Add FEP Purpose and Guidelines #3
No reviewers
Labels
No labels
FEP
P0
P1
P2
P3
good first issue
theme
yaczrokh
Infrastructure
blocked
bug
config
discussion
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
go
help wanted
internal
invalid
kludge
observability
perfomance
question
refactoring
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: TrueCloudLab/frostfs.info#3
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "FEP00"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
First, we need to define what FEP is and how it works.
PEP -> FEP?
An the same for bellow line:
- **Superseded** — Replaced by another succeeding PEP
s/start reading at/read/
orrefer to
?@ -0,0 +84,4 @@
the right to reject FEP proposals if they appear too unfocused or too broad. If
in doubt, split your FEP into several well-focused ones.
Each FEP must have a champion -- someone who writes the FEP using the style and
If "champion" a common term?
@ -0,0 +140,4 @@
* In the "Type:" header field, enter "Standards Track",
"Informational", or "Process" as appropriate, and for the "Status:"
field enter "Draft". For full details, see [FEP Header Preamble]({{<ref
"#fep_header_preamble">}}).
The link is not rendered in GH web viewer.
@ -0,0 +140,4 @@
* In the "Type:" header field, enter "Standards Track",
"Informational", or "Process" as appropriate, and for the "Status:"
field enter "Draft". For full details, see [FEP Header Preamble]({{<ref
"#fep_header_preamble">}}).
It's not supposed to be. For nice view the one should
make server
and use local browser against provided URL.Maybe later we could render site PRs to a separate URL to simplify process.
@ -0,0 +84,4 @@
the right to reject FEP proposals if they appear too unfocused or too broad. If
in doubt, split your FEP into several well-focused ones.
Each FEP must have a champion -- someone who writes the FEP using the style and
yes
@ -0,0 +520,4 @@
comment on the pull request. (If the original author's GitHub username is
unknown, use email.) If the original author doesn't respond in a timely manner,
the Committee will make a unilateral decision (it's not like such decisions
can't be reversed :smile:.
Unclosed bracket.