forked from TrueCloudLab/certificates
Check admin subjects before changing policy
This commit is contained in:
parent
81b0c6c37c
commit
101ca6a2d3
16 changed files with 255 additions and 91 deletions
|
@ -105,6 +105,8 @@ func (h *Handler) NewOrder(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
|
|||
// management of allowed/denied names based on just the name, without having bound to EAB. Still,
|
||||
// EAB is not illogical, because that's the way Accounts are connected to an external system and
|
||||
// thus make sense to also set the allowed/denied names based on that info.
|
||||
// TODO: also perform check on the authority level here already, so that challenges are not performed
|
||||
// and after that the CA fails to sign it. (i.e. h.ca function?)
|
||||
|
||||
for _, identifier := range nor.Identifiers {
|
||||
// TODO: gather all errors, so that we can build subproblems; include the nor.Validate() error here too, like in example?
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ import (
|
|||
|
||||
const (
|
||||
// provisionerContextKey provisioner key
|
||||
provisionerContextKey = ContextKey("provisioner")
|
||||
provisionerContextKey = admin.ContextKey("provisioner")
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
// CreateExternalAccountKeyRequest is the type for POST /admin/acme/eab requests
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -26,8 +26,8 @@ type adminAuthority interface {
|
|||
UpdateProvisioner(ctx context.Context, nu *linkedca.Provisioner) error
|
||||
RemoveProvisioner(ctx context.Context, id string) error
|
||||
GetAuthorityPolicy(ctx context.Context) (*linkedca.Policy, error)
|
||||
StoreAuthorityPolicy(ctx context.Context, policy *linkedca.Policy) error
|
||||
UpdateAuthorityPolicy(ctx context.Context, policy *linkedca.Policy) error
|
||||
StoreAuthorityPolicy(ctx context.Context, admin *linkedca.Admin, policy *linkedca.Policy) error
|
||||
UpdateAuthorityPolicy(ctx context.Context, admin *linkedca.Admin, policy *linkedca.Policy) error
|
||||
RemoveAuthorityPolicy(ctx context.Context) error
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -139,11 +139,11 @@ func (m *mockAdminAuthority) GetAuthorityPolicy(ctx context.Context) (*linkedca.
|
|||
return nil, errors.New("not implemented yet")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func (m *mockAdminAuthority) StoreAuthorityPolicy(ctx context.Context, policy *linkedca.Policy) error {
|
||||
func (m *mockAdminAuthority) StoreAuthorityPolicy(ctx context.Context, admin *linkedca.Admin, policy *linkedca.Policy) error {
|
||||
return errors.New("not implemented yet")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func (m *mockAdminAuthority) UpdateAuthorityPolicy(ctx context.Context, policy *linkedca.Policy) error {
|
||||
func (m *mockAdminAuthority) UpdateAuthorityPolicy(ctx context.Context, admin *linkedca.Admin, policy *linkedca.Policy) error {
|
||||
return errors.New("not implemented yet")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -30,8 +30,7 @@ func NewHandler(auth adminAuthority, adminDB admin.DB, acmeDB acme.DB, acmeRespo
|
|||
func (h *Handler) Route(r api.Router) {
|
||||
|
||||
authnz := func(next nextHTTP) nextHTTP {
|
||||
//return h.extractAuthorizeTokenAdmin(h.requireAPIEnabled(next))
|
||||
return h.requireAPIEnabled(next) // TODO(hs): remove this; temporarily no auth checks for simple testing...
|
||||
return h.extractAuthorizeTokenAdmin(h.requireAPIEnabled(next))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
requireEABEnabled := func(next nextHTTP) nextHTTP {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ import (
|
|||
"github.com/smallstep/certificates/api"
|
||||
"github.com/smallstep/certificates/authority/admin"
|
||||
"github.com/smallstep/certificates/authority/admin/db/nosql"
|
||||
"go.step.sm/linkedca"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
type nextHTTP = func(http.ResponseWriter, *http.Request)
|
||||
|
@ -27,6 +28,7 @@ func (h *Handler) requireAPIEnabled(next nextHTTP) nextHTTP {
|
|||
// extractAuthorizeTokenAdmin is a middleware that extracts and caches the bearer token.
|
||||
func (h *Handler) extractAuthorizeTokenAdmin(next nextHTTP) nextHTTP {
|
||||
return func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
|
||||
|
||||
tok := r.Header.Get("Authorization")
|
||||
if tok == "" {
|
||||
api.WriteError(w, admin.NewError(admin.ErrorUnauthorizedType,
|
||||
|
@ -40,7 +42,7 @@ func (h *Handler) extractAuthorizeTokenAdmin(next nextHTTP) nextHTTP {
|
|||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ctx := context.WithValue(r.Context(), adminContextKey, adm)
|
||||
ctx := context.WithValue(r.Context(), admin.AdminContextKey, adm)
|
||||
next(w, r.WithContext(ctx))
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -49,13 +51,14 @@ func (h *Handler) extractAuthorizeTokenAdmin(next nextHTTP) nextHTTP {
|
|||
func (h *Handler) checkAction(next nextHTTP, supportedInStandalone bool) nextHTTP {
|
||||
return func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
|
||||
|
||||
// actions allowed in standalone mode are always allowed
|
||||
// actions allowed in standalone mode are always supported
|
||||
if supportedInStandalone {
|
||||
next(w, r)
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// when in standalone mode, actions are not supported
|
||||
// when not in standalone mode and using a nosql.DB backend,
|
||||
// actions are not supported
|
||||
if _, ok := h.adminDB.(*nosql.DB); ok {
|
||||
api.WriteError(w, admin.NewError(admin.ErrorNotImplementedType,
|
||||
"operation not supported in standalone mode"))
|
||||
|
@ -67,11 +70,12 @@ func (h *Handler) checkAction(next nextHTTP, supportedInStandalone bool) nextHTT
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ContextKey is the key type for storing and searching for ACME request
|
||||
// essentials in the context of a request.
|
||||
type ContextKey string
|
||||
|
||||
const (
|
||||
// adminContextKey account key
|
||||
adminContextKey = ContextKey("admin")
|
||||
)
|
||||
// adminFromContext searches the context for a *linkedca.Admin.
|
||||
// Returns the admin or an error.
|
||||
func adminFromContext(ctx context.Context) (*linkedca.Admin, error) {
|
||||
val, ok := ctx.Value(admin.AdminContextKey).(*linkedca.Admin)
|
||||
if !ok || val == nil {
|
||||
return nil, admin.NewError(admin.ErrorBadRequestType, "admin not in context")
|
||||
}
|
||||
return val, nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ func TestHandler_extractAuthorizeTokenAdmin(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
req.Header["Authorization"] = []string{"token"}
|
||||
createdAt := time.Now()
|
||||
var deletedAt time.Time
|
||||
admin := &linkedca.Admin{
|
||||
adm := &linkedca.Admin{
|
||||
Id: "adminID",
|
||||
AuthorityId: "authorityID",
|
||||
Subject: "admin",
|
||||
|
@ -164,20 +164,20 @@ func TestHandler_extractAuthorizeTokenAdmin(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
auth := &mockAdminAuthority{
|
||||
MockAuthorizeAdminToken: func(r *http.Request, token string) (*linkedca.Admin, error) {
|
||||
assert.Equals(t, "token", token)
|
||||
return admin, nil
|
||||
return adm, nil
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
next := func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
|
||||
ctx := r.Context()
|
||||
a := ctx.Value(adminContextKey) // verifying that the context now has a linkedca.Admin
|
||||
a := ctx.Value(admin.AdminContextKey) // verifying that the context now has a linkedca.Admin
|
||||
adm, ok := a.(*linkedca.Admin)
|
||||
if !ok {
|
||||
t.Errorf("expected *linkedca.Admin; got %T", a)
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
opts := []cmp.Option{cmpopts.IgnoreUnexported(linkedca.Admin{}, timestamppb.Timestamp{})}
|
||||
if !cmp.Equal(admin, adm, opts...) {
|
||||
t.Errorf("linkedca.Admin diff =\n%s", cmp.Diff(admin, adm, opts...))
|
||||
if !cmp.Equal(adm, adm, opts...) {
|
||||
t.Errorf("linkedca.Admin diff =\n%s", cmp.Diff(adm, adm, opts...))
|
||||
}
|
||||
w.Write(nil) // mock response with status 200
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -87,8 +87,14 @@ func (par *PolicyAdminResponder) CreateAuthorityPolicy(w http.ResponseWriter, r
|
|||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if err := par.auth.StoreAuthorityPolicy(ctx, newPolicy); err != nil {
|
||||
api.WriteError(w, admin.WrapErrorISE(err, "error storing authority policy"))
|
||||
adm, err := adminFromContext(ctx)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
api.WriteError(w, admin.WrapErrorISE(err, "error retrieving admin from context"))
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if err := par.auth.StoreAuthorityPolicy(ctx, adm, newPolicy); err != nil {
|
||||
api.WriteError(w, admin.WrapError(admin.ErrorBadRequestType, err, "error storing authority policy"))
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -103,25 +109,49 @@ func (par *PolicyAdminResponder) CreateAuthorityPolicy(w http.ResponseWriter, r
|
|||
|
||||
// UpdateAuthorityPolicy handles the PUT /admin/authority/policy request
|
||||
func (par *PolicyAdminResponder) UpdateAuthorityPolicy(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
|
||||
var policy = new(linkedca.Policy)
|
||||
if err := api.ReadProtoJSON(r.Body, policy); err != nil {
|
||||
|
||||
ctx := r.Context()
|
||||
policy, err := par.auth.GetAuthorityPolicy(ctx)
|
||||
|
||||
shouldWriteError := false
|
||||
if ae, ok := err.(*admin.Error); ok {
|
||||
shouldWriteError = !ae.IsType(admin.ErrorNotFoundType)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if shouldWriteError {
|
||||
api.WriteError(w, admin.WrapErrorISE(err, "error retrieving authority policy"))
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if policy == nil {
|
||||
api.JSONNotFound(w)
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
var newPolicy = new(linkedca.Policy)
|
||||
if err := api.ReadProtoJSON(r.Body, newPolicy); err != nil {
|
||||
api.WriteError(w, err)
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ctx := r.Context()
|
||||
if err := par.auth.UpdateAuthorityPolicy(ctx, policy); err != nil {
|
||||
api.WriteError(w, admin.WrapErrorISE(err, "error updating authority policy"))
|
||||
adm, err := adminFromContext(ctx)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
api.WriteError(w, admin.WrapErrorISE(err, "error retrieving admin from context"))
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
newPolicy, err := par.auth.GetAuthorityPolicy(ctx)
|
||||
if err := par.auth.UpdateAuthorityPolicy(ctx, adm, newPolicy); err != nil {
|
||||
api.WriteError(w, admin.WrapError(admin.ErrorBadRequestType, err, "error updating authority policy"))
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
newlyStoredPolicy, err := par.auth.GetAuthorityPolicy(ctx)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
api.WriteError(w, admin.WrapErrorISE(err, "error retrieving authority policy after updating"))
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
api.ProtoJSONStatus(w, newPolicy, http.StatusOK)
|
||||
api.ProtoJSONStatus(w, newlyStoredPolicy, http.StatusOK)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// DeleteAuthorityPolicy handles the DELETE /admin/authority/policy request
|
||||
|
|
10
authority/admin/context.go
Normal file
10
authority/admin/context.go
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
|
|||
package admin
|
||||
|
||||
// ContextKey is the key type for storing and searching for
|
||||
// Admin API objects in request contexts.
|
||||
type ContextKey string
|
||||
|
||||
const (
|
||||
// AdminContextKey account key
|
||||
AdminContextKey = ContextKey("admin")
|
||||
)
|
|
@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ func (c *Collection) LoadByProvisioner(provName string) ([]*linkedca.Admin, bool
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Store adds an admin to the collection and enforces the uniqueness of
|
||||
// admin IDs and amdin subject <-> provisioner name combos.
|
||||
// admin IDs and admin subject <-> provisioner name combos.
|
||||
func (c *Collection) Store(adm *linkedca.Admin, prov provisioner.Interface) error {
|
||||
// Input validation.
|
||||
if adm.ProvisionerId != prov.GetID() {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -219,15 +219,19 @@ func (a *Authority) reloadPolicyEngines(ctx context.Context) error {
|
|||
if a.config.AuthorityConfig.EnableAdmin {
|
||||
linkedPolicy, err := a.adminDB.GetAuthorityPolicy(ctx)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
return admin.WrapErrorISE(err, "error getting policy to initialize authority")
|
||||
return admin.WrapErrorISE(err, "error getting policy to (re)load policy engines")
|
||||
}
|
||||
policyOptions = policyToCertificates(linkedPolicy)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
policyOptions = a.config.AuthorityConfig.Policy
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// return early if no policy options set
|
||||
// if no new or updated policy option is set, clear policy engines that (may have)
|
||||
// been configured before and return early
|
||||
if policyOptions == nil {
|
||||
a.x509Policy = nil
|
||||
a.sshHostPolicy = nil
|
||||
a.sshUserPolicy = nil
|
||||
return nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -574,7 +578,7 @@ func (a *Authority) init() error {
|
|||
return err
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Load Policy Engines
|
||||
// Load x509 and SSH Policy Engines
|
||||
if err := a.reloadPolicyEngines(context.Background()); err != nil {
|
||||
return err
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -2,10 +2,15 @@ package authority
|
|||
|
||||
import (
|
||||
"context"
|
||||
"fmt"
|
||||
|
||||
"github.com/pkg/errors"
|
||||
|
||||
"go.step.sm/linkedca"
|
||||
|
||||
"github.com/smallstep/certificates/authority/admin"
|
||||
"github.com/smallstep/certificates/authority/policy"
|
||||
"go.step.sm/linkedca"
|
||||
authPolicy "github.com/smallstep/certificates/authority/policy"
|
||||
policy "github.com/smallstep/certificates/policy"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
func (a *Authority) GetAuthorityPolicy(ctx context.Context) (*linkedca.Policy, error) {
|
||||
|
@ -20,31 +25,39 @@ func (a *Authority) GetAuthorityPolicy(ctx context.Context) (*linkedca.Policy, e
|
|||
return policy, nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func (a *Authority) StoreAuthorityPolicy(ctx context.Context, policy *linkedca.Policy) error {
|
||||
func (a *Authority) StoreAuthorityPolicy(ctx context.Context, adm *linkedca.Admin, policy *linkedca.Policy) error {
|
||||
a.adminMutex.Lock()
|
||||
defer a.adminMutex.Unlock()
|
||||
|
||||
if err := a.checkPolicy(ctx, adm, policy); err != nil {
|
||||
return err
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if err := a.adminDB.CreateAuthorityPolicy(ctx, policy); err != nil {
|
||||
return err
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if err := a.reloadPolicyEngines(ctx); err != nil {
|
||||
return admin.WrapErrorISE(err, "error reloading admin resources when creating authority policy")
|
||||
return admin.WrapErrorISE(err, "error reloading policy engines when creating authority policy")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func (a *Authority) UpdateAuthorityPolicy(ctx context.Context, policy *linkedca.Policy) error {
|
||||
func (a *Authority) UpdateAuthorityPolicy(ctx context.Context, adm *linkedca.Admin, policy *linkedca.Policy) error {
|
||||
a.adminMutex.Lock()
|
||||
defer a.adminMutex.Unlock()
|
||||
|
||||
if err := a.checkPolicy(ctx, adm, policy); err != nil {
|
||||
return err
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if err := a.adminDB.UpdateAuthorityPolicy(ctx, policy); err != nil {
|
||||
return err
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if err := a.reloadPolicyEngines(ctx); err != nil {
|
||||
return admin.WrapErrorISE(err, "error reloading admin resources when updating authority policy")
|
||||
return admin.WrapErrorISE(err, "error reloading policy engines when updating authority policy")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return nil
|
||||
|
@ -59,34 +72,84 @@ func (a *Authority) RemoveAuthorityPolicy(ctx context.Context) error {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if err := a.reloadPolicyEngines(ctx); err != nil {
|
||||
return admin.WrapErrorISE(err, "error reloading admin resources when deleting authority policy")
|
||||
return admin.WrapErrorISE(err, "error reloading policy engines when deleting authority policy")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func policyToCertificates(p *linkedca.Policy) *policy.Options {
|
||||
func (a *Authority) checkPolicy(ctx context.Context, adm *linkedca.Admin, p *linkedca.Policy) error {
|
||||
|
||||
// convert the policy; return early if nil
|
||||
policyOptions := policyToCertificates(p)
|
||||
if policyOptions == nil {
|
||||
return nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
engine, err := authPolicy.NewX509PolicyEngine(policyOptions.GetX509Options())
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
return admin.WrapErrorISE(err, "error creating temporary policy engine")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO(hs): Provide option to force the policy, even when the admin subject would be locked out?
|
||||
|
||||
sans := []string{adm.Subject}
|
||||
if err := isAllowed(engine, sans); err != nil {
|
||||
return err
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO(hs): perform the check for other admin subjects too?
|
||||
// What logic to use for that: do all admins need access? Only super admins? At least one?
|
||||
|
||||
return nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func isAllowed(engine authPolicy.X509Policy, sans []string) error {
|
||||
var (
|
||||
allowed bool
|
||||
err error
|
||||
)
|
||||
if allowed, err = engine.AreSANsAllowed(sans); err != nil {
|
||||
var policyErr *policy.NamePolicyError
|
||||
if errors.As(err, &policyErr); policyErr.Reason == policy.NotAuthorizedForThisName {
|
||||
return fmt.Errorf("the provided policy would lock out %s from the CA. Please update your policy to include %s as an allowed name", sans, sans)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
return err
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if !allowed {
|
||||
return fmt.Errorf("the provided policy would lock out %s from the CA. Please update your policy to include %s as an allowed name", sans, sans)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func policyToCertificates(p *linkedca.Policy) *authPolicy.Options {
|
||||
|
||||
// return early
|
||||
if p == nil {
|
||||
return nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// prepare full policy struct
|
||||
opts := &policy.Options{
|
||||
X509: &policy.X509PolicyOptions{
|
||||
AllowedNames: &policy.X509NameOptions{},
|
||||
DeniedNames: &policy.X509NameOptions{},
|
||||
opts := &authPolicy.Options{
|
||||
X509: &authPolicy.X509PolicyOptions{
|
||||
AllowedNames: &authPolicy.X509NameOptions{},
|
||||
DeniedNames: &authPolicy.X509NameOptions{},
|
||||
},
|
||||
SSH: &policy.SSHPolicyOptions{
|
||||
Host: &policy.SSHHostCertificateOptions{
|
||||
AllowedNames: &policy.SSHNameOptions{},
|
||||
DeniedNames: &policy.SSHNameOptions{},
|
||||
SSH: &authPolicy.SSHPolicyOptions{
|
||||
Host: &authPolicy.SSHHostCertificateOptions{
|
||||
AllowedNames: &authPolicy.SSHNameOptions{},
|
||||
DeniedNames: &authPolicy.SSHNameOptions{},
|
||||
},
|
||||
User: &policy.SSHUserCertificateOptions{
|
||||
AllowedNames: &policy.SSHNameOptions{},
|
||||
DeniedNames: &policy.SSHNameOptions{},
|
||||
User: &authPolicy.SSHUserCertificateOptions{
|
||||
AllowedNames: &authPolicy.SSHNameOptions{},
|
||||
DeniedNames: &authPolicy.SSHNameOptions{},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// fill x509 policy configuration
|
||||
if p.X509 != nil {
|
||||
if p.X509.Allow != nil {
|
||||
|
@ -102,6 +165,7 @@ func policyToCertificates(p *linkedca.Policy) *policy.Options {
|
|||
opts.X509.DeniedNames.URIDomains = p.X509.Deny.Uris
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// fill ssh policy configuration
|
||||
if p.Ssh != nil {
|
||||
if p.Ssh.Host != nil {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -191,26 +191,20 @@ func (a *Authority) Sign(csr *x509.CertificateRequest, signOpts provisioner.Sign
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// If a policy is configured, perform allow/deny policy check on authority level
|
||||
// TODO: policy currently also applies to admin token certs; how to circumvent?
|
||||
// Allow any name of an admin in the DB? Or in the admin collection?
|
||||
todoRemoveThis := false
|
||||
if todoRemoveThis && a.x509Policy != nil {
|
||||
allowed, err := a.x509Policy.AreCertificateNamesAllowed(leaf)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
return nil, errs.InternalServerErr(err,
|
||||
errs.WithKeyVal("csr", csr),
|
||||
errs.WithKeyVal("signOptions", signOpts),
|
||||
errs.WithMessage("error creating certificate"),
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if !allowed {
|
||||
// TODO: include SANs in error message?
|
||||
return nil, errs.ApplyOptions(
|
||||
errs.ForbiddenErr(errors.New("authority not allowed to sign"), "error creating certificate"),
|
||||
opts...,
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Check if authority is allowed to sign the certificate
|
||||
var allowedToSign bool
|
||||
if allowedToSign, err = a.isAllowedToSign(leaf); err != nil {
|
||||
return nil, errs.InternalServerErr(err,
|
||||
errs.WithKeyVal("csr", csr),
|
||||
errs.WithKeyVal("signOptions", signOpts),
|
||||
errs.WithMessage("error creating certificate"),
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if !allowedToSign {
|
||||
return nil, errs.ApplyOptions(
|
||||
errs.ForbiddenErr(errors.New("authority not allowed to sign"), "error creating certificate"),
|
||||
opts...,
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Sign certificate
|
||||
|
@ -236,6 +230,61 @@ func (a *Authority) Sign(csr *x509.CertificateRequest, signOpts provisioner.Sign
|
|||
return fullchain, nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// isAllowedToSign checks if the Authority is allowed to sign the X.509 certificate.
|
||||
// It first checks if the certificate contains an admin subject that exists in the
|
||||
// collection of admins. The CA is always allowed to sign those. If the cert contains
|
||||
// different names and a policy is configured, the policy will be executed against
|
||||
// the cert to see if the CA is allowed to sign it.
|
||||
func (a *Authority) isAllowedToSign(cert *x509.Certificate) (bool, error) {
|
||||
|
||||
// // check if certificate is an admin identity token certificate and the admin subject exists
|
||||
// b := isAdminIdentityTokenCertificate(cert)
|
||||
// _ = b
|
||||
|
||||
// if isAdminIdentityTokenCertificate(cert) && a.admins.HasSubject(cert.Subject.CommonName) {
|
||||
// return true, nil
|
||||
// }
|
||||
|
||||
// if no policy is configured, the cert is implicitly allowed
|
||||
if a.x509Policy == nil {
|
||||
return true, nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return a.x509Policy.AreCertificateNamesAllowed(cert)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func isAdminIdentityTokenCertificate(cert *x509.Certificate) bool {
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO: remove this check
|
||||
|
||||
if cert.Issuer.CommonName != "" {
|
||||
return false
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
subject := cert.Subject.CommonName
|
||||
if subject == "" {
|
||||
return false
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
dnsNames := cert.DNSNames
|
||||
if len(dnsNames) != 1 {
|
||||
return false
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if dnsNames[0] != subject {
|
||||
return false
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
extras := cert.ExtraExtensions
|
||||
if len(extras) != 1 {
|
||||
return false
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
extra := extras[0]
|
||||
|
||||
return extra.Id.Equal(asn1.ObjectIdentifier{1, 3, 6, 1, 4, 1, 37476, 9000, 64, 1})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Renew creates a new Certificate identical to the old certificate, except
|
||||
// with a validity window that begins 'now'.
|
||||
func (a *Authority) Renew(oldCert *x509.Certificate) ([]*x509.Certificate, error) {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -10,9 +10,10 @@ import (
|
|||
"reflect"
|
||||
"strings"
|
||||
|
||||
"go.step.sm/crypto/x509util"
|
||||
"golang.org/x/crypto/ssh"
|
||||
"golang.org/x/net/idna"
|
||||
|
||||
"go.step.sm/crypto/x509util"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
type NamePolicyReason int
|
||||
|
@ -39,7 +40,7 @@ type NamePolicyError struct {
|
|||
Detail string
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func (e NamePolicyError) Error() string {
|
||||
func (e *NamePolicyError) Error() string {
|
||||
switch e.Reason {
|
||||
case NotAuthorizedForThisName:
|
||||
return "not authorized to sign for this name: " + e.Detail
|
||||
|
@ -295,7 +296,7 @@ func (e *NamePolicyEngine) validateNames(dnsNames []string, ips []net.IP, emailA
|
|||
// then return error, because DNS should be explicitly configured to be allowed in that case. In case there are
|
||||
// (other) excluded constraints, we'll allow a DNS (implicit allow; currently).
|
||||
if e.numberOfDNSDomainConstraints == 0 && e.totalNumberOfPermittedConstraints > 0 {
|
||||
return NamePolicyError{
|
||||
return &NamePolicyError{
|
||||
Reason: NotAuthorizedForThisName,
|
||||
Detail: fmt.Sprintf("dns %q is not explicitly permitted by any constraint", dns),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -307,7 +308,7 @@ func (e *NamePolicyEngine) validateNames(dnsNames []string, ips []net.IP, emailA
|
|||
}
|
||||
parsedDNS, err := idna.Lookup.ToASCII(dns)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
return NamePolicyError{
|
||||
return &NamePolicyError{
|
||||
Reason: CannotParseDomain,
|
||||
Detail: fmt.Sprintf("dns %q cannot be converted to ASCII", dns),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -316,7 +317,7 @@ func (e *NamePolicyEngine) validateNames(dnsNames []string, ips []net.IP, emailA
|
|||
parsedDNS = "*" + parsedDNS
|
||||
}
|
||||
if _, ok := domainToReverseLabels(parsedDNS); !ok {
|
||||
return NamePolicyError{
|
||||
return &NamePolicyError{
|
||||
Reason: CannotParseDomain,
|
||||
Detail: fmt.Sprintf("cannot parse dns %q", dns),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -331,7 +332,7 @@ func (e *NamePolicyEngine) validateNames(dnsNames []string, ips []net.IP, emailA
|
|||
|
||||
for _, ip := range ips {
|
||||
if e.numberOfIPRangeConstraints == 0 && e.totalNumberOfPermittedConstraints > 0 {
|
||||
return NamePolicyError{
|
||||
return &NamePolicyError{
|
||||
Reason: NotAuthorizedForThisName,
|
||||
Detail: fmt.Sprintf("ip %q is not explicitly permitted by any constraint", ip.String()),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -346,14 +347,14 @@ func (e *NamePolicyEngine) validateNames(dnsNames []string, ips []net.IP, emailA
|
|||
|
||||
for _, email := range emailAddresses {
|
||||
if e.numberOfEmailAddressConstraints == 0 && e.totalNumberOfPermittedConstraints > 0 {
|
||||
return NamePolicyError{
|
||||
return &NamePolicyError{
|
||||
Reason: NotAuthorizedForThisName,
|
||||
Detail: fmt.Sprintf("email %q is not explicitly permitted by any constraint", email),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
mailbox, ok := parseRFC2821Mailbox(email)
|
||||
if !ok {
|
||||
return NamePolicyError{
|
||||
return &NamePolicyError{
|
||||
Reason: CannotParseRFC822Name,
|
||||
Detail: fmt.Sprintf("invalid rfc822Name %q", mailbox),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -363,7 +364,7 @@ func (e *NamePolicyEngine) validateNames(dnsNames []string, ips []net.IP, emailA
|
|||
// https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5280#section-7.5
|
||||
domainASCII, err := idna.ToASCII(mailbox.domain)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
return NamePolicyError{
|
||||
return &NamePolicyError{
|
||||
Reason: CannotParseDomain,
|
||||
Detail: fmt.Sprintf("cannot parse email domain %q", email),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -381,7 +382,7 @@ func (e *NamePolicyEngine) validateNames(dnsNames []string, ips []net.IP, emailA
|
|||
|
||||
for _, uri := range uris {
|
||||
if e.numberOfURIDomainConstraints == 0 && e.totalNumberOfPermittedConstraints > 0 {
|
||||
return NamePolicyError{
|
||||
return &NamePolicyError{
|
||||
Reason: NotAuthorizedForThisName,
|
||||
Detail: fmt.Sprintf("uri %q is not explicitly permitted by any constraint", uri.String()),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -396,7 +397,7 @@ func (e *NamePolicyEngine) validateNames(dnsNames []string, ips []net.IP, emailA
|
|||
|
||||
for _, principal := range principals {
|
||||
if e.numberOfPrincipalConstraints == 0 && e.totalNumberOfPermittedConstraints > 0 {
|
||||
return NamePolicyError{
|
||||
return &NamePolicyError{
|
||||
Reason: NotAuthorizedForThisName,
|
||||
Detail: fmt.Sprintf("username principal %q is not explicitly permitted by any constraint", principal),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -431,14 +432,14 @@ func checkNameConstraints(
|
|||
constraint := excludedValue.Index(i).Interface()
|
||||
match, err := match(parsedName, constraint)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
return NamePolicyError{
|
||||
return &NamePolicyError{
|
||||
Reason: CannotMatchNameToConstraint,
|
||||
Detail: err.Error(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if match {
|
||||
return NamePolicyError{
|
||||
return &NamePolicyError{
|
||||
Reason: NotAuthorizedForThisName,
|
||||
Detail: fmt.Sprintf("%s %q is excluded by constraint %q", nameType, name, constraint),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -452,7 +453,7 @@ func checkNameConstraints(
|
|||
constraint := permittedValue.Index(i).Interface()
|
||||
var err error
|
||||
if ok, err = match(parsedName, constraint); err != nil {
|
||||
return NamePolicyError{
|
||||
return &NamePolicyError{
|
||||
Reason: CannotMatchNameToConstraint,
|
||||
Detail: err.Error(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -464,7 +465,7 @@ func checkNameConstraints(
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if !ok {
|
||||
return NamePolicyError{
|
||||
return &NamePolicyError{
|
||||
Reason: NotAuthorizedForThisName,
|
||||
Detail: fmt.Sprintf("%s %q is not permitted by any constraint", nameType, name),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ import (
|
|||
)
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO(hs): the functionality in the policy engine is a nice candidate for trying fuzzing on
|
||||
// TODO(hs): more complex uses cases that combine multiple names and permitted/excluded entries
|
||||
// TODO(hs): more complex use cases that combine multiple names and permitted/excluded entries
|
||||
|
||||
func TestNamePolicyEngine_matchDomainConstraint(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
tests := []struct {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ import (
|
|||
"testing"
|
||||
|
||||
"github.com/google/go-cmp/cmp"
|
||||
|
||||
"github.com/smallstep/assert"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue