TrueCloudLab/frostfs-contract
22
0
Fork 19
Code Issues 12 Pull requests 1 Projects Releases 2 Activity Actions

Remove notary disabled code #8

Merged
acid-ant merged 1 commit from acid-ant/feature/7-remove-notary-disabled-code into master 2023-07-26 21:08:03 +00:00
Conversation 1 Commits 1 Files changed 8 +27 -43
acid-ant commented 2023-02-10 09:39:30 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy link

Close #7

Signed-off-by: Anton Nikiforov an.nikiforov@yadro.com

Close #7 Signed-off-by: Anton Nikiforov <an.nikiforov@yadro.com>
alexvanin (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2023-02-10 09:39:30 +00:00
carpawell (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2023-02-10 09:39:30 +00:00
fyrchik (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2023-02-10 09:39:30 +00:00
ale64bit (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2023-02-10 09:39:30 +00:00
fyrchik (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2023-02-10 11:18:30 +00:00
alphabet/alphabet_contract.go Outdated
@ -34,13 +33,17 @@ func OnNEP17Payment(from interop.Hash160, amount int, data interface{}) {
func _deploy(data interface{}, isUpdate bool) {
ctx := storage.GetContext()
fyrchik (Migrated from github.com) commented 2023-02-10 10:56:45 +00:00
Copy link

Can you link it with some issue?

Can you link it with some issue?
alphabet/alphabet_contract.go Outdated
@ -49,7 +52,11 @@ func _deploy(data interface{}, isUpdate bool) {
total int
fyrchik (Migrated from github.com) commented 2023-02-10 11:06:21 +00:00
Copy link

In theory, everything done by InitVote as well as any "in-progress" votes should also be removed.
For us it makes no sense because all the networks we use are already notary-enabled. But I would at least mention this in the commit message.

In theory, everything done by `InitVote` as well as any "in-progress" votes should also be removed. For us it makes no sense because all the networks we use are already notary-enabled. But I would at least mention this in the commit message.
alphabet/alphabet_contract.go Outdated
fyrchik (Migrated from github.com) commented 2023-02-10 11:09:34 +00:00
Copy link

I would also do some refactoring in another commit but in this PR.
For example, CheckAlphabetWitness could accept no argumets, it always uses common.AlphabetAddress, right?

I would also do some refactoring in another commit but in this PR. For example, `CheckAlphabetWitness` could accept no argumets, it always uses `common.AlphabetAddress`, right?
audit/audit_contract.go Outdated
fyrchik (Migrated from github.com) commented 2023-02-10 11:11:41 +00:00
Copy link

We delete it in _deploy, this line can be removed.

We delete it in `_deploy`, this line can be removed.
netmap/netmap_contract.go Outdated
@ -208,3 +146,3 @@
common.CheckAlphabetWitness(common.AlphabetAddress())
common.CheckAlphabetWitness()
fyrchik (Migrated from github.com) commented 2023-02-10 11:15:49 +00:00
Copy link

It produces a notification in case 1a, I don't think we can remove it safely. Have you checked whether it is called in node?

It produces a notification in case `1a`, I don't think we can remove it safely. Have you checked whether it is called in `node`?
reputation/reputation_contract.go Outdated
@ -20,2 +20,3 @@
func _deploy(data interface{}, isUpdate bool) {
ctx := storage.GetContext()
//TODO(@acid-ant): #9 remove notaryDisabled from args in future version
args := data.([]interface{})
fyrchik (Migrated from github.com) commented 2023-02-10 11:17:04 +00:00
Copy link

I would check that notaryDisabled is false and panic otherwise in all _deploy functions.

I would check that `notaryDisabled` is false and panic otherwise in all `_deploy` functions.
acid-ant (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2023-02-10 12:54:44 +00:00
netmap/netmap_contract.go Outdated
@ -208,3 +146,3 @@
common.CheckAlphabetWitness(common.AlphabetAddress())
common.CheckAlphabetWitness()
acid-ant (Migrated from github.com) commented 2023-02-10 12:54:35 +00:00
Copy link

In our case this method degrades to following lines:

common.CheckWitness(publicKey)
return

In CheckWitness we are producing notification?
As for code in node, yes, we have few places where we invoke AddPeer.
For example here pkg/morph/client/netmap/add_peer.go:24
So if it is really produces some notifications in CheckWitness I'll revert this changes. In other case we need to do some cleanup in node too.

In our case this method degrades to following lines: ``` common.CheckWitness(publicKey) return ``` In `CheckWitness` we are producing notification? As for code in `node`, yes, we have few places where we invoke `AddPeer`. For example here [pkg/morph/client/netmap/add_peer.go:24](https://github.com/TrueCloudLab/frostfs-node/blob/master/pkg/morph/client/netmap/add_peer.go#L24) So if it is really produces some notifications in `CheckWitness` I'll revert this changes. In other case we need to do some cleanup in node too.
acid-ant (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2023-02-10 15:08:24 +00:00
alphabet/alphabet_contract.go Outdated
@ -34,13 +33,17 @@ func OnNEP17Payment(from interop.Hash160, amount int, data interface{}) {
func _deploy(data interface{}, isUpdate bool) {
ctx := storage.GetContext()
acid-ant (Migrated from github.com) commented 2023-02-10 15:08:24 +00:00
Copy link

Created #9

Created #9
acid-ant (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2023-02-10 15:09:19 +00:00
alphabet/alphabet_contract.go Outdated
acid-ant (Migrated from github.com) commented 2023-02-10 15:09:19 +00:00
Copy link

Added new commit with refactoring for common.CheckAlphabetWitness.

Added new commit with refactoring for `common.CheckAlphabetWitness`.
acid-ant (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2023-02-10 15:09:31 +00:00
audit/audit_contract.go Outdated
acid-ant (Migrated from github.com) commented 2023-02-10 15:09:31 +00:00
Copy link

Thanks, removed.

Thanks, removed.
acid-ant (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2023-02-10 15:10:13 +00:00
reputation/reputation_contract.go Outdated
@ -20,2 +20,3 @@
func _deploy(data interface{}, isUpdate bool) {
ctx := storage.GetContext()
//TODO(@acid-ant): #9 remove notaryDisabled from args in future version
args := data.([]interface{})
acid-ant (Migrated from github.com) commented 2023-02-10 15:10:13 +00:00
Copy link

Sounds good, updated.

Sounds good, updated.
KirillovDenis (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2023-02-13 06:33:49 +00:00
KirillovDenis (Migrated from github.com) left a comment
Copy link

LGTM

LGTM
fyrchik (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2023-02-14 14:39:45 +00:00
netmap/netmap_contract.go Outdated
@ -208,3 +146,3 @@
common.CheckAlphabetWitness(common.AlphabetAddress())
common.CheckAlphabetWitness()
fyrchik (Migrated from github.com) commented 2023-02-14 14:39:44 +00:00
Copy link

Yes, but storage node creates a notary transaction with this method which produces a notary notification (implicit here). I think we should leave this method for now and revisit how we handle node addition/state update later.

I think we considered producing AddPeer with runtime.Notify here too, but I forgot the outcome of this discussion. cc @alexvanin

Yes, but storage node creates a notary transaction with this method which produces a notary notification (implicit here). I think we should leave this method for now and revisit how we handle node addition/state update later. I think we considered producing `AddPeer` with `runtime.Notify` here too, but I forgot the outcome of this discussion. cc @alexvanin
acid-ant (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2023-02-15 07:06:49 +00:00
netmap/netmap_contract.go Outdated
@ -208,3 +146,3 @@
common.CheckAlphabetWitness(common.AlphabetAddress())
common.CheckAlphabetWitness()
acid-ant (Migrated from github.com) commented 2023-02-15 07:06:49 +00:00
Copy link

Changes for AddPeer were reverted.

Changes for `AddPeer` were reverted.
fyrchik (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2023-02-16 06:19:55 +00:00
alphabet/alphabet_contract.go Outdated
fyrchik (Migrated from github.com) commented 2023-02-16 06:19:55 +00:00
Copy link

It looks complex, can we move args := data.(struct cast here (it is already done below) and check args.notaryDisabled field?

It looks complex, can we move `args := data.(struct` cast here (it is already done below) and check `args.notaryDisabled` field?
acid-ant (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2023-02-16 08:49:46 +00:00
alphabet/alphabet_contract.go Outdated
acid-ant (Migrated from github.com) commented 2023-02-16 08:49:46 +00:00
Copy link

Ok, refactored.

Ok, refactored.
dstepanov-yadro (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2023-03-01 08:42:58 +00:00
audit/audit_contract.go Outdated
@ -46,1 +46,4 @@
ctx := storage.GetContext()
//TODO(@acid-ant): #9 remove notaryDisabled from args in future version
if data.([]interface{})[0].(bool) {
dstepanov-yadro (Migrated from github.com) commented 2023-03-01 08:33:34 +00:00
Copy link

Looks complex too.

Looks complex too.
dstepanov-yadro (Migrated from github.com) commented 2023-03-01 08:42:28 +00:00
Copy link

Same code in many files, it's better to move to method.

Same code in many files, it's better to move to method.
acid-ant commented 2023-03-07 08:22:32 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Done.

Done.
dstepanov-yadro approved these changes 2023-03-07 11:03:48 +00:00
acid-ant force-pushed acid-ant/feature/7-remove-notary-disabled-code from 771e59623f to b9be2ac036 2023-03-14 09:09:49 +00:00 Compare
alexvanin approved these changes 2023-03-14 11:56:08 +00:00
alexvanin left a comment
Owner
Copy link

Overall looks good. Hope it was tested with basic operation like:

  • deployment,
  • contract update,
  • container creation.
Overall looks good. Hope it was tested with basic operation like: - deployment, - contract update, - container creation.
frostfs/config.yml
@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
name: "FrostFS"
safemethods: ["alphabetList", "alphabetAddress", "innerRingCandidates", "config", "listConfig", "version"]
alexvanin commented 2023-03-14 11:38:00 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

I would rather remove alphabetAddress method in notary disabled environment or make it private.

I would rather remove `alphabetAddress` method in notary disabled environment or make it private.
acid-ant commented 2023-03-14 13:13:45 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Created #17 to track this.

Created #17 to track this.
acid-ant commented 2023-03-14 13:12:30 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Overall looks good. Hope it was tested with basic operation like:

  • deployment,
  • contract update,
  • container creation.

Yes, tested in dev-env this scenario:

  • deploy prev, create container, update, create container
  • deploy newest, create container
> Overall looks good. Hope it was tested with basic operation like: > - deployment, > - contract update, > - container creation. Yes, tested in dev-env this scenario: - deploy prev, create container, update, create container - deploy newest, create container
fyrchik merged commit b9be2ac036 into master 2023-03-15 09:47:04 +00:00
fyrchik deleted branch acid-ant/feature/7-remove-notary-disabled-code 2023-03-15 09:47:04 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
dstepanov-yadro
alexvanin
alexvanin
carpawell
fyrchik
ale64bit
Labels
Clear labels   
P0

Highest

  
P1

High

  
P2

Medium

  
P3

Low

  
good first issue

Good for newcomers

  
Infrastructure

Infrastructure, Automation, CI/CD or DevOps related stuff

  
blocked

The issue or PR is blocked by something

  
bug

Something is not working

  
config

Configuration format update or breaking change

  
discussion

Talking about something in order to reach a decision or to exchange ideas

  
documentation

Documentation related

  
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement

New feature

  
go

Language features adoption

  
help wanted

Extra attention is needed

  
internal

   
invalid

Something is wrong

  
kludge

This is a kludge and we know it

  
observability

Related to metrics, tracing and logs

  
perfomance

Perfomance related

  
question

More information is needed

  
refactoring

Refactoring

  
wontfix

This won't be fixed

No labels
P0
P1
P2
P3
good first issue
Infrastructure
blocked
bug
config
discussion
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
go
help wanted
internal
invalid
kludge
observability
perfomance
question
refactoring
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
4 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: TrueCloudLab/frostfs-contract#8
No description provided.
Delete branch "acid-ant/feature/7-remove-notary-disabled-code"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?