Either non-pointer or pointer, both cases are disallowed to be generic.
Need to be reverted and properly handled within the scope of #2376.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
So that hardfork name was explicitly present in the test name. We'll
have a set of similar tests later.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
No functional changes, just a refactoring.
Change error text to be able to use this error from external packages.
Signed-off-by: Tatiana Nesterenko <tatiana@nspcc.io>
Behaviour change.
`terminatesession` returns ErrUnknownSession in case of impossibility of finding session,
previously there was no-error response with `false` result.
`traverseIterator`returns ErrUnknownSession in case of impossibility of finding session,
previously there was no-error response with default result; `traverseIterator`returns ErrUnknownIterator,
there were no such errors before.
Accordingly to proposal:
https://github.com/neo-project/proposals/pull/156
Also adding description of `traverseIterator` in docs/rpc.md.
Signed-off-by: Tatiana Nesterenko <tatiana@nspcc.io>
This change makes code incompatible with C# node,
because currently no error is returned on invalid proof.
According to proposal:
https://github.com/neo-project/proposals/pull/156
Also adding `verifyProof` descpiption in docs/rpc.md.
Signed-off-by: Tatiana Nesterenko <tatiana@nspcc.io>
No functional changes, just a refactoring.
Use more specific and meaningful names to be able to use these errors from external packages.
Signed-off-by: Tatiana Nesterenko <tatiana@nspcc.io>
While our server no longer uses these codes (-100, -400) they still can come
from C# servers and while we consider them deprecated we better at least have
some definition of them until C# implements our proposal:
https://github.com/neo-project/proposals/pull/156
Also adding description of deprecated RPC error codes in ROADMAP.md.
Signed-off-by: Tatiana Nesterenko <tatiana@nspcc.io>
RPC binding config may be malformed or the source .go contract may contain
structures like this:
```
type Str struct {
Field int
field int
}
```
We need to recognise these cases and return error. otherwise the resulting
binding can't be compiled.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
Perform private -> public transformation at the last step of RPC binding
generation so that it works not only with NeoGo contracts, but with any
other contracts.
Close#3083.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
And simplify atomic service value stored by RPC server. Oracle service can
either be an untyped nil or be the proper non-nil *oracle.Oracle.
Otherwise `submitoracleresponse` RPC handler doesn't work properly.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
52-bit precision is not enough for our 256-bit VM, but this value
matches the reference implementation, see the
https://github.com/neo-project/neo/issues/2879.
MaxIntegerPrec will be increased (or even removed) as soon as the
ref. issue is resolved.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
Ensure that Scopes can be properly parsed not only from the string
representation, but also from a single byte. transaction.Signer
is not affected (checked against the C# implementation), only
RPC-related signer scopes are allowed to be unmarshalled from byte.
Close#3059.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
This prevents the possible attack on notary request sender when
malicious partie is allowed to send notary request with main transaction
being someone else's fallback.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
If the contract was deployed then cache must be initialized after
in-memory data reset. If the contract isn't active yet, then no
cache will be initialized on deploy (i.e. on call to Initialize()
method by native Management).
Close#2984.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
Make the contracts cache initialization unified. The order of cache
iniitialization is not important and Nottary contract is added to the
bc.contracts.Contracts wrt P2PSigExtensions setting, thus no functional
changes, just refactoring for future applications.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
Initialize Prometheus metrics on node start where appropriate and review
the usage of the following metrics:
```
anna@kiwi:~/Documents/GitProjects/nspcc-dev/neo-go$ find | grep prometheus.go
./pkg/network/prometheus.go
./pkg/core/stateroot/prometheus.go
./pkg/core/prometheus.go
./pkg/services/rpcsrv/prometheus.go
./pkg/services/metrics/prometheus.go
```
Close#2970.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
The reader is about to exit and it will close legacy c.Notifications, but it
will leave subscription channels at the same time. This is wrong since these
channels will no longer receive any new events, game over.
Signed-off-by: Roman Khimov <roman@nspcc.ru>
wsReader() closes c.done first and then goes over the list of
c.respChannels. Technically this means that any of the two can be taken in
this select.
Signed-off-by: Roman Khimov <roman@nspcc.ru>
Previously RPC server shutdown procedure listened to the execution
channel and stopped at the first element that arrived in the queue. This
could lead to the following problems:
* stopper could steal the execution result from subscriber
* stopper didn't wait for other subscription actions to complete
Add dedicated channel to `Server` for subscription routine. Close the
channel on `handleSubEvents` return and wait for signal in `Shutdown`.
Signed-off-by: Leonard Lyubich <leonard@morphbits.io>
Previously RPC server could never be shut down completely due to
some start precondition failure (in particular, inability to serve HTTP
on any configured endpoint). The problem was caused by next facts:
* start method ran subscription routine after HTTP init succeeded only
* stop method blocked waiting for the subscription routine to return
Run `handleSubEvents` routine on fresh `Start` unconditionally. With
this change, `Shutdown` method won't produce deadlock since
`handleSubEvents` closes wait channel.
Refs #2896.
Signed-off-by: Leonard Lyubich <leonard@morphbits.io>
There is an existing problem with RPC server shutdown freeze after start
failure due to some init actions (at least HTTP listen) described in
#2896.
Add dedicated unit test which checks that `Shutdown` returns within 5s
after `Start` method encounters internal problems.
Signed-off-by: Leonard Lyubich <leonard@morphbits.io>
I've carefully checked the way how new service can be added to the
Blockchain instance or to be removed from it. Current implemention
of SetNotary and SetOracle methods doesn't contain dangerous code,
and native contracts have atomic values everywhere where service
is stored.
Current implementation of Notary, Oracle and StateRoot services'
reload/disabling/enabling on SIGUSR1 is safe and doesn't require
any adjustment.
This commit closes#2944, it's not a bug in the code, it's just
stale documentation.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
52-bit precision is not enough for our 256-bit VM, but this value
matches the reference implementation, see the
https://github.com/neo-project/neo/issues/2879.
MaxIntegerPrec will be increased (or even removed) as soon as the
ref. issue is resolved.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
During new transaction verification if there's an on-chain conflicting
transaction, we should check the signers of this conflicting transaction.
If the signers intersect with signers of the incoming transaction, then
the conflict is treated as valid and verification for new incoming
transaction should fail. Otherwise, the conflict is treated as the
malicious attack attempt and will not be taken into account;
verification for the new incoming transaction should continue.
This commint implements the scheme described at
https://github.com/neo-project/neo/pull/2818#issuecomment-1632972055,
thanks to @shargon for digging.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
Witnesses are not yet created by the moment we return this error,
thus, it was always 0 as an actual number of witnesses in
ErrInvalidWitnessNum.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
`(*Blockchain).HasTransaction` is one of the oldest methods in our
codebase, and currently it's completely unused. I also doubt that
this method works as expected because it returns `true` if transaction
in the mempool.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
This prevents the possible attack on notary request sender when
malicious partie is allowed to send notary request with main transaction
being someone else's fallback.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
Ensure that Scopes can be properly parsed not only from the string
representation, but also from a single byte. transaction.Signer
is not affected (checked against the C# implementation), only
RPC-related signer scopes are allowed to be unmarshalled from byte.
Close#3059.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
This check is good and was present here since #1729, but it was
accidently removed from the reference implementation (see the
discussion in https://github.com/neo-project/neo/issues/2848). The
removal of this check from the C# node leaded to the T5 testnet state
diff since 1670095 heigh which causes inability to process new blocks
since 2272533 height (see #3049). This check was added back to the
C# node in https://github.com/neo-project/neo/pull/2849, but it is
planned to be the part of the upcoming 3.6.0 C# node release.
We need to keep our testnet healthy, thus, strict contract script
check will be temporary removed from the node code and is planned
to be added back to be a part of the next 3.6.0-compatible release.
Close#3049.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
This check is good and was present here since #1729, but it was
accidently removed from the reference implementation (see the
discussion in https://github.com/neo-project/neo/issues/2848). The
removal of this check from the C# node leaded to the T5 testnet state
diff since 1670095 heigh which causes inability to process new blocks
since 2272533 height (see #3049). This check was added back to the
C# node in https://github.com/neo-project/neo/pull/2849, but it is
planned to be the part of the upcoming 3.6.0 C# node release.
We need to keep our testnet healthy, thus, strict contract script
check will be temporary removed from the node code and is planned
to be added back to be a part of the next 3.6.0-compatible release.
Close#3049.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
Our wrapping optimization relied on the caller context having a TRY block,
but each context (including internal calls!) has an exception handling stack
of its own, which means that for an invocation stack of
entry
A.someMethodFromEntry() # this one has a TRY
A.internalMethodViaCALL() # this one doesn't
B.someMethod()
we get `HasTryBlock() == false` for `A.internalMethodViaCALL()` context, which
leads to missing wrapper and missing rollbacks if B is to THROW. What this
patch does instead is it checks for any context within contract boundaries.
Fixes#3045.
Signed-off-by: Roman Khimov <roman@nspcc.ru>
Our wrapping optimization relied on the caller context having a TRY block,
but each context (including internal calls!) has an exception handling stack
of its own, which means that for an invocation stack of
entry
A.someMethodFromEntry() # this one has a TRY
A.internalMethodViaCALL() # this one doesn't
B.someMethod()
we get `HasTryBlock() == false` for `A.internalMethodViaCALL()` context, which
leads to missing wrapper and missing rollbacks if B is to THROW. What this
patch does instead is it checks for any context within contract boundaries.
Fixes#3045.
Signed-off-by: Roman Khimov <roman@nspcc.ru>
That's the way how C# node handles equality checks for stackitem.Interop types
for these points. Ref. https://github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/issues/3002#issuecomment-1591220501.
Along the way, add GT case for CryptoLib's bls12381Equal method. It should be there since #2940.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
In this case emitted event parameters should match from invocation to
invocation. It's an error otherwise (and if the type is not Any).
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
Unfortunately, without pre-set user extended types configuration for events
and without --guess-eventtypes flag set we are allowed to rely only on manifest
information about types. Manifest can't give us a lot of information, but we
still need to be able to generate RPC binding. Arrays and structs are correctly
handled by the current code, but maps always rely on the fact that map's value
type is set. It's not true in the described case, so make the maps type convertor
handle this situation in a similar way how arrays are handled.
Without this commit the following panic occurs on attempt to generate RPC binding:
```
--- FAIL: TestAssistedRPCBindings/testdata/notifications (0.01s)
panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference [recovered]
panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference
[signal SIGSEGV: segmentation violation code=0x1 addr=0x0 pc=0x7f7c0e]
goroutine 190 [running]:
testing.tRunner.func1.2({0x109cb40, 0x1d58760})
/usr/local/go/src/testing/testing.go:1396 +0x24e
testing.tRunner.func1()
/usr/local/go/src/testing/testing.go:1399 +0x39f
panic({0x109cb40, 0x1d58760})
/usr/local/go/src/runtime/panic.go:884 +0x212
github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/pkg/smartcontract/rpcbinding.extendedTypeToGo({0x22, {0x0, 0x0}, {0x0, 0x0}, 0x0, 0x0, {0x0, 0x0, 0x0}}, ...)
/home/anna/Documents/GitProjects/nspcc-dev/neo-go/pkg/smartcontract/rpcbinding/binding.go:515 +0x36e
github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/pkg/smartcontract/rpcbinding.scTypeToGo({0xc000206d92?, 0xc000206d80?}, 0x22, 0xc0005d70e0)
/home/anna/Documents/GitProjects/nspcc-dev/neo-go/pkg/smartcontract/rpcbinding/binding.go:643 +0x138
github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/pkg/smartcontract/rpcbinding.scTemplateToRPC({{0xc00049bb07, 0x7}, 0xc0004c89c0, {0x33, 0x22, 0x11, 0x0, 0xff, 0xee, 0xdd, ...}, ...}, ...)
/home/anna/Documents/GitProjects/nspcc-dev/neo-go/pkg/smartcontract/rpcbinding/binding.go:686 +0xbc4
github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/pkg/smartcontract/rpcbinding.Generate({{0xc00049bb07, 0x7}, 0xc0004c89c0, {0x33, 0x22, 0x11, 0x0, 0xff, 0xee, 0xdd, ...}, ...})
/home/anna/Documents/GitProjects/nspcc-dev/neo-go/pkg/smartcontract/rpcbinding/binding.go:421 +0x387
github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/cli/smartcontract.contractGenerateSomething(0xc00043e2c0, 0x137cd00)
/home/anna/Documents/GitProjects/nspcc-dev/neo-go/cli/smartcontract/generate.go:99 +0x855
github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/cli/smartcontract.contractGenerateRPCWrapper(0xc00043e2c0?)
/home/anna/Documents/GitProjects/nspcc-dev/neo-go/cli/smartcontract/generate.go:60 +0x25
github.com/urfave/cli.HandleAction({0x1048380?, 0x137c660?}, 0x13?)
/home/anna/go/pkg/mod/github.com/urfave/cli@v1.22.5/app.go:524 +0x50
github.com/urfave/cli.Command.Run({{0x123539d, 0x13}, {0x0, 0x0}, {0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, {0x12577ad, 0x2a}, {0x127ad35, ...}, ...}, ...)
/home/anna/go/pkg/mod/github.com/urfave/cli@v1.22.5/command.go:173 +0x65b
github.com/urfave/cli.(*App).RunAsSubcommand(0xc0001f4000, 0xc00043e000)
/home/anna/go/pkg/mod/github.com/urfave/cli@v1.22.5/app.go:405 +0x91b
github.com/urfave/cli.Command.startApp({{0x12281e1, 0x8}, {0x0, 0x0}, {0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, {0x1254d8a, 0x28}, {0x0, ...}, ...}, ...)
/home/anna/go/pkg/mod/github.com/urfave/cli@v1.22.5/command.go:372 +0x6e7
github.com/urfave/cli.Command.Run({{0x12281e1, 0x8}, {0x0, 0x0}, {0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, {0x1254d8a, 0x28}, {0x0, ...}, ...}, ...)
/home/anna/go/pkg/mod/github.com/urfave/cli@v1.22.5/command.go:102 +0x825
github.com/urfave/cli.(*App).Run(0xc00024e000, {0xc0004f6420, 0xb, 0xb})
/home/anna/go/pkg/mod/github.com/urfave/cli@v1.22.5/app.go:277 +0x8a7
github.com/nspcc-dev/neo-go/cli/smartcontract.TestAssistedRPCBindings.func1.1(0x9f8829?)
/home/anna/Documents/GitProjects/nspcc-dev/neo-go/cli/smartcontract/generate_test.go:395 +0x5fc
testing.tRunner(0xc0006824e0, 0xc0004a3680)
/usr/local/go/src/testing/testing.go:1446 +0x10b
created by testing.(*T).Run
/usr/local/go/src/testing/testing.go:1493 +0x35f
```
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
There are two ways of doing this: first one is to emit all notifications
parameter data into rpcbindings configuration on compile time (event if
the parameter has a simple type), and the second one is to fetch parameter
type from the manifest on rpcbinding file generation if needed (we always
have manifest at this stage, thus it's not a problem to retrieve necessary
information). The latter case is chosen to reduce the bindings configuration
file size.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
Notification and its parameters may have any UTF8-compatible name
which is inappropriate for bindings configuration and for the resulting
RPC bindings file. This commit stores the prettified version of
notification's name and parameters that are ready to be used in the
resulting RPC binding without any changes.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
The user should specify it via parameter's `extendedtype` field and
via upper-level `namedtypes` field of the contract configuration YAML.
Also, as we have proper event structure source, make the `--guess-eventtype`
compilation option and make event types guess optional.
Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
