TrueCloudLab
/
xk6-frostfs
36
0
Fork 14
Code Issues 30 Pull Requests Actions Releases Activity

Improve reading VUs to work with objects produced by writing VUs #25

New Issue
Closed
opened 2023-03-08 23:37:54 +00:00 by snegurochka · 1 comment
snegurochka commented 2023-03-08 23:37:54 +00:00
Collaborator

Original issue: https://github.com/nspcc-dev/xk6-neofs/issues/20

Currently reading VUs are reading a fixed set of objects that were pre-generated before K6 run. As result, readers are sending requests that are covering very narrow set of data in neoFS. More realistic scenario would be if reading VUs attempted to read the objects that have been created by writing VUs within the same load session.

We can achieve this by storing objects in registry (in writing functions) and then picking them up with ObjSelector in reading VUs.

Original issue: https://github.com/nspcc-dev/xk6-neofs/issues/20 Currently reading VUs are reading a fixed set of objects that were pre-generated before K6 run. As result, readers are sending requests that are covering very narrow set of data in neoFS. More realistic scenario would be if reading VUs attempted to read the objects that have been created by writing VUs within the same load session. We can achieve this by storing objects in registry (in writing functions) and then picking them up with `ObjSelector` in reading VUs.
👍 1
alexvanin added the
P1
 label 2023-03-10 09:20:49 +00:00
alexvanin commented 2023-03-10 09:21:14 +00:00
Owner

Consider deletes in case of reading deleted objects.

Consider deletes in case of reading deleted objects.
fyrchik added the
enhancement
 label 2023-07-17 07:17:09 +00:00
aarifullin was assigned by fyrchik 2023-07-17 08:09:37 +00:00
dstepanov-yadro was assigned by fyrchik 2023-07-19 07:39:22 +00:00
aarifullin was unassigned by fyrchik 2023-07-19 07:39:36 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
master
lorem-ipsum
Labels
Clear labels   
P0

Highest   
P1

High   
P2

Medium   
P3

Low   
good first issue

Good for newcomers
  
Infrastructure

Infrastructure, Automation, CI/CD or DevOps related stuff   
blocked

The issue or PR is blocked by something   
bug

Something is not working   
config

Configuration format update or breaking change   
discussion

Talking about something in order to reach a decision or to exchange ideas   
documentation

Documentation related   
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists   
enhancement

New feature   
go

Language features adoption   
help wanted

Extra attention is needed   
internal
   
invalid

Something is wrong   
kludge

This is a kludge and we know it   
observability

Related to metrics, tracing and logs   
perfomance

Perfomance related   
question

More information is needed   
refactoring

Refactoring   
wontfix

This won't be fixed
No Label
P0
P1
P2
P3
good first issue
Infrastructure
blocked
bug
config
discussion
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
go
help wanted
internal
invalid
kludge
observability
perfomance
question
refactoring
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No Milestone
Assignees
Clear assignees
No Assignees
dstepanov-yadro
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: TrueCloudLab/xk6-frostfs#25
There is no content yet.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may exist for a short time before cleaning up, in most cases it CANNOT be undone. Continue?