Drop wif.GetVerificationScript(), drop
smartcontract.CreateSignatureRedeemScript(), add GetVerificationScript()
directly to the PublicKey and use it everywhere.
This allows easier reuse of opcodes and in some cases allows to eliminate
dependencies on the whole vm package, like in compiler that only needs opcodes
and doesn't care about VM for any other purpose.
And yes, they're opcodes because an instruction is a whole thing with
operands, that's what context.Next() returns.
Commit c80ee952a1 removed temporary store used
to contain changes of the block being processed. It's wrong in that the block
changes should be applied to the database in a single transaction so that
there wouldn't be any intermediate state observed from the outside (which is
possible now). Also, this made changes commiting persist them to the
underlying store effectively making our persist loop a no-op (and not
producing `persist completed` log lines that we love so much).
add processing of validators while block persist;
add validator structure with decoding/encoding;
add validator get from store;
add EnrollmentTX and StateTX processing;
add pubkey decode bytes, unique and contains functions;
Fixes failure to process transaction from the block when it was relayed
initially:
WARN[0788] blockQueue: failed adding block into the blockchain blockHeight=7270 error="transaction 35088916403e5cf2152e16c3bc6e0fba20c955fba38543b9fa5c50a3d3a4ace5 failed to verify: invalid transaction due to conflicts with the memory pool" nextIndex=7271
WARN[0790] blockQueue: failed adding block into the blockchain blockHeight=7270 error="transaction 35088916403e5cf2152e16c3bc6e0fba20c955fba38543b9fa5c50a3d3a4ace5 failed to verify: invalid transaction due to conflicts with the memory pool" nextIndex=7271
WARN[0790] blockQueue: failed adding block into the blockchain blockHeight=7270 error="transaction 35088916403e5cf2152e16c3bc6e0fba20c955fba38543b9fa5c50a3d3a4ace5 failed to verify: invalid transaction due to conflicts with the memory pool" nextIndex=7271
If we're to receive some 500 headers (less than `headerBatchCount`) and quit
before receiving more of them we end up with clean `bc.headerList` that will
be inited going backwards to the `targetHash`, but code path doesn't add add
the `targetHash` itself which it should do in this particular case, otherwise
we end with no genesis block hash in the list.
Missing it the following line could fail on subsequent restarts:
currHeaderHeight, currHeaderHash, err := storage.CurrentHeaderHeight(bc.store)
if the node was stopped before any headers had been received.
Extend Blockchainer with one more method to spawn a VM for test runs and use
it to run scripts. Gas consumption is not counted or limited in any way at the
moment (see #424).
NewInvocationTX() returned a version number one transaction that actually
failed to pass that version down to the invocation data which lead to
serialization/deserialization inconsistency.
VM should be responsible for code execution and in case anyone interested in additional logging or errors they could handle them like we do it iin cli.
We're about stored values here, so print those, which avoids blocking in
bc.HeaderHeight() and removes duplication between blockHeight and
persistedHeight. Fixes saving the blockchain on exit (deferred function in
Run() blocked in persist()).
Test modification was required because storeBlocks() doesn't actually save
headers and thus TestGetTransaction started to fail on persist().
If you're to sync less than 2000 headers no batched header key-value is
gonna be written into the DB and init() would panic because
bc.headerList.Len() would return 0. Use genesis block as a target in this
case.
Goreport:
neo-go/pkg/core/contract_state_test.go
Line 21: warning: "Contracto" is a misspelling of "Contraction" (misspell)
Line 64: warning: "Contracto" is a misspelling of "Contraction" (misspell)
neo-go/pkg/core/interop_neo.go
Line 420: warning: "succeedes" is a misspelling of "succeeds" (misspell)
neo-go/pkg/network/discovery.go
Line 118: warning: "succeded" is a misspelling of "succeeded" (misspell)
Line 128: warning: "successfuly" is a misspelling of "successfully" (misspell)
commit methods duplicated putSmthIntoStore functions, but have MemCachedStore
now that can easily substitute for a Batch, especially given that interop
needs something like that for its storage purposes anyway.
This adds the following verifications:
* merkleroot check
* index check
* timestamp check
* witnesses verification
VerifyWitnesses is also renamed to verifyTxWitnesses here to not confuse it
with verifyBlockWitnesse and to hide it from external access (no users at the
moment).
Linter isn't happy with our recent changes:
pkg/core/contract_state.go:109:1: receiver name cs should be consistent with previous receiver name a for ContractState
pkg/core/contract_state.go:114:1: receiver name cs should be consistent with previous receiver name a for ContractState
pkg/core/contract_state.go:119:1: receiver name cs should be consistent with previous receiver name a for ContractState
But actually `a` here most probably is a copy-paste from AssetState methods,
so fit the old code to match the new one.
Enable transaction verification for privnets and tests, testnet can't
successfuly verify block number 316711 with it enabled and mainnet stops at
105829.
We want to get a full block, so it has to have transactions
inside. Unfortunately our tests were used to this wrong behavior and utilized
completely bogus transactions without data that couldn't be persisted, so fix
that also.
PublishTX only had one of these flags, but newer contracts (created via the
interop function) can have more and these flags are aggregated into one field
that uses PropertyState enumeration (it's used to publish contract, so
supposedly it's also a nice choice for contract state storage).
It's used a lot and it looks a lot like MemoryStore, it just needs not to
return errors from Put and Delete, so make it use MemoryStore internally with
adjusted interface.
Make it look more like a real transaction, put/delete things with a single
lock. Make a copy of value in Put also, just for safety purposes, no one knows
how this value slice can be used after the Put.
