Get new blocks directly from the Blockchain. It may lead to some duplications
(as we'll also receive our own blocks), but at the same time it's more
correct, because technically we can also get blocks via other means besides
network server like RPC (submitblock call). And it simplifies network server
at the same time.
A part of integration with NEO Blockchain Toolkit (see #902). To be
able to deploy smart-contract compiled with neo-go compiler via NEO
Express, we have to generate additional .abi.json file. This file
contains the following information:
- hash of the compiled contract
- smart-contract metadata (title, description, version, author,
email, has-storage, has-dynamic-invoke, is-payable)
- smart-contract entry point
- functions
- events
However, this .abi.json file is slightly different from the one,
described in manifest.go, so we have to add auxilaury stractures for
json marshalling. The .abi.json format used by NEO-Express is described
[here](https://github.com/neo-project/neo-devpack-dotnet/blob/master/src/Neo.Compiler.MSIL/FuncExport.cs#L66).
Method `methodInfoFromScope(...)` always returned an empty parameters
set, so we were missing this information in both .abi.json and
.debug.json files. Fixed now.
Sequence points is a way to map a specific instruction offset
from a compiled contract to a text span in a source file.
This commit implements mapping only for `return` statements.
Further improvements are straight-forward.
There's a bug after #785: smartcontract.Parameter of type hash160 should
be marshalled in LE (as default marshaller for uint160 does) instead of
BE, so fixed.
Which makes iterating over map stable which is important for serialization and
and even fixes occasional test failures. We use the same ordering here as
NEO 3.0 uses, but it should also be fine for NEO 2.0 because it has no
defined order.
Fixes#809.
Basically, there are three alternative approaches to fixing it:
* allowing both []byte and string for ByteArrayType value
minimal invasion into existing code, but ugly as hell and will probably
backfire at some point
* storing string values in ByteArrayType
incurs quite a number of type conversions (and associated data copying),
though note that these values are not changed usually, so dynamic
properties of []byte are almost irrelevant here
* storing only []byte values in ByteArrayType
makes it impossible to use them as map keys which can be solved in several
ways:
- via an interface (Marshalable)
which is good, but makes testing and comparing values in general harder,
because of keys mismatch
- using serialized Parameter as a key (in a string)
which will need some additional marshaling/unmarshaling
- converting MapType from map to a slice of key-value pairs
not a bad idea as we don't use this map as a map really, the type
itself is all about input/output for real VM types and this approach is
also a bit closer to JSON representation of the Map
