TrueCloudLab/neoneo-go
7
0
Fork 2
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

cli: move RPC bindings related testdata to a separate folder

Browse source 
It helps us to keep the index clean and ordered. When some new RPC binding
test should be added, we don't need to search for a suitable place for it.

Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
This commit is contained in:
Anna Shaleva 2023-08-11 16:07:02 +03:00
parent b2f84c83b3
commit b4c0fcfaad
26 changed files with 18 additions and 18 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

20
cli/smartcontract/generate_test.go
View file

@ -437,12 +437,12 @@ func TestAssistedRPCBindings(t *testing.T) {
}
for _, hasDefinedHash := range []bool{true, false} {
checkBinding(filepath.Join("testdata", "types"), hasDefinedHash, false)
checkBinding(filepath.Join("testdata", "structs"), hasDefinedHash, false)
checkBinding(filepath.Join("testdata", "rpcbindings", "types"), hasDefinedHash, false)
checkBinding(filepath.Join("testdata", "rpcbindings", "structs"), hasDefinedHash, false)
}
checkBinding(filepath.Join("testdata", "notifications"), true, false)
checkBinding(filepath.Join("testdata", "notifications"), true, false, "_extended")
checkBinding(filepath.Join("testdata", "notifications"), true, true, "_guessed")
checkBinding(filepath.Join("testdata", "rpcbindings", "notifications"), true, false)
checkBinding(filepath.Join("testdata", "rpcbindings", "notifications"), true, false, "_extended")
checkBinding(filepath.Join("testdata", "rpcbindings", "notifications"), true, true, "_guessed")
require.False(t, rewriteExpectedOutputs)
}
@ -540,10 +540,10 @@ func TestCompile_GuessEventTypes(t *testing.T) {
}
t.Run("not declared in manifest", func(t *testing.T) {
check(t, filepath.Join("testdata", "invalid5"), "inconsistent usages of event `Non declared event`: not declared in the contract config")
check(t, filepath.Join("testdata", "rpcbindings", "invalid1"), "inconsistent usages of event `Non declared event`: not declared in the contract config")
})
t.Run("invalid number of params", func(t *testing.T) {
check(t, filepath.Join("testdata", "invalid6"), "inconsistent usages of event `SomeEvent` against config: number of params mismatch: 2 vs 1")
check(t, filepath.Join("testdata", "rpcbindings", "invalid2"), "inconsistent usages of event `SomeEvent` against config: number of params mismatch: 2 vs 1")
})
/*
// TODO: this on is a controversial one. If event information is provided in the config file, then conversion code
@ -552,13 +552,13 @@ func TestCompile_GuessEventTypes(t *testing.T) {
// Thus, this testcase is always failing (no compilation error occures).
// Question: do we want to compare `RealType` of the emitted parameter with the one expected in the manifest?
t.Run("SC parameter type mismatch", func(t *testing.T) {
check(t, filepath.Join("testdata", "invalid7"), "inconsistent usages of event `SomeEvent` against config: number of params mismatch: 2 vs 1")
check(t, filepath.Join("testdata", "rpcbindings", "invalid3"), "inconsistent usages of event `SomeEvent` against config: number of params mismatch: 2 vs 1")
})
*/
t.Run("extended types mismatch", func(t *testing.T) {
check(t, filepath.Join("testdata", "invalid8"), "inconsistent usages of event `SomeEvent`: extended type of param #0 mismatch")
check(t, filepath.Join("testdata", "rpcbindings", "invalid4"), "inconsistent usages of event `SomeEvent`: extended type of param #0 mismatch")
})
t.Run("named types redeclare", func(t *testing.T) {
check(t, filepath.Join("testdata", "invalid9"), "configured declared named type intersects with the contract's one: `invalid9.NamedStruct`")
check(t, filepath.Join("testdata", "rpcbindings", "invalid5"), "configured declared named type intersects with the contract's one: `invalid5.NamedStruct`")
})
}