The `s3.storage-class` option can be passed to restic (using `-o`) to
specify the storage class to be used for S3 objects created by restic.
The storage class is passed as-is to S3, so it needs to be understood by
the API. On AWS, it can be one of `STANDARD`, `STANDARD_IA`,
`ONEZONE_IA`, `INTELLIGENT_TIERING` and `REDUCED_REDUNDANCY`. If
unspecified, the default storage class is used (`STANDARD` on AWS).
You can mix storage classes in the same bucket, and the setting isn't
stored in the restic repository, so be sure to specify it with each
command that writes to S3.
Closes#706
This change allows passing no arguments to rclone, using `-o
rclone.args=""`. It is helpful when running rclone remotely via SSH
using a key with a forced command (via `command=` in `authorized_keys`).
If our ssh process has died, not only the next, but all subsequent
calls to clientError() should indicate the error.
restic output when the ssh process is killed with "kill -9":
Save(<data/afb68adbf9>) returned error, retrying after 253.661803ms: Write: failed to send packet header: write |1: file already closed
Save(<data/afb68adbf9>) returned error, retrying after 580.752212ms: ssh command exited: signal: killed
Save(<data/afb68adbf9>) returned error, retrying after 790.150468ms: ssh command exited: signal: killed
Save(<data/afb68adbf9>) returned error, retrying after 1.769595051s: ssh command exited: signal: killed
[...]
error in cleanup handler: ssh command exited: signal: killed
Before this patch:
Save(<data/de698d934f>) returned error, retrying after 252.84163ms: Write: failed to send packet header: write |1: file already closed
Save(<data/de698d934f>) returned error, retrying after 660.236963ms: OpenFile: failed to send packet header: write |1: file already closed
Save(<data/de698d934f>) returned error, retrying after 568.049909ms: OpenFile: failed to send packet header: write |1: file already closed
Save(<data/de698d934f>) returned error, retrying after 2.428813824s: OpenFile: failed to send packet header: write |1: file already closed
[...]
error in cleanup handler: failed to send packet header: write |1: file already closed
Previously, the function read from ARGV[1] (hardcoded) rather than the
value passed to it, the command-line argument as it exists in globalOptions.
Resolves#1745
This change removes the hardcoded Google auth mechanism for the GCS
backend, instead using Google's provided client library to discover and
generate credential material.
Google recommend that client libraries use their common auth mechanism
in order to authorise requests against Google services. Doing so means
you automatically support various types of authentication, from the
standard GOOGLE_APPLICATION_CREDENTIALS environment variable to making
use of Google's metadata API if running within Google Container Engine.
Before this change restic would attempt to JSON decode the error
message resulting in confusing `Decode: invalid character 'B' looking
for beginning of value` messages. Afterwards it will return `List
failed, server response: 400 Bad Request (400)`
As mentioned in issue [#1560](https://github.com/restic/restic/pull/1560#issuecomment-364689346)
this changes the signature for `backend.Save()`. It now takes a
parameter of interface type `RewindReader`, so that the backend
implementations or our `RetryBackend` middleware can reset the reader to
the beginning and then retry an upload operation.
The `RewindReader` interface also provides a `Length()` method, which is
used in the backend to get the size of the data to be saved. This
removes several ugly hacks we had to do to pull the size back out of the
`io.Reader` passed to `Save()` before. In the `s3` and `rest` backend
this is actively used.
This is a bug fix: Before, when the worker function fn in List() of the
RetryBackend returned an error, the operation is retried with the next
file. This is not consistent with the documentation, the intention was
that when fn returns an error, this is passed on to the caller and the
List() operation is aborted. Only errors happening on the underlying
backend are retried.
The error leads to restic ignoring exclusive locks that are present in
the repo, so it may happen that a new backup is written which references
data that is going to be removed by a concurrently running `prune`
operation.
The bug was reported by a user here:
https://forum.restic.net/t/restic-backup-returns-0-exit-code-when-already-locked/484
