distribution/storage/layerstore.go

166 lines
3.7 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

Initial implementation of registry LayerService This change contains the initial implementation of the LayerService to power layer push and pulls on the storagedriver. The interfaces presented in this package will be used by the http application to drive most features around efficient pulls and resumable pushes. The file storage/layer.go defines the interface interactions. LayerService is the root type and supports methods to access Layer and LayerUpload objects. Pull operations are supported with LayerService.Fetch and push operations are supported with LayerService.Upload and LayerService.Resume. Reads and writes of layers are split between Layer and LayerUpload, respectively. LayerService is implemented internally with the layerStore object, which takes a storagedriver.StorageDriver and a pathMapper instance. LayerUploadState is currently exported and will likely continue to be as the interaction between it and layerUploadStore are better understood. Likely, the layerUploadStore lifecycle and implementation will be deferred to the application. Image pushes pulls will be implemented in a similar manner without the discrete, persistent upload. Much of this change is in place to get something running and working. Caveats of this change include the following: 1. Layer upload state storage is implemented on the local filesystem, separate from the storage driver. This must be replaced with using the proper backend and other state storage. This can be removed when we implement resumable hashing and tarsum calculations to avoid backend roundtrips. 2. Error handling is rather bespoke at this time. The http API implementation should really dictate the error return structure for the future, so we intend to refactor this heavily to support these errors. We'd also like to collect production data to understand how failures happen in the system as a while before moving to a particular edict around error handling. 3. The layerUploadStore, which manages layer upload storage and state is not currently exported. This will likely end up being split, with the file management portion being pointed at the storagedriver and the state storage elsewhere. 4. Access Control provisions are nearly completely missing from this change. There are details around how layerindex lookup works that are related with access controls. As the auth portions of the new API take shape, these provisions will become more clear. Please see TODOs for details and individual recommendations.
2014-11-18 00:29:42 +00:00
package storage
import (
Spool layer uploads to remote storage To smooth initial implementation, uploads were spooled to local file storage, validated, then pushed to remote storage. That approach was flawed in that it present easy clustering of registry services that share a remote storage backend. The original plan was to implement resumable hashes then implement remote upload storage. After some thought, it was found to be better to get remote spooling working, then optimize with resumable hashes. Moving to this approach has tradeoffs: after storing the complete upload remotely, the node must fetch the content and validate it before moving it to the final location. This can double bandwidth usage to the remote backend. Modifying the verification and upload code to store intermediate hashes should be trivial once the layer digest format has settled. The largest changes for users of the storage package (mostly the registry app) are the LayerService interface and the LayerUpload interface. The LayerService now takes qualified repository names to start and resume uploads. In corallry, the concept of LayerUploadState has been complete removed, exposing all aspects of that state as part of the LayerUpload object. The LayerUpload object has been modified to work as an io.WriteSeeker and includes a StartedAt time, to allow for upload timeout policies. Finish now only requires a digest, eliding the requirement for a size parameter. Resource cleanup has taken a turn for the better. Resources are cleaned up after successful uploads and during a cancel call. Admittedly, this is probably not completely where we want to be. It's recommend that we bolster this with a periodic driver utility script that scans for partial uploads and deletes the underlying data. As a small benefit, we can leave these around to better understand how and why these uploads are failing, at the cost of some extra disk space. Many other changes follow from the changes above. The webapp needs to be updated to meet the new interface requirements. Signed-off-by: Stephen J Day <stephen.day@docker.com>
2015-01-08 22:24:02 +00:00
"time"
"code.google.com/p/go-uuid/uuid"
"github.com/docker/distribution/digest"
"github.com/docker/distribution/manifest"
"github.com/docker/distribution/storagedriver"
Initial implementation of registry LayerService This change contains the initial implementation of the LayerService to power layer push and pulls on the storagedriver. The interfaces presented in this package will be used by the http application to drive most features around efficient pulls and resumable pushes. The file storage/layer.go defines the interface interactions. LayerService is the root type and supports methods to access Layer and LayerUpload objects. Pull operations are supported with LayerService.Fetch and push operations are supported with LayerService.Upload and LayerService.Resume. Reads and writes of layers are split between Layer and LayerUpload, respectively. LayerService is implemented internally with the layerStore object, which takes a storagedriver.StorageDriver and a pathMapper instance. LayerUploadState is currently exported and will likely continue to be as the interaction between it and layerUploadStore are better understood. Likely, the layerUploadStore lifecycle and implementation will be deferred to the application. Image pushes pulls will be implemented in a similar manner without the discrete, persistent upload. Much of this change is in place to get something running and working. Caveats of this change include the following: 1. Layer upload state storage is implemented on the local filesystem, separate from the storage driver. This must be replaced with using the proper backend and other state storage. This can be removed when we implement resumable hashing and tarsum calculations to avoid backend roundtrips. 2. Error handling is rather bespoke at this time. The http API implementation should really dictate the error return structure for the future, so we intend to refactor this heavily to support these errors. We'd also like to collect production data to understand how failures happen in the system as a while before moving to a particular edict around error handling. 3. The layerUploadStore, which manages layer upload storage and state is not currently exported. This will likely end up being split, with the file management portion being pointed at the storagedriver and the state storage elsewhere. 4. Access Control provisions are nearly completely missing from this change. There are details around how layerindex lookup works that are related with access controls. As the auth portions of the new API take shape, these provisions will become more clear. Please see TODOs for details and individual recommendations.
2014-11-18 00:29:42 +00:00
)
type layerStore struct {
Spool layer uploads to remote storage To smooth initial implementation, uploads were spooled to local file storage, validated, then pushed to remote storage. That approach was flawed in that it present easy clustering of registry services that share a remote storage backend. The original plan was to implement resumable hashes then implement remote upload storage. After some thought, it was found to be better to get remote spooling working, then optimize with resumable hashes. Moving to this approach has tradeoffs: after storing the complete upload remotely, the node must fetch the content and validate it before moving it to the final location. This can double bandwidth usage to the remote backend. Modifying the verification and upload code to store intermediate hashes should be trivial once the layer digest format has settled. The largest changes for users of the storage package (mostly the registry app) are the LayerService interface and the LayerUpload interface. The LayerService now takes qualified repository names to start and resume uploads. In corallry, the concept of LayerUploadState has been complete removed, exposing all aspects of that state as part of the LayerUpload object. The LayerUpload object has been modified to work as an io.WriteSeeker and includes a StartedAt time, to allow for upload timeout policies. Finish now only requires a digest, eliding the requirement for a size parameter. Resource cleanup has taken a turn for the better. Resources are cleaned up after successful uploads and during a cancel call. Admittedly, this is probably not completely where we want to be. It's recommend that we bolster this with a periodic driver utility script that scans for partial uploads and deletes the underlying data. As a small benefit, we can leave these around to better understand how and why these uploads are failing, at the cost of some extra disk space. Many other changes follow from the changes above. The webapp needs to be updated to meet the new interface requirements. Signed-off-by: Stephen J Day <stephen.day@docker.com>
2015-01-08 22:24:02 +00:00
driver storagedriver.StorageDriver
pathMapper *pathMapper
blobStore *blobStore
Initial implementation of registry LayerService This change contains the initial implementation of the LayerService to power layer push and pulls on the storagedriver. The interfaces presented in this package will be used by the http application to drive most features around efficient pulls and resumable pushes. The file storage/layer.go defines the interface interactions. LayerService is the root type and supports methods to access Layer and LayerUpload objects. Pull operations are supported with LayerService.Fetch and push operations are supported with LayerService.Upload and LayerService.Resume. Reads and writes of layers are split between Layer and LayerUpload, respectively. LayerService is implemented internally with the layerStore object, which takes a storagedriver.StorageDriver and a pathMapper instance. LayerUploadState is currently exported and will likely continue to be as the interaction between it and layerUploadStore are better understood. Likely, the layerUploadStore lifecycle and implementation will be deferred to the application. Image pushes pulls will be implemented in a similar manner without the discrete, persistent upload. Much of this change is in place to get something running and working. Caveats of this change include the following: 1. Layer upload state storage is implemented on the local filesystem, separate from the storage driver. This must be replaced with using the proper backend and other state storage. This can be removed when we implement resumable hashing and tarsum calculations to avoid backend roundtrips. 2. Error handling is rather bespoke at this time. The http API implementation should really dictate the error return structure for the future, so we intend to refactor this heavily to support these errors. We'd also like to collect production data to understand how failures happen in the system as a while before moving to a particular edict around error handling. 3. The layerUploadStore, which manages layer upload storage and state is not currently exported. This will likely end up being split, with the file management portion being pointed at the storagedriver and the state storage elsewhere. 4. Access Control provisions are nearly completely missing from this change. There are details around how layerindex lookup works that are related with access controls. As the auth portions of the new API take shape, these provisions will become more clear. Please see TODOs for details and individual recommendations.
2014-11-18 00:29:42 +00:00
}
func (ls *layerStore) Exists(name string, digest digest.Digest) (bool, error) {
Initial implementation of registry LayerService This change contains the initial implementation of the LayerService to power layer push and pulls on the storagedriver. The interfaces presented in this package will be used by the http application to drive most features around efficient pulls and resumable pushes. The file storage/layer.go defines the interface interactions. LayerService is the root type and supports methods to access Layer and LayerUpload objects. Pull operations are supported with LayerService.Fetch and push operations are supported with LayerService.Upload and LayerService.Resume. Reads and writes of layers are split between Layer and LayerUpload, respectively. LayerService is implemented internally with the layerStore object, which takes a storagedriver.StorageDriver and a pathMapper instance. LayerUploadState is currently exported and will likely continue to be as the interaction between it and layerUploadStore are better understood. Likely, the layerUploadStore lifecycle and implementation will be deferred to the application. Image pushes pulls will be implemented in a similar manner without the discrete, persistent upload. Much of this change is in place to get something running and working. Caveats of this change include the following: 1. Layer upload state storage is implemented on the local filesystem, separate from the storage driver. This must be replaced with using the proper backend and other state storage. This can be removed when we implement resumable hashing and tarsum calculations to avoid backend roundtrips. 2. Error handling is rather bespoke at this time. The http API implementation should really dictate the error return structure for the future, so we intend to refactor this heavily to support these errors. We'd also like to collect production data to understand how failures happen in the system as a while before moving to a particular edict around error handling. 3. The layerUploadStore, which manages layer upload storage and state is not currently exported. This will likely end up being split, with the file management portion being pointed at the storagedriver and the state storage elsewhere. 4. Access Control provisions are nearly completely missing from this change. There are details around how layerindex lookup works that are related with access controls. As the auth portions of the new API take shape, these provisions will become more clear. Please see TODOs for details and individual recommendations.
2014-11-18 00:29:42 +00:00
// Because this implementation just follows blob links, an existence check
// is pretty cheap by starting and closing a fetch.
_, err := ls.Fetch(name, digest)
Initial implementation of registry LayerService This change contains the initial implementation of the LayerService to power layer push and pulls on the storagedriver. The interfaces presented in this package will be used by the http application to drive most features around efficient pulls and resumable pushes. The file storage/layer.go defines the interface interactions. LayerService is the root type and supports methods to access Layer and LayerUpload objects. Pull operations are supported with LayerService.Fetch and push operations are supported with LayerService.Upload and LayerService.Resume. Reads and writes of layers are split between Layer and LayerUpload, respectively. LayerService is implemented internally with the layerStore object, which takes a storagedriver.StorageDriver and a pathMapper instance. LayerUploadState is currently exported and will likely continue to be as the interaction between it and layerUploadStore are better understood. Likely, the layerUploadStore lifecycle and implementation will be deferred to the application. Image pushes pulls will be implemented in a similar manner without the discrete, persistent upload. Much of this change is in place to get something running and working. Caveats of this change include the following: 1. Layer upload state storage is implemented on the local filesystem, separate from the storage driver. This must be replaced with using the proper backend and other state storage. This can be removed when we implement resumable hashing and tarsum calculations to avoid backend roundtrips. 2. Error handling is rather bespoke at this time. The http API implementation should really dictate the error return structure for the future, so we intend to refactor this heavily to support these errors. We'd also like to collect production data to understand how failures happen in the system as a while before moving to a particular edict around error handling. 3. The layerUploadStore, which manages layer upload storage and state is not currently exported. This will likely end up being split, with the file management portion being pointed at the storagedriver and the state storage elsewhere. 4. Access Control provisions are nearly completely missing from this change. There are details around how layerindex lookup works that are related with access controls. As the auth portions of the new API take shape, these provisions will become more clear. Please see TODOs for details and individual recommendations.
2014-11-18 00:29:42 +00:00
if err != nil {
switch err.(type) {
case ErrUnknownLayer:
Initial implementation of registry LayerService This change contains the initial implementation of the LayerService to power layer push and pulls on the storagedriver. The interfaces presented in this package will be used by the http application to drive most features around efficient pulls and resumable pushes. The file storage/layer.go defines the interface interactions. LayerService is the root type and supports methods to access Layer and LayerUpload objects. Pull operations are supported with LayerService.Fetch and push operations are supported with LayerService.Upload and LayerService.Resume. Reads and writes of layers are split between Layer and LayerUpload, respectively. LayerService is implemented internally with the layerStore object, which takes a storagedriver.StorageDriver and a pathMapper instance. LayerUploadState is currently exported and will likely continue to be as the interaction between it and layerUploadStore are better understood. Likely, the layerUploadStore lifecycle and implementation will be deferred to the application. Image pushes pulls will be implemented in a similar manner without the discrete, persistent upload. Much of this change is in place to get something running and working. Caveats of this change include the following: 1. Layer upload state storage is implemented on the local filesystem, separate from the storage driver. This must be replaced with using the proper backend and other state storage. This can be removed when we implement resumable hashing and tarsum calculations to avoid backend roundtrips. 2. Error handling is rather bespoke at this time. The http API implementation should really dictate the error return structure for the future, so we intend to refactor this heavily to support these errors. We'd also like to collect production data to understand how failures happen in the system as a while before moving to a particular edict around error handling. 3. The layerUploadStore, which manages layer upload storage and state is not currently exported. This will likely end up being split, with the file management portion being pointed at the storagedriver and the state storage elsewhere. 4. Access Control provisions are nearly completely missing from this change. There are details around how layerindex lookup works that are related with access controls. As the auth portions of the new API take shape, these provisions will become more clear. Please see TODOs for details and individual recommendations.
2014-11-18 00:29:42 +00:00
return false, nil
}
return false, err
}
return true, nil
}
func (ls *layerStore) Fetch(name string, dgst digest.Digest) (Layer, error) {
bp, err := ls.path(name, dgst)
Initial implementation of registry LayerService This change contains the initial implementation of the LayerService to power layer push and pulls on the storagedriver. The interfaces presented in this package will be used by the http application to drive most features around efficient pulls and resumable pushes. The file storage/layer.go defines the interface interactions. LayerService is the root type and supports methods to access Layer and LayerUpload objects. Pull operations are supported with LayerService.Fetch and push operations are supported with LayerService.Upload and LayerService.Resume. Reads and writes of layers are split between Layer and LayerUpload, respectively. LayerService is implemented internally with the layerStore object, which takes a storagedriver.StorageDriver and a pathMapper instance. LayerUploadState is currently exported and will likely continue to be as the interaction between it and layerUploadStore are better understood. Likely, the layerUploadStore lifecycle and implementation will be deferred to the application. Image pushes pulls will be implemented in a similar manner without the discrete, persistent upload. Much of this change is in place to get something running and working. Caveats of this change include the following: 1. Layer upload state storage is implemented on the local filesystem, separate from the storage driver. This must be replaced with using the proper backend and other state storage. This can be removed when we implement resumable hashing and tarsum calculations to avoid backend roundtrips. 2. Error handling is rather bespoke at this time. The http API implementation should really dictate the error return structure for the future, so we intend to refactor this heavily to support these errors. We'd also like to collect production data to understand how failures happen in the system as a while before moving to a particular edict around error handling. 3. The layerUploadStore, which manages layer upload storage and state is not currently exported. This will likely end up being split, with the file management portion being pointed at the storagedriver and the state storage elsewhere. 4. Access Control provisions are nearly completely missing from this change. There are details around how layerindex lookup works that are related with access controls. As the auth portions of the new API take shape, these provisions will become more clear. Please see TODOs for details and individual recommendations.
2014-11-18 00:29:42 +00:00
if err != nil {
return nil, err
Initial implementation of registry LayerService This change contains the initial implementation of the LayerService to power layer push and pulls on the storagedriver. The interfaces presented in this package will be used by the http application to drive most features around efficient pulls and resumable pushes. The file storage/layer.go defines the interface interactions. LayerService is the root type and supports methods to access Layer and LayerUpload objects. Pull operations are supported with LayerService.Fetch and push operations are supported with LayerService.Upload and LayerService.Resume. Reads and writes of layers are split between Layer and LayerUpload, respectively. LayerService is implemented internally with the layerStore object, which takes a storagedriver.StorageDriver and a pathMapper instance. LayerUploadState is currently exported and will likely continue to be as the interaction between it and layerUploadStore are better understood. Likely, the layerUploadStore lifecycle and implementation will be deferred to the application. Image pushes pulls will be implemented in a similar manner without the discrete, persistent upload. Much of this change is in place to get something running and working. Caveats of this change include the following: 1. Layer upload state storage is implemented on the local filesystem, separate from the storage driver. This must be replaced with using the proper backend and other state storage. This can be removed when we implement resumable hashing and tarsum calculations to avoid backend roundtrips. 2. Error handling is rather bespoke at this time. The http API implementation should really dictate the error return structure for the future, so we intend to refactor this heavily to support these errors. We'd also like to collect production data to understand how failures happen in the system as a while before moving to a particular edict around error handling. 3. The layerUploadStore, which manages layer upload storage and state is not currently exported. This will likely end up being split, with the file management portion being pointed at the storagedriver and the state storage elsewhere. 4. Access Control provisions are nearly completely missing from this change. There are details around how layerindex lookup works that are related with access controls. As the auth portions of the new API take shape, these provisions will become more clear. Please see TODOs for details and individual recommendations.
2014-11-18 00:29:42 +00:00
}
fr, err := newFileReader(ls.driver, bp)
Initial implementation of registry LayerService This change contains the initial implementation of the LayerService to power layer push and pulls on the storagedriver. The interfaces presented in this package will be used by the http application to drive most features around efficient pulls and resumable pushes. The file storage/layer.go defines the interface interactions. LayerService is the root type and supports methods to access Layer and LayerUpload objects. Pull operations are supported with LayerService.Fetch and push operations are supported with LayerService.Upload and LayerService.Resume. Reads and writes of layers are split between Layer and LayerUpload, respectively. LayerService is implemented internally with the layerStore object, which takes a storagedriver.StorageDriver and a pathMapper instance. LayerUploadState is currently exported and will likely continue to be as the interaction between it and layerUploadStore are better understood. Likely, the layerUploadStore lifecycle and implementation will be deferred to the application. Image pushes pulls will be implemented in a similar manner without the discrete, persistent upload. Much of this change is in place to get something running and working. Caveats of this change include the following: 1. Layer upload state storage is implemented on the local filesystem, separate from the storage driver. This must be replaced with using the proper backend and other state storage. This can be removed when we implement resumable hashing and tarsum calculations to avoid backend roundtrips. 2. Error handling is rather bespoke at this time. The http API implementation should really dictate the error return structure for the future, so we intend to refactor this heavily to support these errors. We'd also like to collect production data to understand how failures happen in the system as a while before moving to a particular edict around error handling. 3. The layerUploadStore, which manages layer upload storage and state is not currently exported. This will likely end up being split, with the file management portion being pointed at the storagedriver and the state storage elsewhere. 4. Access Control provisions are nearly completely missing from this change. There are details around how layerindex lookup works that are related with access controls. As the auth portions of the new API take shape, these provisions will become more clear. Please see TODOs for details and individual recommendations.
2014-11-18 00:29:42 +00:00
if err != nil {
return nil, err
Initial implementation of registry LayerService This change contains the initial implementation of the LayerService to power layer push and pulls on the storagedriver. The interfaces presented in this package will be used by the http application to drive most features around efficient pulls and resumable pushes. The file storage/layer.go defines the interface interactions. LayerService is the root type and supports methods to access Layer and LayerUpload objects. Pull operations are supported with LayerService.Fetch and push operations are supported with LayerService.Upload and LayerService.Resume. Reads and writes of layers are split between Layer and LayerUpload, respectively. LayerService is implemented internally with the layerStore object, which takes a storagedriver.StorageDriver and a pathMapper instance. LayerUploadState is currently exported and will likely continue to be as the interaction between it and layerUploadStore are better understood. Likely, the layerUploadStore lifecycle and implementation will be deferred to the application. Image pushes pulls will be implemented in a similar manner without the discrete, persistent upload. Much of this change is in place to get something running and working. Caveats of this change include the following: 1. Layer upload state storage is implemented on the local filesystem, separate from the storage driver. This must be replaced with using the proper backend and other state storage. This can be removed when we implement resumable hashing and tarsum calculations to avoid backend roundtrips. 2. Error handling is rather bespoke at this time. The http API implementation should really dictate the error return structure for the future, so we intend to refactor this heavily to support these errors. We'd also like to collect production data to understand how failures happen in the system as a while before moving to a particular edict around error handling. 3. The layerUploadStore, which manages layer upload storage and state is not currently exported. This will likely end up being split, with the file management portion being pointed at the storagedriver and the state storage elsewhere. 4. Access Control provisions are nearly completely missing from this change. There are details around how layerindex lookup works that are related with access controls. As the auth portions of the new API take shape, these provisions will become more clear. Please see TODOs for details and individual recommendations.
2014-11-18 00:29:42 +00:00
}
return &layerReader{
fileReader: *fr,
Initial implementation of registry LayerService This change contains the initial implementation of the LayerService to power layer push and pulls on the storagedriver. The interfaces presented in this package will be used by the http application to drive most features around efficient pulls and resumable pushes. The file storage/layer.go defines the interface interactions. LayerService is the root type and supports methods to access Layer and LayerUpload objects. Pull operations are supported with LayerService.Fetch and push operations are supported with LayerService.Upload and LayerService.Resume. Reads and writes of layers are split between Layer and LayerUpload, respectively. LayerService is implemented internally with the layerStore object, which takes a storagedriver.StorageDriver and a pathMapper instance. LayerUploadState is currently exported and will likely continue to be as the interaction between it and layerUploadStore are better understood. Likely, the layerUploadStore lifecycle and implementation will be deferred to the application. Image pushes pulls will be implemented in a similar manner without the discrete, persistent upload. Much of this change is in place to get something running and working. Caveats of this change include the following: 1. Layer upload state storage is implemented on the local filesystem, separate from the storage driver. This must be replaced with using the proper backend and other state storage. This can be removed when we implement resumable hashing and tarsum calculations to avoid backend roundtrips. 2. Error handling is rather bespoke at this time. The http API implementation should really dictate the error return structure for the future, so we intend to refactor this heavily to support these errors. We'd also like to collect production data to understand how failures happen in the system as a while before moving to a particular edict around error handling. 3. The layerUploadStore, which manages layer upload storage and state is not currently exported. This will likely end up being split, with the file management portion being pointed at the storagedriver and the state storage elsewhere. 4. Access Control provisions are nearly completely missing from this change. There are details around how layerindex lookup works that are related with access controls. As the auth portions of the new API take shape, these provisions will become more clear. Please see TODOs for details and individual recommendations.
2014-11-18 00:29:42 +00:00
name: name,
digest: dgst,
}, nil
Initial implementation of registry LayerService This change contains the initial implementation of the LayerService to power layer push and pulls on the storagedriver. The interfaces presented in this package will be used by the http application to drive most features around efficient pulls and resumable pushes. The file storage/layer.go defines the interface interactions. LayerService is the root type and supports methods to access Layer and LayerUpload objects. Pull operations are supported with LayerService.Fetch and push operations are supported with LayerService.Upload and LayerService.Resume. Reads and writes of layers are split between Layer and LayerUpload, respectively. LayerService is implemented internally with the layerStore object, which takes a storagedriver.StorageDriver and a pathMapper instance. LayerUploadState is currently exported and will likely continue to be as the interaction between it and layerUploadStore are better understood. Likely, the layerUploadStore lifecycle and implementation will be deferred to the application. Image pushes pulls will be implemented in a similar manner without the discrete, persistent upload. Much of this change is in place to get something running and working. Caveats of this change include the following: 1. Layer upload state storage is implemented on the local filesystem, separate from the storage driver. This must be replaced with using the proper backend and other state storage. This can be removed when we implement resumable hashing and tarsum calculations to avoid backend roundtrips. 2. Error handling is rather bespoke at this time. The http API implementation should really dictate the error return structure for the future, so we intend to refactor this heavily to support these errors. We'd also like to collect production data to understand how failures happen in the system as a while before moving to a particular edict around error handling. 3. The layerUploadStore, which manages layer upload storage and state is not currently exported. This will likely end up being split, with the file management portion being pointed at the storagedriver and the state storage elsewhere. 4. Access Control provisions are nearly completely missing from this change. There are details around how layerindex lookup works that are related with access controls. As the auth portions of the new API take shape, these provisions will become more clear. Please see TODOs for details and individual recommendations.
2014-11-18 00:29:42 +00:00
}
// Upload begins a layer upload, returning a handle. If the layer upload
// is already in progress or the layer has already been uploaded, this
// will return an error.
func (ls *layerStore) Upload(name string) (LayerUpload, error) {
Initial implementation of registry LayerService This change contains the initial implementation of the LayerService to power layer push and pulls on the storagedriver. The interfaces presented in this package will be used by the http application to drive most features around efficient pulls and resumable pushes. The file storage/layer.go defines the interface interactions. LayerService is the root type and supports methods to access Layer and LayerUpload objects. Pull operations are supported with LayerService.Fetch and push operations are supported with LayerService.Upload and LayerService.Resume. Reads and writes of layers are split between Layer and LayerUpload, respectively. LayerService is implemented internally with the layerStore object, which takes a storagedriver.StorageDriver and a pathMapper instance. LayerUploadState is currently exported and will likely continue to be as the interaction between it and layerUploadStore are better understood. Likely, the layerUploadStore lifecycle and implementation will be deferred to the application. Image pushes pulls will be implemented in a similar manner without the discrete, persistent upload. Much of this change is in place to get something running and working. Caveats of this change include the following: 1. Layer upload state storage is implemented on the local filesystem, separate from the storage driver. This must be replaced with using the proper backend and other state storage. This can be removed when we implement resumable hashing and tarsum calculations to avoid backend roundtrips. 2. Error handling is rather bespoke at this time. The http API implementation should really dictate the error return structure for the future, so we intend to refactor this heavily to support these errors. We'd also like to collect production data to understand how failures happen in the system as a while before moving to a particular edict around error handling. 3. The layerUploadStore, which manages layer upload storage and state is not currently exported. This will likely end up being split, with the file management portion being pointed at the storagedriver and the state storage elsewhere. 4. Access Control provisions are nearly completely missing from this change. There are details around how layerindex lookup works that are related with access controls. As the auth portions of the new API take shape, these provisions will become more clear. Please see TODOs for details and individual recommendations.
2014-11-18 00:29:42 +00:00
// NOTE(stevvooe): Consider the issues with allowing concurrent upload of
// the same two layers. Should it be disallowed? For now, we allow both
// parties to proceed and the the first one uploads the layer.
Spool layer uploads to remote storage To smooth initial implementation, uploads were spooled to local file storage, validated, then pushed to remote storage. That approach was flawed in that it present easy clustering of registry services that share a remote storage backend. The original plan was to implement resumable hashes then implement remote upload storage. After some thought, it was found to be better to get remote spooling working, then optimize with resumable hashes. Moving to this approach has tradeoffs: after storing the complete upload remotely, the node must fetch the content and validate it before moving it to the final location. This can double bandwidth usage to the remote backend. Modifying the verification and upload code to store intermediate hashes should be trivial once the layer digest format has settled. The largest changes for users of the storage package (mostly the registry app) are the LayerService interface and the LayerUpload interface. The LayerService now takes qualified repository names to start and resume uploads. In corallry, the concept of LayerUploadState has been complete removed, exposing all aspects of that state as part of the LayerUpload object. The LayerUpload object has been modified to work as an io.WriteSeeker and includes a StartedAt time, to allow for upload timeout policies. Finish now only requires a digest, eliding the requirement for a size parameter. Resource cleanup has taken a turn for the better. Resources are cleaned up after successful uploads and during a cancel call. Admittedly, this is probably not completely where we want to be. It's recommend that we bolster this with a periodic driver utility script that scans for partial uploads and deletes the underlying data. As a small benefit, we can leave these around to better understand how and why these uploads are failing, at the cost of some extra disk space. Many other changes follow from the changes above. The webapp needs to be updated to meet the new interface requirements. Signed-off-by: Stephen J Day <stephen.day@docker.com>
2015-01-08 22:24:02 +00:00
uuid := uuid.New()
startedAt := time.Now().UTC()
path, err := ls.pathMapper.path(uploadDataPathSpec{
name: name,
uuid: uuid,
})
Initial implementation of registry LayerService This change contains the initial implementation of the LayerService to power layer push and pulls on the storagedriver. The interfaces presented in this package will be used by the http application to drive most features around efficient pulls and resumable pushes. The file storage/layer.go defines the interface interactions. LayerService is the root type and supports methods to access Layer and LayerUpload objects. Pull operations are supported with LayerService.Fetch and push operations are supported with LayerService.Upload and LayerService.Resume. Reads and writes of layers are split between Layer and LayerUpload, respectively. LayerService is implemented internally with the layerStore object, which takes a storagedriver.StorageDriver and a pathMapper instance. LayerUploadState is currently exported and will likely continue to be as the interaction between it and layerUploadStore are better understood. Likely, the layerUploadStore lifecycle and implementation will be deferred to the application. Image pushes pulls will be implemented in a similar manner without the discrete, persistent upload. Much of this change is in place to get something running and working. Caveats of this change include the following: 1. Layer upload state storage is implemented on the local filesystem, separate from the storage driver. This must be replaced with using the proper backend and other state storage. This can be removed when we implement resumable hashing and tarsum calculations to avoid backend roundtrips. 2. Error handling is rather bespoke at this time. The http API implementation should really dictate the error return structure for the future, so we intend to refactor this heavily to support these errors. We'd also like to collect production data to understand how failures happen in the system as a while before moving to a particular edict around error handling. 3. The layerUploadStore, which manages layer upload storage and state is not currently exported. This will likely end up being split, with the file management portion being pointed at the storagedriver and the state storage elsewhere. 4. Access Control provisions are nearly completely missing from this change. There are details around how layerindex lookup works that are related with access controls. As the auth portions of the new API take shape, these provisions will become more clear. Please see TODOs for details and individual recommendations.
2014-11-18 00:29:42 +00:00
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
Spool layer uploads to remote storage To smooth initial implementation, uploads were spooled to local file storage, validated, then pushed to remote storage. That approach was flawed in that it present easy clustering of registry services that share a remote storage backend. The original plan was to implement resumable hashes then implement remote upload storage. After some thought, it was found to be better to get remote spooling working, then optimize with resumable hashes. Moving to this approach has tradeoffs: after storing the complete upload remotely, the node must fetch the content and validate it before moving it to the final location. This can double bandwidth usage to the remote backend. Modifying the verification and upload code to store intermediate hashes should be trivial once the layer digest format has settled. The largest changes for users of the storage package (mostly the registry app) are the LayerService interface and the LayerUpload interface. The LayerService now takes qualified repository names to start and resume uploads. In corallry, the concept of LayerUploadState has been complete removed, exposing all aspects of that state as part of the LayerUpload object. The LayerUpload object has been modified to work as an io.WriteSeeker and includes a StartedAt time, to allow for upload timeout policies. Finish now only requires a digest, eliding the requirement for a size parameter. Resource cleanup has taken a turn for the better. Resources are cleaned up after successful uploads and during a cancel call. Admittedly, this is probably not completely where we want to be. It's recommend that we bolster this with a periodic driver utility script that scans for partial uploads and deletes the underlying data. As a small benefit, we can leave these around to better understand how and why these uploads are failing, at the cost of some extra disk space. Many other changes follow from the changes above. The webapp needs to be updated to meet the new interface requirements. Signed-off-by: Stephen J Day <stephen.day@docker.com>
2015-01-08 22:24:02 +00:00
startedAtPath, err := ls.pathMapper.path(uploadStartedAtPathSpec{
name: name,
uuid: uuid,
})
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
// Write a startedat file for this upload
if err := ls.driver.PutContent(startedAtPath, []byte(startedAt.Format(time.RFC3339))); err != nil {
return nil, err
}
return ls.newLayerUpload(name, uuid, path, startedAt)
Initial implementation of registry LayerService This change contains the initial implementation of the LayerService to power layer push and pulls on the storagedriver. The interfaces presented in this package will be used by the http application to drive most features around efficient pulls and resumable pushes. The file storage/layer.go defines the interface interactions. LayerService is the root type and supports methods to access Layer and LayerUpload objects. Pull operations are supported with LayerService.Fetch and push operations are supported with LayerService.Upload and LayerService.Resume. Reads and writes of layers are split between Layer and LayerUpload, respectively. LayerService is implemented internally with the layerStore object, which takes a storagedriver.StorageDriver and a pathMapper instance. LayerUploadState is currently exported and will likely continue to be as the interaction between it and layerUploadStore are better understood. Likely, the layerUploadStore lifecycle and implementation will be deferred to the application. Image pushes pulls will be implemented in a similar manner without the discrete, persistent upload. Much of this change is in place to get something running and working. Caveats of this change include the following: 1. Layer upload state storage is implemented on the local filesystem, separate from the storage driver. This must be replaced with using the proper backend and other state storage. This can be removed when we implement resumable hashing and tarsum calculations to avoid backend roundtrips. 2. Error handling is rather bespoke at this time. The http API implementation should really dictate the error return structure for the future, so we intend to refactor this heavily to support these errors. We'd also like to collect production data to understand how failures happen in the system as a while before moving to a particular edict around error handling. 3. The layerUploadStore, which manages layer upload storage and state is not currently exported. This will likely end up being split, with the file management portion being pointed at the storagedriver and the state storage elsewhere. 4. Access Control provisions are nearly completely missing from this change. There are details around how layerindex lookup works that are related with access controls. As the auth portions of the new API take shape, these provisions will become more clear. Please see TODOs for details and individual recommendations.
2014-11-18 00:29:42 +00:00
}
// Resume continues an in progress layer upload, returning the current
// state of the upload.
Spool layer uploads to remote storage To smooth initial implementation, uploads were spooled to local file storage, validated, then pushed to remote storage. That approach was flawed in that it present easy clustering of registry services that share a remote storage backend. The original plan was to implement resumable hashes then implement remote upload storage. After some thought, it was found to be better to get remote spooling working, then optimize with resumable hashes. Moving to this approach has tradeoffs: after storing the complete upload remotely, the node must fetch the content and validate it before moving it to the final location. This can double bandwidth usage to the remote backend. Modifying the verification and upload code to store intermediate hashes should be trivial once the layer digest format has settled. The largest changes for users of the storage package (mostly the registry app) are the LayerService interface and the LayerUpload interface. The LayerService now takes qualified repository names to start and resume uploads. In corallry, the concept of LayerUploadState has been complete removed, exposing all aspects of that state as part of the LayerUpload object. The LayerUpload object has been modified to work as an io.WriteSeeker and includes a StartedAt time, to allow for upload timeout policies. Finish now only requires a digest, eliding the requirement for a size parameter. Resource cleanup has taken a turn for the better. Resources are cleaned up after successful uploads and during a cancel call. Admittedly, this is probably not completely where we want to be. It's recommend that we bolster this with a periodic driver utility script that scans for partial uploads and deletes the underlying data. As a small benefit, we can leave these around to better understand how and why these uploads are failing, at the cost of some extra disk space. Many other changes follow from the changes above. The webapp needs to be updated to meet the new interface requirements. Signed-off-by: Stephen J Day <stephen.day@docker.com>
2015-01-08 22:24:02 +00:00
func (ls *layerStore) Resume(name, uuid string) (LayerUpload, error) {
startedAtPath, err := ls.pathMapper.path(uploadStartedAtPathSpec{
name: name,
uuid: uuid,
})
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
startedAtBytes, err := ls.driver.GetContent(startedAtPath)
if err != nil {
switch err := err.(type) {
case storagedriver.PathNotFoundError:
return nil, ErrLayerUploadUnknown
default:
return nil, err
}
}
Initial implementation of registry LayerService This change contains the initial implementation of the LayerService to power layer push and pulls on the storagedriver. The interfaces presented in this package will be used by the http application to drive most features around efficient pulls and resumable pushes. The file storage/layer.go defines the interface interactions. LayerService is the root type and supports methods to access Layer and LayerUpload objects. Pull operations are supported with LayerService.Fetch and push operations are supported with LayerService.Upload and LayerService.Resume. Reads and writes of layers are split between Layer and LayerUpload, respectively. LayerService is implemented internally with the layerStore object, which takes a storagedriver.StorageDriver and a pathMapper instance. LayerUploadState is currently exported and will likely continue to be as the interaction between it and layerUploadStore are better understood. Likely, the layerUploadStore lifecycle and implementation will be deferred to the application. Image pushes pulls will be implemented in a similar manner without the discrete, persistent upload. Much of this change is in place to get something running and working. Caveats of this change include the following: 1. Layer upload state storage is implemented on the local filesystem, separate from the storage driver. This must be replaced with using the proper backend and other state storage. This can be removed when we implement resumable hashing and tarsum calculations to avoid backend roundtrips. 2. Error handling is rather bespoke at this time. The http API implementation should really dictate the error return structure for the future, so we intend to refactor this heavily to support these errors. We'd also like to collect production data to understand how failures happen in the system as a while before moving to a particular edict around error handling. 3. The layerUploadStore, which manages layer upload storage and state is not currently exported. This will likely end up being split, with the file management portion being pointed at the storagedriver and the state storage elsewhere. 4. Access Control provisions are nearly completely missing from this change. There are details around how layerindex lookup works that are related with access controls. As the auth portions of the new API take shape, these provisions will become more clear. Please see TODOs for details and individual recommendations.
2014-11-18 00:29:42 +00:00
Spool layer uploads to remote storage To smooth initial implementation, uploads were spooled to local file storage, validated, then pushed to remote storage. That approach was flawed in that it present easy clustering of registry services that share a remote storage backend. The original plan was to implement resumable hashes then implement remote upload storage. After some thought, it was found to be better to get remote spooling working, then optimize with resumable hashes. Moving to this approach has tradeoffs: after storing the complete upload remotely, the node must fetch the content and validate it before moving it to the final location. This can double bandwidth usage to the remote backend. Modifying the verification and upload code to store intermediate hashes should be trivial once the layer digest format has settled. The largest changes for users of the storage package (mostly the registry app) are the LayerService interface and the LayerUpload interface. The LayerService now takes qualified repository names to start and resume uploads. In corallry, the concept of LayerUploadState has been complete removed, exposing all aspects of that state as part of the LayerUpload object. The LayerUpload object has been modified to work as an io.WriteSeeker and includes a StartedAt time, to allow for upload timeout policies. Finish now only requires a digest, eliding the requirement for a size parameter. Resource cleanup has taken a turn for the better. Resources are cleaned up after successful uploads and during a cancel call. Admittedly, this is probably not completely where we want to be. It's recommend that we bolster this with a periodic driver utility script that scans for partial uploads and deletes the underlying data. As a small benefit, we can leave these around to better understand how and why these uploads are failing, at the cost of some extra disk space. Many other changes follow from the changes above. The webapp needs to be updated to meet the new interface requirements. Signed-off-by: Stephen J Day <stephen.day@docker.com>
2015-01-08 22:24:02 +00:00
startedAt, err := time.Parse(time.RFC3339, string(startedAtBytes))
Initial implementation of registry LayerService This change contains the initial implementation of the LayerService to power layer push and pulls on the storagedriver. The interfaces presented in this package will be used by the http application to drive most features around efficient pulls and resumable pushes. The file storage/layer.go defines the interface interactions. LayerService is the root type and supports methods to access Layer and LayerUpload objects. Pull operations are supported with LayerService.Fetch and push operations are supported with LayerService.Upload and LayerService.Resume. Reads and writes of layers are split between Layer and LayerUpload, respectively. LayerService is implemented internally with the layerStore object, which takes a storagedriver.StorageDriver and a pathMapper instance. LayerUploadState is currently exported and will likely continue to be as the interaction between it and layerUploadStore are better understood. Likely, the layerUploadStore lifecycle and implementation will be deferred to the application. Image pushes pulls will be implemented in a similar manner without the discrete, persistent upload. Much of this change is in place to get something running and working. Caveats of this change include the following: 1. Layer upload state storage is implemented on the local filesystem, separate from the storage driver. This must be replaced with using the proper backend and other state storage. This can be removed when we implement resumable hashing and tarsum calculations to avoid backend roundtrips. 2. Error handling is rather bespoke at this time. The http API implementation should really dictate the error return structure for the future, so we intend to refactor this heavily to support these errors. We'd also like to collect production data to understand how failures happen in the system as a while before moving to a particular edict around error handling. 3. The layerUploadStore, which manages layer upload storage and state is not currently exported. This will likely end up being split, with the file management portion being pointed at the storagedriver and the state storage elsewhere. 4. Access Control provisions are nearly completely missing from this change. There are details around how layerindex lookup works that are related with access controls. As the auth portions of the new API take shape, these provisions will become more clear. Please see TODOs for details and individual recommendations.
2014-11-18 00:29:42 +00:00
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
Spool layer uploads to remote storage To smooth initial implementation, uploads were spooled to local file storage, validated, then pushed to remote storage. That approach was flawed in that it present easy clustering of registry services that share a remote storage backend. The original plan was to implement resumable hashes then implement remote upload storage. After some thought, it was found to be better to get remote spooling working, then optimize with resumable hashes. Moving to this approach has tradeoffs: after storing the complete upload remotely, the node must fetch the content and validate it before moving it to the final location. This can double bandwidth usage to the remote backend. Modifying the verification and upload code to store intermediate hashes should be trivial once the layer digest format has settled. The largest changes for users of the storage package (mostly the registry app) are the LayerService interface and the LayerUpload interface. The LayerService now takes qualified repository names to start and resume uploads. In corallry, the concept of LayerUploadState has been complete removed, exposing all aspects of that state as part of the LayerUpload object. The LayerUpload object has been modified to work as an io.WriteSeeker and includes a StartedAt time, to allow for upload timeout policies. Finish now only requires a digest, eliding the requirement for a size parameter. Resource cleanup has taken a turn for the better. Resources are cleaned up after successful uploads and during a cancel call. Admittedly, this is probably not completely where we want to be. It's recommend that we bolster this with a periodic driver utility script that scans for partial uploads and deletes the underlying data. As a small benefit, we can leave these around to better understand how and why these uploads are failing, at the cost of some extra disk space. Many other changes follow from the changes above. The webapp needs to be updated to meet the new interface requirements. Signed-off-by: Stephen J Day <stephen.day@docker.com>
2015-01-08 22:24:02 +00:00
path, err := ls.pathMapper.path(uploadDataPathSpec{
name: name,
uuid: uuid,
})
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
return ls.newLayerUpload(name, uuid, path, startedAt)
Initial implementation of registry LayerService This change contains the initial implementation of the LayerService to power layer push and pulls on the storagedriver. The interfaces presented in this package will be used by the http application to drive most features around efficient pulls and resumable pushes. The file storage/layer.go defines the interface interactions. LayerService is the root type and supports methods to access Layer and LayerUpload objects. Pull operations are supported with LayerService.Fetch and push operations are supported with LayerService.Upload and LayerService.Resume. Reads and writes of layers are split between Layer and LayerUpload, respectively. LayerService is implemented internally with the layerStore object, which takes a storagedriver.StorageDriver and a pathMapper instance. LayerUploadState is currently exported and will likely continue to be as the interaction between it and layerUploadStore are better understood. Likely, the layerUploadStore lifecycle and implementation will be deferred to the application. Image pushes pulls will be implemented in a similar manner without the discrete, persistent upload. Much of this change is in place to get something running and working. Caveats of this change include the following: 1. Layer upload state storage is implemented on the local filesystem, separate from the storage driver. This must be replaced with using the proper backend and other state storage. This can be removed when we implement resumable hashing and tarsum calculations to avoid backend roundtrips. 2. Error handling is rather bespoke at this time. The http API implementation should really dictate the error return structure for the future, so we intend to refactor this heavily to support these errors. We'd also like to collect production data to understand how failures happen in the system as a while before moving to a particular edict around error handling. 3. The layerUploadStore, which manages layer upload storage and state is not currently exported. This will likely end up being split, with the file management portion being pointed at the storagedriver and the state storage elsewhere. 4. Access Control provisions are nearly completely missing from this change. There are details around how layerindex lookup works that are related with access controls. As the auth portions of the new API take shape, these provisions will become more clear. Please see TODOs for details and individual recommendations.
2014-11-18 00:29:42 +00:00
}
// newLayerUpload allocates a new upload controller with the given state.
Spool layer uploads to remote storage To smooth initial implementation, uploads were spooled to local file storage, validated, then pushed to remote storage. That approach was flawed in that it present easy clustering of registry services that share a remote storage backend. The original plan was to implement resumable hashes then implement remote upload storage. After some thought, it was found to be better to get remote spooling working, then optimize with resumable hashes. Moving to this approach has tradeoffs: after storing the complete upload remotely, the node must fetch the content and validate it before moving it to the final location. This can double bandwidth usage to the remote backend. Modifying the verification and upload code to store intermediate hashes should be trivial once the layer digest format has settled. The largest changes for users of the storage package (mostly the registry app) are the LayerService interface and the LayerUpload interface. The LayerService now takes qualified repository names to start and resume uploads. In corallry, the concept of LayerUploadState has been complete removed, exposing all aspects of that state as part of the LayerUpload object. The LayerUpload object has been modified to work as an io.WriteSeeker and includes a StartedAt time, to allow for upload timeout policies. Finish now only requires a digest, eliding the requirement for a size parameter. Resource cleanup has taken a turn for the better. Resources are cleaned up after successful uploads and during a cancel call. Admittedly, this is probably not completely where we want to be. It's recommend that we bolster this with a periodic driver utility script that scans for partial uploads and deletes the underlying data. As a small benefit, we can leave these around to better understand how and why these uploads are failing, at the cost of some extra disk space. Many other changes follow from the changes above. The webapp needs to be updated to meet the new interface requirements. Signed-off-by: Stephen J Day <stephen.day@docker.com>
2015-01-08 22:24:02 +00:00
func (ls *layerStore) newLayerUpload(name, uuid, path string, startedAt time.Time) (LayerUpload, error) {
fw, err := newFileWriter(ls.driver, path)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
Initial implementation of registry LayerService This change contains the initial implementation of the LayerService to power layer push and pulls on the storagedriver. The interfaces presented in this package will be used by the http application to drive most features around efficient pulls and resumable pushes. The file storage/layer.go defines the interface interactions. LayerService is the root type and supports methods to access Layer and LayerUpload objects. Pull operations are supported with LayerService.Fetch and push operations are supported with LayerService.Upload and LayerService.Resume. Reads and writes of layers are split between Layer and LayerUpload, respectively. LayerService is implemented internally with the layerStore object, which takes a storagedriver.StorageDriver and a pathMapper instance. LayerUploadState is currently exported and will likely continue to be as the interaction between it and layerUploadStore are better understood. Likely, the layerUploadStore lifecycle and implementation will be deferred to the application. Image pushes pulls will be implemented in a similar manner without the discrete, persistent upload. Much of this change is in place to get something running and working. Caveats of this change include the following: 1. Layer upload state storage is implemented on the local filesystem, separate from the storage driver. This must be replaced with using the proper backend and other state storage. This can be removed when we implement resumable hashing and tarsum calculations to avoid backend roundtrips. 2. Error handling is rather bespoke at this time. The http API implementation should really dictate the error return structure for the future, so we intend to refactor this heavily to support these errors. We'd also like to collect production data to understand how failures happen in the system as a while before moving to a particular edict around error handling. 3. The layerUploadStore, which manages layer upload storage and state is not currently exported. This will likely end up being split, with the file management portion being pointed at the storagedriver and the state storage elsewhere. 4. Access Control provisions are nearly completely missing from this change. There are details around how layerindex lookup works that are related with access controls. As the auth portions of the new API take shape, these provisions will become more clear. Please see TODOs for details and individual recommendations.
2014-11-18 00:29:42 +00:00
}
Spool layer uploads to remote storage To smooth initial implementation, uploads were spooled to local file storage, validated, then pushed to remote storage. That approach was flawed in that it present easy clustering of registry services that share a remote storage backend. The original plan was to implement resumable hashes then implement remote upload storage. After some thought, it was found to be better to get remote spooling working, then optimize with resumable hashes. Moving to this approach has tradeoffs: after storing the complete upload remotely, the node must fetch the content and validate it before moving it to the final location. This can double bandwidth usage to the remote backend. Modifying the verification and upload code to store intermediate hashes should be trivial once the layer digest format has settled. The largest changes for users of the storage package (mostly the registry app) are the LayerService interface and the LayerUpload interface. The LayerService now takes qualified repository names to start and resume uploads. In corallry, the concept of LayerUploadState has been complete removed, exposing all aspects of that state as part of the LayerUpload object. The LayerUpload object has been modified to work as an io.WriteSeeker and includes a StartedAt time, to allow for upload timeout policies. Finish now only requires a digest, eliding the requirement for a size parameter. Resource cleanup has taken a turn for the better. Resources are cleaned up after successful uploads and during a cancel call. Admittedly, this is probably not completely where we want to be. It's recommend that we bolster this with a periodic driver utility script that scans for partial uploads and deletes the underlying data. As a small benefit, we can leave these around to better understand how and why these uploads are failing, at the cost of some extra disk space. Many other changes follow from the changes above. The webapp needs to be updated to meet the new interface requirements. Signed-off-by: Stephen J Day <stephen.day@docker.com>
2015-01-08 22:24:02 +00:00
return &layerUploadController{
layerStore: ls,
name: name,
uuid: uuid,
startedAt: startedAt,
fileWriter: *fw,
}, nil
Initial implementation of registry LayerService This change contains the initial implementation of the LayerService to power layer push and pulls on the storagedriver. The interfaces presented in this package will be used by the http application to drive most features around efficient pulls and resumable pushes. The file storage/layer.go defines the interface interactions. LayerService is the root type and supports methods to access Layer and LayerUpload objects. Pull operations are supported with LayerService.Fetch and push operations are supported with LayerService.Upload and LayerService.Resume. Reads and writes of layers are split between Layer and LayerUpload, respectively. LayerService is implemented internally with the layerStore object, which takes a storagedriver.StorageDriver and a pathMapper instance. LayerUploadState is currently exported and will likely continue to be as the interaction between it and layerUploadStore are better understood. Likely, the layerUploadStore lifecycle and implementation will be deferred to the application. Image pushes pulls will be implemented in a similar manner without the discrete, persistent upload. Much of this change is in place to get something running and working. Caveats of this change include the following: 1. Layer upload state storage is implemented on the local filesystem, separate from the storage driver. This must be replaced with using the proper backend and other state storage. This can be removed when we implement resumable hashing and tarsum calculations to avoid backend roundtrips. 2. Error handling is rather bespoke at this time. The http API implementation should really dictate the error return structure for the future, so we intend to refactor this heavily to support these errors. We'd also like to collect production data to understand how failures happen in the system as a while before moving to a particular edict around error handling. 3. The layerUploadStore, which manages layer upload storage and state is not currently exported. This will likely end up being split, with the file management portion being pointed at the storagedriver and the state storage elsewhere. 4. Access Control provisions are nearly completely missing from this change. There are details around how layerindex lookup works that are related with access controls. As the auth portions of the new API take shape, these provisions will become more clear. Please see TODOs for details and individual recommendations.
2014-11-18 00:29:42 +00:00
}
func (ls *layerStore) path(name string, dgst digest.Digest) (string, error) {
// We must traverse this path through the link to enforce ownership.
layerLinkPath, err := ls.pathMapper.path(layerLinkPathSpec{name: name, digest: dgst})
if err != nil {
return "", err
}
blobPath, err := ls.blobStore.resolve(layerLinkPath)
if err != nil {
switch err := err.(type) {
case storagedriver.PathNotFoundError:
return "", ErrUnknownLayer{manifest.FSLayer{BlobSum: dgst}}
default:
return "", err
}
}
return blobPath, nil
}