Implement secp256k1 and secp256r1 recover interops, closes#1003.
Note:
We have to implement Koblitz-related math to recover keys properly
with Neo.Cryptography.Secp256k1Recover interop as far as standard
go elliptic package supports short-form Weierstrass curve with a=-3
only (see https://github.com/golang/go/issues/26776 for details).
However, it's not the best choise to have a lot of such math in our
project, so it would be better to use ready-made solution for
Koblitz-related cryptography.
C# uses ToArray() or UintXXX(bytes) here which interprets hashes as they
should be interpreted (BE, although they always convert to LE when converting
to String just for the fun of it). It leads to state difference for us at
block 2025204 where even though we have the same value for the key, the key
itself differs, ours:
dd2b538e2a0c1db1ae5061c15be14f916bd1e678e512ffcda6d9499d8e7fe97ee71fd6b8004583d9afe09cc4dadbd5deb63d01e061009b7cffdaa674beae0f930ebe6085af900093e5fe56b34a5c220ccdcf6efc336fc5000000000000000000000000000000000010
theirs:
dd2b538e2a0c1db1ae5061c15be14f916bd1e67861e0013db6ded5dbdac49ce0afd9834500b8d61fe77ee97f8e9d49d9a6cdff12e5009b7cffdaa674beae0f930ebe6085af900093e5fe56b34a5c220ccdcf6efc336fc5000000000000000000000000000000000010
In this key there is a tx hash encoded
(e512ffcda6d9499d8e7fe97ee71fd6b84583d9afe09cc4dadbd5deb63d01e061 in LE used
by all the tools like neoscan).
I love Neo.
If blockchain is not closed, logging in defer can occur
after test has finished, which will lead to a panic with
"Log in goroutine after Test* has completed".
add dao which takes care about all CRUD operations on storage
remove blockchain state since everything is stored on change
remove storage operations from structs(entities)
move structs to entities package
It makes very little sense having pointers here, these structures MUST have
some kind of key and this key is not gonna be wandering somewhere on its
own. Fixes a part of #519.
It reduces heap pressure a little for these elements as we don't have to
allocate/free them individually. And they're directly tied to transactions or
block, not being shared or anything like that, so it makes little sense for
them to be pointer-based. It only makes building transactions a little easier,
but that's obviously a minor usecase.
