Same thing done in a2a8981979 for PUSHBYTES,
failing to read the amount of bytes specified should lead to FAULT. Also
makes readUint16() and readUint32() panic as this is the behavior we want in
these cases. Add some tests along the way.
Before:
NEO-GO-VM > loadgo h.go
READY: loaded 16 instructions
NEO-GO-VM > ip
instruction pointer at -1 (PUSH0)
After:
NEO-GO-VM > loadgo h.go
READY: loaded 16 instructions
NEO-GO-VM > ip
instruction pointer at -1 (NOP)
I think NOP is a little less scary.
Current NEO documentation lists them:
https://docs.neo.org/docs/en-us/tooldev/advanced/neo_vm.html
CALL_* instructions were left out because of conflict with golint (but they're
removed in NEO 3.0 anyway, so wasting time on them makes no sense).
Update autogenerated instruction_string.go accordingly.
The code that we have actually implements XTUCK and not TUCK. And it's a bit
broken, so fix it and add some tests. The most interesting one (that required
to touch stack code) is the one when we have 1 element on the stack and are
trying to tell XTUCK to push 2 elements deep.
Fixes things like:
* exported type/method/function X should have comment or be unexported
* comment on exported type/method/function X should be of the form "X ..."
(with optional leading article)
Refs. #213.
Fixes one more instruction being ran when VM FAULTs:
NEO-GO-VM > run
NEO-GO-VM > error encountered at instruction 6 (ROLL)
NEO-GO-VM > runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference
FAULT
NEO-GO-VM > error encountered at instruction 7 (SETITEM)
NEO-GO-VM > interface conversion: interface {} is []vm.StackItem, not []uint8
Refs. #96.
Simplifies a lot of code and removes some duplication. Unfortunately I had to
move test_util random functions in same commit to avoid cycle
dependencies. One of these random functions was also used in core/transaction
testing, to simplify things I've just dropped it there and used a static
string (which is nice to have for a test anyway).
There is still sha256 left in wallet (but it needs to pass Hash structure into
the signing function).
Unfortunately d58fbe0c88 didn't really fix the
problem because tinfo.Type (the expression resulting type) actually is a bool
and we need to check its parameters. Also, there is need to fix the NEQ
operation.
