If NEP2 account label is not provided as a flag for import-related
CLI commands then ask it in the interactive mode.
This change breaks the compatibility with the old behaviour (add
the unnamed account if the name wasn't specified).
Fetch account's name from the CLI argument and do not ask for the
user's input if provided, close#2882. Fetch password from config
if provided, close#2883.
The tests are still there, coverage should counted fine, but it improves things:
? github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/cli [no test files]
ok github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/cli/app 0.058s coverage: 100.0% of statements
ok github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/cli/cmdargs 0.005s coverage: 60.8% of statements
ok github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/cli/flags 0.027s coverage: 97.7% of statements
? github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/cli/input [no test files]
ok github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/cli/nep_test 30.443s coverage: [no statements]
ok github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/cli/options 0.054s coverage: 50.0% of statements
? github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/cli/paramcontext [no test files]
ok github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/cli/query 2.089s coverage: 45.3% of statements
ok github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/cli/server 1.510s coverage: 67.8% of statements
ok github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/cli/smartcontract 8.433s coverage: 94.3% of statements
ok github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/cli/util 0.013s coverage: 10.9% of statements
? github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/cli/vm [no test files]
ok github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/cli/wallet 47.252s coverage: 63.0% of statements
Refs. #2379, but not completely solves it, one package seriously outweights
others:
? github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/cli [no test files]
ok github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/cli/app 0.036s coverage: 100.0% of statements
ok github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/cli/cmdargs 0.011s coverage: 60.8% of statements
ok github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/cli/flags 0.009s coverage: 97.7% of statements
? github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/cli/input [no test files]
ok github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/cli/options 0.033s coverage: 50.0% of statements
? github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/cli/paramcontext [no test files]
ok github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/cli/query 2.155s coverage: 45.3% of statements
ok github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/cli/server 1.373s coverage: 67.8% of statements
ok github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/cli/smartcontract 8.819s coverage: 94.3% of statements
ok github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/cli/util 0.006s coverage: 10.9% of statements
? github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/cli/vm [no test files]
ok github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/cli/wallet 72.103s coverage: 88.2% of statements
Still a nice thing to have.
Make NEP-11 code use getnep11balances the same way NEP-17 code uses
getnep17balances. This command was introduced well before getnep11balances
appeared, so it required always specifying contract explicitly. Now this
constraint can be relaxed somewhat in most cases.
1. In the single token mode compare known hashes instead of names, names can
be misleading.
2. Hardcode NEO/GAS, they are special (if not overrided by the wallet data).
We have this data available since 0.99.1 while all public networks require at
least 0.99.2 for compatibility and NeoFS setups use 0.99.2+ too. This data can
simplify account handling considerably making additional requests unneccessary
in many cases.
In the same way we do for NEP-17 tokens. This code predates "getnep11balances"
call, so this wasn't possible back then, but now we can improve the situation
(allow specifying names/symbols instead of hashes only).
Unfortunately Go doesn't allow to easily reuse readers in full packages, still
we can have this wrapper with a little overhead (the alternative is to move
specific methods into types of their own, but I'm not sure how it's going to
be accepted user-side).
Notice that int64 types are used for gas per block or registration price
because the price has to fit into the system fee limitation and gas per block
value can't be more than 10 GAS. We use int64 for votes as well in other types
since NEO is limited to 100M.
Some commands don't accept arguments, but users try giving them and don't
notice a mistake. It's a bit more user-friendly to tell the user that there is
something wrong with the way he tries to use the command.
