From a1f0919f98dbb03261928f4b2dde0a34a9039949 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alex Vanin Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 16:49:18 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] [#61] container: Unify naming for new epoch processing functions The same name is in network map and balance contracts. Signed-off-by: Alex Vanin --- balance/balance_contract.go | 2 +- container/container_contract.go | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/balance/balance_contract.go b/balance/balance_contract.go index 6d21265..1688ce3 100644 --- a/balance/balance_contract.go +++ b/balance/balance_contract.go @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ func NewEpoch(epochNum int) bool { multiaddr := common.InnerRingMultiAddressViaStorage(ctx, netmapContractKey) if !runtime.CheckWitness(multiaddr) { - panic("epochNum: this method must be invoked from inner ring") + panic("newEpoch: this method must be invoked from inner ring") } it := storage.Find(ctx, []byte{}, storage.KeysOnly) diff --git a/container/container_contract.go b/container/container_contract.go index 6c0e92f..5b83cfc 100644 --- a/container/container_contract.go +++ b/container/container_contract.go @@ -331,12 +331,12 @@ func ListContainerSizes(epoch int) [][]byte { return result } -func ProcessEpoch(epochNum int) { +func NewEpoch(epochNum int) { ctx := storage.GetContext() multiaddr := common.InnerRingMultiAddressViaStorage(ctx, netmapContractKey) if !runtime.CheckWitness(multiaddr) { - panic("processEpoch: this method must be invoked from inner ring") + panic("newEpoch: this method must be invoked from inner ring") } candidates := keysToDelete(ctx, epochNum)