If we're withdrawing funds to contract that has onNEP17Payment method,
then it may call Notary's withdraw one more time, but the account's
state is not yet updated by this moment.
The problem is similar to https://github.com/neo-project/neo/pull/2734.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
And refactor some code a bit, don't use bytes.Clone where type-specific
helpers may be used instead.
Close#2907.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
It's a bug since Prefix is shared between all iterator items and
appending is not enough. If prefix has enough capacity, then new slice
won't be created and the previous item's prefix will be changed.
This commit fixes the following test failure caused by moving from
bytes.Clone to slice.Copy:
```
--- FAIL: TestComlileAndInvokeFunction/test_Storage.Find (0.02s)
--- FAIL: TestComlileAndInvokeFunction/test_Storage.Find/keys_only (0.01s)
contract_test.go:866:
Error Trace: /home/anna/Documents/GitProjects/nspcc-dev/neo-go/cli/smartcontract/contract_test.go:866
Error: Not equal:
expected: []stackitem.Item{(*stackitem.ByteArray)(0xc000a1cdf8), (*stackitem.ByteArray)(0xc000a1ce10)}
actual : []stackitem.Item{(*stackitem.ByteArray)(0xc000a1cdb0), (*stackitem.ByteArray)(0xc000a1cdc8)}
Diff:
--- Expected
+++ Actual
@@ -2,3 +2,3 @@
(*stackitem.ByteArray)((len=8) {
- 00000000 66 69 6e 64 6b 65 79 31 |findkey1|
+ 00000000 66 69 6e 64 6b 65 79 32 |findkey2|
}),
Test: TestComlileAndInvokeFunction/test_Storage.Find/keys_only
--- FAIL: TestComlileAndInvokeFunction/test_Storage.Find/both (0.01s)
contract_test.go:881:
Error Trace: /home/anna/Documents/GitProjects/nspcc-dev/neo-go/cli/smartcontract/contract_test.go:881
Error: Not equal:
expected: []stackitem.Item{(*stackitem.ByteArray)(0xc000515920), (*stackitem.ByteArray)(0xc000515938)}
actual : []stackitem.Item{(*stackitem.ByteArray)(0xc000515848), (*stackitem.ByteArray)(0xc000515860)}
Diff:
--- Expected
+++ Actual
@@ -2,3 +2,3 @@
(*stackitem.ByteArray)((len=8) {
- 00000000 66 69 6e 64 6b 65 79 31 |findkey1|
+ 00000000 66 69 6e 64 6b 65 79 32 |findkey2|
}),
Test: TestComlileAndInvokeFunction/test_Storage.Find/both
```
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
Revert 5f6c01336c, remove all multierror
related nolint comments and use multierror wrapping instead.
Close#2906.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
Added sync logs for every service separately to provide the ability to
have a custom logger for each service. This commit makes the code follow
the zap usages rules: `Sync calls the underlying Core's Sync method,
flushing any buffered log entries. Applications should take care to
call Sync before exiting.`
Signed-off-by: Ekaterina Pavlova <ekt@morphbits.io>
New event is to notify the user about header's content by the moment
when block is stored (which happens after block's processing). This is
needed for proper Waiter work.
Closes#2751.
Signed-off-by: Ekaterina Pavlova <ekt@morphbits.io>
We have cache update mechanism (Neo's cache votesChanged flag), it must
be used for current epoch and new epoch cached values update. And the
cached current/new epoch values themselves must always contain valid
information for the current/new epoch. These cached values must only be
changed once per epoch, never set them to nil.
This commit prevents CN node panic described in #3253 when dBFT tries
to retrieve new epoch validators with some votes modifications made
before at the same dBFT epoch.
Close#3253.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
I had some reason to suspect something is wrong here (but it's all OK). Even
though this is kinda tested in TestDeployGetUpdateDestroyContract, it uses
internal APIs and with neotest we can ensure it work OK for a complete tx/block
environment. So, won't hurt having these tests as well.
Signed-off-by: Roman Khimov <roman@nspcc.ru>
Initialise services dependant on roles designation based on N+1
block so that Genesis roles extension work properly. There's not
much sence to fetch node roles information for the latest persisted
block because Designation contract itself makes designated nodes
responsible since the next subsequent block.
A part of #3228.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
Manifest will be a part of the state.Contract which will be checked on its
way to the storage. Tiny optimisation which allows not to serialize manifest
twice. Ref. https://github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/pull/3218#discussion_r1402374232.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
This method returns persisted block height and doesn't take into account
persisting block height. Some of the callers of this method relay on
the wrong assumption that BlockHeight() returns persisting block index.
Fix improper usages of this method and adjust tests. Ref.
61a066583e/src/Neo/SmartContract/ApplicationEngine.cs (L634).
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
We have this log on the network server side, but it would also be
useful in case of failed blockchain initialization.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
Refactored native NeoToken cache scheme introduced in #3110 sometimes requires
validators list recalculation during native cache initialization process (when
initializing with the existing storage from the block that is preceded each N-th block).
To recalculate validators from candidates, native NeoToken needs an access to
cached native Policy blocked accounts. By the moment of native Neo initialization,
the cache of native Policy is not yet initialized, thus we need a direct DAO access
for Policy to handle blocked account check.
Close#3181.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
This section contains genesis-related settings including genesis-related or natives-related
extensions. Currently it includes the set of node roles that may be designated
duing the native Designation contract initialisation.
Close#3156.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
And rename roles.go to role.go to match the role_string.go and the
existing naming pattern for enums.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
We often use binary.PutUint*, but almost all these cases have preallocated
buffer of the size that matches exactly the desired one and use a single or
a couple of calls to PutUint*. Thus, I don't think that replacing
binary.PutUint* by AppendUint* will make things better for all these usages.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
