Logical sharding for metabase #979
Labels
No labels
P0
P1
P2
P3
badger
frostfs-adm
frostfs-cli
frostfs-ir
frostfs-lens
frostfs-node
good first issue
triage
Infrastructure
blocked
bug
config
discussion
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
go
help wanted
internal
invalid
kludge
observability
perfomance
question
refactoring
wontfix
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: TrueCloudLab/frostfs-node#979
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
With a metabase size of more than 10-12 GB, insert and update performance begins to degrade significantly:
Describe the solution you'd like
A similar problem for the blobovnicza was solved by increasing the number of database files and reducing their size. Now blobovnicza performance looks not so terrible:
Perhaps a similar approach will help solve the problem of degradation of metabase performance.
I propose to divide the metabase into several files by analogy with the blobovnicza.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Try to use badger for metabase:
But badger's iteration implemented on iteration over all SST and merge sort, so need to check how GC will work. Also badger returns error in case of update conflict, which should be retried, this can lead badger metabase implementation to single threaded like bbolt.