Only request headers from the other peer if his height is bigger than
ours. Otherwise we routinely ask 0-height newcomers for some random headers
that they know nothing about.
This one is essential for the consensus nodes as otherwise they won't give out
the blocks they generate making their generation almost useless. It also makes
our networking part more complete.
We have a race between reader and writer goroutines for the same connection
that leads to handshake failures when reader is faster to read the incoming
version (and try to reply to it) than writer is to write our own Version:
WARN[0000] peer disconnected addr="172.200.0.4:20334" peerCount=5 reason="invalid handshake: tried to send VersionAck, but didn't send Version yet
Fix it by moving Version sending before the reader loop starts.
add processing of validators while block persist;
add validator structure with decoding/encoding;
add validator get from store;
add EnrollmentTX and StateTX processing;
add pubkey decode bytes, unique and contains functions;
Right now message can be written in several Write's so
concurrent calls of writeMsg() can in theory interleave.
This commit fixes it.
Signed-off-by: Evgenii Stratonikov <evgeniy@nspcc.ru>
Otherwise the node might crash in `startProtocol` because of missing Version
field in the peer. And it also keeps the sequence correct, Version MUST be
sent first and ACKs can only follow it.
Our node didn't respect the MaxPeers setting, fix it with a drop of random
connection when this limit is reached (to give a chance for newcomers to
communicate), but also introduce AttemptConnPeers setting to tune the number
of attempted connections.
This also raises the default MaxPeers for testnet/mainnet to 100, because
neo-go nodes love making friends.
This allows to start handshaking from both client and server (mainnet/testnet
nodes were seen to not care about string ordering for it), but still maintains
some sane checks in the process. It also makes functions thread-safe because
we have two goroutines servicing read and write side of the Peer connection,
so they can clash on access to the struct fields.
Add a test for it also.
Extend Blockchainer with one more method to spawn a VM for test runs and use
it to run scripts. Gas consumption is not counted or limited in any way at the
moment (see #424).
Keeping run() as the owner of all maps would mean adding at least three more
channels to keep address getters with thread-safety. But then there also is a
race between requestToWork() and run() which is way harder to solve with
channels because there are lots of possibilities for deadlocks. So rework all
of this with good old mutexes.
While at it, fix `requestCh` handling in the inner select of run, it will waste
one loop to handle it, so we should add one to the `requested`.
Fixes#445.
Goreport:
neo-go/pkg/core/contract_state_test.go
Line 21: warning: "Contracto" is a misspelling of "Contraction" (misspell)
Line 64: warning: "Contracto" is a misspelling of "Contraction" (misspell)
neo-go/pkg/core/interop_neo.go
Line 420: warning: "succeedes" is a misspelling of "succeeds" (misspell)
neo-go/pkg/network/discovery.go
Line 118: warning: "succeded" is a misspelling of "succeeded" (misspell)
Line 128: warning: "successfuly" is a misspelling of "successfully" (misspell)
golint suggests:
pkg/network/payload/address.go:48:12: should omit type net.IP from declaration of var netip; it will be inferred from the right-hand side
It's a temporary stub until proper encoding/decoding is implemented. It's
useful for testnet/mainnet connections because without it consensus message
receival leads to peer disconnection.
It's bogus and no other node implementation has anything like that. It fires
up for no good reason in the case when some other node connects to us and it
obviously doesn't use its listening port for it.
If the block references two ouputs in some other transaction the code failed
to verify it because of key collision. C# code implements it properly by using
full CoinReference type as a key, so let's do it in a similar fashion.
In the very specific case when the list of headers received is exactly one
block ahead of the chain of full blocks requestBlocks() failed to generate
request to get the next full block.
This one will replace blockCache in Blockchain itself as it can and should be
external from it. The idea is that we only feed successive blocks into the
Blockchain and it only stores valid proper Blockchain and nothing else.
For example, at the moment our node can't handle `consensus` message, so when
it received it before the patch it just crashed because of uninitialized `p`.
