Improve test rigour for reloadPolicyEngines

This commit is contained in:
Herman Slatman 2022-04-25 11:02:03 +02:00
parent 6264e8495c
commit 20f5d12b99
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: F4D8A44EA0A75A4F
2 changed files with 188 additions and 63 deletions

View file

@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ func (a *Authority) reloadPolicyEngines(ctx context.Context) error {
err error
policyOptions *authPolicy.Options
)
// if admin API is enabled, the CA is running in linked mode
if a.config.AuthorityConfig.EnableAdmin {
// temporarily disable policy loading when LinkedCA is in use

View file

@ -331,17 +331,104 @@ func Test_policyToCertificates(t *testing.T) {
}
func TestAuthority_reloadPolicyEngines(t *testing.T) {
type exp struct {
x509Policy bool
sshUserPolicy bool
sshHostPolicy bool
existingX509PolicyEngine, err := policy.NewX509PolicyEngine(&policy.X509PolicyOptions{
AllowedNames: &policy.X509NameOptions{
DNSDomains: []string{"*.hosts.example.com"},
},
})
assert.NoError(t, err)
existingSSHHostPolicyEngine, err := policy.NewSSHHostPolicyEngine(&policy.SSHPolicyOptions{
Host: &policy.SSHHostCertificateOptions{
AllowedNames: &policy.SSHNameOptions{
DNSDomains: []string{"*.hosts.example.com"},
},
},
})
assert.NoError(t, err)
existingSSHUserPolicyEngine, err := policy.NewSSHUserPolicyEngine(&policy.SSHPolicyOptions{
User: &policy.SSHUserCertificateOptions{
AllowedNames: &policy.SSHNameOptions{
EmailAddresses: []string{"@mails.example.com"},
},
},
})
assert.NoError(t, err)
newX509PolicyEngine, err := policy.NewX509PolicyEngine(&policy.X509PolicyOptions{
AllowedNames: &policy.X509NameOptions{
DNSDomains: []string{"*.local"},
},
DeniedNames: &policy.X509NameOptions{
DNSDomains: []string{"badhost.local"},
},
AllowWildcardLiteral: true,
DisableSubjectCommonNameVerification: false,
})
assert.NoError(t, err)
newSSHHostPolicyEngine, err := policy.NewSSHHostPolicyEngine(&policy.SSHPolicyOptions{
Host: &policy.SSHHostCertificateOptions{
AllowedNames: &policy.SSHNameOptions{
DNSDomains: []string{"*.local"},
},
DeniedNames: &policy.SSHNameOptions{
DNSDomains: []string{"badhost.local"},
},
},
})
assert.NoError(t, err)
newSSHUserPolicyEngine, err := policy.NewSSHUserPolicyEngine(&policy.SSHPolicyOptions{
User: &policy.SSHUserCertificateOptions{
AllowedNames: &policy.SSHNameOptions{
Principals: []string{"*"},
},
DeniedNames: &policy.SSHNameOptions{
Principals: []string{"root"},
},
},
})
assert.NoError(t, err)
newAdminX509PolicyEngine, err := policy.NewX509PolicyEngine(&policy.X509PolicyOptions{
AllowedNames: &policy.X509NameOptions{
DNSDomains: []string{"*.local"},
},
})
assert.NoError(t, err)
newAdminSSHHostPolicyEngine, err := policy.NewSSHHostPolicyEngine(&policy.SSHPolicyOptions{
Host: &policy.SSHHostCertificateOptions{
AllowedNames: &policy.SSHNameOptions{
DNSDomains: []string{"*.local"},
},
},
})
assert.NoError(t, err)
newAdminSSHUserPolicyEngine, err := policy.NewSSHUserPolicyEngine(&policy.SSHPolicyOptions{
User: &policy.SSHUserCertificateOptions{
AllowedNames: &policy.SSHNameOptions{
EmailAddresses: []string{"@example.com"},
},
},
})
assert.NoError(t, err)
type expected struct {
x509Policy policy.X509Policy
sshUserPolicy policy.UserPolicy
sshHostPolicy policy.HostPolicy
}
tests := []struct {
name string
config *config.Config
adminDB admin.DB
ctx context.Context
expected *exp
expected *expected
wantErr bool
}{
{
@ -360,6 +447,11 @@ func TestAuthority_reloadPolicyEngines(t *testing.T) {
},
ctx: context.Background(),
wantErr: true,
expected: &expected{
x509Policy: existingX509PolicyEngine,
sshUserPolicy: existingSSHUserPolicyEngine,
sshHostPolicy: existingSSHHostPolicyEngine,
},
},
{
name: "fail/standalone-ssh-host-policy",
@ -379,6 +471,11 @@ func TestAuthority_reloadPolicyEngines(t *testing.T) {
},
ctx: context.Background(),
wantErr: true,
expected: &expected{
x509Policy: existingX509PolicyEngine,
sshUserPolicy: existingSSHUserPolicyEngine,
sshHostPolicy: existingSSHHostPolicyEngine,
},
},
{
name: "fail/standalone-ssh-user-policy",
@ -398,6 +495,11 @@ func TestAuthority_reloadPolicyEngines(t *testing.T) {
},
ctx: context.Background(),
wantErr: true,
expected: &expected{
x509Policy: existingX509PolicyEngine,
sshUserPolicy: existingSSHUserPolicyEngine,
sshHostPolicy: existingSSHHostPolicyEngine,
},
},
{
name: "fail/adminDB.GetAuthorityPolicy-error",
@ -413,6 +515,11 @@ func TestAuthority_reloadPolicyEngines(t *testing.T) {
},
ctx: context.Background(),
wantErr: true,
expected: &expected{
x509Policy: existingX509PolicyEngine,
sshUserPolicy: existingSSHUserPolicyEngine,
sshHostPolicy: existingSSHHostPolicyEngine,
},
},
{
name: "fail/admin-x509-policy",
@ -434,6 +541,11 @@ func TestAuthority_reloadPolicyEngines(t *testing.T) {
},
ctx: context.Background(),
wantErr: true,
expected: &expected{
x509Policy: existingX509PolicyEngine,
sshUserPolicy: existingSSHUserPolicyEngine,
sshHostPolicy: existingSSHHostPolicyEngine,
},
},
{
name: "fail/admin-ssh-host-policy",
@ -457,6 +569,11 @@ func TestAuthority_reloadPolicyEngines(t *testing.T) {
},
ctx: context.Background(),
wantErr: true,
expected: &expected{
x509Policy: existingX509PolicyEngine,
sshUserPolicy: existingSSHUserPolicyEngine,
sshHostPolicy: existingSSHHostPolicyEngine,
},
},
{
name: "fail/admin-ssh-user-policy",
@ -480,6 +597,11 @@ func TestAuthority_reloadPolicyEngines(t *testing.T) {
},
ctx: context.Background(),
wantErr: true,
expected: &expected{
x509Policy: existingX509PolicyEngine,
sshUserPolicy: existingSSHUserPolicyEngine,
sshHostPolicy: existingSSHHostPolicyEngine,
},
},
{
name: "ok/linkedca-unsupported",
@ -491,6 +613,11 @@ func TestAuthority_reloadPolicyEngines(t *testing.T) {
adminDB: &linkedCaClient{},
ctx: context.Background(),
wantErr: false,
expected: &expected{
x509Policy: existingX509PolicyEngine,
sshUserPolicy: existingSSHUserPolicyEngine,
sshHostPolicy: existingSSHHostPolicyEngine,
},
},
{
name: "ok/standalone-no-policy",
@ -502,7 +629,11 @@ func TestAuthority_reloadPolicyEngines(t *testing.T) {
},
ctx: context.Background(),
wantErr: false,
expected: nil,
expected: &expected{
x509Policy: nil,
sshUserPolicy: nil,
sshHostPolicy: nil,
},
},
{
name: "ok/standalone-x509-policy",
@ -525,11 +656,11 @@ func TestAuthority_reloadPolicyEngines(t *testing.T) {
},
ctx: context.Background(),
wantErr: false,
expected: &exp{
expected: &expected{
// expect only the X.509 policy to exist
x509Policy: true,
sshHostPolicy: false,
sshUserPolicy: false,
x509Policy: newX509PolicyEngine,
sshHostPolicy: nil,
sshUserPolicy: nil,
},
},
{
@ -553,11 +684,11 @@ func TestAuthority_reloadPolicyEngines(t *testing.T) {
},
ctx: context.Background(),
wantErr: false,
expected: &exp{
expected: &expected{
// expect only the SSH host policy to exist
x509Policy: false,
sshHostPolicy: true,
sshUserPolicy: false,
x509Policy: nil,
sshHostPolicy: newSSHHostPolicyEngine,
sshUserPolicy: nil,
},
},
{
@ -581,11 +712,11 @@ func TestAuthority_reloadPolicyEngines(t *testing.T) {
},
ctx: context.Background(),
wantErr: false,
expected: &exp{
expected: &expected{
// expect only the SSH user policy to exist
x509Policy: false,
sshHostPolicy: false,
sshUserPolicy: true,
x509Policy: nil,
sshHostPolicy: nil,
sshUserPolicy: newSSHUserPolicyEngine,
},
},
{
@ -617,11 +748,11 @@ func TestAuthority_reloadPolicyEngines(t *testing.T) {
},
ctx: context.Background(),
wantErr: false,
expected: &exp{
expected: &expected{
// expect only the SSH policy engines to exist
x509Policy: false,
sshHostPolicy: true,
sshUserPolicy: true,
x509Policy: nil,
sshHostPolicy: newSSHHostPolicyEngine,
sshUserPolicy: newSSHUserPolicyEngine,
},
},
{
@ -663,11 +794,11 @@ func TestAuthority_reloadPolicyEngines(t *testing.T) {
},
ctx: context.Background(),
wantErr: false,
expected: &exp{
expected: &expected{
// expect all three policy engines to exist
x509Policy: true,
sshHostPolicy: true,
sshUserPolicy: true,
x509Policy: newX509PolicyEngine,
sshHostPolicy: newSSHHostPolicyEngine,
sshUserPolicy: newSSHUserPolicyEngine,
},
},
{
@ -690,10 +821,10 @@ func TestAuthority_reloadPolicyEngines(t *testing.T) {
},
ctx: context.Background(),
wantErr: false,
expected: &exp{
x509Policy: true,
sshHostPolicy: false,
sshUserPolicy: false,
expected: &expected{
x509Policy: newAdminX509PolicyEngine,
sshHostPolicy: nil,
sshUserPolicy: nil,
},
},
{
@ -718,10 +849,10 @@ func TestAuthority_reloadPolicyEngines(t *testing.T) {
},
ctx: context.Background(),
wantErr: false,
expected: &exp{
x509Policy: false,
sshHostPolicy: true,
sshUserPolicy: false,
expected: &expected{
x509Policy: nil,
sshHostPolicy: newAdminSSHHostPolicyEngine,
sshUserPolicy: nil,
},
},
{
@ -746,10 +877,10 @@ func TestAuthority_reloadPolicyEngines(t *testing.T) {
},
ctx: context.Background(),
wantErr: false,
expected: &exp{
x509Policy: false,
sshHostPolicy: false,
sshUserPolicy: true,
expected: &expected{
x509Policy: nil,
sshHostPolicy: nil,
sshUserPolicy: newAdminSSHUserPolicyEngine,
},
},
{
@ -789,11 +920,11 @@ func TestAuthority_reloadPolicyEngines(t *testing.T) {
},
},
wantErr: false,
expected: &exp{
expected: &expected{
// expect all three policy engines to exist
x509Policy: true,
sshHostPolicy: true,
sshUserPolicy: true,
x509Policy: newX509PolicyEngine,
sshHostPolicy: newAdminSSHHostPolicyEngine,
sshUserPolicy: newAdminSSHUserPolicyEngine,
},
},
{
@ -842,11 +973,11 @@ func TestAuthority_reloadPolicyEngines(t *testing.T) {
},
},
wantErr: false,
expected: &exp{
expected: &expected{
// expect all three policy engines to exist
x509Policy: true,
sshHostPolicy: false,
sshUserPolicy: false,
x509Policy: newX509PolicyEngine,
sshHostPolicy: nil,
sshUserPolicy: nil,
},
},
}
@ -855,23 +986,17 @@ func TestAuthority_reloadPolicyEngines(t *testing.T) {
a := &Authority{
config: tt.config,
adminDB: tt.adminDB,
x509Policy: existingX509PolicyEngine,
sshUserPolicy: existingSSHUserPolicyEngine,
sshHostPolicy: existingSSHHostPolicyEngine,
}
if err := a.reloadPolicyEngines(tt.ctx); (err != nil) != tt.wantErr {
t.Errorf("Authority.reloadPolicyEngines() error = %v, wantErr %v", err, tt.wantErr)
}
// if expected value is set, check existence of the policy engines
// Check that they're always nil if the expected value is not set,
// which happens on errors.
if tt.expected != nil {
assert.Equal(t, tt.expected.x509Policy, a.x509Policy != nil)
assert.Equal(t, tt.expected.sshHostPolicy, a.sshHostPolicy != nil)
assert.Equal(t, tt.expected.sshUserPolicy, a.sshUserPolicy != nil)
} else {
assert.Nil(t, a.x509Policy)
assert.Nil(t, a.sshHostPolicy)
assert.Nil(t, a.sshUserPolicy)
}
assert.Equal(t, tt.expected.x509Policy, a.x509Policy)
assert.Equal(t, tt.expected.sshHostPolicy, a.sshHostPolicy)
assert.Equal(t, tt.expected.sshUserPolicy, a.sshUserPolicy)
})
}
}