Support DNS and IPs as SANs in single Order

This commit is contained in:
Herman Slatman 2021-06-03 22:03:21 +02:00
parent a0e92f8e99
commit af615db6b5
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: F4D8A44EA0A75A4F

View file

@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ func (o *Order) sans(csr *x509.CertificateRequest) ([]x509util.SubjectAlternativ
case "dns": case "dns":
orderNames[i] = n.Value orderNames[i] = n.Value
case "ip": case "ip":
orderIPs[i] = net.ParseIP(n.Value) // NOTE: this assumes are all valid IPs or will result in nil entries orderIPs[i] = net.ParseIP(n.Value) // NOTE: this assumes are all valid IPs at this time; or will result in nil entries
default: default:
return sans, NewErrorISE("unsupported identifier type in order: %s", n.Type) return sans, NewErrorISE("unsupported identifier type in order: %s", n.Type)
} }
@ -207,55 +207,49 @@ func (o *Order) sans(csr *x509.CertificateRequest) ([]x509util.SubjectAlternativ
orderNames = uniqueSortedLowerNames(orderNames) orderNames = uniqueSortedLowerNames(orderNames)
orderIPs = uniqueSortedIPs(orderIPs) orderIPs = uniqueSortedIPs(orderIPs)
// TODO: limit what IP addresses can be used? Only private? Only certain ranges totalNumberOfSANs := len(csr.DNSNames) + len(csr.IPAddresses)
// based on configuration? Public vs. private range? That logic should be configurable somewhere. sans = make([]x509util.SubjectAlternativeName, totalNumberOfSANs)
// TODO: ensure that DNSNames indeed MUST NEVER have an IP
// TODO: only allow IP based identifier based on configuration?
// TODO: validation of the input (if IP; should be valid IPv4/v6; Incoming request should have Host header set / ALPN IN-ADDR.ARPA)
// TODO: limit the IP address identifier to a single IP address? RFC _can_ be read like that, but there can be multiple identifiers, of course
// Determine if DNS names or IPs should be processed. // TODO: limit what IP addresses can be used? Only private? Only certain ranges (i.e. only allow the specific ranges by default, configuration for all?)
// At this time, orders in which DNS names and IPs are mixed are not supported. // TODO: ensure that's OK and/or should we support more, RFC-wise // TODO: can DNS already be limited to a certain domain? That would probably be nice to have too, but maybe not as part of this PR
shouldProcessIPAddresses := len(csr.DNSNames) == 0 && len(orderIPs) != 0 // TODO: verify that this logic is OK and sufficient // TODO: if it seems not too big of a change, make consts/enums out of the stringly typed identifiers (challenge types, identifier types)
if shouldProcessIPAddresses { // based on configuration? Public vs. private range? That logic should be configurable somewhere.
// Validate identifier IPs against CSR alternative names (IPs). // TODO: only allow IP based identifier based on configuration? Some additional configuration and validation on the provisioner for this case.
if len(csr.IPAddresses) != len(orderIPs) {
// Validate identifier names against CSR alternative names.
//
// Note that with certificate templates we are not going to check for the
// absence of other SANs as they will only be set if the templates allows
// them.
if len(csr.IPAddresses) != len(orderIPs) {
return sans, NewError(ErrorBadCSRType, "number of CSR IPs do not match identifiers exactly: "+
"CSR IPs = %v, Order IPs = %v", csr.IPAddresses, orderIPs)
}
for i := range csr.IPAddresses {
if !ipsAreEqual(csr.IPAddresses[i], orderIPs[i]) {
return sans, NewError(ErrorBadCSRType, "CSR IPs do not match identifiers exactly: "+ return sans, NewError(ErrorBadCSRType, "CSR IPs do not match identifiers exactly: "+
"CSR IPs = %v, Order IPs = %v", csr.IPAddresses, orderIPs) "CSR IPs = %v, Order IPs = %v", csr.IPAddresses, orderIPs)
} }
sans[i] = x509util.SubjectAlternativeName{
sans = make([]x509util.SubjectAlternativeName, len(csr.IPAddresses)) Type: x509util.IPType,
for i := range csr.IPAddresses { Value: csr.IPAddresses[i].String(),
if !ipsAreEqual(csr.IPAddresses[i], orderIPs[i]) {
return sans, NewError(ErrorBadCSRType, "CSR IPs do not match identifiers exactly: "+
"CSR IPs = %v, Order IPs = %v", csr.IPAddresses, orderIPs)
}
sans[i] = x509util.SubjectAlternativeName{
Type: x509util.IPType,
Value: csr.IPAddresses[i].String(),
}
} }
} else { }
// Validate identifier names against CSR alternative names.
// if len(csr.DNSNames) != len(orderNames) {
// Note that with certificate templates we are not going to check for the return sans, NewError(ErrorBadCSRType, "CSR names do not match identifiers exactly: "+
// absence of other SANs as they will only be set if the templates allows "CSR names = %v, Order names = %v", csr.DNSNames, orderNames)
// them. }
if len(csr.DNSNames) != len(orderNames) {
for i := range csr.DNSNames {
if csr.DNSNames[i] != orderNames[i] {
return sans, NewError(ErrorBadCSRType, "CSR names do not match identifiers exactly: "+ return sans, NewError(ErrorBadCSRType, "CSR names do not match identifiers exactly: "+
"CSR names = %v, Order names = %v", csr.DNSNames, orderNames) "CSR names = %v, Order names = %v", csr.DNSNames, orderNames)
} }
sans[i] = x509util.SubjectAlternativeName{
sans = make([]x509util.SubjectAlternativeName, len(csr.DNSNames)) Type: x509util.DNSType,
for i := range csr.DNSNames { Value: csr.DNSNames[i],
if csr.DNSNames[i] != orderNames[i] {
return sans, NewError(ErrorBadCSRType, "CSR names do not match identifiers exactly: "+
"CSR names = %v, Order names = %v", csr.DNSNames, orderNames)
}
sans[i] = x509util.SubjectAlternativeName{
Type: x509util.DNSType,
Value: csr.DNSNames[i],
}
} }
} }
@ -276,7 +270,7 @@ func canonicalize(csr *x509.CertificateRequest) (canonicalized *x509.Certificate
canonicalized.DNSNames = append(csr.DNSNames, csr.Subject.CommonName) canonicalized.DNSNames = append(csr.DNSNames, csr.Subject.CommonName)
} }
canonicalized.DNSNames = uniqueSortedLowerNames(csr.DNSNames) canonicalized.DNSNames = uniqueSortedLowerNames(csr.DNSNames)
canonicalized.IPAddresses = uniqueSortedIPs(csr.IPAddresses) // TODO: sorting and setting this value MAY result in different values in CSR (and probably also ending up in cert); is that behavior wanted? canonicalized.IPAddresses = uniqueSortedIPs(csr.IPAddresses)
return canonicalized return canonicalized
} }
@ -285,15 +279,16 @@ func canonicalize(csr *x509.CertificateRequest) (canonicalized *x509.Certificate
// adresses are NOT considered equal to the IPv4 address in this case. // adresses are NOT considered equal to the IPv4 address in this case.
// Both IPs should be the same version AND equal to each other. // Both IPs should be the same version AND equal to each other.
func ipsAreEqual(x, y net.IP) bool { func ipsAreEqual(x, y net.IP) bool {
if isIPv4(x) && isIPv4(y) { if matchAddrFamily(x, y) {
return x.Equal(y) return x.Equal(y)
} }
return x.Equal(y) return false
} }
// isIPv4 returns if an IP is IPv4 or not. // matchAddrFamily returns if two IPs are both IPv4 OR IPv6
func isIPv4(ip net.IP) bool { // Implementation taken and adapted from https://golang.org/src/net/ip.go
return ip.To4() != nil func matchAddrFamily(x net.IP, y net.IP) bool {
return x.To4() != nil && y.To4() != nil || x.To16() != nil && x.To4() == nil && y.To16() != nil && y.To4() == nil
} }
// uniqueSortedLowerNames returns the set of all unique names in the input after all // uniqueSortedLowerNames returns the set of all unique names in the input after all