Use `zap.Error` instead of `zap.String` for logging errors: change all expressions like
`zap.String("error", err.Error())` or `zap.String("err", err.Error())` to `zap.Error(err)`.
Leave similar expressions with other messages unchanged, for example,
`zap.String("last_error", lastErr.Error())` or `zap.String("reason", ctx.Err().Error())`.
This change was made by applying the following patch:
```diff
@@
var err expression
@@
-zap.String("error", err.Error())
+zap.Error(err)
@@
var err expression
@@
-zap.String("err", err.Error())
+zap.Error(err)
```
Signed-off-by: Aleksey Savchuk <a.savchuk@yadro.com>
Also, make them public, because otherwise `unused` linter complains.
```
pkg/morph/event/utils.go:25:2 unused field `typ` is unused
```
This complain is wrong, though: we _use_ `typ` field because the whole
struct is used as a map key.
Signed-off-by: Evgenii Stratonikov <e.stratonikov@yadro.com>
They are decoupled, but it is an error to have a handler without a
corresponding parser. Register them together on the code level and get
rid of unreachable code.
Signed-off-by: Evgenii Stratonikov <e.stratonikov@yadro.com>
This codepath hides possible bugs in code.
All initialization function should run before init stage.
Signed-off-by: Evgenii Stratonikov <e.stratonikov@yadro.com>
Since Go 1.22 a "for" statement with a "range" clause is able
to iterate through integer values from zero to an upper limit.
gopatch script:
@@
var i, e expression
@@
-for i := 0; i <= e - 1; i++ {
+for i := range e {
...
}
@@
var i, e expression
@@
-for i := 0; i <= e; i++ {
+for i := range e + 1 {
...
}
@@
var i, e expression
@@
-for i := 0; i < e; i++ {
+for i := range e {
...
}
Signed-off-by: Ekaterina Lebedeva <ekaterina.lebedeva@yadro.com>
After 75d7891ca1
`neo-go` does claim that an empty invocation script is the only way to
fill missing signature for unsigned notary requests. The new notary actor
does it that way and, therefore, breaks notary request parsing by the
Alphabet because of skipping any request that is not filled with a dummy (64
zeros) invocation script. Support both way. The "Dummy" approach will be
dropped later.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Karpy <p.karpy@yadro.com>
With non-blocking pool restricted by 10 in capacity, the probability of
dropping events is unexpectedly big. Notifications are an essential part of the FrostFS,
we should not drop anything, especially new epochs.
```
Mar 31 07:07:03 vedi neofs-ir[19164]: 2023-03-31T07:07:03.901Z debug subscriber/subscriber.go:154 new notification event from sidechain {"name": "NewEpoch"}
Mar 31 07:07:03 vedi neofs-ir[19164]: 2023-03-31T07:07:03.901Z warn event/listener.go:248 listener worker pool drained {"chain": "morph", "capacity": 10}
```
Signed-off-by: Evgenii Stratonikov <e.stratonikov@yadro.com>
It led to a neo-go dead-lock in the `subscriber` component. Subscribing to
notifications is the same RPC as any others, so it could also be blocked
forever if no async listening (reading the notification channel) routine
exists. If a number of subscriptions is big enough (or a caller is lucky
enough) subscribing loop might have not finished subscribing before the
first notification is received and then: subscribing RPC is blocked by
received notification (non)handling and listening notifications routine is
blocked by not finished subscription loop.
That commit starts listening notification channel _before_ any subscription
actions.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Karpy <p.karpy@yadro.com>
