TrueCloudLab/frostfs-http-gw
16
1
Fork 17
Code Issues 9 Pull requests 1 Projects Releases 9 Activity Actions

feature/add_mocks #117

Merged
alexvanin merged 1 commit from dkirillov/frostfs-http-gw:feature/add_mocks into master 2024-09-04 19:50:57 +00:00
Conversation 0 Commits 1 Files changed 12 +1005 -113
dkirillov commented 2024-06-17 14:57:56 +00:00
Member
Copy link
No description provided.
dkirillov self-assigned this 2024-06-17 14:57:56 +00:00
dkirillov force-pushed feature/add_mocks from 4270140663 to 7b49e81e0b 2024-06-17 14:58:48 +00:00 Compare
dkirillov force-pushed feature/add_mocks from 7b49e81e0b to 98c43c74a3 2024-06-18 06:28:15 +00:00 Compare
dkirillov changed title from WIP: feature/add_mocks to feature/add_mocks 2024-06-18 06:49:58 +00:00
dkirillov requested review from storage-services-committers 2024-06-18 06:50:06 +00:00
dkirillov requested review from storage-services-developers 2024-06-18 06:50:06 +00:00
alexvanin reviewed 2024-06-18 07:55:21 +00:00
internal/frostfs/frostfs.go Outdated
@ -0,0 +32,4 @@
}
// Container implements frostfs.FrostFS interface method.
func (x *FrostFS) Container(ctx context.Context, layerPrm handler.PrmContainer) (*container.Container, error) {
alexvanin commented 2024-06-18 07:47:05 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

We keep parameter definition outside of this package so FrostFS interface can be defined without import of this package, right?

We keep parameter definition outside of this package so `FrostFS` interface can be defined without import of this package, right?
dkirillov commented 2024-06-18 08:27:22 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

Right

Right
alexvanin marked this conversation as resolved
internal/handler/frostfs_mock.go Outdated
@ -0,0 +130,4 @@
// }
//
// return res, nil
// }
alexvanin commented 2024-06-18 07:36:25 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Unused?

Unused?
👀 1
alexvanin marked this conversation as resolved
internal/handler/frostfs_mock.go Outdated
@ -0,0 +227,4 @@
// }
//
// return nil
//}
alexvanin commented 2024-06-18 07:55:05 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Unused?

Unused?
alexvanin marked this conversation as resolved
internal/handler/frostfs_mock.go Outdated
@ -0,0 +351,4 @@
// }
//
// return table, nil
//}
alexvanin commented 2024-06-18 07:36:38 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Unused?

Unused?
alexvanin marked this conversation as resolved
internal/handler/frostfs_mock.go Outdated
@ -0,0 +368,4 @@
return true
}
for _, rec := range table.Records() {
alexvanin commented 2024-06-18 07:54:40 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Can we simplify access check somehow so we won't depend on eACL? Maybe we can define a list of cnr + owner + op + objID tuples which are allowed and all others are denied?

Can we simplify access check somehow so we won't depend on eACL? Maybe we can define a list of `cnr + owner + op + objID` tuples which are allowed and all others are denied?
👍 1
alexvanin marked this conversation as resolved
internal/handler/handler.go Outdated
@ -36,2 +35,4 @@
}
// PrmContainer groups parameters of FrostFS.Container operation.
type PrmContainer struct {
alexvanin commented 2024-06-18 07:49:18 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

What you think about having separate go file for frostfs interface and parameter definitions? frostfs.go and frostfs_mock.go looks good in my opinion.

What you think about having separate go file for frostfs interface and parameter definitions? `frostfs.go` and `frostfs_mock.go` looks good in my opinion.
dkirillov commented 2024-06-18 08:31:30 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

It isn't so big to move this to separate file I suppose

It isn't so big to move this to separate file I suppose
alexvanin marked this conversation as resolved
dkirillov force-pushed feature/add_mocks from 98c43c74a3 to 3741e3b003 2024-06-18 09:04:31 +00:00 Compare
alexvanin approved these changes 2024-06-18 13:22:06 +00:00
alexvanin merged commit 3741e3b003 into master 2024-06-18 13:22:16 +00:00
alexvanin referenced this pull request from a commit 2024-06-18 13:22:17 +00:00
[#117] Add mocked handler for tests
alexvanin deleted branch feature/add_mocks 2024-06-18 13:22:20 +00:00
alexvanin referenced this pull request from a commit 2024-06-25 15:12:23 +00:00
[#117] Fix FrostFS interface usage
alexvanin referenced this pull request from a commit 2024-06-25 15:12:23 +00:00
[#117] Update tests
alexvanin added this to the v0.30.0 milestone 2024-07-16 11:57:10 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
alexvanin
TrueCloudLab/storage-services-developers
Labels
Clear labels   
P0

Highest

  
P1

High

  
P2

Medium

  
P3

Low

  
good first issue

Good for newcomers

  
Infrastructure

Infrastructure, Automation, CI/CD or DevOps related stuff

  
blocked

The issue or PR is blocked by something

  
bug

Something is not working

  
config

Configuration format update or breaking change

  
discussion

Talking about something in order to reach a decision or to exchange ideas

  
documentation

Documentation related

  
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement

New feature

  
go

Language features adoption

  
help wanted

Extra attention is needed

  
internal

   
invalid

Something is wrong

  
kludge

This is a kludge and we know it

  
observability

Related to metrics, tracing and logs

  
perfomance

Perfomance related

  
question

More information is needed

  
refactoring

Refactoring

  
wontfix

This won't be fixed

No labels
P0
P1
P2
P3
good first issue
Infrastructure
blocked
bug
config
discussion
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
go
help wanted
internal
invalid
kludge
observability
perfomance
question
refactoring
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
v0.30.0
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
dkirillov
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: TrueCloudLab/frostfs-http-gw#117
No description provided.
Delete branch "dkirillov/frostfs-http-gw:feature/add_mocks"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?