forked from TrueCloudLab/certificates
Improve test rigour for reloadPolicyEngines
This commit is contained in:
parent
6264e8495c
commit
20f5d12b99
2 changed files with 188 additions and 63 deletions
|
@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ func (a *Authority) reloadPolicyEngines(ctx context.Context) error {
|
|||
err error
|
||||
policyOptions *authPolicy.Options
|
||||
)
|
||||
// if admin API is enabled, the CA is running in linked mode
|
||||
|
||||
if a.config.AuthorityConfig.EnableAdmin {
|
||||
|
||||
// temporarily disable policy loading when LinkedCA is in use
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -331,17 +331,104 @@ func Test_policyToCertificates(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestAuthority_reloadPolicyEngines(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
type exp struct {
|
||||
x509Policy bool
|
||||
sshUserPolicy bool
|
||||
sshHostPolicy bool
|
||||
|
||||
existingX509PolicyEngine, err := policy.NewX509PolicyEngine(&policy.X509PolicyOptions{
|
||||
AllowedNames: &policy.X509NameOptions{
|
||||
DNSDomains: []string{"*.hosts.example.com"},
|
||||
},
|
||||
})
|
||||
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
|
||||
existingSSHHostPolicyEngine, err := policy.NewSSHHostPolicyEngine(&policy.SSHPolicyOptions{
|
||||
Host: &policy.SSHHostCertificateOptions{
|
||||
AllowedNames: &policy.SSHNameOptions{
|
||||
DNSDomains: []string{"*.hosts.example.com"},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
})
|
||||
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
|
||||
existingSSHUserPolicyEngine, err := policy.NewSSHUserPolicyEngine(&policy.SSHPolicyOptions{
|
||||
User: &policy.SSHUserCertificateOptions{
|
||||
AllowedNames: &policy.SSHNameOptions{
|
||||
EmailAddresses: []string{"@mails.example.com"},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
})
|
||||
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
|
||||
newX509PolicyEngine, err := policy.NewX509PolicyEngine(&policy.X509PolicyOptions{
|
||||
AllowedNames: &policy.X509NameOptions{
|
||||
DNSDomains: []string{"*.local"},
|
||||
},
|
||||
DeniedNames: &policy.X509NameOptions{
|
||||
DNSDomains: []string{"badhost.local"},
|
||||
},
|
||||
AllowWildcardLiteral: true,
|
||||
DisableSubjectCommonNameVerification: false,
|
||||
})
|
||||
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
|
||||
newSSHHostPolicyEngine, err := policy.NewSSHHostPolicyEngine(&policy.SSHPolicyOptions{
|
||||
Host: &policy.SSHHostCertificateOptions{
|
||||
AllowedNames: &policy.SSHNameOptions{
|
||||
DNSDomains: []string{"*.local"},
|
||||
},
|
||||
DeniedNames: &policy.SSHNameOptions{
|
||||
DNSDomains: []string{"badhost.local"},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
})
|
||||
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
|
||||
newSSHUserPolicyEngine, err := policy.NewSSHUserPolicyEngine(&policy.SSHPolicyOptions{
|
||||
User: &policy.SSHUserCertificateOptions{
|
||||
AllowedNames: &policy.SSHNameOptions{
|
||||
Principals: []string{"*"},
|
||||
},
|
||||
DeniedNames: &policy.SSHNameOptions{
|
||||
Principals: []string{"root"},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
})
|
||||
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
|
||||
newAdminX509PolicyEngine, err := policy.NewX509PolicyEngine(&policy.X509PolicyOptions{
|
||||
AllowedNames: &policy.X509NameOptions{
|
||||
DNSDomains: []string{"*.local"},
|
||||
},
|
||||
})
|
||||
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
|
||||
newAdminSSHHostPolicyEngine, err := policy.NewSSHHostPolicyEngine(&policy.SSHPolicyOptions{
|
||||
Host: &policy.SSHHostCertificateOptions{
|
||||
AllowedNames: &policy.SSHNameOptions{
|
||||
DNSDomains: []string{"*.local"},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
})
|
||||
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
|
||||
newAdminSSHUserPolicyEngine, err := policy.NewSSHUserPolicyEngine(&policy.SSHPolicyOptions{
|
||||
User: &policy.SSHUserCertificateOptions{
|
||||
AllowedNames: &policy.SSHNameOptions{
|
||||
EmailAddresses: []string{"@example.com"},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
})
|
||||
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
|
||||
type expected struct {
|
||||
x509Policy policy.X509Policy
|
||||
sshUserPolicy policy.UserPolicy
|
||||
sshHostPolicy policy.HostPolicy
|
||||
}
|
||||
tests := []struct {
|
||||
name string
|
||||
config *config.Config
|
||||
adminDB admin.DB
|
||||
ctx context.Context
|
||||
expected *exp
|
||||
expected *expected
|
||||
wantErr bool
|
||||
}{
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -360,6 +447,11 @@ func TestAuthority_reloadPolicyEngines(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
},
|
||||
ctx: context.Background(),
|
||||
wantErr: true,
|
||||
expected: &expected{
|
||||
x509Policy: existingX509PolicyEngine,
|
||||
sshUserPolicy: existingSSHUserPolicyEngine,
|
||||
sshHostPolicy: existingSSHHostPolicyEngine,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
name: "fail/standalone-ssh-host-policy",
|
||||
|
@ -379,6 +471,11 @@ func TestAuthority_reloadPolicyEngines(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
},
|
||||
ctx: context.Background(),
|
||||
wantErr: true,
|
||||
expected: &expected{
|
||||
x509Policy: existingX509PolicyEngine,
|
||||
sshUserPolicy: existingSSHUserPolicyEngine,
|
||||
sshHostPolicy: existingSSHHostPolicyEngine,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
name: "fail/standalone-ssh-user-policy",
|
||||
|
@ -398,6 +495,11 @@ func TestAuthority_reloadPolicyEngines(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
},
|
||||
ctx: context.Background(),
|
||||
wantErr: true,
|
||||
expected: &expected{
|
||||
x509Policy: existingX509PolicyEngine,
|
||||
sshUserPolicy: existingSSHUserPolicyEngine,
|
||||
sshHostPolicy: existingSSHHostPolicyEngine,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
name: "fail/adminDB.GetAuthorityPolicy-error",
|
||||
|
@ -413,6 +515,11 @@ func TestAuthority_reloadPolicyEngines(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
},
|
||||
ctx: context.Background(),
|
||||
wantErr: true,
|
||||
expected: &expected{
|
||||
x509Policy: existingX509PolicyEngine,
|
||||
sshUserPolicy: existingSSHUserPolicyEngine,
|
||||
sshHostPolicy: existingSSHHostPolicyEngine,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
name: "fail/admin-x509-policy",
|
||||
|
@ -434,6 +541,11 @@ func TestAuthority_reloadPolicyEngines(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
},
|
||||
ctx: context.Background(),
|
||||
wantErr: true,
|
||||
expected: &expected{
|
||||
x509Policy: existingX509PolicyEngine,
|
||||
sshUserPolicy: existingSSHUserPolicyEngine,
|
||||
sshHostPolicy: existingSSHHostPolicyEngine,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
name: "fail/admin-ssh-host-policy",
|
||||
|
@ -457,6 +569,11 @@ func TestAuthority_reloadPolicyEngines(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
},
|
||||
ctx: context.Background(),
|
||||
wantErr: true,
|
||||
expected: &expected{
|
||||
x509Policy: existingX509PolicyEngine,
|
||||
sshUserPolicy: existingSSHUserPolicyEngine,
|
||||
sshHostPolicy: existingSSHHostPolicyEngine,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
name: "fail/admin-ssh-user-policy",
|
||||
|
@ -480,6 +597,11 @@ func TestAuthority_reloadPolicyEngines(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
},
|
||||
ctx: context.Background(),
|
||||
wantErr: true,
|
||||
expected: &expected{
|
||||
x509Policy: existingX509PolicyEngine,
|
||||
sshUserPolicy: existingSSHUserPolicyEngine,
|
||||
sshHostPolicy: existingSSHHostPolicyEngine,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
name: "ok/linkedca-unsupported",
|
||||
|
@ -491,6 +613,11 @@ func TestAuthority_reloadPolicyEngines(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
adminDB: &linkedCaClient{},
|
||||
ctx: context.Background(),
|
||||
wantErr: false,
|
||||
expected: &expected{
|
||||
x509Policy: existingX509PolicyEngine,
|
||||
sshUserPolicy: existingSSHUserPolicyEngine,
|
||||
sshHostPolicy: existingSSHHostPolicyEngine,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
name: "ok/standalone-no-policy",
|
||||
|
@ -500,9 +627,13 @@ func TestAuthority_reloadPolicyEngines(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
Policy: nil,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
ctx: context.Background(),
|
||||
wantErr: false,
|
||||
expected: nil,
|
||||
ctx: context.Background(),
|
||||
wantErr: false,
|
||||
expected: &expected{
|
||||
x509Policy: nil,
|
||||
sshUserPolicy: nil,
|
||||
sshHostPolicy: nil,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
name: "ok/standalone-x509-policy",
|
||||
|
@ -525,11 +656,11 @@ func TestAuthority_reloadPolicyEngines(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
},
|
||||
ctx: context.Background(),
|
||||
wantErr: false,
|
||||
expected: &exp{
|
||||
expected: &expected{
|
||||
// expect only the X.509 policy to exist
|
||||
x509Policy: true,
|
||||
sshHostPolicy: false,
|
||||
sshUserPolicy: false,
|
||||
x509Policy: newX509PolicyEngine,
|
||||
sshHostPolicy: nil,
|
||||
sshUserPolicy: nil,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -553,11 +684,11 @@ func TestAuthority_reloadPolicyEngines(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
},
|
||||
ctx: context.Background(),
|
||||
wantErr: false,
|
||||
expected: &exp{
|
||||
expected: &expected{
|
||||
// expect only the SSH host policy to exist
|
||||
x509Policy: false,
|
||||
sshHostPolicy: true,
|
||||
sshUserPolicy: false,
|
||||
x509Policy: nil,
|
||||
sshHostPolicy: newSSHHostPolicyEngine,
|
||||
sshUserPolicy: nil,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -581,11 +712,11 @@ func TestAuthority_reloadPolicyEngines(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
},
|
||||
ctx: context.Background(),
|
||||
wantErr: false,
|
||||
expected: &exp{
|
||||
expected: &expected{
|
||||
// expect only the SSH user policy to exist
|
||||
x509Policy: false,
|
||||
sshHostPolicy: false,
|
||||
sshUserPolicy: true,
|
||||
x509Policy: nil,
|
||||
sshHostPolicy: nil,
|
||||
sshUserPolicy: newSSHUserPolicyEngine,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -617,11 +748,11 @@ func TestAuthority_reloadPolicyEngines(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
},
|
||||
ctx: context.Background(),
|
||||
wantErr: false,
|
||||
expected: &exp{
|
||||
expected: &expected{
|
||||
// expect only the SSH policy engines to exist
|
||||
x509Policy: false,
|
||||
sshHostPolicy: true,
|
||||
sshUserPolicy: true,
|
||||
x509Policy: nil,
|
||||
sshHostPolicy: newSSHHostPolicyEngine,
|
||||
sshUserPolicy: newSSHUserPolicyEngine,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -663,11 +794,11 @@ func TestAuthority_reloadPolicyEngines(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
},
|
||||
ctx: context.Background(),
|
||||
wantErr: false,
|
||||
expected: &exp{
|
||||
expected: &expected{
|
||||
// expect all three policy engines to exist
|
||||
x509Policy: true,
|
||||
sshHostPolicy: true,
|
||||
sshUserPolicy: true,
|
||||
x509Policy: newX509PolicyEngine,
|
||||
sshHostPolicy: newSSHHostPolicyEngine,
|
||||
sshUserPolicy: newSSHUserPolicyEngine,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -690,10 +821,10 @@ func TestAuthority_reloadPolicyEngines(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
},
|
||||
ctx: context.Background(),
|
||||
wantErr: false,
|
||||
expected: &exp{
|
||||
x509Policy: true,
|
||||
sshHostPolicy: false,
|
||||
sshUserPolicy: false,
|
||||
expected: &expected{
|
||||
x509Policy: newAdminX509PolicyEngine,
|
||||
sshHostPolicy: nil,
|
||||
sshUserPolicy: nil,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -718,10 +849,10 @@ func TestAuthority_reloadPolicyEngines(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
},
|
||||
ctx: context.Background(),
|
||||
wantErr: false,
|
||||
expected: &exp{
|
||||
x509Policy: false,
|
||||
sshHostPolicy: true,
|
||||
sshUserPolicy: false,
|
||||
expected: &expected{
|
||||
x509Policy: nil,
|
||||
sshHostPolicy: newAdminSSHHostPolicyEngine,
|
||||
sshUserPolicy: nil,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -746,10 +877,10 @@ func TestAuthority_reloadPolicyEngines(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
},
|
||||
ctx: context.Background(),
|
||||
wantErr: false,
|
||||
expected: &exp{
|
||||
x509Policy: false,
|
||||
sshHostPolicy: false,
|
||||
sshUserPolicy: true,
|
||||
expected: &expected{
|
||||
x509Policy: nil,
|
||||
sshHostPolicy: nil,
|
||||
sshUserPolicy: newAdminSSHUserPolicyEngine,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -789,11 +920,11 @@ func TestAuthority_reloadPolicyEngines(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
wantErr: false,
|
||||
expected: &exp{
|
||||
expected: &expected{
|
||||
// expect all three policy engines to exist
|
||||
x509Policy: true,
|
||||
sshHostPolicy: true,
|
||||
sshUserPolicy: true,
|
||||
x509Policy: newX509PolicyEngine,
|
||||
sshHostPolicy: newAdminSSHHostPolicyEngine,
|
||||
sshUserPolicy: newAdminSSHUserPolicyEngine,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -842,36 +973,30 @@ func TestAuthority_reloadPolicyEngines(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
wantErr: false,
|
||||
expected: &exp{
|
||||
expected: &expected{
|
||||
// expect all three policy engines to exist
|
||||
x509Policy: true,
|
||||
sshHostPolicy: false,
|
||||
sshUserPolicy: false,
|
||||
x509Policy: newX509PolicyEngine,
|
||||
sshHostPolicy: nil,
|
||||
sshUserPolicy: nil,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
for _, tt := range tests {
|
||||
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
a := &Authority{
|
||||
config: tt.config,
|
||||
adminDB: tt.adminDB,
|
||||
config: tt.config,
|
||||
adminDB: tt.adminDB,
|
||||
x509Policy: existingX509PolicyEngine,
|
||||
sshUserPolicy: existingSSHUserPolicyEngine,
|
||||
sshHostPolicy: existingSSHHostPolicyEngine,
|
||||
}
|
||||
if err := a.reloadPolicyEngines(tt.ctx); (err != nil) != tt.wantErr {
|
||||
t.Errorf("Authority.reloadPolicyEngines() error = %v, wantErr %v", err, tt.wantErr)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// if expected value is set, check existence of the policy engines
|
||||
// Check that they're always nil if the expected value is not set,
|
||||
// which happens on errors.
|
||||
if tt.expected != nil {
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, tt.expected.x509Policy, a.x509Policy != nil)
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, tt.expected.sshHostPolicy, a.sshHostPolicy != nil)
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, tt.expected.sshUserPolicy, a.sshUserPolicy != nil)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
assert.Nil(t, a.x509Policy)
|
||||
assert.Nil(t, a.sshHostPolicy)
|
||||
assert.Nil(t, a.sshUserPolicy)
|
||||
}
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, tt.expected.x509Policy, a.x509Policy)
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, tt.expected.sshHostPolicy, a.sshHostPolicy)
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, tt.expected.sshUserPolicy, a.sshUserPolicy)
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue