Merge pull request #3391 from nspcc-dev/fix-tx-awaiting

cli: unify `canceltx` command output

cli/util/cancel.go

@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ func cancelTx(ctx *cli.Context) error {
 
 	mainTx, _ := c.GetRawTransactionVerbose(txHash)
 	if mainTx != nil && !mainTx.Blockhash.Equals(util.Uint256{}) {
-		return cli.NewExitError(fmt.Errorf("transaction %s is already accepted at block %s", txHash, mainTx.Blockhash.StringLE()), 1)
+		return cli.NewExitError(fmt.Errorf("target transaction %s is accepted at block %s", txHash, mainTx.Blockhash.StringLE()), 1)
 	}
 
 	if mainTx != nil && !mainTx.HasSigner(acc.ScriptHash()) {
@@ -76,10 +76,7 @@ func cancelTx(ctx *cli.Context) error {
 	if err != nil {
 		return cli.NewExitError(fmt.Errorf("failed to send conflicting transaction: %w", err), 1)
 	}
-	var (
-		acceptedH = resHash
-		res       *state.AppExecResult
-	)
+	var res *state.AppExecResult
 	if ctx.Bool("await") {
 		res, err = a.WaitAny(gctx, resVub, txHash, resHash)
 		if err != nil {
@@ -93,12 +90,14 @@ func cancelTx(ctx *cli.Context) error {
 			return cli.NewExitError(fmt.Errorf("failed to await target/ conflicting transaction %s/ %s: %w", txHash.StringLE(), resHash.StringLE(), err), 1)
 		}
 		if txHash.Equals(res.Container) {
-			fmt.Fprintln(ctx.App.Writer, "Target transaction accepted")
-			acceptedH = txHash
-		} else {
+			tx, err := c.GetRawTransactionVerbose(txHash)
+			if err != nil {
+				return cli.NewExitError(fmt.Errorf("target transaction %s is accepted", txHash), 1)
+			}
+			return cli.NewExitError(fmt.Errorf("target transaction %s is accepted at block %s", txHash, tx.Blockhash.StringLE()), 1)
+		}
 		fmt.Fprintln(ctx.App.Writer, "Conflicting transaction accepted")
 	}
-	}
-	txctx.DumpTransactionInfo(ctx.App.Writer, acceptedH, res)
+	txctx.DumpTransactionInfo(ctx.App.Writer, resHash, res)
 	return nil
 }

cli/util/util_test.go

@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
 package util_test
 
 import (
+	"fmt"
 	"os"
 	"path/filepath"
-	"strings"
 	"testing"
 	"time"
 
@@ -168,24 +168,13 @@ func TestAwaitUtilCancelTx(t *testing.T) {
 	_, ok := e.Chain.GetMemPool().TryGetValue(txHash)
 	require.True(t, ok)
 
+	// Allow both cases: either target or conflicting tx acceptance.
 	e.In.WriteString("one\r")
-	e.Run(t, append(args, txHash.StringLE())...)
-
+	err = e.RunOrError(t, fmt.Sprintf("target transaction %s is accepted", txHash), append(args, txHash.StringLE())...)
+	if err == nil {
 		response := e.GetNextLine(t)
-	if strings.Contains(response, "Conflicting transaction accepted") {
+		require.Equal(t, "Conflicting transaction accepted", response)
 		resHash, _ := e.CheckAwaitableTxPersisted(t)
-		require.Eventually(t, func() bool {
-			_, aerErr := e.Chain.GetAppExecResults(resHash.Hash(), trigger.Application)
-			return aerErr == nil
-		}, time.Second*2, time.Millisecond*50)
-	} else if strings.Contains(response, "Target transaction accepted") {
-		require.Eventually(t, func() bool {
-			_, _, err := e.Chain.GetTransaction(txHash)
-			require.NoError(t, err, "original transaction should be on chain")
-			_, aerErr := e.Chain.GetAppExecResults(txHash, trigger.Application)
-			return aerErr == nil
-		}, time.Second*2, time.Millisecond*50)
-	} else {
-		t.Fatalf("unexpected response: %s", response)
+		require.NotEqual(t, resHash, txHash)
 	}
 }

internal/testcli/executor.go

@@ -286,6 +286,20 @@ func (e *Executor) Run(t *testing.T, args ...string) {
 	require.NoError(t, e.run(args...))
 	checkExit(t, ch, 0)
 }
+
+// RunOrError runs command and checks that if there was an error, then its text matches the provided one.
+func (e *Executor) RunOrError(t *testing.T, errText string, args ...string) error {
+	ch := setExitFunc()
+	err := e.run(args...)
+	if err != nil {
+		require.True(t, strings.Contains(err.Error(), errText))
+		checkExit(t, ch, 1)
+	} else {
+		checkExit(t, ch, 0)
+	}
+	return err
+}
+
 func (e *Executor) run(args ...string) error {
 	e.Out.Reset()
 	e.Err.Reset()