Badger implementation isn't tested and works not well,
but requires human resources to maintain.
Signed-off-by: Dmitrii Stepanov <d.stepanov@yadro.com>
It was introduced in 69e1e6ca to help node determine faulty shards.
However, the situation is possible in a real-life scenario:
1. Object O is evacuated from shard A to B.
2. Shard A is unmounted because of lower-level errors.
3. We now have object in meta on A and in blobstor on B. Technically we
have it in meta on shard B too, but we still got the error if B goes
to a degraded mode.
Signed-off-by: Evgenii Stratonikov <e.stratonikov@yadro.com>
In some places we have debug=false, in others debug=true.
Let's be consistent.
Semantic patch:
```
@@
@@
-test.NewLogger(..., false)
+test.NewLogger(..., true)
```
Signed-off-by: Evgenii Stratonikov <e.stratonikov@yadro.com>
Semantic patch:
```
@@
var f expression
var t expression
var a expression
@@
f(
...,
- zap.String(t, a.String()),
+ zap.Stringer(t, a),
...,
)
```
Signed-off-by: Evgenii Stratonikov <e.stratonikov@yadro.com>
Concurrent initialization in case of the metabase resync leads to
high memory consumption and potential OOM.
Signed-off-by: Dmitrii Stepanov <d.stepanov@yadro.com>
Now it's possible to run evacuate shard in async.
Also only one evacuate process can be in progress.
Signed-off-by: Dmitrii Stepanov <d.stepanov@yadro.com>
RemoveDuplicates() removes all duplicate object copies stored on
multiple shards. All shards are processed and the command tries to leave
a copy on the best shard according to HRW.
Signed-off-by: Evgenii Stratonikov <e.stratonikov@yadro.com>
Initially it was there to check whether an update is being initiated by
a proper node. It is now obsolete for 2 reasons:
1. Background synchronization fetches all operations from a single node.
2. There are a lot more problems with trust in the tree service, it is
only used in controlled environments.
Signed-off-by: Evgenii Stratonikov <e.stratonikov@yadro.com>
"Object is expired" means that object is presented in `meta` but it is not
`ObjectNotFound` error. Previous implementation made `shard` search for an
object without `meta` which was an error.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Karpy <p.karpy@yadro.com>
Currently we track based on `PayloadSize`, because it is already stored
in the metabase and it is easier to calculate without slowing down the
whole system.
Signed-off-by: Evgenii Stratonikov <e.stratonikov@yadro.com>
Signed-off-by: Pavel Karpy <p.karpy@yadro.com>
Currently the only way to tell whether `evacuate/set-mode` is finished
is to set a very big timeout and _hope_ that the operation will finish.
In this commit we add INFO logs for such operations which should
simplify the life of an administrator.
Signed-off-by: Evgenii Stratonikov <e.stratonikov@yadro.com>
Under load changing shard mode can lead to it being removed from the
list during some other PUT.
```
Dec 28 07:01:26 az neofs-node[364505]: panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference
Dec 28 07:01:26 az neofs-node[364505]: [signal SIGSEGV: segmentation violation code=0x1 addr=0x20 pc=0xc9fbb1]
Dec 28 07:01:26 az neofs-node[364505]: goroutine 11791912 [running]:
Dec 28 07:01:26 az neofs-node[364505]: github.com/nspcc-dev/neofs-node/pkg/local_object_storage/engine.(*StorageEngine).putToShard(0xc000435490, {0xc0003f7a28?, 0xc0001192c0?}, 0x2, {0x0, 0x>
Dec 28 07:01:26 az neofs-node[364505]: github.com/nspcc-dev/neofs-node/pkg/local_object_storage/engine/put.go:91 +0x1b1
Dec 28 07:01:26 az neofs-node[364505]: github.com/nspcc-dev/neofs-node/pkg/local_object_storage/engine.(*StorageEngine).put.func1(0xc000435490?, {0xc0003f7a28?, 0xc0001192c0?})
Dec 28 07:01:26 az neofs-node[364505]: github.com/nspcc-dev/neofs-node/pkg/local_object_storage/engine/put.go:71 +0x19c
Dec 28 07:01:26 az neofs-node[364505]: github.com/nspcc-dev/neofs-node/pkg/local_object_storage/engine.(*StorageEngine).iterateOverSortedShards(0x1?, {{0x62, 0x23, 0xfe, 0x60, 0x67, 0xd5, 0x>
Dec 28 07:01:26 az neofs-node[364505]: github.com/nspcc-dev/neofs-node/pkg/local_object_storage/engine/shards.go:225 +0xc8
Dec 28 07:01:26 az neofs-node[364505]: github.com/nspcc-dev/neofs-node/pkg/local_object_storage/engine.(*StorageEngine).put(0xc000435490, {0x1?})
Dec 28 07:01:26 az neofs-node[364505]: github.com/nspcc-dev/neofs-node/pkg/local_object_storage/engine/put.go:66 +0x2a9
Dec 28 07:01:26 az neofs-node[364505]: github.com/nspcc-dev/neofs-node/pkg/local_object_storage/engine.(*StorageEngine).Put.func1()
Dec 28 07:01:26 az neofs-node[364505]: github.com/nspcc-dev/neofs-node/pkg/local_object_storage/engine/put.go:43 +0x2a
Dec 28 07:01:26 az neofs-node[364505]: github.com/nspcc-dev/neofs-node/pkg/local_object_storage/engine.(*StorageEngine).execIfNotBlocked(0x8?, 0x38?)
Dec 28 07:01:26 az neofs-node[364505]: github.com/nspcc-dev/neofs-node/pkg/local_object_storage/engine/control.go:147 +0xcf
Dec 28 07:01:26 az neofs-node[364505]: github.com/nspcc-dev/neofs-node/pkg/local_object_storage/engine.(*StorageEngine).Put(0xc4df775a80?, {0x0?})
Dec 28 07:01:26 az neofs-node[364505]: github.com/nspcc-dev/neofs-node/pkg/local_object_storage/engine/put.go:42 +0x65
Dec 28 07:01:26 az neofs-node[364505]: github.com/nspcc-dev/neofs-node/pkg/local_object_storage/engine.Put(0xc06d928b80?, 0xc06b1b8dc8?)
Dec 28 07:01:26 az neofs-node[364505]: github.com/nspcc-dev/neofs-node/pkg/local_object_storage/engine/put.go:158 +0x19
Dec 28 07:01:26 az neofs-node[364505]: main.engineWithoutNotifications.Put({0x20301b?}, 0x20301b?)
```
Signed-off-by: Evgenii Stratonikov <e.stratonikov@yadro.com>
Because synchronization _most likely_ will have apply already existing
operations, it is much faster to check their presence in a read
transaction. However, always doing this will degrade the perfomance
for normal `Apply`. And, let's be honest, it is already not good.
Thus we add a separate parameter which specifies whether this logic is
enabled.
Signed-off-by: Evgenii Stratonikov <e.stratonikov@yadro.com>
Includes extending listing methods in the Storage Engine with object types.
It allows tuning replication/policer algorithms: container nodes do
not remove `LOCK` objects as redundant and try to fulfill `LOCK` placement
on the ohter container nodes.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Karpy <carpawell@nspcc.ru>
