Feature/2 rebranding #3
No reviewers
Labels
No labels
P0
P1
P2
P3
good first issue
Infrastructure
blocked
bug
config
discussion
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
go
help wanted
internal
invalid
kludge
observability
perfomance
question
refactoring
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: TrueCloudLab/frostfs-http-gw#3
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "feature/2-rebranding"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Related to #2
frostfs-http-gw.dirs
,frostfs-http-gw.postinst
Overall LGTM. In next PR let's refactor internal code.
@ -100,3 +99,4 @@
$ frostfs-http-gw -p $NEOFS_NODE -w $WALLET_PATH --address $ACCOUNT_ADDRESS
```
Example:
```
I assume we are going to rename it to
s0*.frostfs.devenv
. Mention that explicitly in #2 or fix it here. There are plenty of dev-env links and usage of$NEOFS_NODE
.@ -100,3 +99,4 @@
$ frostfs-http-gw -p $NEOFS_NODE -w $WALLET_PATH --address $ACCOUNT_ADDRESS
```
Example:
```
I thought we should wait for renaming in dev-env here
I think it is just 2022. /cc @realloc
@ -0,0 +17,4 @@
# for details, see https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ or
# the debian-policy package
@ -0,0 +29,4 @@
*)
echo "postrm called with unknown argument \`$1'" >&2
exit 1
debian/frostfs-http-gw.dirs
still usessrv/neofs_cache
.FrostFS development by TrueCloudLab started at 2022, so we need to add a line, not t replace NSPCC.