. Unrelated to the above, the "length" parameter has been migrated to "size" for completing layer uploads. This change should have gone out before but these diffs ending up being coupled with the parameter name change due to updates to the layer unit tests.
2014-11-26 20:16:58 +00:00
resp, err := http.Post(layerUploadURL, "", nil)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unexpected error starting layer push: %v", err)
}
defer resp.Body.Close()
Initial implementation of Layer API The http API has its first set of endpoints to implement the core aspects of fetching and uploading layers. Uploads can be started and completed in a single chunk and the content can be fetched via tarsum. Most proposed error conditions should be represented but edge cases likely remain. In this version, note that the layers are still called layers, even though the routes are pointing to blobs. This will change with backend refactoring over the next few weeks. The unit tests are a bit of a shamble but these need to be carefully written along with the core specification process. As the the client-server interaction solidifies, we can port this into a verification suite for registry providers.
2014-11-21 03:57:01 +00:00
Initial implementation of Manifest HTTP API Push, pull and delete of manifest files in the registry have been implemented on top of the storage services. Basic workflows, including reporting of missing manifests are tested, including various proposed response codes. Common testing functionality has been collected into shared methods. A test suite may be emerging but it might better to capture more edge cases (such as resumable upload, range requests, etc.) before we commit to a full approach. To support clearer test cases and simpler handler methods, an application aware urlBuilder has been added. We may want to export the functionality for use in the client, which could allow us to abstract away from gorilla/mux. A few error codes have been added to fill in error conditions missing from the proposal. Some use cases have identified some problems with the approach to error reporting that requires more work to reconcile. To resolve this, the mapping of Go errors into error types needs to pulled out of the handlers and into the application. We also need to move to type-based errors, with rich information, rather than value-based errors. ErrorHandlers will probably replace the http.Handlers to make this work correctly. Unrelated to the above, the "length" parameter has been migrated to "size" for completing layer uploads. This change should have gone out before but these diffs ending up being coupled with the parameter name change due to updates to the layer unit tests.
2014-11-26 20:16:58 +00:00
checkResponse(t, fmt.Sprintf("pushing starting layer push %v", name), resp, http.StatusAccepted)
checkHeaders(t, resp, http.Header{
"Location": []string{"*"},
"Content-Length": []string{"0"},
})
return resp.Header.Get("Location")
}
// pushLayer pushes the layer content returning the url on success.
func pushLayer(t *testing.T, ub *urlBuilder, name string, dgst digest.Digest, uploadURLBase string, rs io.ReadSeeker) string {
rsLength, _ := rs.Seek(0, os.SEEK_END)
rs.Seek(0, os.SEEK_SET)
uploadURL := appendValues(uploadURLBase, url.Values{
"digest": []string{dgst.String()},
"size": []string{fmt.Sprint(rsLength)},
})
// Just do a monolithic upload
req, err := http.NewRequest("PUT", uploadURL, rs)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unexpected error creating new request: %v", err)
Initial implementation of Layer API The http API has its first set of endpoints to implement the core aspects of fetching and uploading layers. Uploads can be started and completed in a single chunk and the content can be fetched via tarsum. Most proposed error conditions should be represented but edge cases likely remain. In this version, note that the layers are still called layers, even though the routes are pointing to blobs. This will change with backend refactoring over the next few weeks. The unit tests are a bit of a shamble but these need to be carefully written along with the core specification process. As the the client-server interaction solidifies, we can port this into a verification suite for registry providers.
2014-11-21 03:57:01 +00:00
}
Initial implementation of Manifest HTTP API Push, pull and delete of manifest files in the registry have been implemented on top of the storage services. Basic workflows, including reporting of missing manifests are tested, including various proposed response codes. Common testing functionality has been collected into shared methods. A test suite may be emerging but it might better to capture more edge cases (such as resumable upload, range requests, etc.) before we commit to a full approach. To support clearer test cases and simpler handler methods, an application aware urlBuilder has been added. We may want to export the functionality for use in the client, which could allow us to abstract away from gorilla/mux. A few error codes have been added to fill in error conditions missing from the proposal. Some use cases have identified some problems with the approach to error reporting that requires more work to reconcile. To resolve this, the mapping of Go errors into error types needs to pulled out of the handlers and into the application. We also need to move to type-based errors, with rich information, rather than value-based errors. ErrorHandlers will probably replace the http.Handlers to make this work correctly. Unrelated to the above, the "length" parameter has been migrated to "size" for completing layer uploads. This change should have gone out before but these diffs ending up being coupled with the parameter name change due to updates to the layer unit tests.
2014-11-26 20:16:58 +00:00
resp, err := http.DefaultClient.Do(req)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unexpected error doing put: %v", err)
}
defer resp.Body.Close()
Initial implementation of Layer API The http API has its first set of endpoints to implement the core aspects of fetching and uploading layers. Uploads can be started and completed in a single chunk and the content can be fetched via tarsum. Most proposed error conditions should be represented but edge cases likely remain. In this version, note that the layers are still called layers, even though the routes are pointing to blobs. This will change with backend refactoring over the next few weeks. The unit tests are a bit of a shamble but these need to be carefully written along with the core specification process. As the the client-server interaction solidifies, we can port this into a verification suite for registry providers.
2014-11-21 03:57:01 +00:00
Initial implementation of Manifest HTTP API Push, pull and delete of manifest files in the registry have been implemented on top of the storage services. Basic workflows, including reporting of missing manifests are tested, including various proposed response codes. Common testing functionality has been collected into shared methods. A test suite may be emerging but it might better to capture more edge cases (such as resumable upload, range requests, etc.) before we commit to a full approach. To support clearer test cases and simpler handler methods, an application aware urlBuilder has been added. We may want to export the functionality for use in the client, which could allow us to abstract away from gorilla/mux. A few error codes have been added to fill in error conditions missing from the proposal. Some use cases have identified some problems with the approach to error reporting that requires more work to reconcile. To resolve this, the mapping of Go errors into error types needs to pulled out of the handlers and into the application. We also need to move to type-based errors, with rich information, rather than value-based errors. ErrorHandlers will probably replace the http.Handlers to make this work correctly. Unrelated to the above, the "length" parameter has been migrated to "size" for completing layer uploads. This change should have gone out before but these diffs ending up being coupled with the parameter name change due to updates to the layer unit tests.
2014-11-26 20:16:58 +00:00
checkResponse(t, "putting monolithic chunk", resp, http.StatusCreated)
expectedLayerURL, err := ub.buildLayerURL(name, dgst)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("error building expected layer url: %v", err)
}
Initial implementation of Layer API The http API has its first set of endpoints to implement the core aspects of fetching and uploading layers. Uploads can be started and completed in a single chunk and the content can be fetched via tarsum. Most proposed error conditions should be represented but edge cases likely remain. In this version, note that the layers are still called layers, even though the routes are pointing to blobs. This will change with backend refactoring over the next few weeks. The unit tests are a bit of a shamble but these need to be carefully written along with the core specification process. As the the client-server interaction solidifies, we can port this into a verification suite for registry providers.
2014-11-21 03:57:01 +00:00
Initial implementation of Manifest HTTP API Push, pull and delete of manifest files in the registry have been implemented on top of the storage services. Basic workflows, including reporting of missing manifests are tested, including various proposed response codes. Common testing functionality has been collected into shared methods. A test suite may be emerging but it might better to capture more edge cases (such as resumable upload, range requests, etc.) before we commit to a full approach. To support clearer test cases and simpler handler methods, an application aware urlBuilder has been added. We may want to export the functionality for use in the client, which could allow us to abstract away from gorilla/mux. A few error codes have been added to fill in error conditions missing from the proposal. Some use cases have identified some problems with the approach to error reporting that requires more work to reconcile. To resolve this, the mapping of Go errors into error types needs to pulled out of the handlers and into the application. We also need to move to type-based errors, with rich information, rather than value-based errors. ErrorHandlers will probably replace the http.Handlers to make this work correctly. Unrelated to the above, the "length" parameter has been migrated to "size" for completing layer uploads. This change should have gone out before but these diffs ending up being coupled with the parameter name change due to updates to the layer unit tests.
2014-11-26 20:16:58 +00:00
checkHeaders(t, resp, http.Header{
"Location": []string{expectedLayerURL},
"Content-Length": []string{"0"},
})
return resp.Header.Get("Location")
}
func checkResponse(t *testing.T, msg string, resp *http.Response, expectedStatus int) {
if resp.StatusCode != expectedStatus {
t.Logf("unexpected status %s: %v != %v", msg, resp.StatusCode, expectedStatus)
maybeDumpResponse(t, resp)
t.FailNow()
}
}
func maybeDumpResponse(t *testing.T, resp *http.Response) {
if d, err := httputil.DumpResponse(resp, true); err != nil {
t.Logf("error dumping response: %v", err)
} else {
Initial implementation of Layer API The http API has its first set of endpoints to implement the core aspects of fetching and uploading layers. Uploads can be started and completed in a single chunk and the content can be fetched via tarsum. Most proposed error conditions should be represented but edge cases likely remain. In this version, note that the layers are still called layers, even though the routes are pointing to blobs. This will change with backend refactoring over the next few weeks. The unit tests are a bit of a shamble but these need to be carefully written along with the core specification process. As the the client-server interaction solidifies, we can port this into a verification suite for registry providers.
2014-11-21 03:57:01 +00:00
t.Logf("response:\n%s", string(d))
Initial implementation of Manifest HTTP API Push, pull and delete of manifest files in the registry have been implemented on top of the storage services. Basic workflows, including reporting of missing manifests are tested, including various proposed response codes. Common testing functionality has been collected into shared methods. A test suite may be emerging but it might better to capture more edge cases (such as resumable upload, range requests, etc.) before we commit to a full approach. To support clearer test cases and simpler handler methods, an application aware urlBuilder has been added. We may want to export the functionality for use in the client, which could allow us to abstract away from gorilla/mux. A few error codes have been added to fill in error conditions missing from the proposal. Some use cases have identified some problems with the approach to error reporting that requires more work to reconcile. To resolve this, the mapping of Go errors into error types needs to pulled out of the handlers and into the application. We also need to move to type-based errors, with rich information, rather than value-based errors. ErrorHandlers will probably replace the http.Handlers to make this work correctly. Unrelated to the above, the "length" parameter has been migrated to "size" for completing layer uploads. This change should have gone out before but these diffs ending up being coupled with the parameter name change due to updates to the layer unit tests.
2014-11-26 20:16:58 +00:00
}
}
// matchHeaders checks that the response has at least the headers. If not, the
// test will fail. If a passed in header value is "*", any non-zero value will
// suffice as a match.
func checkHeaders(t *testing.T, resp *http.Response, headers http.Header) {
for k, vs := range headers {
if resp.Header.Get(k) == "" {
t.Fatalf("response missing header %q", k)
}
for _, v := range vs {
if v == "*" {
// Just ensure there is some value.
if len(resp.Header[k]) > 0 {
continue
}
}
for _, hv := range resp.Header[k] {
if hv != v {
t.Fatalf("header value not matched in response: %q != %q", hv, v)
}
}
}
Initial implementation of Layer API The http API has its first set of endpoints to implement the core aspects of fetching and uploading layers. Uploads can be started and completed in a single chunk and the content can be fetched via tarsum. Most proposed error conditions should be represented but edge cases likely remain. In this version, note that the layers are still called layers, even though the routes are pointing to blobs. This will change with backend refactoring over the next few weeks. The unit tests are a bit of a shamble but these need to be carefully written along with the core specification process. As the the client-server interaction solidifies, we can port this into a verification suite for registry providers.
2014-11-21 03:57:01 +00:00
}
}
Reference in a new issue Copy permalink