This is not the way intended in https://github.com/neo-project/proposals/pull/156.
-511 covers _both_ cases because users hardly can distinguish one from another,
it's just that our mempool implementation has error codes for both..
Signed-off-by: Roman Khimov <roman@nspcc.ru>
mempool.ErrInsufficientFunds is used when sender doesn't have enough
balance to pay the submitted transaction fees (-511 code according to
https://github.com/neo-project/proposals/pull/156). mempool.ErrConflict is
used when sender is not able to pay the overall transactions fee sum in
the pool (generic -500 error according to the proposal).
This bugfix is kind of breaking change for those users who relied on the
old -511 code previously returning "insufficient funds" error.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
If we're withdrawing funds to contract that has onNEP17Payment method,
then it may call Notary's withdraw one more time, but the account's
state is not yet updated by this moment.
The problem is similar to https://github.com/neo-project/neo/pull/2734.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
Shouldn't affect things much, yet at the same time we no longer need any
connection after we're done with the request.
Signed-off-by: Roman Khimov <roman@nspcc.ru>
Add waiting for startSending to ensure that the client is ready before
the server starts sending messages.
Close#3005Close#3312
Signed-off-by: Ekaterina Pavlova <ekt@morphbits.io>
We have more and more timeouts happening for test runs, so 10m is not enough
for busy GH machines sometime. I think we can just give them a bit more time.
Refs. #2379 though.
Signed-off-by: Roman Khimov <roman@nspcc.ru>
The theory is:
* we add a block
* it triggers notary
* which can process the fallback before we're to setFinalizeWithError
* it'll fail and require an additional block to enter, but it's never added
* FAIL
The solution is:
* always add an additional block, but treat the first fb specially
Signed-off-by: Roman Khimov <roman@nspcc.ru>
And refactor some code a bit, don't use bytes.Clone where type-specific
helpers may be used instead.
Close#2907.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
It's a bug since Prefix is shared between all iterator items and
appending is not enough. If prefix has enough capacity, then new slice
won't be created and the previous item's prefix will be changed.
This commit fixes the following test failure caused by moving from
bytes.Clone to slice.Copy:
```
--- FAIL: TestComlileAndInvokeFunction/test_Storage.Find (0.02s)
--- FAIL: TestComlileAndInvokeFunction/test_Storage.Find/keys_only (0.01s)
contract_test.go:866:
Error Trace: /home/anna/Documents/GitProjects/nspcc-dev/neo-go/cli/smartcontract/contract_test.go:866
Error: Not equal:
expected: []stackitem.Item{(*stackitem.ByteArray)(0xc000a1cdf8), (*stackitem.ByteArray)(0xc000a1ce10)}
actual : []stackitem.Item{(*stackitem.ByteArray)(0xc000a1cdb0), (*stackitem.ByteArray)(0xc000a1cdc8)}
Diff:
--- Expected
+++ Actual
@@ -2,3 +2,3 @@
(*stackitem.ByteArray)((len=8) {
- 00000000 66 69 6e 64 6b 65 79 31 |findkey1|
+ 00000000 66 69 6e 64 6b 65 79 32 |findkey2|
}),
Test: TestComlileAndInvokeFunction/test_Storage.Find/keys_only
--- FAIL: TestComlileAndInvokeFunction/test_Storage.Find/both (0.01s)
contract_test.go:881:
Error Trace: /home/anna/Documents/GitProjects/nspcc-dev/neo-go/cli/smartcontract/contract_test.go:881
Error: Not equal:
expected: []stackitem.Item{(*stackitem.ByteArray)(0xc000515920), (*stackitem.ByteArray)(0xc000515938)}
actual : []stackitem.Item{(*stackitem.ByteArray)(0xc000515848), (*stackitem.ByteArray)(0xc000515860)}
Diff:
--- Expected
+++ Actual
@@ -2,3 +2,3 @@
(*stackitem.ByteArray)((len=8) {
- 00000000 66 69 6e 64 6b 65 79 31 |findkey1|
+ 00000000 66 69 6e 64 6b 65 79 32 |findkey2|
}),
Test: TestComlileAndInvokeFunction/test_Storage.Find/both
```
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
Revert 5f6c01336c, remove all multierror
related nolint comments and use multierror wrapping instead.
Close#2906.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
