aarifullin/neoneo-go
1
0
Fork 0
forked from TrueCloudLab/neoneo-go
Code Pull requests Activity
neoneo-go/pkg/vm/opcode/opcode_string.go

284 lines
7.2 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

vm: implement new PUSH opcodes
2020-04-21 13:45:48 +00:00
// Code generated by "stringer -type Opcode"; DO NOT EDIT.
vm: move opcodes into their own package This allows easier reuse of opcodes and in some cases allows to eliminate dependencies on the whole vm package, like in compiler that only needs opcodes and doesn't care about VM for any other purpose. And yes, they're opcodes because an instruction is a whole thing with operands, that's what context.Next() returns.
2019-12-03 14:05:06 +00:00
package opcode
import "strconv"
func _() {
// An "invalid array index" compiler error signifies that the constant values have changed.
// Re-run the stringer command to generate them again.
var x [1]struct{}
vm: implement new PUSH opcodes
2020-04-21 13:45:48 +00:00
_ = x[PUSHINT8-0]
_ = x[PUSHINT16-1]
_ = x[PUSHINT32-2]
_ = x[PUSHINT64-3]
_ = x[PUSHINT128-4]
_ = x[PUSHINT256-5]
_ = x[PUSHNULL-11]
_ = x[PUSHDATA1-12]
_ = x[PUSHDATA2-13]
_ = x[PUSHDATA4-14]
_ = x[PUSHM1-15]
_ = x[PUSH0-16]
_ = x[PUSHF-16]
_ = x[PUSH1-17]
_ = x[PUSHT-17]
_ = x[PUSH2-18]
_ = x[PUSH3-19]
_ = x[PUSH4-20]
_ = x[PUSH5-21]
_ = x[PUSH6-22]
_ = x[PUSH7-23]
_ = x[PUSH8-24]
_ = x[PUSH9-25]
_ = x[PUSH10-26]
_ = x[PUSH11-27]
_ = x[PUSH12-28]
_ = x[PUSH13-29]
_ = x[PUSH14-30]
_ = x[PUSH15-31]
_ = x[PUSH16-32]
vm: implement new JMP* and CALL* opcodes In compiler JMP*_L opcodes are always used, as this requires less effort.
2020-04-23 08:56:36 +00:00
_ = x[NOP-33]
_ = x[JMP-34]
_ = x[JMPL-35]
_ = x[JMPIF-36]
_ = x[JMPIFL-37]
_ = x[JMPIFNOT-38]
_ = x[JMPIFNOTL-39]
_ = x[JMPEQ-40]
_ = x[JMPEQL-41]
_ = x[JMPNE-42]
_ = x[JMPNEL-43]
_ = x[JMPGT-44]
_ = x[JMPGTL-45]
_ = x[JMPGE-46]
_ = x[JMPGEL-47]
_ = x[JMPLT-48]
_ = x[JMPLTL-49]
_ = x[JMPLE-50]
_ = x[JMPLEL-51]
_ = x[CALL-52]
_ = x[CALLL-53]
vm: remove stack isolation opcodes They are not present in NEO3 and will be creating additional difficulties during future flow-control opcodes implementation.
2020-04-23 08:40:06 +00:00
_ = x[OLDPUSH1-81]
vm: move opcodes into their own package This allows easier reuse of opcodes and in some cases allows to eliminate dependencies on the whole vm package, like in compiler that only needs opcodes and doesn't care about VM for any other purpose. And yes, they're opcodes because an instruction is a whole thing with operands, that's what context.Next() returns.
2019-12-03 14:05:06 +00:00
_ = x[RET-102]
_ = x[APPCALL-103]
_ = x[SYSCALL-104]
_ = x[TAILCALL-105]
vm: implement new PUSH opcodes
2020-04-21 13:45:48 +00:00
_ = x[ISNULL-112]
vm: move opcodes into their own package This allows easier reuse of opcodes and in some cases allows to eliminate dependencies on the whole vm package, like in compiler that only needs opcodes and doesn't care about VM for any other purpose. And yes, they're opcodes because an instruction is a whole thing with operands, that's what context.Next() returns.
2019-12-03 14:05:06 +00:00
_ = x[DUPFROMALTSTACK-106]
_ = x[TOALTSTACK-107]
_ = x[FROMALTSTACK-108]
_ = x[XDROP-109]
_ = x[XSWAP-114]
_ = x[XTUCK-115]
_ = x[DEPTH-116]
_ = x[DROP-117]
_ = x[DUP-118]
_ = x[NIP-119]
_ = x[OVER-120]
_ = x[PICK-121]
_ = x[ROLL-122]
_ = x[ROT-123]
_ = x[SWAP-124]
_ = x[TUCK-125]
_ = x[CAT-126]
_ = x[SUBSTR-127]
_ = x[LEFT-128]
_ = x[RIGHT-129]
_ = x[SIZE-130]
_ = x[INVERT-131]
_ = x[AND-132]
_ = x[OR-133]
_ = x[XOR-134]
_ = x[EQUAL-135]
_ = x[INC-139]
_ = x[DEC-140]
_ = x[SIGN-141]
_ = x[NEGATE-143]
_ = x[ABS-144]
_ = x[NOT-145]
_ = x[NZ-146]
_ = x[ADD-147]
_ = x[SUB-148]
_ = x[MUL-149]
_ = x[DIV-150]
_ = x[MOD-151]
_ = x[SHL-152]
_ = x[SHR-153]
_ = x[BOOLAND-154]
_ = x[BOOLOR-155]
_ = x[NUMEQUAL-156]
_ = x[NUMNOTEQUAL-158]
_ = x[LT-159]
_ = x[GT-160]
_ = x[LTE-161]
_ = x[GTE-162]
_ = x[MIN-163]
_ = x[MAX-164]
_ = x[WITHIN-165]
_ = x[SHA1-167]
_ = x[SHA256-168]
_ = x[HASH160-169]
_ = x[HASH256-170]
_ = x[CHECKSIG-172]
_ = x[VERIFY-173]
_ = x[CHECKMULTISIG-174]
_ = x[ARRAYSIZE-192]
_ = x[PACK-193]
_ = x[UNPACK-194]
_ = x[PICKITEM-195]
_ = x[SETITEM-196]
_ = x[NEWARRAY-197]
_ = x[NEWSTRUCT-198]
_ = x[NEWMAP-199]
_ = x[APPEND-200]
_ = x[REVERSE-201]
_ = x[REMOVE-202]
_ = x[HASKEY-203]
_ = x[KEYS-204]
_ = x[VALUES-205]
_ = x[THROW-240]
_ = x[THROWIFNOT-241]
}
vm: implement new JMP* and CALL* opcodes In compiler JMP*_L opcodes are always used, as this requires less effort.
2020-04-23 08:56:36 +00:00
const _Opcode_name = "PUSHINT8PUSHINT16PUSHINT32PUSHINT64PUSHINT128PUSHINT256PUSHNULLPUSHDATA1PUSHDATA2PUSHDATA4PUSHM1PUSH0PUSH1PUSH2PUSH3PUSH4PUSH5PUSH6PUSH7PUSH8PUSH9PUSH10PUSH11PUSH12PUSH13PUSH14PUSH15PUSH16NOPJMPJMP_LJMPIFJMPIF_LJMPIFNOTJMPIFNOT_LJMPEQJMPEQ_LJMPNEJMPNE_LJMPGTJMPGT_LJMPGEJMPGE_LJMPLTJMPLT_LJMPLEJMPLE_LCALLCALL_LOLDPUSH1RETAPPCALLSYSCALLTAILCALLDUPFROMALTSTACKTOALTSTACKFROMALTSTACKXDROPISNULLXSWAPXTUCKDEPTHDROPDUPNIPOVERPICKROLLROTSWAPTUCKCATSUBSTRLEFTRIGHTSIZEINVERTANDORXOREQUALINCDECSIGNNEGATEABSNOTNZADDSUBMULDIVMODSHLSHRBOOLANDBOOLORNUMEQUALNUMNOTEQUALLTGTLTEGTEMINMAXWITHINSHA1SHA256HASH160HASH256CHECKSIGVERIFYCHECKMULTISIGARRAYSIZEPACKUNPACKPICKITEMSETITEMNEWARRAYNEWSTRUCTNEWMAPAPPENDREVERSEREMOVEHASKEYKEYSVALUESTHROWTHROWIFNOT"
vm: move opcodes into their own package This allows easier reuse of opcodes and in some cases allows to eliminate dependencies on the whole vm package, like in compiler that only needs opcodes and doesn't care about VM for any other purpose. And yes, they're opcodes because an instruction is a whole thing with operands, that's what context.Next() returns.
2019-12-03 14:05:06 +00:00
var _Opcode_map = map[Opcode]string{
vm: implement new PUSH opcodes
2020-04-21 13:45:48 +00:00
0: _Opcode_name[0:8],
1: _Opcode_name[8:17],
2: _Opcode_name[17:26],
3: _Opcode_name[26:35],
vm: move opcodes into their own package This allows easier reuse of opcodes and in some cases allows to eliminate dependencies on the whole vm package, like in compiler that only needs opcodes and doesn't care about VM for any other purpose. And yes, they're opcodes because an instruction is a whole thing with operands, that's what context.Next() returns.
2019-12-03 14:05:06 +00:00
4: _Opcode_name[35:45],
5: _Opcode_name[45:55],
vm: implement new PUSH opcodes
2020-04-21 13:45:48 +00:00
11: _Opcode_name[55:63],
12: _Opcode_name[63:72],
13: _Opcode_name[72:81],
14: _Opcode_name[81:90],
15: _Opcode_name[90:96],
16: _Opcode_name[96:101],
17: _Opcode_name[101:106],
18: _Opcode_name[106:111],
19: _Opcode_name[111:116],
20: _Opcode_name[116:121],
21: _Opcode_name[121:126],
22: _Opcode_name[126:131],
23: _Opcode_name[131:136],
24: _Opcode_name[136:141],
25: _Opcode_name[141:146],
26: _Opcode_name[146:152],
27: _Opcode_name[152:158],
28: _Opcode_name[158:164],
29: _Opcode_name[164:170],
30: _Opcode_name[170:176],
31: _Opcode_name[176:182],
32: _Opcode_name[182:188],
vm: implement new JMP* and CALL* opcodes In compiler JMP*_L opcodes are always used, as this requires less effort.
2020-04-23 08:56:36 +00:00
33: _Opcode_name[188:191],
34: _Opcode_name[191:194],
35: _Opcode_name[194:199],
36: _Opcode_name[199:204],
37: _Opcode_name[204:211],
38: _Opcode_name[211:219],
39: _Opcode_name[219:229],
40: _Opcode_name[229:234],
41: _Opcode_name[234:241],
42: _Opcode_name[241:246],
43: _Opcode_name[246:253],
44: _Opcode_name[253:258],
45: _Opcode_name[258:265],
46: _Opcode_name[265:270],
47: _Opcode_name[270:277],
48: _Opcode_name[277:282],
49: _Opcode_name[282:289],
50: _Opcode_name[289:294],
51: _Opcode_name[294:301],
52: _Opcode_name[301:305],
53: _Opcode_name[305:311],
81: _Opcode_name[311:319],
102: _Opcode_name[319:322],
103: _Opcode_name[322:329],
104: _Opcode_name[329:336],
105: _Opcode_name[336:344],
106: _Opcode_name[344:359],
107: _Opcode_name[359:369],
108: _Opcode_name[369:381],
109: _Opcode_name[381:386],
112: _Opcode_name[386:392],
114: _Opcode_name[392:397],
115: _Opcode_name[397:402],
116: _Opcode_name[402:407],
117: _Opcode_name[407:411],
118: _Opcode_name[411:414],
119: _Opcode_name[414:417],
120: _Opcode_name[417:421],
121: _Opcode_name[421:425],
122: _Opcode_name[425:429],
123: _Opcode_name[429:432],
124: _Opcode_name[432:436],
125: _Opcode_name[436:440],
126: _Opcode_name[440:443],
127: _Opcode_name[443:449],
128: _Opcode_name[449:453],
129: _Opcode_name[453:458],
130: _Opcode_name[458:462],
131: _Opcode_name[462:468],
132: _Opcode_name[468:471],
133: _Opcode_name[471:473],
134: _Opcode_name[473:476],
135: _Opcode_name[476:481],
139: _Opcode_name[481:484],
140: _Opcode_name[484:487],
141: _Opcode_name[487:491],
143: _Opcode_name[491:497],
144: _Opcode_name[497:500],
145: _Opcode_name[500:503],
146: _Opcode_name[503:505],
147: _Opcode_name[505:508],
148: _Opcode_name[508:511],
149: _Opcode_name[511:514],
150: _Opcode_name[514:517],
151: _Opcode_name[517:520],
152: _Opcode_name[520:523],
153: _Opcode_name[523:526],
154: _Opcode_name[526:533],
155: _Opcode_name[533:539],
156: _Opcode_name[539:547],
158: _Opcode_name[547:558],
159: _Opcode_name[558:560],
160: _Opcode_name[560:562],
161: _Opcode_name[562:565],
162: _Opcode_name[565:568],
163: _Opcode_name[568:571],
164: _Opcode_name[571:574],
165: _Opcode_name[574:580],
167: _Opcode_name[580:584],
168: _Opcode_name[584:590],
169: _Opcode_name[590:597],
170: _Opcode_name[597:604],
172: _Opcode_name[604:612],
173: _Opcode_name[612:618],
174: _Opcode_name[618:631],
192: _Opcode_name[631:640],
193: _Opcode_name[640:644],
194: _Opcode_name[644:650],
195: _Opcode_name[650:658],
196: _Opcode_name[658:665],
197: _Opcode_name[665:673],
198: _Opcode_name[673:682],
199: _Opcode_name[682:688],
200: _Opcode_name[688:694],
201: _Opcode_name[694:701],
202: _Opcode_name[701:707],
203: _Opcode_name[707:713],
204: _Opcode_name[713:717],
205: _Opcode_name[717:723],
240: _Opcode_name[723:728],
241: _Opcode_name[728:738],
vm: move opcodes into their own package This allows easier reuse of opcodes and in some cases allows to eliminate dependencies on the whole vm package, like in compiler that only needs opcodes and doesn't care about VM for any other purpose. And yes, they're opcodes because an instruction is a whole thing with operands, that's what context.Next() returns.
2019-12-03 14:05:06 +00:00
}
func (i Opcode) String() string {
if str, ok := _Opcode_map[i]; ok {
return str
}
return "Opcode(" + strconv.FormatInt(int64(i), 10) + ")"
}
Copy permalink