A container node is expected to have full "get" access to assemble the
object.
A non-container node is expected to forward any request to a container node.
Any token is expected to be issued for an original request sender not for a
node so any new request is invalid by design with that token.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Karpy <carpawell@nspcc.ru>
Do not lose meta information of the original requests: cache session and
bearer tokens of the original request b/w a new generated ones. Middle
request wrappers should not contain any meta information, since it is
useless (e.g. ACL service checks only the original tokens).
Signed-off-by: Pavel Karpy <carpawell@nspcc.ru>
After presenting request statuses on the API level, all the errors are
unwrapped before sending to the caller side. It led to a losing invalid
request's context.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Karpy <carpawell@nspcc.ru>
It was needed before we started to flush during transition to
`degraded` mode. Now it is confusing.
Signed-off-by: Evgenii Stratonikov <evgeniy@morphbits.ru>
Do not use node's local storage if it is clear that an object will be
removed anyway as a redundant. It requires moving the changing local storage
logic from the validation step to the local target implementation.
It allows performing any relations checks (e.g. object locking) only if a
node is considered as a valid container member and is expected to store
(stored previously) all the helper objects (e.g. `LOCK`, `TOMBSTONE`, etc).
Signed-off-by: Pavel Karpy <carpawell@nspcc.ru>
It is not an error: removing virtual object is expected and should be just
skipped. Getting a virtual object with `raw` flag is considered as an
impossible action, all the virtual objects removals will be handled via
their children's removals implicitly.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Karpy <carpawell@nspcc.ru>
Currently there is a possibility for modifying operations to fail
because of I/O errors and a new tree to be created on another shard.
This commit adds existence check for modifying operations.
Read operations remain as they are, not to slow things.
`TreeDrop` is an exception, because this is a tree removal and trying
multiple shards is not an unwanted behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Evgenii Stratonikov <evgeniy@morphbits.ru>
By default writecache puts the whole object to update storage ID.
This logic comes from the times when we needed to put objects
in the metabase by the writecache itself. Now this is done by the
blobstor at unmarshaling objects during flush only to update storage ID
is an overkill.
Signed-off-by: Evgenii Stratonikov <evgeniy@morphbits.ru>
All logic errors are wrapped in `logicerr.Logical` type and do not
affect shard error counter.
Signed-off-by: Evgenii Stratonikov <evgeniy@morphbits.ru>
In previous implementation `Shard.Delete` logged writecache's removal
failures in `error` level. There is a need to decrease severity of these
log records since they aren't critical and don't require individual
review.
Change level of the message to `info`.
Signed-off-by: Leonard Lyubich <ctulhurider@gmail.com>
From the `Bucket.ForEach` doc:
```
The provided function must not modify the bucket; this will result in undefined behavior.
```
Signed-off-by: Evgenii Stratonikov <evgeniy@morphbits.ru>
After the refactor there are new storage characteristics: a type and
a general storage id (that could be stringified).
Signed-off-by: Pavel Karpy <carpawell@nspcc.ru>
