Commit graph

14 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Roman Khimov
ce67e6795e rpcbinding: properly support maps
I'm not sure that map with a `*big.Int` key is a good one, but it can work
this way.
2022-12-06 13:15:10 +03:00
Roman Khimov
8e0be6e7a5 rpcbinding: improve indentation for internal array code 2022-12-06 13:15:10 +03:00
Roman Khimov
0214628127 rpcbinding: generate bindings using new extended type data 2022-12-06 13:15:10 +03:00
Roman Khimov
82c6ce218b rpcbinding: use binding condig to generate code for simple arrays
Part of #2767.
2022-11-14 13:01:13 +03:00
Roman Khimov
a7f86dcb7f rpcbinding: generate Expanded methods for iterators
Refs. #2768.
2022-11-09 18:13:45 +03:00
Roman Khimov
d569fe01e6 rpcbinding: initial support for iterators, see #2768
Already better than stackitem.Item.
2022-11-09 18:13:45 +03:00
Roman Khimov
69d8905ad9 rpcbinding: exclude onNEPXXPayment methods from wrappers
They make no sense there.
2022-11-08 17:01:36 +03:00
Roman Khimov
130608ac67 rpcbinding: support writer-only wrappers
"verify" contract doesn't have any safe methods.
2022-11-08 17:01:36 +03:00
Roman Khimov
df29008a50 rpcbinding: add GAS testcase, fix methodless wrappers
* strip NEP-XX methods before going into generator to avoid unused imports
 * nepXX.Invoker types already include Call
 * always import util, it's used for Hash
2022-11-08 17:01:36 +03:00
Roman Khimov
aeb61fb61d rpcbinding: generate ASSERT for bool-returning methods
It's a common pattern.
2022-11-08 17:01:36 +03:00
Roman Khimov
2a4a5ab479 rpcbinding: support simple wrappers for writer methods
Fixes #2769.
2022-11-08 17:01:36 +03:00
Roman Khimov
02ce59cfd5 binding: avoid name conflicts with Go keywords
And clashing one name on another after rename.
2022-10-27 22:57:49 +03:00
Roman Khimov
617c31093f smartcontract: initial rpcbinding implementation, fix #2705
It can do some unwrapping and reuse nepXX packages. It only uses manifest data
at the moment, see #2767, #2768, #2769.
2022-10-27 22:57:49 +03:00
Roman Khimov
1ac60ada19 cli: move tests to subpackages
Refs. #2379, but not completely solves it, one package seriously outweights
others:

?       github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/cli [no test files]
ok      github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/cli/app     0.036s  coverage: 100.0% of statements
ok      github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/cli/cmdargs 0.011s  coverage: 60.8% of statements
ok      github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/cli/flags   0.009s  coverage: 97.7% of statements
?       github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/cli/input   [no test files]
ok      github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/cli/options 0.033s  coverage: 50.0% of statements
?       github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/cli/paramcontext    [no test files]
ok      github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/cli/query   2.155s  coverage: 45.3% of statements
ok      github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/cli/server  1.373s  coverage: 67.8% of statements
ok      github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/cli/smartcontract   8.819s  coverage: 94.3% of statements
ok      github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/cli/util    0.006s  coverage: 10.9% of statements
?       github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/cli/vm      [no test files]
ok      github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/cli/wallet  72.103s coverage: 88.2% of statements

Still a nice thing to have.
2022-10-06 09:21:26 +03:00