`slices.SortFunc` doesn't use reflection and is a bit faster.
I have done some micro-benchmarks for `[]NodeInfo`:
```
$ benchstat -col "/func" out
goos: linux
goarch: amd64
pkg: git.frostfs.info/TrueCloudLab/frostfs-node/pkg/local_object_storage/pilorama
cpu: 11th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-1135G7 @ 2.40GHz
│ sort.Slice │ slices.SortFunc │
│ sec/op │ sec/op vs base │
Sort-8 2.130µ ± 2% 1.253µ ± 2% -41.20% (p=0.000 n=10)
```
Haven't included them, though, as they I don't see them being used a
lot.
Signed-off-by: Evgenii Stratonikov <e.stratonikov@yadro.com>
1. In redo() we save the old state.
2. If we do redo() for the same operation twice, the old state will be
overritten with the new one.
3. This in turn affects undo() and subsequent isAncestor() check.
Signed-off-by: Evgenii Stratonikov <e.stratonikov@yadro.com>
To achieve high performance we must choose proper values for both
batch size and delay. For user operations we want to set low delay.
However it would prevent tree synchronization operations to form big
enough batches. For these operations, batching gives the most benefit
not only in terms of on-CPU execution cost, but also by speeding up
transaction persist (`fsync`).
In this commit we try merging batches that are already
_triggered_, but not yet _started to execute_. This way we can still
query batches for execution after the provided delay while also allowing
multiple formed batches to execute faster.
Signed-off-by: Evgenii Stratonikov <e.stratonikov@yadro.com>
1. Reduce allocations inside transactions.
2. Do not encode container ID to string: it allocates a lot and takes more
space.
Signed-off-by: Evgenii Stratonikov <e.stratonikov@yadro.com>
