frostfs-adm refactorings #161

Merged
fyrchik merged 10 commits from dstepanov-yadro/frostfs-node:refactoring/OBJECT-3610 into master 2023-03-27 12:42:39 +00:00

Drop nolint comments and fix linters for frostfs-adm

Drop nolint comments and fix linters for frostfs-adm
dstepanov-yadro force-pushed refactoring/OBJECT-3610 from 5a887397d1 to 1bd7248ba0 2023-03-22 14:52:16 +00:00 Compare
dstepanov-yadro force-pushed refactoring/OBJECT-3610 from 115491fe34 to a9435740ad 2023-03-23 06:23:24 +00:00 Compare
dstepanov-yadro force-pushed refactoring/OBJECT-3610 from a9435740ad to 052ae9b50a 2023-03-23 06:38:43 +00:00 Compare
dstepanov-yadro changed title from WIP: Refactorings to frostfs-adm refactorings 2023-03-23 08:47:21 +00:00
dstepanov-yadro force-pushed refactoring/OBJECT-3610 from 66dd320158 to 6d0a9ac70d 2023-03-23 08:48:14 +00:00 Compare
dstepanov-yadro requested review from fyrchik 2023-03-23 08:56:56 +00:00
dstepanov-yadro requested review from storage-core-committers 2023-03-23 08:57:02 +00:00
dstepanov-yadro requested review from storage-core-developers 2023-03-23 08:57:02 +00:00
dstepanov-yadro force-pushed refactoring/OBJECT-3610 from 6d0a9ac70d to f388355b4c 2023-03-23 13:39:09 +00:00 Compare
fyrchik approved these changes 2023-03-24 07:57:14 +00:00
@ -175,3 +127,4 @@
return c.awaitTx()
}
func register(nnsCs *state.Contract, c *initializeContext, zone string, domain string, cs *contractState, writer *io.BufBinWriter) error {

Given that the package is morph, simple register seems too generic.

Given that the package is `morph`, simple `register` seems too generic.
Poster
Collaborator

fixed

fixed
fyrchik marked this conversation as resolved
@ -210,0 +214,4 @@
}
func getWallet(cmd *cobra.Command, v *viper.Viper, needContracts bool, walletDir string) (*wallet.Wallet, error) {
if needContracts {

Again, what about flattening here?

if !needContracts { return "", nil }
...
Again, what about flattening here? ``` if !needContracts { return "", nil } ... ```
Poster
Collaborator

fixed

fixed
fyrchik marked this conversation as resolved
@ -205,3 +220,1 @@
p := getPath("Path to the storage directory (all available storage will be used): ")
c.BlobstorPath = filepath.Join(p, "blob")
c.MetabasePath = filepath.Join(p, "meta")
func getOutputPath(args []string) string {

While we are here, how about flattening the structure?

if len(args) != 0 {
    return ...
}
...
While we are here, how about flattening the structure? ``` if len(args) != 0 { return ... } ... ```
Poster
Collaborator

fixed

fixed
fyrchik marked this conversation as resolved
dstepanov-yadro force-pushed refactoring/OBJECT-3610 from f388355b4c to 6a087b0184 2023-03-24 08:32:11 +00:00 Compare
dstepanov-yadro force-pushed refactoring/OBJECT-3610 from 6a087b0184 to a8927fc57c 2023-03-24 08:32:57 +00:00 Compare
dstepanov-yadro force-pushed refactoring/OBJECT-3610 from a8927fc57c to 479e703ce1 2023-03-24 12:11:14 +00:00 Compare
fyrchik added the due date 2023-03-27 2023-03-27 07:37:31 +00:00
acid-ant approved these changes 2023-03-27 12:13:42 +00:00
fyrchik merged commit 5bf1ec348f into master 2023-03-27 12:42:39 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No reviewers
TrueCloudLab/storage-core-developers
No Milestone
No Assignees
3 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

2023-03-27

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: TrueCloudLab/frostfs-node#161
There is no content yet.