When block is being spread through the network we can get a lot of invs with
the same hash. Some more stale nodes may also announce previous or some
earlier block. We can avoid full DB lookup for them and minimize inv handling
time (timeouts in inv handler had happened in #2744).
It doesn't affect tests, just makes node a little less likely to spend some
considerable amount of time in the inv handler.
Blockchain's notificationDispatcher sends events to channels and these
channels must be read from. Unfortunately, regular service shutdown procedure
does unsubscription first (outside of the read loop) and only then drains the
channel. While it waits for unsubscription request to be accepted
notificationDispatcher can try pushing more data into the same channel which
will lead to a deadlock. Reading in the same method solves this, any number of
events can be pushed until unsub channel accepts the data.
Which allows to enable/disable the service, change nodes, keys and other
settings. Unfortunately, atomic.Value doesn't allow Store(nil), so we have to
store a pointer there that can point to nil interface.
It's not an ideal solution, but at least it solves the problem for
now. Caveats:
* consensus only needs one method, so it's mirrored to Blockchain
* rpcsrv uses core.* definition of the StateRoot (so technically it might as
well not have an internal Ledger), but it uses core already unfortunately
1. It's not good for pkg/core to import anything from pkg/neorpc.
2. The type is closely tied to the state package, even though it's not stored
in the DB
Specifying a certain stateroot R as `invoke*historic` RPC-call
parameter, we're willing to perform historic call based on the storage
state of root R. Thus, next block should be of the height h(R)+1. This
allows to use historic functionality for the current blockchain height.
name old time/op new time/op delta
TokenTransferLog_Append-8 93.0µs ±170% 46.8µs ±152% ~ (p=0.053 n=10+9)
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
TokenTransferLog_Append-8 53.8kB ± 4% 38.6kB ±39% -28.26% (p=0.004 n=8+10)
name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta
TokenTransferLog_Append-8 384 ± 0% 128 ± 0% -66.67% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
We shouldn't use StoragePrice from Blockchain because its dao doesn't
contain the whole set of changes from previouse transactions in the
current block. Instead, we should use an updated storage price for
each transaction and retrieve the price from cached DAO.
The usage of the Blockchain's one leads to the same ExecFeeFactor within
a single block. What we need is to update ExecFeeFactor after each
transaction invocation, thus, cached DAO should be used as it contains
all relevant changes.
