[#506] node: Invalidate list
cache after container add/removal
`update` already has problems mentioned in its doc-comment and the code itself is not straightforward. Invalidating cache altogether seems like a better option because we don't construct cache output ourselves (thus, no "impossible" results). Signed-off-by: Evgenii Stratonikov <e.stratonikov@yadro.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f13f5d3b0f
commit
b62008daca
2 changed files with 4 additions and 46 deletions
|
@ -308,51 +308,9 @@ func (s ttlContainerLister) List(id *user.ID) ([]cid.ID, error) {
|
|||
return res, nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// updates cached list of owner's containers: cnr is added if flag is true, otherwise it's removed.
|
||||
// Concurrent calls can lead to some races:
|
||||
// - two parallel additions to missing owner's cache can lead to only one container to be cached
|
||||
// - async cache value eviction can lead to idle addition
|
||||
//
|
||||
// All described race cases aren't critical since cache values expire anyway, we just try
|
||||
// to increase cache actuality w/o huge overhead on synchronization.
|
||||
func (s *ttlContainerLister) update(owner user.ID, cnr cid.ID, add bool) {
|
||||
func (s *ttlContainerLister) invalidate(owner user.ID) {
|
||||
strOwner := owner.EncodeToString()
|
||||
|
||||
val, ok := s.inner.cache.Peek(strOwner)
|
||||
if !ok {
|
||||
// we could cache the single cnr but in this case we will disperse
|
||||
// with the Sidechain a lot
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if s.inner.ttl <= time.Since(val.t) {
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
item := val.v
|
||||
|
||||
item.mtx.Lock()
|
||||
{
|
||||
found := false
|
||||
|
||||
for i := range item.list {
|
||||
if found = item.list[i].Equals(cnr); found {
|
||||
if !add {
|
||||
item.list = append(item.list[:i], item.list[i+1:]...)
|
||||
// if list became empty we don't remove the value from the cache
|
||||
// since empty list is a correct value, and we don't want to insta
|
||||
// re-request it from the Sidechain
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
break
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if add && !found {
|
||||
item.list = append(item.list, cnr)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
item.mtx.Unlock()
|
||||
s.inner.remove(strOwner)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
type cachedIRFetcher struct {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ func configureEACLAndContainerSources(c *cfg, client *cntClient.Client, cnrSrc c
|
|||
// creation success are most commonly tracked by polling GET op.
|
||||
cnr, err := cnrSrc.Get(ev.ID)
|
||||
if err == nil {
|
||||
cachedContainerLister.update(cnr.Value.Owner(), ev.ID, true)
|
||||
cachedContainerLister.invalidate(cnr.Value.Owner())
|
||||
cachedContainerStorage.containerCache.set(ev.ID, cnr, nil)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// unlike removal, we expect successful receive of the container
|
||||
|
@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ func configureEACLAndContainerSources(c *cfg, client *cntClient.Client, cnrSrc c
|
|||
cachedContainerStorage.handleRemoval(ev.ID)
|
||||
info, err := cachedContainerStorage.DeletionInfo(ev.ID)
|
||||
if err == nil {
|
||||
cachedContainerLister.update(info.Owner, ev.ID, false)
|
||||
cachedContainerLister.invalidate(info.Owner)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
c.log.Debug(logs.FrostFSNodeContainerRemovalEventsReceipt,
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue