Make NEP-11 code use getnep11balances the same way NEP-17 code uses
getnep17balances. This command was introduced well before getnep11balances
appeared, so it required always specifying contract explicitly. Now this
constraint can be relaxed somewhat in most cases.
1. In the single token mode compare known hashes instead of names, names can
be misleading.
2. Hardcode NEO/GAS, they are special (if not overrided by the wallet data).
We have this data available since 0.99.1 while all public networks require at
least 0.99.2 for compatibility and NeoFS setups use 0.99.2+ too. This data can
simplify account handling considerably making additional requests unneccessary
in many cases.
In the same way we do for NEP-17 tokens. This code predates "getnep11balances"
call, so this wasn't possible back then, but now we can improve the situation
(allow specifying names/symbols instead of hashes only).
Unfortunately Go doesn't allow to easily reuse readers in full packages, still
we can have this wrapper with a little overhead (the alternative is to move
specific methods into types of their own, but I'm not sure how it's going to
be accepted user-side).
Notice that int64 types are used for gas per block or registration price
because the price has to fit into the system fee limitation and gas per block
value can't be more than 10 GAS. We use int64 for votes as well in other types
since NEO is limited to 100M.
See neo-project/neo#2390. Can't see it there? No wonder, that's why we have
this bug for a year and a half. Not critical, we don't care about versions,
but _very_ annoying.
Saving into a file can't be successful without signAndPush flag (wallet
present). This situation can't happen in CLI invocations since
testinvokefunction doesn't have `--out` flag, but still it's a logic
error. Everything else can be simplified a bit taking that into account.
Some commands don't accept arguments, but users try giving them and don't
notice a mistake. It's a bit more user-friendly to tell the user that there is
something wrong with the way he tries to use the command.
It has a stub for SIGHUP, but doesn't have anything for USR1 and USR2:
Error: cli\server\server.go:520:31: undefined: syscall.SIGUSR1
Error: cli\server\server.go:521:31: undefined: syscall.SIGUSR2
Error: cli\server\server.go:565:17: undefined: syscall.SIGUSR1
Error: cli\server\server.go:608:17: undefined: syscall.SIGUSR2
