Back in the before time, the best practices surrounding usage of Context
weren't quite worked out. We defined our own type to make usage easier.
As this packaged was used elsewhere, it make it more and more
challenging to integrate with the forked `Context` type. Now that it is
available in the standard library, we can just use that one directly.
To make usage more consistent, we now use `dcontext` when referring to
the distribution context package.
Signed-off-by: Stephen J Day <stephen.day@docker.com>
Driver was passing connections by copying. Storing
`swift.Connection` as pointer to fix the warnings.
Ref: #2030.
Signed-off-by: Ahmet Alp Balkan <ahmetalpbalkan@gmail.com>
This is already supported by ncw/swift, so we just need to pass the
parameters from the storage driver.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Majewsky <stefan.majewsky@sap.com>
This is similar to waitForSegmentsToShowUp which is called during
Close/Commit. Intuitively, you wouldn't expect missing segments to be a
problem during read operations, since the previous Close/Commit
confirmed that all segments are there.
But due to the distributed nature of Swift, the read request could be
hitting a different storage node of the Swift cluster, where the
segments are still missing.
Load tests on my team's staging Swift cluster have shown this to occur
about once every 100-200 layer uploads when the Swift proxies are under
high load. The retry logic, borrowed from waitForSegmentsToShowUp, fixes
this temporary inconsistency.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Majewsky <stefan.majewsky@sap.com>
Not just when Commit()ing the result. This fixes some errors I observed
when the layer (i.e. the DLO) is Stat()ed immediately after closing,
and reports the wrong file size because the container listing is not
yet up-to-date.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Majewsky <stefan.majewsky@sap.com>
In 326c3a9c49, which was only intended to
be a refactoring commit, the behavior of this block subtly changed so
that unknown types of errors would be swallowed instead of propagated.
I noticed this while investigating an error similar to #1539 aka
docker/docker#21290. It appears that during GetContent() for a
hashstate, the Swift proxy produces an error. Since this error was
silently swallowed, an empty []byte is used to restart the hash, then
producing the digest of the empty string instead of the layer's digest.
This PR will not fix the issue, but it should make the actual error more
visible by propagating it into `blobWriter#resumeDigest' and
'blobWriter#validateBlob', respectively.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Majewsky <stefan.majewsky@sap.com>
Swift returns an empty object list when trying to read a non-existing object path, treat it as a
PathNotFoundError when trying to list a non existing virtual directory.
Signed-off-by: David li <wenquan.li@hpe.com>
The Delete method lists objects under the given path and tries to delete
all of them with a bulk delete request. If the path has no objects
underneath it, the body of this request will be empty, which causes
HTTP-level issues. Specifically, Go's HTTP client senses the empty
request buffer and doesn't include a Content-Length, which causes the
Swift server to fail the request.
This commit fixes the problem by avoiding sending empty bulk delete
requests. This is the correct thing to do anyway, since there's no
reason to request deletion of zero objects.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lehmann <aaron.lehmann@docker.com>
Errors thrown by storage drivers don't have the name of the driver, causing user
confusion about whether the error is coming from Docker or from a storage driver.
This change adds the storage driver name to each error message.
This required changing ErrUnsupportedDriver to a type, leading to code changes
whenever ErrUnsupportedDriver is used. The tests check whether the driver name
appears in the error message.
Signed-off-by: Amit Shukla <amit.shukla@docker.com>
