Also do not limit depth. It was introduced in e34fa2e915 as a simple
solution to OOM problem. In this commit we do exactly the refactoring
described there. Maximum size is the same as stack item size and
can be changed if needed withouth significat refactoring.
`1 MiB` seems sufficient, though.
Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Stratonikov <evgeniy@nspcc.ru>
We can have very deep reference types and attempt to JSONize them can easily
lead to OOM (even though there are no recursive references inside). Therefore
we have to limit them. While regular ToJSON() is buffer size limited to
MaxSize, ToJSONWithTypes is not and limiting it to MaxSize output will require
substantial rewriting effort while not really providing fair result, MaxSize
is more about stack item size while its JSON representation can be much bigger
because of various overheads.
Initial thought was to limit it by element count based on
MaxIteratorResultItems, but the problem here is that we don't always have this
limit in contexts using ToJSONWithTypes (like notification event
marshaling). Thus we need some generic limit which would be fine for all
users.
We at the same time have maxJSONDepth used when deserializing from JSON, so
it can be used for marshaling as well, it's not often that we have deeper
structures in real results.
Inspired by neo-project/neo#2521.
If we're done with element it no longer can lead to recursion error, so fix
cases like `[arr, arr]` where we have two copies of `arr` trigger this error
for no good reason (there is no recursion there).
This commit fixes the following Go vs C# state diff:
block 74613: value mismatch for key EwAAAHN0cmVhbXMvDg==: eyJpZCI6MTQsInN0YXJ0IjoxNjIyNTAwMjAwMDAwLCJzdG9wIjoxNjIyNTAyMDAwMDAwLCJkZXBvc2l0IjoxMDAwMDAwMDAsInJlbWFpbmluZyI6MTAwMDAwMDAwLCJzZW5kZXIiOiJmeEY4RDl2ZFU3K0gwcDV3NTlyWllMNytNSlE9IiwicmVjaXBpZW50IjoiSVV6c3pveFV0S1NGVnlZRGczSmdTQTFlbTFNPSJ9 vs eyJpZCI6MTQsInN0YXJ0IjoxNjIyNTAwMjAwMDAwLCJzdG9wIjoxNjIyNTAyMDAwMDAwLCJkZXBvc2l0IjoxMDAwMDAwMDAsInJlbWFpbmluZyI6MTAwMDAwMDAwLCJzZW5kZXIiOiJmeEY4RDl2ZFU3XHUwMDJCSDBwNXc1OXJaWUw3XHUwMDJCTUpRPSIsInJlY2lwaWVudCI6IklVenN6b3hVdEtTRlZ5WURnM0pnU0ExZW0xTT0ifQ==
I.e.:
```
{"id":14,"start":1622500200000,"stop":1622502000000,"deposit":100000000,"remaining":100000000,"sender":"fxF8D9vdU7+H0p5w59rZYL7+MJQ=","recipient":"IUzszoxUtKSFVyYDg3JgSA1em1M="}
```
vs
```
{"id":14,"start":1622500200000,"stop":1622502000000,"deposit":100000000,"remaining":100000000,"sender":"fxF8D9vdU7\u002BH0p5w59rZYL7\u002BMJQ=","recipient":"IUzszoxUtKSFVyYDg3JgSA1em1M="}
```
There are 2 kinds of JSON marshaling:
1. Lossy raw marshaling, when type information is lost and
map keys are expected to be valid utf-8 strings.
2. Almost lossless marshaling, which can handle any non-recursive item.
Interop value preserves only type.
This commit implements the second.
Signed-off-by: Evgenii Stratonikov <evgeniy@nspcc.ru>
