Includes:
1. Renaming counter key to distinguish logical and physical objects
2. Version update dropping since changes could be done in a compatible way
Signed-off-by: Pavel Karpy <carpawell@nspcc.ru>
If metabase can't be opened in the default mode, try opening shard
first in `ReadOnly` mode and then in `DegradedReadOnly`.
Signed-off-by: Leonard Lyubich <leonard@nspcc.ru>
Signed-off-by: Evgenii Stratonikov <evgeniy@nspcc.ru>
The main problem is to distinguish the case of initial initialization
and update from version 0. We can't do this at `Open`, because of
`resync_metabase` flag. Thus, the following approach was taken:
1. During `Open` check whether the metabase was initialized.
2. Check for the version in `Init` or write the new one if the metabase
is new.
3. Update version in `Reset`.
Signed-off-by: Evgenii Stratonikov <evgeniy@nspcc.ru>
It allows storing information about object in both ways at the same time:
1. Metabase should know if an object is covered by a tombstone (that is
not expired yet);
2. It should be possible to physically delete objects covered by a
tombstone immediately (mark with GC) but keep tombstone knowledge.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Karpy <carpawell@nspcc.ru>
In the previous implementation of the metabase, there was no possibility of
reinitializing the metabase: clearing information about existing objects and
bringing it back to its initial state. This operation can be useful in
cases when the stored metadata about objects has lost (or possibly lost)
relevance, and you need to generate data from scratch. Also at the
initialization stage, static resources of the base were not created -
container-independent buckets.
Make `Metabase.Init` method to allocate graveyard, container-size and
to-move-it buckets in underlying BoltDB instance. Implement `Metabase.Reset`
method: it works like `Init` but clean up all static buckets and removes
other ones. Due to the logical similarity, the methods share a single piece
of code.
Signed-off-by: Leonard Lyubich <leonard@nspcc.ru>