TrueCloudLab/xk6-frostfs
42
1
Fork 20
Code Issues 32 Pull requests 2 Releases Activity Actions

Improve reading VUs to work with objects produced by writing VUs #25

New issue
Closed
opened 2023-03-08 23:37:54 +00:00 by snegurochka · 1 comment
snegurochka commented 2023-03-08 23:37:54 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Original issue: https://github.com/nspcc-dev/xk6-neofs/issues/20

Currently reading VUs are reading a fixed set of objects that were pre-generated before K6 run. As result, readers are sending requests that are covering very narrow set of data in neoFS. More realistic scenario would be if reading VUs attempted to read the objects that have been created by writing VUs within the same load session.

We can achieve this by storing objects in registry (in writing functions) and then picking them up with ObjSelector in reading VUs.

Original issue: https://github.com/nspcc-dev/xk6-neofs/issues/20 Currently reading VUs are reading a fixed set of objects that were pre-generated before K6 run. As result, readers are sending requests that are covering very narrow set of data in neoFS. More realistic scenario would be if reading VUs attempted to read the objects that have been created by writing VUs within the same load session. We can achieve this by storing objects in registry (in writing functions) and then picking them up with `ObjSelector` in reading VUs.
👍 1
alexvanin added the
P1
 label 2023-03-10 09:20:49 +00:00
alexvanin commented 2023-03-10 09:21:14 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Consider deletes in case of reading deleted objects.

Consider deletes in case of reading deleted objects.
fyrchik added the
enhancement
 label 2023-07-17 07:17:09 +00:00
aarifullin was assigned by fyrchik 2023-07-17 08:09:37 +00:00
dstepanov-yadro was assigned by fyrchik 2023-07-19 07:39:22 +00:00
aarifullin was unassigned by fyrchik 2023-07-19 07:39:36 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag specified
Branches Tags
master
lorem-ipsum
No results found.
Labels
Clear labels   
P0

Highest

  
P1

High

  
P2

Medium

  
P3

Low

  
good first issue

Good for newcomers

  
Infrastructure

Infrastructure, Automation, CI/CD or DevOps related stuff

  
blocked

The issue or PR is blocked by something

  
bug

Something is not working

  
config

Configuration format update or breaking change

  
discussion

Talking about something in order to reach a decision or to exchange ideas

  
documentation

Documentation related

  
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement

New feature

  
go

Language features adoption

  
help wanted

Extra attention is needed

  
internal

   
invalid

Something is wrong

  
kludge

This is a kludge and we know it

  
observability

Related to metrics, tracing and logs

  
perfomance

Perfomance related

  
question

More information is needed

  
refactoring

Refactoring

  
wontfix

This won't be fixed

No labels
P0
P1
P2
P3
good first issue
Infrastructure
blocked
bug
config
discussion
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
go
help wanted
internal
invalid
kludge
observability
perfomance
question
refactoring
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
dstepanov-yadro
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: TrueCloudLab/xk6-frostfs#25
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?