Turns out C# VM doesn't have it since preview2, so our limiting of
MaxArraySize in incompatible with it. Removing this limit shouldn't be a
problem with the reference counter we have, both APPEND and SETITEM add things
to reference counter and we can't exceed MaxStackSize. PACK on the other hand
can't get more than MaxStackSize-1 of input elements.
Unify NEWSTRUCT with NEWARRAY* and use better integer checks at the same time.
Multisig limit is still 1024.
Resulting item can't have more than MaxStackSize elements. Technically this
limits to MaxStackSize cloned elements but it's considered to be enough to
mitigate the issue (the next size check is going to happen during push to the
stack). See neo-project/neo#2534, thanks @vang1ong7ang.
We already do this in binary opcodes, let's be consistent.
This fixes state difference at height 275663
for tx 3c498317684d63849b03e4c58ad57ce4b19bb206b7b01bcc64233de3b3e207f4
Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Stratonikov <evgeniy@nspcc.ru>
We have additional logic for getting BaseExecFee policy value. This
logic should be moved to interop context instead of being in Policer,
because Policer is just an interface over Policy contract.
After moving this logic to interop context, we need to use it to define
BaseExecFee instead of (Policer).BaseExecFee. Thus, moving
(*Blockchain).GetPrice to (*Context).GetPrice is necessary.
When calling external contracts we expect exactly 1 value to be on
stack. For methods returning nothing, `Null` value is pushed, otherwise
it is an error.`
It's not needed any more with Go 1.13 as we have wrapping/unwrapping in base
packages. All errors.Wrap calls are replaced with fmt.Errorf, some strings are
improved along the way.
Implement 3 new instructions: TRY,ENDTRY,ENDFINALLY.
1. TRY marks the start of the block where exceptions are catched.
It has 2 arguments which are relative offsets of exception handler
and the end of the whole try/catch construction.
2. ENDTRY denotes either end of try or catch block.
3. ENDFINALLY denotes end of finally block which is executed
irregardless of whether an exception has occured.
We were accepting transactions with zero system fee, but we shouldn't do
that. Also, transaction's verification execution has to be limited by network
fee.
