restic/vendor/github.com/elithrar/simple-scrypt/README.md
Alexander Neumann 41c35b2218 Lock simple-scrypt library to master branch
The master branch includes a fix for i386, otherwise the calibration
panics. See https://github.com/restic/restic/issues/676 for details.
2017-08-05 19:24:56 +02:00

155 lines
5.1 KiB
Markdown

# simple-scrypt
[![GoDoc](https://godoc.org/github.com/elithrar/simple-scrypt?status.svg)](https://godoc.org/github.com/elithrar/simple-scrypt) [![Build Status](https://travis-ci.org/elithrar/simple-scrypt.svg?branch=master)](https://travis-ci.org/elithrar/simple-scrypt)
simple-scrypt provides a convenience wrapper around Go's existing
[scrypt](http://golang.org/x/crypto/scrypt) package that makes it easier to
securely derive strong keys ("hash user passwords"). This library allows you to:
* Generate a scrypt derived key with a crytographically secure salt and sane
default parameters for N, r and p.
* Upgrade the parameters used to generate keys as hardware improves by storing
them with the derived key (the scrypt spec. doesn't allow for this by
default).
* Provide your own parameters (if you wish to).
The API closely mirrors Go's [bcrypt](https://golang.org/x/crypto/bcrypt)
library in an effort to make it easy to migrate—and because it's an easy to grok
API.
## Installation
With a [working Go toolchain](https://golang.org/doc/code.html):
```sh
go get -u github.com/elithrar/simple-scrypt
```
## Example
simple-scrypt doesn't try to re-invent the wheel or do anything "special". It
wraps the `scrypt.Key` function as thinly as possible, generates a
crytographically secure salt for you using Go's `crypto/rand` package, and
returns the derived key with the parameters prepended:
```go
package main
import(
"fmt"
"log"
"github.com/elithrar/simple-scrypt"
)
func main() {
// e.g. r.PostFormValue("password")
passwordFromForm := "prew8fid9hick6c"
// Generates a derived key of the form "N$r$p$salt$dk" where N, r and p are defined as per
// Colin Percival's scrypt paper: http://www.tarsnap.com/scrypt/scrypt.pdf
// scrypt.Defaults (N=16384, r=8, p=1) makes it easy to provide these parameters, and
// (should you wish) provide your own values via the scrypt.Params type.
hash, err := scrypt.GenerateFromPassword([]byte(passwordFromForm), scrypt.DefaultParams)
if err != nil {
log.Fatal(err)
}
// Print the derived key with its parameters prepended.
fmt.Printf("%s\n", hash)
// Uses the parameters from the existing derived key. Return an error if they don't match.
err := scrypt.CompareHashAndPassword(hash, []byte(passwordFromForm))
if err != nil {
log.Fatal(err)
}
}
```
## Upgrading Parameters
Upgrading derived keys from a set of parameters to a "stronger" set of parameters
as hardware improves, or as you scale (and move your auth process to separate
hardware), can be pretty useful. Here's how to do it with simple-scrypt:
```go
func main() {
// SCENE: We've successfully authenticated a user, compared their submitted
// (cleartext) password against the derived key stored in our database, and
// now want to upgrade the parameters (more rounds, more parallelism) to
// reflect some shiny new hardware we just purchased. As the user is logging
// in, we can retrieve the parameters used to generate their key, and if
// they don't match our "new" parameters, we can re-generate the key while
// we still have the cleartext password in memory
// (e.g. before the HTTP request ends).
current, err := scrypt.Cost(hash)
if err != nil {
log.Fatal(err)
}
// Now to check them against our own Params struct (e.g. using reflect.DeepEquals)
// and determine whether we want to generate a new key with our "upgraded" parameters.
slower := scrypt.Params{
N: 32768,
R: 8,
P: 2,
SaltLen: 16,
DKLen: 32,
}
if !reflect.DeepEqual(current, slower) {
// Re-generate the key with the slower parameters
// here using scrypt.GenerateFromPassword
}
}
```
## Automatically Determining Parameters
Thanks to the work by [tgulacsi](https://github.com/tgulacsi), you can have simple-scrypt
automatically determine the optimal parameters for you (time vs. memory). You should run this once
on program startup, as calibrating parameters can be an expensive operation.
```go
var params scrypt.Params
func main() {
var err error
// 500ms, 64MB of RAM per hash.
params, err = scrypt.Calibrate(500*time.Millisecond, 64, Params{})
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
...
}
func RegisterUserHandler(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
err := r.ParseForm()
if err != nil {
http.Error(w, err.Error(), http.StatusBadRequest)
return
}
// Make sure you validate: not empty, not too long, etc.
email := r.PostFormValue("email")
pass := r.PostFormValue("password")
// Use our calibrated parameters
hash, err := scrypt.GenerateFromPassword([]byte(pass), params)
if err != nil {
http.Error(w, err.Error(), http.StatusBadRequest)
return
}
// Save to DB, etc.
}
```
Be aware that increasing these, whilst making it harder to brute-force the resulting hash, also
increases the risk of a denial-of-service attack against your server. A surge in authenticate
attempts (even if legitimate!) could consume all available resources.
## License
MIT Licensed. See LICENSE file for details.