forked from TrueCloudLab/neoneo-go
Merge pull request #3031 from nspcc-dev/conflicts-priority
mempool: adjust the rule of conflicting transaction ranking
This commit is contained in:
commit
50fad8455f
2 changed files with 103 additions and 24 deletions
|
@ -520,14 +520,17 @@ func (mp *Pool) checkTxConflicts(tx *transaction.Transaction, fee Feer) ([]*tran
|
|||
|
||||
var expectedSenderFee utilityBalanceAndFees
|
||||
// Check Conflicts attributes.
|
||||
var conflictsToBeRemoved []*transaction.Transaction
|
||||
var (
|
||||
conflictsToBeRemoved []*transaction.Transaction
|
||||
conflictingFee int64
|
||||
)
|
||||
if fee.P2PSigExtensionsEnabled() {
|
||||
// Step 1: check if `tx` was in attributes of mempooled transactions.
|
||||
if conflictingHashes, ok := mp.conflicts[tx.Hash()]; ok {
|
||||
for _, hash := range conflictingHashes {
|
||||
existingTx := mp.verifiedMap[hash]
|
||||
if existingTx.HasSigner(payer) && existingTx.NetworkFee > tx.NetworkFee {
|
||||
return nil, fmt.Errorf("%w: conflicting transaction %s has bigger network fee", ErrConflictsAttribute, existingTx.Hash().StringBE())
|
||||
if existingTx.HasSigner(payer) {
|
||||
conflictingFee += existingTx.NetworkFee
|
||||
}
|
||||
conflictsToBeRemoved = append(conflictsToBeRemoved, existingTx)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -542,11 +545,12 @@ func (mp *Pool) checkTxConflicts(tx *transaction.Transaction, fee Feer) ([]*tran
|
|||
if !tx.HasSigner(existingTx.Signers[mp.payerIndex].Account) {
|
||||
return nil, fmt.Errorf("%w: not signed by the sender of conflicting transaction %s", ErrConflictsAttribute, existingTx.Hash().StringBE())
|
||||
}
|
||||
if existingTx.NetworkFee >= tx.NetworkFee {
|
||||
return nil, fmt.Errorf("%w: conflicting transaction %s has bigger or equal network fee", ErrConflictsAttribute, existingTx.Hash().StringBE())
|
||||
}
|
||||
conflictingFee += existingTx.NetworkFee
|
||||
conflictsToBeRemoved = append(conflictsToBeRemoved, existingTx)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if conflictingFee != 0 && tx.NetworkFee <= conflictingFee {
|
||||
return nil, fmt.Errorf("%w: conflicting transactions have bigger or equal network fee: %d vs %d", ErrConflictsAttribute, tx.NetworkFee, conflictingFee)
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Step 3: take into account sender's conflicting transactions before balance check.
|
||||
expectedSenderFee = actualSenderFee
|
||||
for _, conflictingTx := range conflictsToBeRemoved {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1,13 +1,14 @@
|
|||
package mempool
|
||||
|
||||
import (
|
||||
"fmt"
|
||||
"math/big"
|
||||
"sort"
|
||||
"strings"
|
||||
"testing"
|
||||
"time"
|
||||
|
||||
"github.com/holiman/uint256"
|
||||
"github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/internal/random"
|
||||
"github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/pkg/core/transaction"
|
||||
"github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/pkg/network/payload"
|
||||
"github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/pkg/util"
|
||||
|
@ -423,18 +424,23 @@ func TestMempoolAddRemoveOracleResponse(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestMempoolAddRemoveConflicts(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
capacity := 6
|
||||
mp := New(capacity, 0, false, nil)
|
||||
var (
|
||||
capacity = 6
|
||||
mp = New(capacity, 0, false, nil)
|
||||
sender = transaction.Signer{Account: util.Uint160{1, 2, 3}}
|
||||
maliciousSender = transaction.Signer{Account: util.Uint160{4, 5, 6}}
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
var (
|
||||
fs = &FeerStub{p2pSigExt: true, balance: 100000}
|
||||
nonce uint32 = 1
|
||||
)
|
||||
getConflictsTx := func(netFee int64, hashes ...util.Uint256) *transaction.Transaction {
|
||||
getTx := func(netFee int64, sender transaction.Signer, hashes ...util.Uint256) *transaction.Transaction {
|
||||
tx := transaction.New([]byte{byte(opcode.PUSH1)}, 0)
|
||||
tx.NetworkFee = netFee
|
||||
tx.Nonce = nonce
|
||||
nonce++
|
||||
tx.Signers = []transaction.Signer{{Account: util.Uint160{1, 2, 3}}}
|
||||
tx.Signers = []transaction.Signer{sender}
|
||||
tx.Attributes = make([]transaction.Attribute, len(hashes))
|
||||
for i, h := range hashes {
|
||||
tx.Attributes[i] = transaction.Attribute{
|
||||
|
@ -448,6 +454,12 @@ func TestMempoolAddRemoveConflicts(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
require.Equal(t, false, ok)
|
||||
return tx
|
||||
}
|
||||
getConflictsTx := func(netFee int64, hashes ...util.Uint256) *transaction.Transaction {
|
||||
return getTx(netFee, sender, hashes...)
|
||||
}
|
||||
getMaliciousTx := func(netFee int64, hashes ...util.Uint256) *transaction.Transaction {
|
||||
return getTx(netFee, maliciousSender, hashes...)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// tx1 in mempool and does not conflicts with anyone
|
||||
smallNetFee := int64(3)
|
||||
|
@ -528,26 +540,89 @@ func TestMempoolAddRemoveConflicts(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
assert.Equal(t, []util.Uint256{tx3.Hash(), tx2.Hash()}, mp.conflicts[tx1.Hash()])
|
||||
|
||||
// tx13 conflicts with tx2, but is not signed by tx2.Sender
|
||||
tx13 := transaction.New([]byte{byte(opcode.PUSH1)}, 0)
|
||||
tx13.NetworkFee = smallNetFee
|
||||
tx13.Nonce = uint32(random.Int(0, 1e4))
|
||||
tx13.Signers = []transaction.Signer{{Account: util.Uint160{3, 2, 1}}}
|
||||
tx13.Attributes = []transaction.Attribute{{
|
||||
Type: transaction.ConflictsT,
|
||||
Value: &transaction.Conflicts{
|
||||
Hash: tx2.Hash(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
}}
|
||||
tx13 := getMaliciousTx(smallNetFee, tx2.Hash())
|
||||
_, ok := mp.TryGetValue(tx13.Hash())
|
||||
require.Equal(t, false, ok)
|
||||
require.ErrorIs(t, mp.Add(tx13, fs), ErrConflictsAttribute)
|
||||
|
||||
// tx15 conflicts with tx14, but added firstly and has the same network fee => tx14 must not be added.
|
||||
tx14 := getConflictsTx(smallNetFee)
|
||||
tx15 := getConflictsTx(smallNetFee, tx14.Hash())
|
||||
require.NoError(t, mp.Add(tx15, fs))
|
||||
require.NoError(t, mp.Add(tx14, fs))
|
||||
err := mp.Add(tx15, fs)
|
||||
require.ErrorIs(t, err, ErrConflictsAttribute)
|
||||
err := mp.Add(tx14, fs)
|
||||
require.Error(t, err)
|
||||
|
||||
require.True(t, strings.Contains(err.Error(), fmt.Sprintf("conflicting transactions have bigger or equal network fee: %d vs %d", smallNetFee, smallNetFee)))
|
||||
|
||||
check := func(t *testing.T, mainFee int64, fail bool) {
|
||||
// Clear mempool.
|
||||
mp.RemoveStale(func(t *transaction.Transaction) bool {
|
||||
return false
|
||||
}, fs)
|
||||
|
||||
// mempooled tx17, tx18, tx19 conflict with tx16
|
||||
tx16 := getConflictsTx(mainFee)
|
||||
tx17 := getConflictsTx(smallNetFee, tx16.Hash())
|
||||
tx18 := getConflictsTx(smallNetFee, tx16.Hash())
|
||||
tx19 := getMaliciousTx(smallNetFee, tx16.Hash()) // malicious, thus, doesn't take into account during fee evaluation
|
||||
require.NoError(t, mp.Add(tx17, fs))
|
||||
require.NoError(t, mp.Add(tx18, fs))
|
||||
require.NoError(t, mp.Add(tx19, fs))
|
||||
if fail {
|
||||
require.Error(t, mp.Add(tx16, fs))
|
||||
_, ok = mp.TryGetValue(tx17.Hash())
|
||||
require.True(t, ok)
|
||||
_, ok = mp.TryGetValue(tx18.Hash())
|
||||
require.True(t, ok)
|
||||
_, ok = mp.TryGetValue(tx19.Hash())
|
||||
require.True(t, ok)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
require.NoError(t, mp.Add(tx16, fs))
|
||||
_, ok = mp.TryGetValue(tx17.Hash())
|
||||
require.False(t, ok)
|
||||
_, ok = mp.TryGetValue(tx18.Hash())
|
||||
require.False(t, ok)
|
||||
_, ok = mp.TryGetValue(tx19.Hash())
|
||||
require.False(t, ok)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
check(t, smallNetFee*2, true)
|
||||
check(t, smallNetFee*2+1, false)
|
||||
|
||||
check = func(t *testing.T, mainFee int64, fail bool) {
|
||||
// Clear mempool.
|
||||
mp.RemoveStale(func(t *transaction.Transaction) bool {
|
||||
return false
|
||||
}, fs)
|
||||
|
||||
// mempooled tx20, tx21, tx22 don't conflict with anyone, but tx23 conflicts with them
|
||||
tx20 := getConflictsTx(smallNetFee)
|
||||
tx21 := getConflictsTx(smallNetFee)
|
||||
tx22 := getConflictsTx(smallNetFee)
|
||||
tx23 := getConflictsTx(mainFee, tx20.Hash(), tx21.Hash(), tx22.Hash())
|
||||
require.NoError(t, mp.Add(tx20, fs))
|
||||
require.NoError(t, mp.Add(tx21, fs))
|
||||
require.NoError(t, mp.Add(tx22, fs))
|
||||
if fail {
|
||||
require.Error(t, mp.Add(tx23, fs))
|
||||
_, ok = mp.TryGetData(tx20.Hash())
|
||||
require.True(t, ok)
|
||||
_, ok = mp.TryGetData(tx21.Hash())
|
||||
require.True(t, ok)
|
||||
_, ok = mp.TryGetData(tx22.Hash())
|
||||
require.True(t, ok)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
require.NoError(t, mp.Add(tx23, fs))
|
||||
_, ok = mp.TryGetData(tx20.Hash())
|
||||
require.False(t, ok)
|
||||
_, ok = mp.TryGetData(tx21.Hash())
|
||||
require.False(t, ok)
|
||||
_, ok = mp.TryGetData(tx22.Hash())
|
||||
require.False(t, ok)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
check(t, smallNetFee*3, true)
|
||||
check(t, smallNetFee*3+1, false)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestMempoolAddWithDataGetData(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue