Most of the time people are interested in successful executions. Unfortunately,
unwrap package can't help here because of a different result structure (some
interface abstract can help, but it's still mostly stack-oriented and sessions
can be a problem), so this additional interface is needed.
Signed-off-by: Roman Khimov <roman@nspcc.ru>
Adjust names of all used structures, no need to duplicate `Waiter` everywhere,
we already in the `waiter` package. Also, adjust comments to Actor so that links
to Waiter are properly described in docs.
Ref. #3265.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
There are use-cases when not only Actor, but also Invoker and even
simple RPC client must wait (e.g. sendtx or dumptx CLI commands). Actor
requires optional signers in constructor, and it's not always
appropriate to create Actor only to be able to use Waiter, sometimes
it's needed to use only Waiter without Actor.
Signed-off-by: Ekaterina Pavlova <ekt@morphbits.io>
Change first argument of NewWaiter to be able to directly accept RPC
Client and export for external usage.
Refs #3244.
Signed-off-by: Ekaterina Pavlova <ekt@morphbits.io>
This was recently added in neotest, but working with the real RPC is
still not enjoyable. This commit extends `wallet.Account` with
invocation script builder to aid network fee calculations and signing.
Signed-off-by: Evgenii Stratonikov <fyfyrchik@runbox.com>
Everywhere including examples, external interop APIs, bindings generators
code and in other valuable places. A couple of `interface{}` usages are
intentionally left in the CHANGELOG.md, documentation and tests.
`Actor.MakeUnsignedUncheckedRun` method imposes restriction to
`CalculateNetworkFee` method's implementations: `Hash` or `Size` methods
must not be called on the pointer to the given transaction.
Add docs to adjust described requirement.
Signed-off-by: Leonard Lyubich <ctulhurider@gmail.com>
If VUB-th block is received, we still can't guaranty that transaction
wasn't accepted to chain. Back this situation by rolling back to a
poll-based waiter.
Do not block subscribers until the unsubscription request to RPC server
is completed. Otherwise, another notification may be received from the
RPC server which will block the unsubscription process.
At the same time, fix event-based waiter. We must not block the receiver
channel during unsubscription because there's a chance that subsequent
event will be sent by the server. We need to read this event in order not
to block the WSClient's readloop.
Execution events are followed by block events, not vise versa, thus,
we can wait until VUB block to be accepted to be sure that
transaction wasn't accepted to chain.
Somewhat similar to invoker, but changing the state (or just creating a
transaction). Transaction creation could've been put into a structure of its
own, but it seems to be less convenient to use this way.
