Under high load we are limited by the _amount_ of keys we need to update
in a single transaction. In this commit we try storing all state
with a single key.
Signed-off-by: Evgenii Stratonikov <e.stratonikov@yadro.com>
In the previous implementation any non-nil error that preceded object
fetching from blobstor led to iterating over every storage (in other words,
no storage ID information was taken into account). Now storage ID is
skipped only if metabase (storage ID source) returns any error.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Karpy <p.karpy@yadro.com>
Signed-off-by: Evgenii Stratonikov <e.stratonikov@yadro.com>
After the reconnection interval feature there was an bug related to the big
objects collecting: split error is returned from a client directly, not
via API status and was considered as a connection error.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Karpy <p.karpy@yadro.com>
Signed-off-by: Evgenii Stratonikov <e.stratonikov@yadro.com>
It should be similar to a `TreeAddByPath`. `applyOperation` is used for
`Apply` when the operation can be inserted in the middle of a log.
Signed-off-by: Evgenii Stratonikov <e.stratonikov@yadro.com>
Under load changing shard mode can lead to it being removed from the
list during some other PUT.
```
Dec 28 07:01:26 az neofs-node[364505]: panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference
Dec 28 07:01:26 az neofs-node[364505]: [signal SIGSEGV: segmentation violation code=0x1 addr=0x20 pc=0xc9fbb1]
Dec 28 07:01:26 az neofs-node[364505]: goroutine 11791912 [running]:
Dec 28 07:01:26 az neofs-node[364505]: github.com/nspcc-dev/neofs-node/pkg/local_object_storage/engine.(*StorageEngine).putToShard(0xc000435490, {0xc0003f7a28?, 0xc0001192c0?}, 0x2, {0x0, 0x>
Dec 28 07:01:26 az neofs-node[364505]: github.com/nspcc-dev/neofs-node/pkg/local_object_storage/engine/put.go:91 +0x1b1
Dec 28 07:01:26 az neofs-node[364505]: github.com/nspcc-dev/neofs-node/pkg/local_object_storage/engine.(*StorageEngine).put.func1(0xc000435490?, {0xc0003f7a28?, 0xc0001192c0?})
Dec 28 07:01:26 az neofs-node[364505]: github.com/nspcc-dev/neofs-node/pkg/local_object_storage/engine/put.go:71 +0x19c
Dec 28 07:01:26 az neofs-node[364505]: github.com/nspcc-dev/neofs-node/pkg/local_object_storage/engine.(*StorageEngine).iterateOverSortedShards(0x1?, {{0x62, 0x23, 0xfe, 0x60, 0x67, 0xd5, 0x>
Dec 28 07:01:26 az neofs-node[364505]: github.com/nspcc-dev/neofs-node/pkg/local_object_storage/engine/shards.go:225 +0xc8
Dec 28 07:01:26 az neofs-node[364505]: github.com/nspcc-dev/neofs-node/pkg/local_object_storage/engine.(*StorageEngine).put(0xc000435490, {0x1?})
Dec 28 07:01:26 az neofs-node[364505]: github.com/nspcc-dev/neofs-node/pkg/local_object_storage/engine/put.go:66 +0x2a9
Dec 28 07:01:26 az neofs-node[364505]: github.com/nspcc-dev/neofs-node/pkg/local_object_storage/engine.(*StorageEngine).Put.func1()
Dec 28 07:01:26 az neofs-node[364505]: github.com/nspcc-dev/neofs-node/pkg/local_object_storage/engine/put.go:43 +0x2a
Dec 28 07:01:26 az neofs-node[364505]: github.com/nspcc-dev/neofs-node/pkg/local_object_storage/engine.(*StorageEngine).execIfNotBlocked(0x8?, 0x38?)
Dec 28 07:01:26 az neofs-node[364505]: github.com/nspcc-dev/neofs-node/pkg/local_object_storage/engine/control.go:147 +0xcf
Dec 28 07:01:26 az neofs-node[364505]: github.com/nspcc-dev/neofs-node/pkg/local_object_storage/engine.(*StorageEngine).Put(0xc4df775a80?, {0x0?})
Dec 28 07:01:26 az neofs-node[364505]: github.com/nspcc-dev/neofs-node/pkg/local_object_storage/engine/put.go:42 +0x65
Dec 28 07:01:26 az neofs-node[364505]: github.com/nspcc-dev/neofs-node/pkg/local_object_storage/engine.Put(0xc06d928b80?, 0xc06b1b8dc8?)
Dec 28 07:01:26 az neofs-node[364505]: github.com/nspcc-dev/neofs-node/pkg/local_object_storage/engine/put.go:158 +0x19
Dec 28 07:01:26 az neofs-node[364505]: main.engineWithoutNotifications.Put({0x20301b?}, 0x20301b?)
```
Signed-off-by: Evgenii Stratonikov <e.stratonikov@yadro.com>
Because synchronization _most likely_ will have apply already existing
operations, it is much faster to check their presence in a read
transaction. However, always doing this will degrade the perfomance
for normal `Apply`. And, let's be honest, it is already not good.
Thus we add a separate parameter which specifies whether this logic is
enabled.
Signed-off-by: Evgenii Stratonikov <e.stratonikov@yadro.com>
