Don't need to keep the copy of the official Golang image in our
dockerfile, let's use it as a base builder image.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
Currently it's failing, but no token is required for public repos:
```
[2023-10-10T10:35:11.917Z] ['error'] There was an error running the uploader: Error uploading to https://codecov.io: Error: There was an error fetching the storage URL during POST: 404 - {'detail': ErrorDetail(string='Unable to locate build via Github Actions API. Please upload with the Codecov repository upload token to resolve issue.', code='not_found')}
```
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
If it's the end of epoch, then it contains the updated validators list recalculated
during the last block's PostPersist. If it's middle of the epoch, then it contains
previously calculated value (value for the previous completed epoch) that is equal
to the current nextValidators cache value.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
Do not recalculate new committee/validators value in the start of every
subsequent epoch. Use values that was calculated in the PostPersist method
of the previously processed block in the end of the previous epoch.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
No funcional changes, just refactoring. It doesn't need the whole cache,
only the set of committee keys with votes.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
Recalculate them once per epoch. Consensus is aware of it and must
call CalculateNextValidators exactly when needed.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
We have two similar blockchain APIs: GetNextBlockValidators and GetValidators.
It's hard to distinguish them, thus renaming it to match the meaning, so what
we have now is:
GetNextBlockValidators literally just returns the top of the committee that
was elected in the start of batch of CommitteeSize blocks batch. It doesn't
change its valie every block.
ComputeNextBlockValidators literally computes the list of validators based on
the most fresh committee members information got from the NeoToken's storage
and based on the latest register/unregister/vote events. The list returned by
this method may be updated every block.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
Blockchain passes his own pure unwrapped DAO to
(*Blockchain).ComputeNextBlockValidators which means that native
RW NEO cache structure stored inside this DAO can be modified by
anyone who uses exported ComputeNextBlockValidators Blockchain API,
and technically it's valid, and we should allow this, because it's
the only purpose of `validators` caching. However, at the same time
some RPC server is allowed to request a subsequent wrapped DAO for
some test invocation. It means that descendant wrapped DAO
eventually will request RW NEO cache and try to `Copy()`
the underlying's DAO cache which is in direct use of
ComputeNextBlockValidators. Here's the race:
ComputeNextBlockValidators called by Consensus service tries to
update cached `validators` value, and descendant wrapped DAO
created by the RPC server tries to copy DAO's native cache and
read the cached `validators` value.
So the problem is that native cache not designated to handle
concurrent access between parent DAO layer and derived (wrapped)
DAO layer. I've carefully reviewed all the usages of native cache,
and turns out that the described situation is the only place where
parent DAO is used directly to modify its cache concurrently with
some descendant DAO that is trying to access the cache. All other
usages of native cache (not only NEO, but also all other native
contrcts) strictly rely on the hierarchical DAO structure and don't
try to perform these concurrent operations between DAO layers.
There's also persist operation, but it keeps cache RW lock taken,
so it doesn't have this problem as far. Thus, in this commit we rework
NEO's `validators` cache value so that it always contain the relevant
list for upper Blockchain's DAO and is updated every PostPersist (if
needed).
Note: we must be very careful extending our native cache in the
future, every usage of native cache must be checked against the
described problem.
Close#2989.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
Network server constructor reads config.Version variable, and
testcli.DeployContract writes dummy config.Version which causes
race in tests. Avoid this race by moving config.Version initialisation
to a separate package and perform it inside test packages init().
Close#3011, close#3017.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
To dump the DB, the service must be stopped.
If this is not the case `dump` command just hangs without any output,
which _may_ be unexpected from the ops POV.
Introduce a 1 second timeous, which is more than enough, given
that bbolt retries doing flock() every 50ms.
Signed-off-by: Evgenii Stratonikov <fyfyrchik@runbox.com>
Currently we take int64 value from the Go parser and push it to the
stack. Using uint64 is not a common practice (usually we just use `int`),
but can be a problem while doing bit arithmetic and serializing numbers.
Signed-off-by: Evgenii Stratonikov <fyfyrchik@runbox.com>
And ignore on dependency checks, we update all the examples at once
anyway, so may safely skip the check for zkp folder.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
An upgrade from gnark v0.8.X to v0.9.0 changes serialization format of verifying/proving keys
and proofs. In neo-go zkpbinding package we have to support both at least for now, because
gnark@v0.9.0 requires minimum go 1.19.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
The example shows that the proover knows the solution of the cubic
equation: y = x^3 + x + 5. The example is constructed for BLS12-381
curve points using Groth-16 prooving algorithm. The example includes
everything that developer needs to start using ZKP on the NEO platform
with Go SDK:
1. The described cubic circuit implementation.
2. The off-chain proof generation with the help of gnark-crypto library.
3. Go verification contract generation and deployment with the help of
NeoGo libraries.
4. The on-chain proof verification for various sets of input data.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
Valid transactions can't use more than MaxVerificationGAS for script execution
and this applies to the whole set of signers, so use this value by default
unless local instance configuration suggests something lower for generic
invocations.
Signed-off-by: Roman Khimov <roman@nspcc.ru>
We can ignore core.ErrInvalidSignature (which means that the script has
executed, but returned false), but we shouldn't ignore other errors which
likely mean that the script is incorrect (or hits some resource limits).
Use neorpc.ErrInvalidSignature as a return to separate this case from
contract-based verification.
Signed-off-by: Roman Khimov <roman@nspcc.ru>
