Merge pull request #1439 from nspcc-dev/core/verify_tx_witnesses_fix

core: take into account gasConsumed during tx witnesses verification
This commit is contained in:
Roman Khimov 2020-09-29 18:11:39 +03:00 committed by GitHub
commit adcbb2287f
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
3 changed files with 34 additions and 21 deletions

View file

@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ func TestVerifyTx(t *testing.T) {
bc := newTestChain(t)
defer bc.Close()
accs := make([]*wallet.Account, 3)
accs := make([]*wallet.Account, 4)
for i := range accs {
var err error
accs[i], err = wallet.NewAccount()
@ -326,6 +326,16 @@ func TestVerifyTx(t *testing.T) {
tx.Scripts[0].InvocationScript[10] = ^tx.Scripts[0].InvocationScript[10]
checkErr(t, ErrVerificationFailed, tx)
})
t.Run("InsufficientNetworkFeeForSecondWitness", func(t *testing.T) {
tx := bc.newTestTx(h, testScript)
tx.Signers = append(tx.Signers, transaction.Signer{
Account: accs[3].PrivateKey().GetScriptHash(),
Scopes: transaction.Global,
})
require.NoError(t, accs[0].SignTx(tx))
require.NoError(t, accs[3].SignTx(tx))
checkErr(t, ErrVerificationFailed, tx)
})
t.Run("OldTX", func(t *testing.T) {
tx := bc.newTestTx(h, testScript)
require.NoError(t, accs[0].SignTx(tx))
@ -492,22 +502,22 @@ func TestVerifyHashAgainstScript(t *testing.T) {
newH := cs.ScriptHash()
newH[0] = ^newH[0]
w := &transaction.Witness{InvocationScript: []byte{byte(opcode.PUSH4)}}
err := bc.verifyHashAgainstScript(newH, w, ic, gas)
_, err := bc.verifyHashAgainstScript(newH, w, ic, gas)
require.True(t, errors.Is(err, ErrUnknownVerificationContract))
})
t.Run("Invalid", func(t *testing.T) {
w := &transaction.Witness{InvocationScript: []byte{byte(opcode.PUSH4)}}
err := bc.verifyHashAgainstScript(csInvalid.ScriptHash(), w, ic, gas)
_, err := bc.verifyHashAgainstScript(csInvalid.ScriptHash(), w, ic, gas)
require.True(t, errors.Is(err, ErrInvalidVerificationContract))
})
t.Run("ValidSignature", func(t *testing.T) {
w := &transaction.Witness{InvocationScript: []byte{byte(opcode.PUSH4)}}
err := bc.verifyHashAgainstScript(cs.ScriptHash(), w, ic, gas)
_, err := bc.verifyHashAgainstScript(cs.ScriptHash(), w, ic, gas)
require.NoError(t, err)
})
t.Run("InvalidSignature", func(t *testing.T) {
w := &transaction.Witness{InvocationScript: []byte{byte(opcode.PUSH3)}}
err := bc.verifyHashAgainstScript(cs.ScriptHash(), w, ic, gas)
_, err := bc.verifyHashAgainstScript(cs.ScriptHash(), w, ic, gas)
require.True(t, errors.Is(err, ErrVerificationFailed))
})
})
@ -517,7 +527,7 @@ func TestVerifyHashAgainstScript(t *testing.T) {
InvocationScript: []byte{byte(opcode.NOP)},
VerificationScript: verif,
}
err := bc.verifyHashAgainstScript(hash.Hash160(verif), w, ic, 1)
_, err := bc.verifyHashAgainstScript(hash.Hash160(verif), w, ic, 1)
require.True(t, errors.Is(err, ErrVerificationFailed))
})
t.Run("NoResult", func(t *testing.T) {
@ -526,7 +536,7 @@ func TestVerifyHashAgainstScript(t *testing.T) {
InvocationScript: []byte{byte(opcode.PUSH1)},
VerificationScript: verif,
}
err := bc.verifyHashAgainstScript(hash.Hash160(verif), w, ic, gas)
_, err := bc.verifyHashAgainstScript(hash.Hash160(verif), w, ic, gas)
require.True(t, errors.Is(err, ErrVerificationFailed))
})
t.Run("BadResult", func(t *testing.T) {
@ -537,7 +547,7 @@ func TestVerifyHashAgainstScript(t *testing.T) {
InvocationScript: []byte{byte(opcode.NOP)},
VerificationScript: verif,
}
err := bc.verifyHashAgainstScript(hash.Hash160(verif), w, ic, gas)
_, err := bc.verifyHashAgainstScript(hash.Hash160(verif), w, ic, gas)
require.True(t, errors.Is(err, ErrVerificationFailed))
})
t.Run("TooManyResults", func(t *testing.T) {
@ -546,7 +556,7 @@ func TestVerifyHashAgainstScript(t *testing.T) {
InvocationScript: []byte{byte(opcode.PUSH1), byte(opcode.PUSH1)},
VerificationScript: verif,
}
err := bc.verifyHashAgainstScript(hash.Hash160(verif), w, ic, gas)
_, err := bc.verifyHashAgainstScript(hash.Hash160(verif), w, ic, gas)
require.True(t, errors.Is(err, ErrVerificationFailed))
})
}