[#1471] Replace sort.Slice in some places

`slices.SortFunc` doesn't use reflection and is a bit faster.
I have done some micro-benchmarks for `[]NodeInfo`:
```
$ benchstat -col "/func" out
goos: linux
goarch: amd64
pkg: git.frostfs.info/TrueCloudLab/frostfs-node/pkg/local_object_storage/pilorama
cpu: 11th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-1135G7 @ 2.40GHz
       │ sort.Slice  │           slices.SortFunc           │
       │   sec/op    │   sec/op     vs base                │
Sort-8   2.130µ ± 2%   1.253µ ± 2%  -41.20% (p=0.000 n=10)
```

Haven't included them, though, as they I don't see them being used a
lot.

Signed-off-by: Evgenii Stratonikov <e.stratonikov@yadro.com>
This commit is contained in:
Evgenii Stratonikov 2024-11-06 10:34:16 +03:00 committed by Dmitrii Stepanov
parent 17ec84151b
commit 15102e6dfd
7 changed files with 29 additions and 31 deletions

View file

@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
package pilorama
import (
"cmp"
"encoding/binary"
"slices"
"sort"
"sync"
"time"
@ -48,8 +48,8 @@ func (b *batch) run() {
// Sorting without a mutex is ok, because we append to this slice only if timer is non-nil.
// See (*boltForest).addBatch for details.
sort.Slice(b.operations, func(i, j int) bool {
return b.operations[i].Time < b.operations[j].Time
slices.SortFunc(b.operations, func(mi, mj *Move) int {
return cmp.Compare(mi.Time, mj.Time)
})
b.operations = slices.CompactFunc(b.operations, func(x, y *Move) bool { return x.Time == y.Time })