While more than likely never to come up in a real-world situation,
during renewal integration testing a value of 120 seconds has
proven to be too high (the old challenge record has not expired
by the time the new one is created).
client.RenewCertificate now supports CSRs, and in fact prefers them,
when renewing certificates. In other words, if the certificate was
created via a CSR then using that will be attempted before re-generating
off a new private key.
Also adjusted the API of ObtainCertificateForCSR to be a little
more in line with the original ObtainCertificate function.
This commit also breaks requestCertificate() into two parts, the first of
which generates a CSR, the second of which became requestCertificateForCsr()
which does what the name implies.
Add 2 new functions to acme.Client for registration stuff:
* QueryRegistration: This performs a POST on the client
registration's URI and gets the updated registration info.
* DeleteRegistration: This deletes the registration as currently
configured in the client.
The latter, while a part of the IETF draft, may not be 100%
functional in LE yet, my tests showed that resources were still
available after deletion.
Dyn provider was using incorrect zone in Present and Cleanup functions.
This uses FindZoneByFqdn() to find the correct zone for use in the
subsequent API calls.
Route 53 allows multiple zones with the same name to co-exist in an
account. The most common use case for this is a split-view DNS with one
private and one public zone for the same domain name. This patch makes
sure we don’t ever provision the authorization record to the private
zone.
The other case where a user has multiple public zones with the same
name is not covered here since this would require a bigger change in
code in order to determine which of the zones is active from the
viewpoint of the internet. Also this is probably an edge use case that
can be addressed once it comes up in the issues.
I have modified the official Dockerfile and made two changes
- Each RUN instruction creates an additional layer in the docker image. Adding files in one RUN instruction and deleting it in another RUN instruction will not reduce the size of the image. I used a single RUN command so that all the package/file removal happens in the same command in which the package installation happens, so that no additional layers are created.
- Similar to RUN statement, ADD instruction also creates an additional layer. Using git clone in the RUN statement and deleting it within the same statement ensures that an additional layer with source files is not added.
