The order in which storage.Find items are returns depends on what items
were processed in previous transactions of the same block.
The easiest way to implement this sort of caching is to cache operations
with storage, flushing the only in `Persist()`.
This syscall should only work for contracts created by current transaction and
that is what is supposed to be checked here. Do so by looking at the
differences between ic.dao and original lower DAO.
C# uses ToArray() or UintXXX(bytes) here which interprets hashes as they
should be interpreted (BE, although they always convert to LE when converting
to String just for the fun of it). It leads to state difference for us at
block 2025204 where even though we have the same value for the key, the key
itself differs, ours:
dd2b538e2a0c1db1ae5061c15be14f916bd1e678e512ffcda6d9499d8e7fe97ee71fd6b8004583d9afe09cc4dadbd5deb63d01e061009b7cffdaa674beae0f930ebe6085af900093e5fe56b34a5c220ccdcf6efc336fc5000000000000000000000000000000000010
theirs:
dd2b538e2a0c1db1ae5061c15be14f916bd1e67861e0013db6ded5dbdac49ce0afd9834500b8d61fe77ee97f8e9d49d9a6cdff12e5009b7cffdaa674beae0f930ebe6085af900093e5fe56b34a5c220ccdcf6efc336fc5000000000000000000000000000000000010
In this key there is a tx hash encoded
(e512ffcda6d9499d8e7fe97ee71fd6b84583d9afe09cc4dadbd5deb63d01e061 in LE used
by all the tools like neoscan).
I love Neo.
Tesnet sync failed with:
Feb 07 00:04:19 nodoka neo-go[1747]: 2020-02-07T00:04:19.838+0300 WARN blockQueue: failed adding block into the blockchain {"error": "failed to store notifications: not supported", "blockHeight": 713984, "nextIndex": 713985}
because some (not so) smart contract emitted a notification with an
InteropItem inside.
add dao which takes care about all CRUD operations on storage
remove blockchain state since everything is stored on change
remove storage operations from structs(entities)
move structs to entities package
When 74590551 introduced this code we had no proper caching layer, so there
were these strange fallbacks in the code. fc0031e5 should'd removed them, but
failed to do so, so do it now and fix processing of transactions that touch
storage for the same key (address) in the same block.
Drop wif.GetVerificationScript(), drop
smartcontract.CreateSignatureRedeemScript(), add GetVerificationScript()
directly to the PublicKey and use it everywhere.
