Support different operations in policy engine #6

New issue

Closed

opened 2023-10-26 14:07:36 +00:00 by fyrchik · 2 comments

fyrchik commented

2023-10-26 14:07:36 +00:00

Owner

Currently the operation is just sting.

We need to document the format. It could be similar to AWS arn, but I'd prefer more concise option.
Operations in binary format could be just numbers (policy engine defined in enum).
*to be extensible, consider having some kind of a union (numbers for well-known s3 and native operations, strings as an extended option).

Currently the operation is just sting. 1. We need to document the format. It could be similar to AWS arn, but I'd prefer more concise option. 2. Operations in binary format could be just numbers (policy engine defined in enum). 3. *to be extensible, consider having some kind of a union (numbers for well-known s3 and native operations, strings as an extended option).

fyrchik added the

enhancement

discussion

labels 2023-10-26 14:13:16 +00:00

aarifullin commented

2023-11-21 13:26:31 +00:00

Member

We need to document the format. It could be similar to AWS arn, but I'd prefer more concise option.

Do we suppose that the format has been agreed after @dstepanov-yadro added schema? Also, s3 format is supported

Operations in binary format could be just numbers (policy engine defined in enum).

Are you talking about using named numbers for these consts like PutObject/GetObject etc. ?

> We need to document the format. It could be similar to AWS arn, but I'd prefer more concise option. Do we suppose that the format has been agreed after @dstepanov-yadro added [schema](https://git.frostfs.info/TrueCloudLab/policy-engine/src/branch/master/schema/native/consts.go)? Also, [s3](https://git.frostfs.info/TrueCloudLab/policy-engine/src/branch/master/schema/s3/consts.go) format is supported > Operations in binary format could be just numbers (policy engine defined in enum). Are you talking about using named numbers for [these consts](https://git.frostfs.info/TrueCloudLab/policy-engine/src/branch/master/schema/native/consts.go#L4) like PutObject/GetObject etc. ?

fyrchik commented

2024-02-02 11:37:38 +00:00

Author

Owner

Do we suppose that the format has been agreed

Yes.

Operations are defined and restricted according to schema. Using numbers for them is encoding/decoding optimizations, will do in a separate task if needed.

Closed via #19

> Do we suppose that the format has been agreed Yes. Operations are defined and restricted according to schema. Using numbers for them is encoding/decoding optimizations, will do in a separate task if needed. Closed via #19

fyrchik closed this issue

2024-02-02 11:37:44 +00:00